In the United States, all medical malpractice law is litigated and resolved in one of two ways. The first is the theory of contributory negligence. In this theory, the original law (and ancient law derived from the Common law of England) states that, under this doctrine, if the patient contributed at all to the harm caused by the medical professional, then the patient was not entitled to any compensatory relief. In other words, no suit for damages would be allowed against the medical provider. This theory insisted that only a completely blameless patient should have recourse against a medical professional.The second theory is the theory of comparative negligence. This is the more modern doctrine. Under comparative negligence all injured patients could still file a malpractice suit even if the patient contributed to the harm caused. Therefore, if a doctor was 55% at fault and the patient was 45% at fault, the patient could still recover 55% of the damages from the doctor.Set forth two strengths and two weaknesses for each of these theories and choose which one you believe to be the most just and why.
SLU Health Care Law & Medical Malpractice Law in The United States Discussion
topic: It is okay for contemporary parents to live together before marriage?This is a research essay paper, I will post the example for you how you can write my paper as well. in your paper you should:1:Introduce the relevance and importance of your topic2: Offer necessary background and context3: provide a clear, specific thesis4:Support the thesis with specifics from your research5:Address counteraguments6: Offer an engaging intro and conclusion7: Follow MLA formatting for in -text citation and works cited page ( annotated bibliography) remember in this research paper : 3 agreement resources to supports your idea and 2 debates resource for argument I post the example essay you can see and how you can complete my paper as well.
Contemporary Parents Living Together Before Marriage Research Essay Paper
InstructionsUse your work from Part A of the Project to identify improvement opportunities in the value stream that are suitable for Kaizen events or Work-Outs.1)List the potential Kaizen events, select the one to be deployed, and justify your selection. Then, define the Kaizen objective and scope for the selected event.2)Develop a detailed agenda for your selected Kaizen event. Use a tabular format, showing:•Days and times•Session topics•Lean tools to be used•Deliverables or outputs•Rationale DayTimeSession 3)Explain your choice f or number of days and sequence for session topics, and justify the Lean tools to be used and outputs from each session. Show how your Kaizen agenda supports the Kaizen objective and scope for the event. This discussion should be specific to your value stream and organization.Submission Requirements Your work is to be submitted in Word. Total length should be 3 to 4 pages, including the actual agenda.You are free to organize your submission in whatever way you feel best presents the material and makes it easy to understand. Typically, this will mean presenting each day’s tabular agenda in granular detail (15 minute to 2-hourtimeslots with details for each session), and then providing supporting pages with additional explanations.As guidance, design this as a document you would share with your team and/or your supervisor. It should be detailed enough to clearly explain how the event will be structured and why, but concise enough that it will actually get read.Note: A generic agenda for a Kaizen event or a generic Lean discussion is not acceptable.
JWI 550 SU Wk 6 Management Operations Sales Conversion Kaizen Event Essay
Stewardship versus economic decision making in financial reporting
Stewardship versus economic decision making in financial reporting. The main objective of financial reporting according to the IASB’s Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements framework is that of providing adequate information in order to enable shareholders conduct economic decision making. This brought the debate of whether such objective neglected the importance of the stewardship assessment by the part of shareholders. In the past decade the IASB and the US FASB have been working on a joint project to develop a conceptual framework for financial reporting. Such conceptual framework has the aim of providing a base for developing harmonised, future accounting standards. In 2008, the boards issued an exposure draft of chapter one and chapter two of the conceptual framework with chapter one tackling the objectives of financial reporting. In the exposure draft that has been lately issued by the two boards, it was identified that the objective of financial reporting should be that of catering for all the decisions that capital providers make, including both resource allocation decisions and decisions made to protect and enhance their investments. Furthermore on the underlying exposure draft there is stated that information about the stewardship of an entity’s economic resources should be considered as decision-useful information. Hence in this exposure draft it is clear that the two boards shifted from focusing solely on economic decision making, to general decision making, with stewardship being included in such broader definition. Although this move to focus on decision usefulness rather than specifically on economic decision making was a means to subsume stewardship in the objective of financial reporting, authors such as Andrew Lennard still argue that stewardship and decision usefulness should be recognised as separate objectives. “â€¦stewardship contributes an important dimension to financial reporting, which should be reflected by specific acknowledgement in the objectives of financial reporting.”  The majority of the authors who recognise stewardship as a fundamental objective in financial reporting, claim that financial statements should be prepared on the basis of historical costs. This ensures in providing a clear, factual account of the transactions that occurred during the year, over which management had control. Thus reporting on historical cost can aid shareholders accomplish their stewardship assessment needs better. On the other hand, to cater for decision usefulness, especially in terms of economic decision making, financial reporting would focus more on the forecasting of future cash flows. Such objective would be better addressed with valuations based on market values, since they better reflect the timing and certainty of future cash flows. This is leading to the emergence of valuation techniques based on current values, such as fair value. The adoption of fair value accounting is perhaps one of the most controversial issues currently being faced by the accountancy world. Both the IASB and the FASB have been working on this issue for the last couple years. Traditionally, financial reporting has been exclusively based on historical costs. The use of current values, such as fair value reporting emerged relatively recently, and was applied to only few selected areas. One of the areas where fair value had a major influence is in the measurement of financial instrument. Using market values to value Financial Instruments is deemed to be reliable (since markets in these items are well developed) and relevant (because the values of financial instruments can experience large fluctuations, thus historical costs depicts a very poor picture of current values). However, in the nearby future, fair value measurement is likely to be extended to other assets, especially in the light of the fact of the IASB’s and FASB’s perceived preference for fair value measurement even where the market is not well developed. “The IASB believes that fair value measurement under IFRS and GAAP is already consistent. Also, the IASB and the FASB will continue to work together to ensure that applying fair value in an inactive market is accounted for consistently”  . Shareholders are divided into two main categories, private individuals and institutional investors. Although financial reporting is designed to cater for the needs of capital providers, due to the lack of knowledge commonly found within private individual shareholders, concerns may arise on what such private individual shareholders identify as useful, for their decision making. Need for the study: The dissertation’s objective is to identify the current needs of private shareholders and what they identify as valuable information. The dissertation shall then examine to what extent the focus on decision usefulness and the forecasting of future cash flows through fair value accounting shall aid private shareholders in satisfying their requirements. Research Methodology: The dissertation will be of a qualitative nature. The aim of such dissertation is to achieve a deep understanding of what local private shareholders value as relevant information, and to examine whether the emerging concept of fair value accounting will be providing such users more relevant accounting information. The aim of the study is not to generalise findings but to obtain rich description on the underlying topic. The method being taken into consideration to gather the qualitative data is the setting up of focus groups with shareholders. Such group discussions provide direct evidence about similarities and differences in participant’s opinions. Participants are not required to answer for every question enabling them to build on one another’s response. Furthermore by acting as a moderator I can ensure that the discussion is always kept on track. Finally, focus groups can be considered as a more plausible solution when compared to open ended interviews with shareholders. The response rate of shareholders to a focus group is likely to be greater when compared to a personal one on one interview, since the latter is perceived as more intrusive. The main limitation of using focus groups is perhaps the risk that people influence each other’s response. As a result the response of participants can be different than the response that would have been generated from a private one on one interview. Shareholders from two local, listed companies are going to be considered as the population sample. These companies are Bank of Valletta and HSBC. The choice fell on these companies because due to the recent changes to IAS 39 and IFRS 7, fair value measurement had a considerable impact on the banking sector. Thereby, due to such fact shareholders can be even more concerned and affected with the underlying subject. Two focus groups are planned to be set, one with BOV shareholders and one with HSBC shareholders, with groups ranging from six to twelve members. Shareholder’s list can be obtained from the Malta Financial Services Authority. The sampled population will exclude overseas shareholders, trusts and investment companies, thus focusing solely on local private shareholders. Chapters Overview: Introduction: firstly the stewardship versus economic decision making debate will be tackled, and its effects on valuation on financial reporting will be analysed. The dissertation shall then focus on the emergence of fair value as a measurement tool and its prospective usage. Furthermore fair value will be compared and contrasted with cost based valuation. The introduction will also include an examination of how each valuation method caters for the individual private shareholders’ requirements. Literature Review: literature review can be focused on two aspects being the debate of fair value measurement versus cost based measurement, and the debate of whether private shareholders use accounting information mostly for economic decision making, or to assess stewardship. Research Methodology: in this section I shall describe how the results were achieved, explaining how the data was collected and analyzed. This section shall contain the weaknesses and limitations of the research methods and methodology used. In the methodology I shall also include any problems that I anticipated and explain any steps taken to prevent them from occurring. Findings: this part of dissertation will contain the information generated from the focus groups. Results will be presented, interpreted and discussed in this section. Conclusion: this part will provide concluding insights on the research, and recommendations of other research questions that can be tackled to improve the research on the area. The main questions to be answered in this section are: what has been learnt from the results? How can this knowledge be used? What are the shortcomings of the research? Bibliography: Accounting Standards Board. (2007). STEWARDSHIP/ACCOUNTABILITY AS AN OBJECTIVE OF FINANCIAL REPORTING A comment on the IASB/FASB Conceptual Framework Project. UK: Accounting Standards Board. Alan Bryman, E. B. (2007). Business Research Methods 2 edition. UK: Oxford University Press. Doron Nissim, S. P. (2007). ON THE APPLICATION OF FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING. Columbia Univesity. Lennard, A. (2008). Stewardship and the objectives of financial statements: a comment on IASB’s Preliminary Views on an improved Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. UK: Accounting Standards Board. RONEN, J. (2008). To Fair Value or Not to Fair Value: A Broader Perspective. Accounting Foundation , Sydney. Schmidt, S. (2004). Fair Value Accounting. US: Governors of Federal Reserve System. Whittington, G. (2008). Fair Value and the IASB/FASB Conceptual Framework Project: An Alternative View . Cambridge: University of Cambridge. Stewardship versus economic decision making in financial reporting
“Travelling More” Website Idea Essay
order essay cheap Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction Perspective of the website idea The PEST analysis The SWOT analysis Comparative analysis of other resources Works Cited Executive Summary The objective of the report is to provide the generalized evaluation of the marketing sphere of travel blogging and to depict the main principles and perspectives for the resource Travelling More. The website (with the domain name travelllingmore.com) would be a compatible Internet resource on travelling, with the recommendations, unique offers, shared experiences, and future possibilities of merchandise opportunities available for its visitors. The informative unit of the website would include the sections of information about the destinations in general, the details of the local attractions, restaurants, hotels, landmarks, and cultural events. The report also features the results of the PEST analysis conducted for the purpose of defining the target audience of the website and the target market. The results suggest that the potential target market for the Travelling More blog can be quite flexible, considering the fact that information units would be organized in a way to be adaptive to the users’ demand. However, the primary target audience would consist of the active people of the different age groups since the desire to try various styles of travelling and recreations requires more active lifestyle attitude. The same target market can be used for introducing the e-commerce elements to the website. The results of the SWOT analysis confirm that the main strength of the idea is its appeal to different audiences, whereas its weakness may be the large amount of content that needs to be provided. The opportunity is to acquaint the users with the different travelling styles. However, the threat is that the competitors would also implement the similar manner of the information representation but with more content. In comparison to other travel blogs, the special feature that makes Travelling More unique amongst other similar web resources is that it will proportionally feature the information on the travelling opportunities of different styles, from camping to luxury recreation. It would also ensure the potential success of the blog since it could be more responsive and adaptive to the needs of the readers. Introduction The idea behind the increasing popularity of the travel blogging relies on two aspects. Firstly, travelling, recreation, and cultural tourism seem to be the major growing interests of the public. Secondly, the concept of the travel blog presupposes the individual unbiased opinion of the blogger. Travel blogs help users to receive information from the experience of other people rather than just get advertising content from the tourist agency. The factor that defines the competitive situation among the travel bloggers and the growing number of the websites about traveling is the general interest of the public to traveling (“Monthly Departures to International Destinations” par.1). The wide spreading of the social media enhanced the cultural tourism. Meanwhile, in modern society people have all means of sharing the impressions of their journey, and prefer to get advice on travelling from their peers rather than manuals or agencies. The areas of interest of the tourists often change, and, therefore, the means of informing about the travelling attractions other than blogs do not always catch up with the developments. Especially, it concerns the social groups that prefer to try new types of recreation. Moreover, the popularity of the travel blog is often defined by not only its ability to follow the trends amongst the tourist places of interest but also to introduce their own fads and to discover new places, restaurants, or cultural destinations. The travel bloggers at the current market vary in their level of amateurism, the spectrum of their content, categories of the travel experience that they review, and, of course, involvement in the e-commerce. Alongside some professionally made travel blogs, for whose authors blogging is their main occupation, there are many amateur projects and recently started websites. They can often have some interesting theme or colorful description of one the experienced travels, but the main problem they face is the inability to provide enough content to make the users return to the website. Meanwhile, the bigger websites that include more than one blogger who provides content are difficult to manage and to make the information relevant and exhaustive. Those are the resources about travelling that often have the outdated information because it is harder to update it on a bigger website. The other problematic category is the blogs that misuse the element of advertisement or e-commerce on their websites. Both those things can be useful and are able to improve the spectrum of the services the website provides, but they need to be used correctly. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Perspective of the website idea The Travelling More blog (with the domain name travelllingmore.com) can be described as a compatible Internet resource about travelling. It will include the tips about the destinations, cultural and dining locations, shared experiences, and future possibilities of merchandise opportunities available for its visitors. The primary objective of creating a new perspective of the travelling blog is to try not to repeat the mistakes of the competitors. Thus, the first aim is to make sure that the information is not stale or outdated; the point of blogging the travelling experience is to introduce people to the new aspects of perhaps familiar cities rather than repeating something that they already know. In this respect, the format of the blog has one crucial advantage. It enables the blogger to concentrate on the minor but more exciting and unexpected details instead of providing the profound guidance. The smaller details often catch more attention. Moreover, the content of the blog, in such a way, would not be crammed with the incomprehensible information. The other mistake to avoid is common for the amateur travel blogs. Many recourses become popular for a short period because they blogged one interesting material, but then they lose their users. The reason for that lies in the inconsistency. In order to keep the high numbers of users visiting the blog, Travelling More needs to provide the content for the website consistently. It is better to blog a small piece of material regularly than a large description of the whole travel at once. In order to improve the informative aspect of the blog, it needs to have categories for descriptions because each user is interested in the different nuances of the travel. The basic categories would include the sections of information about the destinations in general, the details of the local attractions, restaurants, hotels, shopping, landmarks, and cultural events. Apart from that, the system of suggestion of materials and the organized tags would help the users to get their bearings about the website more quickly. Finally, in terms of adding the e-commerce element to the website, it should correspond to the main theme and be recommendatory rather than imposing. It would help to make the content more diverse and, at the same time, save the users’ time that they would spend on looking for the similar products. The PEST analysis In the modern framework of the market structure, there are different groups of society varying in age, gender, lifestyle, income, cultural background, etc. Those aspects combined form the basis of the political, economic, social and technological factors (PEST) analysis (Koumparoulis 32). Analyzing the political factors that influence the target market of the travel blogging, we need to take into account the factor of political stability (“Tourism Statistics” par.2). In other words, blogging about places that undergo civil disorders and wars will not make the resource successful. Also, it is important to account the fact that different countries have different systems of entry. If the destination requires a complicated procedure of getting a visa, the users should be informed about that. We will write a custom Essay on “Travelling More” Website Idea specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Economic aspect concerns the target market itself. The potential audience of the blog can belong to the groups with the different levels of income. The idea of Travelling More is to try to relate to different groups and to explore the diverse travelling options. In such a way, reading about it, the users will not only find new destinations for themselves but also discover more about travelling options that are not usually associated with their income. The important task of the blog is also, if possible, to provide information about the economic situation in the country of destination, the currency exchange rates, etc. In terms of social factors, the target market includes people of different age and gender groups, as long as they are interested in the active lifestyle and exploring new places. According to statistics, the data of 2014 suggest that nearly 68 million of American tourists per year travel outside the US (Mangla par.1). It guarantees a large potential audience for the travel blogging, especially, because the technological factor is not a key issue in this case. It requires no more technological knowledge than just accessing the Internet. The SWOT analysis According to the SWOT analysis, the main strength of Travelling More is the appeal to different audiences, whereas its weakness may be in the large amount of content that needs to be provided. The opportunity is to acquaint the users with the different travelling styles. However, the threat is that the competitors would also implement the similar manner of the information representation but with more content. Strengths Weaknesses The appeal to different audiences Consistency of the content Convenient system of organizing content with tags and references The need to process and blog large amount of content High competitiveness Opportunities Threats Unique way of representing different styles of travelling at one resource The advice and recommendations of the blog will allow introducing the e-commerce element The competitors would follow the same strategy Lack of the diversity of the content Comparative analysis of other resources The first resource that can be compared to Travelling More is the blog reviewing the world’s concept stores located at the domain hipshops.com (“Hipshops” par.1). The website focuses on the representing the popular culture locations around the world, including the coffee shops, clothing and fashion attractions. The major strength of the blog is its system of organizing content with tags and references. It is easy to find the necessary information on the website, and it is not overloaded with either photos or textual descriptions. It is also designed with the exquisite minimalism. However, the weakness of the resource, compared to Travelling More, is its narrow area of focus. Travelling More would cover the larger spectrum of the tourist attractions, including not only shopping destinations but also a variety of places to dine, nightlife, events, housing options and hotels, as well as unusual landmarks and cultural attractions. Another travel blog that is a strong competitor is brownbook.me (“Brownbook” par.1). The materials on the website offer a very deep insight into the described destinations. The blog has a thorough research behind it, but most importantly, it includes the elements of advertisement and e-commerce. The weakness of the Brownbook is that it is focused on only one geographical area, whereas Travelling More will be able to offer more variety of not only different destinations but also styles of travelling. Works Cited “Brownbook – an Urban Guide to the Middle East.” Brownbook. 2016. Web. “Hipshops – a Smart Compilation of Concept Stores from Around the World.” Hipshops. 2016. Web. Koumparoulis, Dimitrios Nikolaou. “PEST Analysis: The case of E-shop.”International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences 2.2 (2013): 31-36. Print. Not sure if you can write a paper on “Travelling More” Website Idea by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Mangla, Ismat. “Americans Traveled Abroad In Record Numbers In 2014.” International Business Times. 2015. Web. “Monthly Departures to International Destinations.” Office of Travel and Tourism Industries. 2016. Web. “Tourism Statistics.” Eurostat. 2016. Web.
Assignment 2: Tests of Significance Throughout this assignment you will review mock studies and analyze data within each study.
Assignment 2: Tests of Significance Throughout this assignment you will review mock studies and analyze data within each study.. Assignment 2: Tests of Significance Throughout this assignment you will review mock studies and analyze data within each study. You will need to follow the directions outlined in each section of the attached document using SPSS and decide whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. You will need to list the five steps of hypothesis testing (as covered in the lesson for Week 4) to see how every question should be formatted. You will complete all of the problems. Be sure to cut and paste the appropriate SPSS outputs under each problem and interpret the outputs within the context of each mock study. All calculations should be coming from your SPSS. Hand calculation IS not accepted. You are also required to submit the SPSS output file (.spv) to get credit for this assignment. This spv. file should include ALL your outputs. In other words, you are not allowed to submit more than one output file for this assignment. * Be sure that your answers are clearly distinguishable. You may bold your font or use a different color. This assignment is due no later than Sunday of Week 5 by 11:59 pm ET. General requirements: Submissions should be typed, double-spaced, 1″ margins, times new roman 12 pt font, and saved as .doc, .docx, .pdf. Use APA format for citations and references View the grading rubric so you understand how you will be assessed on this Assignment. Disclaimer- Originality of attachments will be verified by Turnitin. Both you and your instructor will receive the results. This course has “Resubmission” status enabled to help you if you realized you submitted an incorrect or blank file, or if you need to submit multiple documents as part of your Assignment. Resubmission of an Assignment after it is grades, to attempt a better grade, is not permitted. Assignment 2: Tests of Significance Throughout this assignment you will review mock studies and analyze data within each study.
RES7 400 Ashford University Posttest Only and Experimental Designs Paper
RES7 400 Ashford University Posttest Only and Experimental Designs Paper.
I’m working on a business discussion question and need an explanation to help me study.
Two key factors, the inclusion of control groups and the utilization of random assignment, distinguish experimental designs from most other designs. Because these designs offer a higher degree of control, experimental designs have much greater internal validity than other methods. Provide examples of both a posttest-only design and a pretest-posttest design. For each design, discuss the major threats to validity and the limits on the conclusions that can be drawn. Discuss the importance of random assignment, and the advantages and disadvantages of using independent group designs over repeated measure designs. Post should be at least 300 words
RES7 400 Ashford University Posttest Only and Experimental Designs Paper