Get help from the best in academic writing.

PHI 208 Last Part of Assignment

PHI 208 Last Part of Assignment. I need support with this Sociology question so I can learn better.

In this final written assignment, you will combine what you have done in these two exercises by examining an ethical issue and defending your own position on an ethical question regarding that issue.
This final written assignment should be written in essay form with the following clearly labeled sections:

Introduction
Ethical Argument
Explanation and Defense
Objection and Response
Conclusion

The paper should be between 1,300 and 1,500 words, utilize three scholarly resources, and include a title page and reference page.
Part 1: Introduction
In this section of the paper, you will begin with your ethical question, introduce the topic and paper, and close with a thesis statement.

The ethical question may be the same as your Week 3 written assignment (“Applying an Ethical Theory”) or a revised version of it.
The introduction should be revised in a way that reflects your additional thinking on the issue and question.
End this section with a thesis statement that states your position on the issue (the answer to the ethical question you believe is strongest) and provides a brief summary of the main ideas you will be presenting in the paper. Please see the assignment guidance for examples of thesis statements.

Place the introduction under the Part 1: Introduction heading.
Part 2: Ethical Argument
In this section of the paper, you will present the strongest argument you can in support of the position you have stated in your introduction.

This will be similar to the “supporting reasons” you offered in the first assignment; however, this argument should reflect your research into the key ethical issues that need to be identified and addressed, the arguments on different sides of this problem, and the theories of moral reasoning we have studied in the class (you will discuss the specific details and implications of the moral theories in the next two sections).
You can think of this as a summary of the main argument you would give if you were an attorney trying to convince a jury of your position.

Place this information under the Part 2: Ethical Argument heading.
Part 3: Explanation and Defense
In this section, you will explain and defend your argument by drawing on the moral theory that aligns most closely with the argument you presented in Part 2. This may be the same theory you discussed in your second assignment, but it may also be a different theory.

You must first explain the theory in general terms similar to how you explained a theory in your second assignment, including a brief account of the historical background of the theory and the philosopher(s) associated with it and general overview of the core moral ideal or principle of the theory, including the way it guides and constrains moral reasoning.
You should then clearly show how your argument represents an application of that form of moral reasoning.
In other words, if the argument you present in Part 2 is utilitarian, deontological, or virtue-based (teleological), you will want to explain utilitarianism, deontology, or virtue ethics in general terms, then explain how your argument from Part 2 reflects or draws upon the core principles and values of that theory. Please refer to the Week 3 assignment instructions for directions on how to explain and apply the moral theory.

Place this section under the Part 3: Explanation and Defense heading.
Part 4: Objection and Response
In this section of the paper, you will present the strongest objection you can to your argument, and briefly defend that objection by appealing to a different ethical theory than the one you focused on in Part 3.

Briefly explain the core moral ideal or principle of the theory and how that could be the basis of an objection to your argument. For instance, if you explained and defended your own argument by applying the principles of virtue ethics, you could raise an objection from the perspective of utilitarianism by briefly explaining the core utilitarian principle and how applying that principle could lead someone to a different conclusion than the one you are defending.
Next, you should respond to the objection by explaining why it is not strong enough to undermine the main argument in defense of your position.
See the assignment guidance for suggestions on how to effectively respond to the objection.

Place this section under the Part 4: Objection and Response heading.
Part 5: Conclusion
In this section of the paper, provide a summary of what you have done in the paper by briefly describing what you accomplished in each of the above sections.
Place this section under the Part 5: Conclusion heading.
Resource Requirement
You must use at least three scholarly resources, only one of which may be the textbook. In other words, you must use at least two scholarly resources in addition to the textbook.
Acceptable ways of using a source include providing a quotation, summary, or paraphrase; merely providing a citation, especially when it is unclear how or where the text supports your claim, is not sufficient.
If you need help with finding additional resources or are unsure about whether a particular resource will count toward the requirement, please contact your instructor.
For sources to count toward the resources requirement, they must be cited within the text of your paper and on the reference page. Sources that are listed on the references page but not cited within the paper do not count toward fulfilling the resources requirement.
In your paper,

Introduce the topic and paper.
Provide a thesis statement.
Present an argument in support of the position.
Defend the argument by explaining and applying the ethical theory that most closely aligns with the argument.
Present an objection to the argument by appealing to a different ethical theory.
Respond to the objection.
Provide a conclusion that describes what was accomplished in each of the sections of the paper.

The Ethical Reasoning Final Paper

Must be 1,300 to 1,500 words in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.)resource.
Must include a separate title page with the following:

Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted

For further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.).

Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice (Links to an external site.) resource for additional guidance.
Must use at least two scholarly sources in addition to the course text.

The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.

Must document any information used from sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.) guide.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. See the Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
PHI 208 Last Part of Assignment

Internet of Things (IoT) MANAGE DISCUSSION. Paper details Instructions: For each of the four Discussions in this course, you will post one thread of at least 300 words. The discussion forums in this course require a high level of thought and investigation on a number of important topics and related questions. Your posts must demonstrate course-related knowledge from the assigned readings and presentations and you are to support your assertions with at least two scholarly research articles in APA format. Sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Important ideas from the assigned weekly reading in the textbook may be used as one of the required references for your initial post. Assignment: Much is being said about the Internet of Things (IoT) but there is little focus on education regarding the possible opportunities and threats of IoT. From smart homes, to smart cars, to wearable technologies such as the Fitbit, current trends suggest that, regardless of what the “thing” is, if it can be connected to the Internet, it will be connected and soon. In a number of sectors, settings, and fields the convergence of different technologies working together through IoT to solve problems is being harnessed to improve outcomes. Few would argue that IoT has significant potential to impact how we live and work, yet there are many complexities surrounding the data that is being collected from everywhere on almost everyone. What does the IoT mean for education? What beneficial outcomes might exist? What forms of exploitation or threats might need to be considered? Integrate content/thoughts/concepts from a minimum of 2 research articles into your initial post. Textbook: Schrum, L.Internet of Things (IoT) MANAGE DISCUSSION
Political risk is of two types, Macro and Micro. Macro-risk refers to unanticipated and politically motivated environmental changes directed to all foreign enterprises. Micro-risk, on the other hand, is concerned with environmental changes that only affect selected industries or firms in a country (Robock,1971). Examples: Micro Political Risk: Anti-American protesters in Pakistan burned a McDonald’s restaurant, Shell gas station and a KFC restaurant due to US bombing in Afghanistan in October 2001. Macro Political risk: Due to second world war communist governments expropriated private firms in Eastern Europe and China and the same did by fidel castro during 1958-1959 in Cuba.Due to this move the international businesses were hit hard. Rather than initiating solely from local political actions, political risk has been found to have both external and internal sources (Haner,1979). The origination of external factors, are outside the host country and may include cooperative effort between the other countries and the host country or attempts of conflicts/ influences. International factors are from inside the country and may include power struggles among social factions or local religious, government policies or actions, or economic/social conditions. Economic conditions such as Balance of payments or income distribution can influence political risk because (1) they affect or are often the targets of government policy; (2) the economic environment can precipitate a change in government; and (3) the economic situation may influence such political actors as the general public and special interest groups, in turn influencing governmental policy ( I. Alon and M. Martin, A normative model of macro political risk assessment, Multinational Business Review (2) (1998), pp. 10-19. | Cited By in Scopus (10)Alon

NUSF 115 SJSU Food Fraud Prevention Policy Strategy & Decision Making Summary

NUSF 115 SJSU Food Fraud Prevention Policy Strategy & Decision Making Summary.

The instructions for Literature Assignment#2 are as follows. (The instruction is similar to your Literature Assignment#1-part 2).1. Before selecting articles for your own assignment, your group should have a discussion to break the topic into several subtopics. Each student is responsible for researching one subtopic. In this case, your group can avoid overlapped topics and articles.2. Search two peer-reviewed articles related to the subtopic you are responsible for. One article must be a primary research (original research) article. The other article can be either a primary research article or a scientific review. The articles should be published within 10 years. The following databases are usually used for researching peer-reviewed articles related to food toxicology (you may also find articles from other databases):Academic Search Complete https://web-b-ebscohost-com.libaccess.sjlibrary.org/ehost/search/advanced?vid=0&sid=d500e232-de8a-4286-bf49-8a77b28f50e6%40pdc-v-sessmgr02 (Links to an external site.)Science Direct https://www-sciencedirect-com.libaccess.sjlibrary.org/ (Links to an external site.)PubMed https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?otool=casjsulib (Links to an external site.)3. Make sure the articles were published within 10 years (2011- 2020).4. You will read, summarize and evaluate the articles. For more guidance, read the following link:- Understanding Scientific Studies (published in EUFIC)https://www.eufic.org/en/understanding-science/article/understanding-scientific-studies (Links to an external site.)- Reviewing review articles, part 2: The howhttp://crosstalk.cell.com/blog/reviewing-review-articles-part-2-the-how (Links to an external site.)5. The summary will be 2 pages long (around 400 words, type double-spaced) including:the title, authors, when and where the article was published (just like the format for Literature Assignment#1)the summary and evaluation of the primary research article : What is the purpose of the study? How did the authors test the hypothesis (briefly summarize the experiments)? What is/are the major finding(s) of the study Do you find any limitations of the study? Your comment on the quality of this study? If your second article is a scientific review, summarize the purpose of the review, key findings for subtopics, and your comment on the quality of this review.6. This summary will serve as a basis for your group presentation. Two weeks before your group presentation, upload your Literature Assignment #2. Please also upload the two full text articles being selected for this assignment to “Literature Assignment#2: full text article collection box”. 7. Grading: 20 points each summary (two summaries: 20×2 = 40 points)My main topic is food adulteration, and my subtopic is prevention of food fraud, please do the research and summary based on the subtopic.
NUSF 115 SJSU Food Fraud Prevention Policy Strategy & Decision Making Summary

Management Changes: Non-profit Organisations Research Paper

essay order Management Changes: Non-profit Organisations Research Paper. Research Question and Context Non-profit organisations are unable to meet their daily objectives due to inadequate financial resources. They rely on donors and well-wishers for funding. Therefore, for non-profit institutions to stick to their call and achieve their objectives, they should come up with alternative sources of funds. The purpose of this dissertation is to identify management changes that can help non-profit organisations to become financially viable institutions. The research question intends to determine how change management process can facilitate to fashion a fundamental shift of non-profit institutions to empower them economically. The objective of the research question is to identify how non-profit corporations may change their culture and employee behaviour to become financially viable institutions. By the end of the study, the researcher should understand the present position of non-profit organisations, the financial challenges that they experience and what they are doing to become financially sufficient. Besides, the research question will assist the research to identify what should be done to liberate non-profit organisations from financial hardships. Methods of Data Collection Methods of data collection determine the precision of a study. They determine the methods of data analysis that researchers use (Russell, 2005). Hence, it is imperative to use the most appropriate methods of data collection in order to achieve accurate results. The dissertation will use numerous methods to collect data to enhance the accurateness of the results. The methods include group and private qualitative interviews, observation, and secondary data. The reason the dissertation will use group and private qualitative interviews is to facilitate collection of inclusive data. Myers and Newman (2007) alleged, “Qualitative interview approach helps an interviewer to collect complex, in-depth data that is not as easily obtained through questionnaires or question-and-answer interview approach” (p. 12). Qualitative interview will give the researcher an opportunity to gather data on a number of related issues based on participants’ responses. Besides, it will give participants an opportunity to confirm areas that they do not understand. Qualitative interview will enable the interviewees to expound on their answers. Thus, it will assist the researcher to gather accurate data. According to Myers and Newman (2007), qualitative interview gives researchers a chance not only to gather truthful and hard data, but also conduct perception assessment. Therefore, the dissertation selected this approach because it will assist the research to gather emotional data. For instance, the researcher will ask participants to describe how they manage to meet their daily financial needs, particularly when donors and well-wishers fail to disburse money. Besides, the researcher will request the participants to describe how they feel when their organisations are going through financial hardships. Such questions will assist the researcher to gather more comprehensive data compared to requesting members to describe particular processes. In addition, qualitative interview will enable the researcher to collect first-person data. Myers and Newman (2007) argued that qualitative interview does not use the antique methods of questioning. Hence, it gives the researcher a chance to garner first-person evaluation of circumstances. For instance, the process will help the researcher to ask questions that directly relate to experiences of financial hardships in non-profit organisations. Such questions will assist the researcher to gather more expansive information. The correctness of this dissertation will depend on the ability of the researcher to gather honest and accurate data. In most cases, participants answer questions according to what they suppose an interviewer wish to know. Consequently, they do not give accurate and honest feedback. However, qualitative interview does not enable interviewees to figure out what an interviewer wants to know. Hence, respondents are likely to be frank in their responses. As a result, the method will guarantee that the researcher uses precise and correct data to compile findings. The researcher will also utilise observation method to gather information. The method was chosen because it enables researchers to get first-hand data. Observation method will enable the researcher to visit non-profit organisations and gather direct information. The researcher will visit some of the institutions that experience financial challenges and observe how they cope with the hardships, rather than relying on information from individuals who work in non-profit organisations. Besides, it will enable the researcher to identify factors that lead to economic hardships in non-profit organisations. Therefore, the researcher will be in a position to come up with viable recommendations of what transformations ought to be implemented to enable non-profit institutions become financially empowered. Adler and Adler (2002) posited, “Much of human social behaviour that may be of interest to the researcher is highly transient” (p. 44). Observation method enables researchers to record activities going on in the field. Hence, a researcher can later refer to the record when analysing his/her data. This approach will enable the researcher to compare varied non-profit organisations when probing his/her data, thus ensuring that s/he comes up with comprehensive findings. Observation method will boost the validity of the dissertation’s conclusions since it will enable the researcher to understand the hardships that non-profit organisations encounter. Besides, observation method will play a great role when preparing for group and private qualitative interviews. It will give the researcher an allusion of what s/he ought to include in the interview questions. The dissertation will use secondary data due to numerous benefits. First, secondary data will enable researchers to identify some transformations that should be implemented in non-profit organisations. There is a lot of secondary data that details how non-profit institutions can be transformed into financially viable corporations. Hence, such data will be of great help in this research. Second, secondary data will ensure that the researcher does not collect irrelevant information when using other methods of data collection. Adler and Adler (2002) posited that secondary data “helps to make primary data collection more precise since with its help, researchers are able to make out what gaps and deficiencies and what additional information needs to be collected” (p. 45). Therefore, secondary data will act as a guideline when deciding what to observe in the field and the questions to use during research. The primary objective of this dissertation is to identify how change management can be used to transform non-profit organisations into financially viable institutions. Failure to come up with correct recommendations will lead to the situation in the majority of non-profit corporations getting bad. Therefore, secondary data will be used to analyse facts gathered through other methods and enable the researcher to make informed decision. It will help to determine if what is collected from the field corresponds to what is already known. Besides, secondary data will enable the researcher to identify what scholars recommend. Evidence for the Use of a Structured Systematic Approach A structured, systematic approach entails conducting research in a step-by-step manner (AdlerManagement Changes: Non-profit Organisations Research Paper

Northwestern Polytechnic University Good Database Security Paper

Northwestern Polytechnic University Good Database Security Paper.

Considering the importance of data in organization, it is absolutely essential to secure the data present in the database. What are the strategic and technical security measures for good database security? Be sure to discuss at least one security model to properly develop databases for organizational security. Create a diagram of a security model for your research paper.Your paper should meet the following requirements:Be approximately 4-6 pages in length, not including the required cover page and reference page. (Remember, APA is double spaced)Follow APA 7 guidelines. Your paper should include an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.Support your answers with the readings from the course and at least two scholarly journal articles to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to your textbook. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing.
Northwestern Polytechnic University Good Database Security Paper

Geely Automobile Holdings Limited 1. Explain how your assigned company currently creates and captures value for different stakeholders in

Geely Automobile Holdings Limited 1. Explain how your assigned company currently creates and captures value for different stakeholders in the automotive sector. 2. Through research on company resources, analyze the shifts in value creation and capture in the automotive sector over the next five years. 3. Forecast how your assigned company will create and capture value for the different stakeholders in the automotive sector in the next five years. 4. Explain how the drivers of value creation and capture are influenced by key forces such as digitization, globalization, innovation, and the power of the consumer in this industry. 5. Explain how the economics of physical and digital goods and services are being mixed (becoming hybrid) within a larger ecosystem of companies. 6. Describe how the strategic shift from product to service to platform/ecosystem impacts different types of firms in the automotive industry. 7. Describe how your company is positioned relative to competitor firms in creating and capturing value in the automotive industry ecosystem.

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: