Get help from the best in academic writing.

Peirce College Week 6 Management Statement of Cash Flows Ethical Issues Case Study

Peirce College Week 6 Management Statement of Cash Flows Ethical Issues Case Study.

Read Case 15-59, “Management of Statement of Cash Flows, Ethical Issues,” on p. 834 of the text.Post a clear and logical response in 250 words to the questions on p. 835 of the text.1. Form a group with two to four other students. Discuss the propriety of the arrangement that Fred has with Bill Lawson concerning the disbursement of the proceeds from the loan. (type out what should be discussed)2. In your group, discuss the propriety of the actions that Fred is proposing to improve the firm’s statement of cash flows. Suppose that there is very little risk that the loan will not be repaid. Does this information affect your assessment? (type out what should be discussed) 3. Assume that Karla is subject to the Institute of Management Accountant’s (IMA) code of ethics. Look up this code, and identify the standards of ethical conduct that will be violated, if any, by Karla should she agree to cooperate with Fred’s scheme.4. Using the IMA code of ethics, if you were in Karla’s position, what would you do (supposing that Fred insists on implementing his plan)? Now, answer the question, assuming that Fred is willing to consider alternative ways to solve the company’s problems.Will provide case
Peirce College Week 6 Management Statement of Cash Flows Ethical Issues Case Study

Quality Methods in Healthcare.

CompetencyDescribe different quality methods within healthcare.Course ScenarioChaparral Regional Hospital is a small, urban hospital of approximately 60 beds, and offers the following:Emergency room servicesIntensive careSurgical careObstetricsDiagnostic servicesSome rehabilitation therapiesInpatient pharmacy servicesGeriatric servicesConsumer physician referral servicesRecently, the CEO has been hearing complaints from both patients and staff, varying from long wait times to rude physicians. You have been hired to design and implement a Quality Improvement Plan to help uncover quality problems and to satisfactorily resolve them.InstructionsThe CEO has received some resistance from the Board on undertaking a QI program. She has asked you to develop a set of talking points on the pros and cons of common measurement techniques used in healthcare that she can use the next time she runs into a Board member.Talking points are used to quickly explain something by condensing it into a compelling, but easily digestible, list. If the goal is to increase support for a QI program, the talking points must provide the ideas she needs to convey in order to achieve the goal.Your talking points should be submitted in a Word document. Your talking points should include the pros and cons of implementing a QI program.Upon completion of your talking points, please prepare a PowerPoint presentation (or other shareable Webware/software you prefer) with narration where you will explain each talking point to the CEO so they clearly understand and can answer questions from the Board.APA formatting for the talking points, and proper grammar, punctuation, and form are required.Length of PowerPoint is secondary to the quality of the presentation as a whole.Highlight specific pros and cons of QI programs.Use the Notes area on each slide as needed to expand on the key points. I WILL NARRATE FROM THE NOTES ON THE SLIDESYou may use a free screen capture site such as Screencast-O-Matic to record a video of your presentation. Screencast-O-Matic is a site and program that can perform screen desk and audio capture up to 15 minutes for free, and can be utilized on a Windows or Mac computer. (Note: You can use a similar program if you prefer. Screencast-O-Matic is just one suggestion). Make sure that both your voice and the PowerPoint slides are captured on the video.Your audio presentation should include an introduction, a concise discussion of each slide, and a conclusion. Make sure to use audience-specific language and tone in your PowerPoint. Remember, you would be presenting this to the CEO of your facility. The presentation will be assessed on your overall knowledge of the content, clarity of your voice, pronunciation of words, organization of your presentation, proper recording of your presentation, overall aesthetics and professionalism, and general clarity of your presentation.Your presentation should be 10 minutes or less. Make sure to address the following:Include a link to the location of your live video on the last slide of your PowerPoint presentation.Make sure to use audience specific language and tone in your PowerPoint. Remember, you would be presenting this to the management team at your location.Save both your paper and PowerPoint presentation to a folder on your computer. Then, zip or compress your folder. Upload the zipped folder (with both the paper and PowerPoint) to the assignment drop box.APA formatting for the References slide, and proper grammar, punctuation, and form are required.
Quality Methods in Healthcare

Clemson University ISIS and Counterterrorism Essay

Clemson University ISIS and Counterterrorism Essay.

Please read The Below FirstI’m looking for someone who does not use Chegg or Course Hero or any online cites to provide your answers. The professor checks these other sites as well. If you do this to provide your answers and don’t use your own, let me know immediately so I can choose someone else to assist me. I have been notified that an assignment was linked to Chegg or Course Heroetc. Someone that uses their own words, so nothing can be found on the internet. Someone who does not Plagiarize others work from online websites. I have word documents attached with the instructions. Then please let me know.  Thank you.Subject is:CounterintelligenceText sources available for this essay are as follows:DOT. (2015). National Terrorist Financing Risk Assessment. Retrieved from: finance/Documents/National%20Terrorist%20Financing%20Risk%20Assessment%20–%2006-12-2015.pdfODNI. (2016). ISIL Finances: Future Scenarios. Retrieved from:………Or any additional resources that you think are appropriate.Your answers will be original?The professor or anyone will not be able find these answers on any online website? Please answer:1. Read all the instructions and let me know if you have any questions about what must be done. 2. Your answers will be all original? 3. Do you guarantee that all your work is original and none of what you write can or will be found on any online site? Therefore, I try to provide a longer time for the work to be completed.APA format – Course is INTL650 Counterterrorism
Clemson University ISIS and Counterterrorism Essay

Languages homework help

help writing Languages homework help. This is a paper that focuses on the central argument and rhetorical analysis of a documentary. The paper also divides the paper in to two parts for easy analysis of the assignment.,The central argument and rhetorical analysis of a documentary,The Analysis is into two parts,The First part of the analysis is to clearly state the central argument of the documentary. You may also want to break this section into four parts or paragraphs (1. The overall argument, 2. Thesis of the first episode, 3. Thesis of the second episode, 4 thesis of third episode ). This section should be between 1.5-2 pages.,The Second part of the analysis is the actual rhetorical analysis and the bulk of the assignment., To begin building the second part you will need to re-watch the documentary with these questions in mind:,1. Firstly, what kinds of arguments (e.g., classical oration, Toulmin, ,Rogerian,, etc.) are being used here? Does the kind of argument being used affect the effectiveness of the overall thrust of the documentary?, 2. Secondly, what did the author choose to study? Why?, 3. Thirdly, what is the writer’s purpose? To inform? To persuade?, 4. Fourthly, who is the author’s intended audience?, 5. How does the writer arrange their ideas? Chronologically? Philosophically?,Additionally,6. Additionally, how does the writer use diction? (Word choice, arrangement, accuracy, is it formal, informal? Technical versus slang?), 7. Does the writer use dialogue? Quotations? Why?, 8. Are important terms repeated? Also, what are the top three terms of the documentary, 9. What is the effect of the text and the visual rhetoric. Does music feature? What impact does having interviews have?, 10. What is the role of the logos, pathos, ethos, and kairos in the text?, 11. What other rhetorical devices are at work in the documentary? Additionally, does the presence of these devices make the argument more or less compelling?, 12. What is the overall effect of this documentary on you, the audience? Additionally, do you think the author achieves the effect they sought? Do you find the documentary compelling? If not, why not? What audience would find it compelling?,The central argument and rhetorical analysis of a documentary,From these questions you are to answer in a 6-8 page analysis the basic question, “What is the role of rhetoric in the documentary and is it effective?”,Again, the key idea for this assignment is to focus more on HOW the argument is being made rather than WHAT the actual argument is. Obviously, you will have to know the WHAT for the first section but that only forms one small part of the assignment., The whole assignment should be 8-10 pages with standard fonts, margins. Also, feel free to use timestamps from the Youtube video with inline citations.,Attachments,Click Here To Download,Languages homework help

Capital budgeting techniques: Sensitivity and Scenario analysis

Capital budgeting techniques: Sensitivity and Scenario analysis. Graphically show and explain the following terms, how you could link them to capital budgeting techniques in your decision making (1000 words) Sensitivity analysis Scenario analysis Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is a ‘what if’ tool that examines the effect of increase or decrease in a company’s net profit. Sensitivity analysis can help in answering question like ‘What would be the forecasted net income if sales are increased or decreased by 30%, 20% or 10%. Sensitivity analysis is frequently used in capital budgeting for determining how sensitive an NPV analysis is to changes in variable assumptions. While conducting analysis, each variable is fixed except one and by changing this one variable, the effect on NPV or IRR can be viewed. The first step in performing a sensitivity analysis is building a base case scenario. This is typically the NPV using assumptions which are believed to be accurate. From this point various assumptions can be changed which had initially been based on potential assumptions. NPV is then recalculated and the sensitivity of NPV based on the change in assumptions is determined. Scenario Analysis Scenario analysis is a process of analysing decisions by considering alternative possible outcomes. Scenario analysis is designed to see the consequences of an action under different set of factors. Scenario analysis takes sensitivity analysis a step further. Rather than just looking at the sensitivity of the NPV analysis to changes in the variable assumptions, scenario analysis also looks at the probability distribution of the variables. Like sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis starts with the construction of a base case scenario. From there other scenarios are considered known as the ‘best case’ and ‘worst case’ scenario. Probabilities are assigned to the scenarios and computed to arrive at an expected value. Capital Budgeting and Use of Sensitivity and Scenario Analysis Capital budgeting is the process of analysing a company’s investment decisions such as investing in new equipment, machineries, plants, projects and products. This process involves the estimation of the expected cash flows, the calculation of the Net Present Value (NPV) and the calculation of the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of the investment. NPV is defined as the present value of all cash inflows minus the present value of all cash outflows. If NPV is positive, the investment is making money and is thus viable. IRR is defined as the discount rate that makes the NPV zero. If IRR is greater than the opportunity cost of capital then the investment is feasible. There are two obstacles involved in the capital budgeting process. One involves the correct estimation of expected cash flow. The other is the use of correct discount rate also known as the project cost of capital. Capital budgeting is by definition, forward looking. When dealing with expected resources and demands, uncertainty is a major factor. Sensitivity analysis is a statistical tool that determines how consequential deviations from the expected value occur. Capital Budgeting example XYZ Water Filtration Plant needs to construct a new water filtration plant to filter 20 million litre water and deliver to consumers. An assessment should be carried out to evaluate the economics of the project and determine which parameter is sensitive to investment value, also to establish a sales price. Market price of water is $4 – $5 per litre therefore, four different water price scenarios would need to be analysed to reach the best economic parameter, they are: $4, $4.25, $4.5 and $4.75. The selection criteria would be based on: NPV Cost of Capital – 15% IRR Analysis and Comparison of Alternatives Preliminary data and estimation Table 1: Project Information Water filtration plant cost $32,750,000 AUD Water price (assumption) $4.5 AUD/Litre Water production 20 Million Litre Revenue $90,000 per day $32,850,000 per year Operating cost $1 per litre $7,300,000 per year Plant lifetime 15 year Cost of capital 15% Table 2: Baseline Cash flow calculation Baseline cash flow and NPV are calculated as follows: Year Revenue Capital Investment Operational Cost Depreciation Equity to be split Government take Cash Flow NPV 0 (32,750,000) (32,750,000) 6,334,796 1-15 34,675,000 (7,300,000) (2,183,333) 29,558,333 (20,690,833) 6,684,167 Table 3: Sensitivity Analysis Calculation In sensitivity analysis, each variable is changed one at a time to analyse its impact on the end result. In this case the impact of 10% increase or decrease in revenue, capital investment and operational cost is considered on the NPV. Increase/ Decrease Year Revenue Capital Investment Operational Cost Cash Flow NPV @15% Revenue 10% 0 – (32,750,000) – (32,750,000) 8,895,944 1-15 36,135,000 – (7,300,000) 7,122,167 -10% 0 – (32,750,000) – (32,750,000) (2,629,222) 1-15 29,565,000 – (7,300,000) 5,151,167 CAPEX 10% 0 – (36,025,000) – (36,025,000) (1,035,312) 1-15 32,850,000 (7,300,000) 5,983,833 -10% 0 – (29,475,000) – (29,475,000) 7,302,034 1-15 32,850,000 – (7,300,000) 6,289,500 OPEX 10% 0 – (32,750,000) – (32,750,000) 1,852,787 1-15 32,850,000 – (8,030,000) 5,917,667 -10% 0 – (32,750,000) – (32,750,000) 4,413,935 1-15 32,850,000 – (6,570,000) 6,355,667 From table 3, a sensitivity graph can be plotted as follows: Based on above sensitivity analysis, it is evident that the revenue by terms of price is the main variable that is affecting NPV. Hence the economic optimization and evaluation will be based on parameter water price. Using formula in the spreadsheet, following can be obtained: Table 4: Water Sales Price Scenario Water Price NPV IRR Payout Time $4.00 (3,269,509) 12.90% 6.5 $4.25 (68,074) 14.96% 5.9 $4.50 3,133,361 16.95% 5.3 $4.75 6,334,796 18.89% 4.9 Selection of preferred alternative From table 4, we can conclude that best scenario is at water price $4.74 per litre, refer to criteria NPV, IRR and Payout Time. Then the project is worth doing, with the water price $4.75 per litre resulting NPV>0, IRR>MARR and payout time less than five years. Benefits of using Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity and scenario analysis in useful in capital budgeting techniques for a number of reasons, including: It supports decision making or the development of recommendations for decision makers such as testing the robustness of a result. Financial model makers can effectively communicate with the decision makers for example, by making recommendations more credible, understandable and compelling. Increases understanding of relationships between input and output variables. It helps the investor to maintain their risk comfort level. Once projections are made concerning a specific investment, it can be decided whether risk should be taken for the worst case scenario. SOURCE Source: Boundless. “Scenario Analysis.” Boundless Finance. Boundless, 03 Jul. 2014. Retrieved 27 Apr. 2015 from 627/lectures/chapter5.pdf Capital budgeting techniques: Sensitivity and Scenario analysis

WK 2 Principles of Finance I, business & finance homework help

WK 2 Principles of Finance I, business & finance homework help.

Principles of Finance I Complete the following textbook questions:Chapter 4: Questions 4-1 through 4-5 on page 183Chapter 5: Questions 5-1 through 5-5 on page 231Business School Assignment InstructionsThe requirements below must be met for your paper to be accepted and graded:Write between 750 – 1,250 words (approximately 3 – 5 pages) using Microsoft Word in APA style, see example below.Use font size 12 and 1” margins.Include cover page and reference page.At least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing.No more than 20% of your content/information may come from references.Use at least three references from outside the course material; one reference must be from EBSCOhost. Text book, lectures, and other materials in the course may be used, but are not counted toward the three reference requirement.Cite all reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) in the paper and list on a reference page in APA style.
WK 2 Principles of Finance I, business & finance homework help