Get help from the best in academic writing.

Part 1: Art Creation Select a poem piece to use as a point of inspiration. Create a work of

Part 1: Art Creation
Select a poem piece to use as a point of inspiration. Create a work of poetry inspired by your selected art piece.

Part 2: Reflection
Write a reflection about the relationship between your art production and the inspiration piece. Include the following in the reflection paper:

Inspiration Piece
Include the inspiration poem
Record the title, artist/author/composer, year, and place of origin.
Briefly explain the background of the inspiration piece.
Your Art Piece
Include your original poem within the document.
Provide a title.
Explain the background of your piece.

Explain the thematic connection between the two pieces.
How are they similar and different?
Are they the same medium? How does the medium impact what the viewer experiences?
References page (minimum of 1 scholarly source)

Analysis of the book Because of winie Dixie by Di Camilo

Analysis of the book Because of winie Dixie by Di Camilo.

The paper is about analysis of the book Because of winie Dixie by Di Camilo , the paper has to be three papers. 1.5 page about the analysis of characterization and the other 1.5 page about the analysis of the setting of the book. It has to be analysis not summarized so for example for both of the analysis of characterization and settings it has to be a claim- quote( all the sources have to be from the book only) and interpretation of the claim.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

The Future Enterprise (Www: 1/25/2022)

Part 1: Art Creation Select a poem piece to use as a point of inspiration. Create a work of The a-s-s-e-s-s-m-e-n-t will be 2000 words long. Please see the questions shown in the screenshot. I will send you all info after hired, eg PPTs, student access etc. Please send a draft in [12hrs-1 day time, day 2, and day 3 as well] Will need to draft some questions to ask the teacher and revise base on feedback (Send bk ard in 1-day max)
Need to Get Around 70 % Or above

Emile Zola Accuses the French Government,The great realist novelist Émile Zola was a lifelong republican. Along with the actress Sarah Bernhardt, Zola was deeply distressed by the case of the Alsatian Jewish officer Alfred Dreyfus, who was court-martialed

Emile Zola Accuses the French Government,The great realist novelist Émile Zola was a lifelong republican. Along with the actress Sarah Bernhardt, Zola was deeply distressed by the case of the Alsatian Jewish officer Alfred Dreyfus, who was court-martialed.

Research and analyze : Emile Zola Accuses the French Government of Framing Alfred Dreyfus

Primary Source:

Émile Zola Accuses the French Government of Framing Alfred Dreyfus

The great realist novelist Émile Zola was a lifelong republican. Along with the actress Sarah Bernhardt, Zola was deeply distressed by the case of the Alsatian Jewish officer Alfred Dreyfus, who was court-martialed and sentenced to life in prison—on scanty and suspicious evidence—of selling French state secrets to the Germans in 1894. The accusations were clearly guided by anti-Semitic sentiments, which were whipped up by the right-wing press, and especially by Eduoard Drumont, the publisher of the journal La libre parole (The Free Word) and author of La France juivre (Jewish France; 1886). In 1896, new evidence implicated Ferdinand Walsin Esterhazy, a major in the French army and a member of the French branch of the powerful Hungarian noble house. But the courts ignored the evidence, declared Esterhazy innocent, and reconfirmed Dreyfus’s guilt. It was this verdict that enraged Zola and other republicans. In January 1898, Zola wrote the following blistering open letter to the president of the French Republic, entitled ‘J’accuse’(“I accuse you!”), in which he denounced France’s military and justice systems, as well as the Catholic Church, for condemning an innocent man. In the end, Dreyfus was given a new trial, and found innocent. He served his country in the First World War, and was awarded the Legion of Honor medal in 1918. Esterhazy escaped to Belgium and then England, where he (almost certainly the guilty party) died in 1923.

Source: Emile Zola, “Letter to M. Felix Faure, President of the Republic (J’accuse)” in The Dreyfuss Affiar: J’accuse and Other Writings, ed. Alain Pages, trans. Eleanor Levieux (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996), 43–53. Copyright © 1996 by Yale University. English language translation © by Eleanor Levieux 1996. Reprinted by permission of Yale University Press.

Monsieur le President,

Will you all me, out of my gratitude for the gracious manner in which you once granted me an audience, to express my concern for your well-deserved glory? Will you allow me to tell you that although your star has been in the ascendant hitherto, it is now in danger of being dimmed by the most shameful and indelible of stains? […]

What a blot on your name (I was about to say, on your reign) this abominable Dreyfus Affair is! A court martial, acting on your orders, has just dared to acquit such a man as Esterhazy. Truth itself and justice itself have been slapped in the face. And now it is too late, France’s cheek has been sullied by that supreme insult, and History will record that it was during your presidency that such a crime against society was committed? […]

First of all, the truth about the trial and the verdict against Dreyfus.

One wicked man had led it all, done it all: Lt-Col [Armand-Mercier] du Paty de Clam.[1] At the time he was only a Major. He is the entire Dreyfus Affair….It was his idea to dictate the bordereau[2] to Dreyfus; it was his idea to examine it in a room entirely lined with mirrors; it was du Paty de Clam, Major Forzinetti tells us, who went out with a dark lantern intending to slip into the cell where the accused man was sleeping and flash the light on his face all of a sudden so that he would be taken by surprise and blurt out a confession!…

For some time already, the bordereau had been in the possession of Colonel Sandherr, head of the Intelligence Bureau, who has since died of total paralysis. There were ‘leaks’, papers disappeared, just as papers continue to disappear today; and efforts were being made to find out who had written the bordereau when a conviction slowly grew up that that person could only be an officer from the General Staff, and an artillery officer at that. This was a glaring double error, which shows how superficially the bordereau had been examined, since a close and rational scrutiny of it proves that it could only have been written by an infantry officer….

It was du Paty de Clam who invented Dreyfus. The Affair became his affair. He was sure that he could confound the traitor and wring a complete confession from him. Of course, there is the War Minister, General Mercier, whose intelligence seems to be on a mediocre level; and of course there is the Chief of the General Staff, General de Boisdeffre, who appears to have been swayed by his intense clericalism….

Ah, for anyone who knows the true details of the first affair, what a nightmare it is! Major du Paty de Clam arrests Dreyfus and has him placed in solitary confinement. He rushes to the home of Madame Dreyfus and terrifies her, saying that if she speaks up, her husband is lost…

But now, here is Dreyfus summoned before the court martial. The most utter secrecy is demanded. They could not have imposed stricter silence and been more rigorous and mysterious if a traitor had actually opened our borders to the enemy and led the German Emperor straight to Notre Dame. … No punishment can be too severe; the nation will applaud the traitor’s public humiliation; the nation is adamant: the guilty man shall remain on the remote rock where infamy has placed him and he shall be devoured by remorse. But then, those unspeakable accusations, those dangerous accusations that might inflame all of Europe and had to be so carefully concealed behind the closed doors of secret session—are they true? No, they are not! …One need only examine the formal indictment that was read before the court martial.

How hollow that indictment is! Is it possible a man has been found guilty on the strength of it? Such iniquity is staggering. I challenge decent people to read it: their hearts will leap with indignation and rebellion when they think of the disproportionate price Dreyfus is paying so far away on Devil’s Island. So Dreyfus speaks several languages, does he? This is a crime. Not one compromising paper was found in his home? A crime. He occasionally pays a visit to the region he fails from? A crime. . .

So all that was left was the bordereau, on which the experts had not agreed. They say that in the council chambers, the judges were naturally leaning towards acquittal. And if that is the case then you can understand why, on the General Staff, they are so desperately insistent today on proclaiming, in order to justify the judgement [sic], that there was a damning but secret document; they cannot reveal it but it makes everything legitimate and we must bow before it, as before an invisible and unknowable God! I deny the existence of any such document, I deny it with all my strength! […]

…The preconceived idea that they brought with them to the judges’ bench of course as follows: ‘Dreyfus was sentenced for treason by a court martial, therefore he is guilty; and we, as a court martial, cannot find him innocent’…

They reached an iniquitous verdict which will forever weigh heavy on all our future courts martial and forever make their future decisions suspect…they talk to us about the honour of the army; they want us to love the army, respect the army….the army that is involved here is not the dignified army that our need for justice calls out for. What we are faced with here is the sabre, the master that may be imposed on us tomorrow. Should we kiss the hilt of that sabre, that god, with pious devotion? No, we should not! […]

.The war office employed every means imaginable—campaigns in the press, statements and innuendoes, every type of influence—to cover Esterhazy, in order to convict Dreyfus a second time. The republican government should take a broom to that nest of Jesuits (General Billot calls them that himself) and make a clean sweep! […]

It is a crime to have accused individuals of rending France apart when all those individuals ask for is a generous nation at the head of the procession of free, just nations—and all the while the people who committed that crime were hatching an insolent plot to make the entire world swallow a fabrication. It is a crime to lead public opinion astray, to manipulate it for a death-dealing purpose and pervert it to the point of delirium. It is a crime to poison the minds of the humble, ordinary people, to whip reactionary and intolerant passions into a frenzy while sheltering behind the odious bastion of anti-Semitism. France, the great and liberal cradle of the rights of man, will die of anti-Semitism if it is not cured of it. It is a crime to play on patriotism to further the aims of hatred. And it is a crime to worship the sabre as a modern god when all of human science is labouring to hasten the triumph of truth and justice. […]

But this letter has been a long one, M. le President, and it is time to bring it to a close.

I accuse Lt-Col du Paty de Clam of having been the diabolical agent of a miscarriage of justice (though unwittingly, I am willing to believe) and then having defended his evil deed for the past three years through the most preposterous and most blameworthy machinations.

I accuse General Mercier of having been an accomplice….to one of the most iniquitous acts of this century.

I accuse Generals de Boisdeffre and Gonse of having been accomplices to this same crime, one out of intense clerical conviction, no doubt, and the other perhaps because of the espirit de corps which makes the War Office the Holy of Holies and hence unattackable. […]

I accuse the handwriting experts…of having submitted fraudulent and deceitful reports—unless a medical examination concludes that their eyesight and their judgement were impaired.

I accuse the War Office of having conducted an abominable campaign in the press…in order to cover up its misdeeds and lead public opinion astray.

Finally, I accuse the first court martial of having violated the law by sentencing a defendant on the basis of a document which remained secret, and I accuse the second court martial of having covered up that illegal actions, on orders, by having, in its own turn, committed the judicial crime of knowingly acquitting a guilty man.

In making these accusations, I am fully aware that my action comes under Articles 30 and 31 of the law of 29 July 1881 on the press, which makes libel a punishable offence. I deliberately expose myself to that law. […]

I have but one goal: that light be shed, in the name of mankind which has suffered so much and has the right to happiness. My ardent protest is merely a cry from my very soul. Let them dare to summon me before a court of law! Let the inquiry be held in broad daylight!

I am waiting.

M. le President, I beg you to accept the assurance of my most profound respect.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

Discussion and Practice Writing Ideas

1. Discussion:
Find an article on Migration in the database above and provide a Works Cited entry and a two or three line short summary of it.Learn How to use the Library Databases for essay content.
Go the database and find a suitable article on Migration. It can be on any topic related to this. Then write a very brief summary of the main ideas of the article and provide an MLA source reference for it for a Works Cited List. This is a practice assignment for a discussion or homework grade.
2. Practice Writing Ideas:Write out par. 3.7 from page 94. Practice Writing Ideas
Write out thewhole body paragraph from the text including the missing part. Do not change the words of the text.
Explanation of why you need to write it all out.
Writing the entire paragraph allows your brain to absorb the general flow of the ideas, the vocabulary and the sentence structure of academic English. Just filling in blanks is a less effective way of learning although sometimes necessary. Yes, it takes longer to write out all of it, but each time you write, you learn a little bit more, which will save you time in the long run.

Assessment of Strategic Management

Assessment of Strategic Management.

The item has been presented in the medium of written English. Sentences are structured and conform to academic writing. The paper has an identifiable structure including an introduction, a main body, and conclusion. The paper follows the Harvard Referencing Style.


The main body of assessment includes three questions below:

1.     Strategic Landscape: Students should provide a comprehensive table of numeric data showing research into the cost of the production of dairy products in Australia versus the return on sale of these products. The response examines the Australian dairy crisis, and is supported by least five (5) references to the academic literature. Use comprehensive and detailed approach.

2.     Competitive Environment: Students should provide a comprehensives table of numeric data showing research into the competitive position of Australian dairy producers relative to offshore competitors. The response details the effect of Porter’s Five Forces within the Australian Dairy Industry situation with number of five (5) reference to both the core text and the academic literature.

3.     Competitive Advantage Quantitative Analysis: Students should provide a statement, based on the two tables of numeric data at (1) and (2) above of the competitive advantage or disadvantage at which Australian dairy producers find themselves. Five references.




This case study investigates the Australia Dairy Industry and competition with international firms in liquid and desiccated products. 

Essay Help “>Essay Help

Choose a product from the following categories (NEW product): ▪ Food & Drink ▪ Children’s Market ▪ Fashion Industry …and prepare a strategic marketing plan in order to take this product to market.

Choose a product from the following categories (NEW product): ▪ Food & Drink ▪ Children’s Market ▪ Fashion Industry …and prepare a strategic marketing plan in order to take this product to market..

The assessed work will be submitted on a word document and will be 2,000 words + tables, diagrams, appendices. The marketing plan must be submitted in the form of notes. But these notes must contain coherent, well-written content in an academic/business style with accurate in-text references and a reference list. There must be complete academic sentences and paragraphs. Do not use bullet points on this document.

Essay Help “>Essay Help