Get help from the best in academic writing.

OLCU 501 Brandman University Week 7 Impact of Leadership Styles on People Discussion

OLCU 501 Brandman University Week 7 Impact of Leadership Styles on People Discussion.

Literature Reviewa 9 – 12 page literature review; page count is for content only and does not include the required title page, abstract, Table of Contents (TOC) or References. The content of the Literature Review should include the following components:Introduction: In 1 – 2 pages*, briefly describe the issue providing appropriate background information and discuss why researching this issue is importantResearch Purpose and Questions: In 1 – 2 pages*, clearly and concisely state the purpose of the research and the 2 – 3 specific research questions to be answeredLiterature Review: In 6 – 8 pages*, analyze and synthesize 15 or more scholarly sources including 5 research studies to comprehensively examine the issue and answer your research questionsConclusions: In 2 – 3 pages*, draw valid conclusions supported by findings in the literature.
OLCU 501 Brandman University Week 7 Impact of Leadership Styles on People Discussion

I need 7 pages of writing

I need 7 pages of writing.

Under the Main Essays tab, you will find two documentaries about Walmart that were created in 2005. Walmart: The High Cost of Low Prices (2005) takes the position that Walmart is a destructive influence on our society by causing small businesses to close, paying workers insufficient wages, not providing them with proper benefits, abuses international workers, etc. Why Walmart Works and Why that Drives People Crazy (2005) takes the position that charges against Walmart are unfair, that businesses that fail are outdated and are replaced by better businesses, workers are well paid and have good insurance, and that international works are treated fairly and have better jobs than they would without Walmart. In our study of how media persuades others, we have looked at how public service announcements used ethos, pathos, logos, visual and sound techniques to put forward an argument on some important issue like drinking and driving, smoking, texting and driving, using drugs, etc. In this paper you will be looking at both sides of an issue through one of the arguments shared by both documentaries.For this essay, you will take one argument shared by both documentaries, evaluate the techniques used on each side, and then offer your opinion about which documentary presented the better argument. While both documentaries have many arguments, only a small number are covered in both documentaries. The arguments covered by both documentaries are:Impact on Small BusinessesWagesInsuranceImpact on International WorkersWalmart Greed/GenerosityI want you to watch both documentaries, which are available under the “Main Essays” tab and choose one of these topics to write about. Below you will find the time codes for the matching sections in the two documentaries.Walmart’s Impact on Small Businesses0:00-15:35 Walmart’s Negative Impact on Small Businesses. Walmart: The High Cost of Low Prices.27:52-37:27 “Mom and Pop” Why Walmart Works.Wages of Employees15.11-18:04 Walmart employees are not paid enough. Walmart: The High Cost of Low Prices.40:45-47.22 “Wages” Why Walmart WorksInsurance18:15-25:00 Walmart does not provide adequate insurance. Walmart: the High Cost of Low Prices20:27-27:48 “Healthcare” Why Walmart WorksImpact on International Workers1:00:13- 1:11:57 Walmart treats international workers unfairly. Walmart: The High Cost of Low Prices16:16-20:25 “Globalization” Why Walmart WorksYou will choose one, and only one of these arguments and watch how each documentary presents and defends their position on that one issue. If you choose to look at worker’s wages, you will watch both the Walmart: The High Cost of Low Prices documentary on worker’s wages and then watch the Why Walmart Works and Why that Drives People Crazy documentary on worker’s wages. Do not go beyond the time code ranges I have given you. Some people get confused and don’t know what sections match, some evaluate the whole documentary, and I want to make sure you understand you are just looking both sides of one argument.The paper itself will be fairly simple, and it will use a lot of the same techniques as Paper Two: Argument in Public Service Announcements. Below is the general organization of the paper:IntroductionThe reader knows nothing about these two documentaries, so in the introduction you will identify the two documentaries, say when they were made, and explain what the position of each documentary is on Walmart. You will then mention that both documentaries address a particular argument and you will explain that they each use different techniques like ethos, pathos, logos and visual and sound techniques to convince their audience they are right. Write it as if it was going to be published and the people don’t know anything about it.Analysis of Walmart: The High Cost of Low Prices on the argument you have chosenYou will then turn to the first documentary, Walmart the High Cost of Low Prices and explain to the reader generally what happens in the section on your argument. Write about what kind of experts or people appear, what kind of topics are covered. Just give the reader a clear idea of what happens in that section of the documentary.Next, evaluate ethos and how it used by the filmmakers to help them persuade the audience. In documentaries, who made it is not as important as it was for the public service announcements. Your main source of ethos will be experts and people impacted by Walmart, positively and negatively. There are no celebrities in these documentaries, so that won’t be an issue.Next, evaluate Pathos as it is used in the Walmart: The High Cost of Low Prices. This will be anything used to stir the viewer’s emotions and manipulate them into feeling sad or angry or some other emotion that can draw in the viewer and get them to care about the issues.Next, evaluate Logos. You will be giving facts from the experts and you will sometimes see facts shown on screen. There will be logical arguments presented by people in the documentary.Next evaluate Visual Techniques. How was the camera used to more effectively communicate information or to impact the audience emotionally? Did the film maker use black and white or show the audience certain things to persuade them? One visual theme that runs through the first documentary are shots of the American flag. Why are they doing that?Finally, evaluate Sound Techniques. How is music used to impact the audience? How are sound effects used? How is the audience being manipulated by the music or sound to persuade the viewer that their argument is right.Evaluate Why Walmart Works and Why that Drives People Crazy on the argument you have chosenYou will now do the exact same thing with the answering argument from the second documentary. If you looked at Impact on Small Businesses in the first documentary, you are now evaluating Impact on Small Businesses in the second documentary.You will then turn to the second documentary, Why Walmart Works and Why Does that Drive People Crazy and explain to the reader generally what happens in the section on your argument. Write about what kind of experts or people appear, what kind of topics are covered. Just give the reader a clear idea of what happens in that section of the documentary.Next, evaluate ethos and how it used by the filmmakers to help them persuade the audience. In documentaries, who made it is not as important as it was for the public service announcements. Your main source of ethos will be experts and people impacted by Walmart, positively and negatively. There are no celebrities in these documentaries, so that won’t be an issue. This documentary has A LOT of experts.Next, evaluate Pathos as it is used in the Walmart: The High Cost of Low Prices. This will be anything used to stir the viewer’s emotions and manipulate them into feeling sad or angry or some other emotion that can draw in the viewer and get them to care about the issues.Next, evaluate Logos. You will be giving facts from the experts and you will sometimes see facts shown on screen or by the narrator. There will be logical arguments presented by people in the documentary.Next evaluate Visual Techniques. How was the camera used to more effectively communicate information or to impact the audience emotionally? Did the film maker use black and white or show the audience certain things to persuade them? This documentary is a bit less flashy than the first, but it still uses visual techniques.Finally, evaluate Sound Techniques. How is music used to impact the audience? How are sound effects used? How is the audience being manipulated by the music or sound to persuade the viewer that their argument is right.ConclusionIn the conclusion, you need to explain which documentary you think did a better job on the one argument you are evaluating. Which one was more convincing and used the above techniques best? You may have your own opinion on Walmart, and you can share that a little, but this is mostly about who you think presented their case more effectively. You may disagree with a documentary but think they did the best job making their case.This is a long handout, and the paper will be the longest of the course. It should run to five to seven pages. .You will not need a Works Cited page for this essay. Since I am providing the two documentaries, I know where you are getting your information. You cannot use any other sources in this paper. Like Paper Two, this is just you, alone, evaluating the techniques used in the two documentaries.
I need 7 pages of writing

Capella Nursing Quantitative & Qualitative Developing Insights Discussion

nursing essay writing service Capella Nursing Quantitative & Qualitative Developing Insights Discussion.

I’m working on a nursing question and need an explanation to help me understand better.

Write a 6 page analysis of two nursing research articles. One article must be quantitative in nature. One article must be qualitative in nature.IntroductionThe master’s-prepared nurse must become a critical consumer of research, as contemporary and emerging research helps to shape the present and future of the profession’s practice. Additionally, as evidence-based practice is becoming foundational for decision-making and practice strategies, it is important that nurses understand how to analyze research sources and mine them for the most relevant and significant pieces of information for their circumstances and practice environments.QUALITATIVE RESEARCHQualitative research uses the scientific method to answer clearly articulated research questions from a subjective perspective. EBP is based on research outcomes that may not include qualitative studies, which may be more appropriate for developing theory and testing hypotheses. Generally, EBP reviews use carefully defined criteria to evaluate the quality of a study and research outcomes. While EBP reviews may be informed or enhanced by qualitative research, they are not based solely on qualitative research outcomes, because of a lack of generally accepted criteria for judging the merit of qualitative studies.The epistemology of qualitative research incorporates the following views, which are particularly applicable to nursing practice. These views acknowledge (Grove et al., 2015):That reality or ways in which we define what we know are socially constructed, containing many points of views and perspectives.That what we know is linked intrinsically to who we are.That how we approach research is defined by what we value.That all knowledge is bound by time and context.Because the approach to qualitative research is subjective, the research design and approaches are unique and to some, controversial. The extent to which qualitative studies are credible is the degree of rigor that the study has in relationship to data collection and thoroughness of analysis (Grove et al., 2015). There are four commonly accepted approaches used in nursing research—phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, and historical. Qualitative research methodologies include coded observations, interview, surveys, focus groups, and questionnaires. Data analysis occurs in three stages—description, analysis, and interpretation. It is presented in narrative or visual format with a focus on the identification of key themes or trends in the data.Quantitative ResearchQuantitative research is a formal and objective process for generating new knowledge about a research topic, sometimes used to test hypotheses. Qualitative research is more subjective and is used to generate theories or develop hypotheses that can be tested quantitatively.The four types of quantitative research are:Descriptive.Correlational.Quasi-experimental.Experimental.Each of these approaches to research has applications in the health care industry. The differences among these approaches to research are based on the stated objective of the research and the level of measurement used to gather data for analysis. Research design will vary, but each type includes the same steps of the research process defined for qualitative research (Grove et al., 2015):Identify the research problem and research purpose.Conduct a literature review to determine the evidence base for the problem.Identify the study framework or theoretical foundation (for example, Orem, Pender, Watson, et cetera).Identify the research objective and state research questions and hypothesis.Clarify the study variables and level of measurement.State any assumptions that the researcher may make that could impact data analysis (for example, assumptions regarding sampling strategies, population characteristics, et cetera).State the limitations to research (for example, sampling limitations, data collection challenges, et cetera).Identify the research design.Descriptive.Correlational.Quasi-experimental.Experimental.Define the population and sample, including sampling strategies.Describe the methods of measurement.Collect data.Analyze data.Describe the outcomes and recommendations.The master’s-prepared nurse must become a critical consumer of research, as contemporary and emerging research helps to shape the present and future of the profession’s practice. Additionally, as evidence-based practice is becoming foundational for decision-making and practice strategies, it is important that nurses understand how to analyze research sources and mine them for the most relevant and significant pieces of information for their circumstances and practice environments.ReferenceGrove, S. K., Gray, J. R., & Burns, N. (2015). Understanding nursing research: Building an evidence-based practice (6th ed.). Elsevier/Saunders.PreparationAs you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.What are the key characteristics of quantitative research?How can you identify a research study that is using quantitative methodology?Which topics, issues, or areas of quantitative research are the most relevant to your current or future practice?What are the key characteristics of qualitative research?How can you identify a research study that is using qualitative methodology?Which topics, issues, or areas of qualitative research are the most relevant to your current or future practice?What are strategies that you could use to help break down a research study?How can you identify and address ethical implications within a research study?ScenarioSome of the most significant current information on patient care in nursing comes from scholarly, peer-reviewed journals and articles. Within this category of information sources, we can further categorize the studies into qualitative and quantitative sources, each with their own set of methods and standards. Within each of these categories, nurses must be able to differentiate between sources of published data that are used to develop evidenced-based practices (EBP).InstructionsPart 1For the first part of this assessment, choose a topic, an issue, or a phenomenon that informs nursing practice and that has been researched quantitatively. Select a nursing quantitative research article, published in a peer-reviewed journal within the past five years on your chosen topic, issue, or phenomenon.After selecting the article, complete the following (Note: The main bullet points below correspond to the assessment grading criteria, while the sub-bullets may help guide you to ensure that you are fully addressing the criteria):Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of a quantitative research study.Summarize the quantitative research study.Describe the problem, purpose, and hypothesis of the study.Identify and describe the quantitative study methodology (experimental, quasi-experimental, non-experimental, descriptive, or clinical trial).Describe the data collection, data analysis, and reporting procedures.Critique the entire study.Analyze the ethical implications of a quantitative research study when applied to the patient care setting.Why are ethical standards important in research when applied to patient care in a health care setting?To what extent do any ethical considerations impact human subjects?Analyze the significance of a research problem in a quantitative research study.How is the research problem significant to nursing practice?How could study of the research problem lead to improvements in health care?Evaluate a quantitative research study as an appropriate source of information for informing patient care decision making.How does the study provide information related to patient care?To what extent is the information in the study valid, reliable, and aligns with best practices?Part 2For the second part of this assessment, choose a topic, an issue, or a phenomenon that informs nursing practice and that has been researched qualitatively. Select a nursing qualitative research article published in a peer-reviewed journal within the past five years on your chosen topic, issue, or phenomenon. Please view the Qualitative Versus Quantitative Analysis Quiz to help you find an appropriate qualitative research article.After selecting the article, complete the following (Note: The main bullet points below correspond to the assessment grading criteria, while the sub-bullets may help guide you to ensure that you are fully addressing the criteria):Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of a qualitative research study.Summarize the qualitative research study, including the problem, purpose, and hypothesis of the study.Identify and describe the qualitative study methodology (ethnography, phenomenology, grounded theory, or case study).Describe the data collection, data analysis, and reporting procedures.Critique the entire study.Analyze the ethical implications of a qualitative research study when applied to the patient care setting.Why are ethical standards important in research when applied to patient care in a health care setting?To what extent do any ethical considerations impact human subjects?Analyze the significance of a research problem in a qualitative research study.How is the research problem significant to nursing practice?How could study of the research problem lead to improvements in health care?Evaluate a qualitative research study as an appropriate source of information for informing patient care decision making.How does the study provide information related to patient care?To what extent is the information in the study valid, reliable, and aligns with best practices?Assessed ThroughoutWrite clearly and concisely, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.Additional RequirementsLength of submission: 6–8 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title and reference pages. Your report should be thorough, but concise. No abstract is required for this assessment.Number of references: Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence. Resources should be no more than five years old.APA formatting: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] to help you in writing and formatting your analysis.Competencies MeasuredBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:Competency 1: Analyze how research can be used to improve nursing practice.Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of a quantitative research study.Analyze the significance of a research problem in a quantitative research study.Evaluate a quantitative research study as an appropriate source of information for informing patient care decision making.Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of a qualitative research study.Analyze the significance of a research problem in a qualitative research study.Evaluate a qualitative research study as an appropriate source of information for informing patient care decision making.Competency 4: Explain how ethical protections can be implemented in research and evidence-based nursing practice.Analyze the ethical implications of a quantitative research study when applied to the patient care setting.Analyze the ethical implications of a qualitative research study when applied to the patient care setting.Competency 5: Communicate effectively across disciplines, demonstrating respect for self and others.Write clearly and concisely, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.
Capella Nursing Quantitative & Qualitative Developing Insights Discussion

Creating excel workbook and report

Creating excel workbook and report.

The following are the assignmenttaskthat you need to completebefore you write up the report:1.Re-compute return statistics from Assignment #2(Template 1) if they are incorrect.2.Re-run the optimization assignment from Assignment #2if you have to. You should be using monthly input for all data (including the risk-free rate);the expected returnshould bethearithmetic monthly average return for theasset class. For comparison purposes (seebelow), you should retain the results of the following sets of optimized portfolios from Assignment #2: Equal-weighted (naïve) portfolios and optimal portfolios with 2% p.a. risk free rate, i.e., altogether 6portfolios for three time periods. Please denote the equal-weighted portfolios as EQA, EQ1, and EQ2 for the whole period, sub-period 1 and sub-period 2, respectively. Also, denote the optimal portfolios as OPA, OP1, and OP2 for the (unconstrained) optimal portfolio for the whole period, sub-period 1, and sub-period 2, respectively.The historical arithmetic average monthly returns of the asset classes are weighted and used as the target return for thesesix portfolios.Objective: Mean-Variance Optimization as the Basis for Strategic Asset Allocation Canvas submission due date: 1:30pm, March 9, 2021* This assignment is a twoor three-person team effort. Deliverables include a report(pdf) and an EXCEL workbook(xlx or xlxs) containing all working models of optimization for all cases listed below. (See required formats of these two deliverables are at the end of this Instructions.) Submit the two files to Assignment #3on CANVASby 1:30p.m.on March 9, 2021.** Please note bothdeliverables (the report and the EXCELworkbook) must be turned in on time. Missing any deliverable will be considered as not meeting the requirements for this assignment and automatically you’ll receive a zero score. There will be no make-up of any kind for this assignment. Team peer evaluation will be done after the report is submitted. *** Results you have obtained previously from Assignment #2and the new assignmenttasksenumerated below are to be used in the preparation ofthe report.IMPORTANT: You must use ALL of the results you obtain from the tasks in Assignment #2 and #3 to support your answers to the questions posted in this assignment for full credit.23.Now, run the optimization for the whole period, sub-period 1, and sub-period 2 with 3% p.a. risk-free rate and thesame target portfolio returns (historical) as before, i.e., same target returns asOPA, OP1 and OP2, respectively. (Hint: you don’t change the expected return, but just change the risk-free rate).Label the results as OPA3, OP13, and OP23, respectively.4.Repeat 3) with a risk-free rate of 4% p.a. for the whole period, sub-period 1, and sub-period 2. Label the results as OPA4, OP14, and OP24, respectively.5.Now, run the optimization for the whole period, sub-period 1, and sub-period 2 with 2% p.a. risk-free rate and the same target portfolio returns (historical) as before, i.e., no need to change the portfolio expected return, but with the following investment limits. [Note: You need to put these as constraintsin the Solver dialog box.]Please denote thesenew portfolios as COPA (constrained optimal for whole period), COP1 (constrained optimal for sub-period 1), and COP2 (constrained optimal for sub-period 2). Asset ClassesMinMaxUS Large Cap stocks (S&P 500)–US Small Cap stocks (Russell 2000)–Equity –Developed Markets ex US (MSCI EAFE)–Equity –Emerging Markets (MSCI Emerging Markets)–Commodities (S&P GSCI)–US Real Estate (FTSE NAREIT-Equity)–Cash (Three-Month US Treasury Bills)2%5%US Treasury Bonds-20%US IG Corporate Bonds-20%US High-YieldCorporate Bonds-5%Global High-Yield Bonds-5%Global IG Corporate BondsGlobal Treasury Bonds6.Run the optimization for the three periods (whole period, subperiod 1, and subperiod2) with an expected target monthly return of 0.75% (i.e.,9% p.a.) with a 2% p.a. risk-free rate. [Note: You need to force the expected return of the optimal portfolio to be 0.75% monthly–You put this as a constraint in the Solver dialog box.See the screen shot below.] Please labeltheseoptimal portfolios as OPA9, OP19, and OP29for the whole period, subperiod 1,and subperiod 2, respectively. 7.Run the optimization for the three periods (whole period, subperiod 1, and subperiod2) with an expected target monthly return of 0.75% (i.e.,9% p.a.) with a 2% p.a. risk-free ratewith investment limits given above.Please denote these portfolios as COPA9(constrained optimal whole period with 0.75% target monthly return), COP19(constrained optimal sub-period 1 with 0.75% target return), and COP29(constrained optimal sub-period 2 with 0.75%target monthly return).38.Using the optimal weights from the constrainedportfoliosfrom sub-period 1(i.e.,optimal weights from COP1, COP19), computethe portfolio return, portfolio risk, and the reward-to-variability ratiofor a portfolio in sub-period 2.Comparetheseresults to those of COP2, and COP29.(Note: This step is known as the out-of-sample testing. The test tries to find out whether using the optimal weights from a previous (historical) period (i.e. ex post optimal weights from sub-period 1) and applying to a future period (i.e.,sub-period 2) give good results. Evaluate this method by comparing the portfolio results obtained from using previous period’s optimal weights to the ex post optimal portfolio for subperiod 2(i.e.,COP2, and COP29).Important: After you have done the above, record the results in the templates(#1-5),and attachit to the Report as Appendix #1.Now,prepareareportassuming you are submitting it to your boss who is the Chief Investment Officer (CIO)of aUniversity Endowment Fund. Your boss wants you to provide research support (results and analysis) so that she can address the following issues/questions/concernsthat theInvestment Policy Committee (IPC) has asked or would probably ask.Thus,the objective is to help the CIO to prepare answers for likelyquestions from the IPC regarding asset allocation for the Fund. The Endowment Fund pays out 4% a year (the spending rate) to the University for operating expenses. Your report must include “adequate discussion based on the empirical results” you have done for the different tasks to address all of the following likely questions. It is up to your group to determine how to write up the report. If you prefer to answer these questions one by one, your grade would not be at the top of the scale.So, be creative in presenting the discussion and results to the CIO, your boss, so that your boss can confidently respond to the questions fielded by the IPC. a)The CIO has sent some of the results you have done above to the IPC. After the members of the IPCperused the results, some of them asked the CIO to explain why the equal-weighted portfolio underperformed the mean-variance optimal portfolio for the periods studied. Explain to the CIOusing only the whole periodresults.(Hint: You may want to analyze the attributes and performance of various asset classes and try to use them to explain the impact on the equal-weighted and optimal portfolios) b)The IPC has noticed that the optimal allocationsof sub-period 1 and sub-period 2are quitedifferent(based on different scenarios of target returns and investment limits). They asked why. Would you please explainto them?c)Recently, the Fed has held the interest ratesteady after lowering it to a very low level. How would an upwardchange in the risk-free rate affect the portfolio performance? Explain to the CIO using your results.d)The CIO wants to propose investment limitson certain asset classesto the IPC for consideration, but the CIO may not be aware of the likely impact on the performance of the Fund. Since you have run some analysis above based on the proposed limits, present youranalysis,and make a recommendation regarding investment limitsforthe historical arithmetic average (target) return and the 9% p.a. target return.(For your reference, see the paper titled “The Impact of Constraints on Minimum-Variance Portfolios” by Chow, Kose 4and Li in Financial Analysts Journal, Volume 72, Number 2, pp. 52-70. You can download this from the library.) e)The mean-variance optimization is known for having high sensitivity to changing target return. The CIO would like to test the sensitivity of the mean-variance optimization toa change in the portfolio target return. Since you have done some runs using the historical arithmetic average return and 9% p.a. target return, present what you’ve learned from your analysis to the CIO using your results.f)Could weuse the optimal weights from a previous period, say sub-period 1 or sub-period 2 or the whole period, as the recommended asset allocation for the future? Explain your answer with the out-of-sample test resultsyou have done. g)Based on the above analyses, what lessons and implications can be learned from your analysis on the mean-variance portfolio optimizationthat you want to share with your boss and the IPC?(IMPORTANT: You must use ALL of the results from your analysis above to support your answers forthese 7questions(a-g)for full credit.)Notes on the Format of the EXCEL Workbook and ReportEXCEL Workbook•Submit only one workbook containing all Excel spreadsheets, templates(#1-#5), and working models, including supporting materials you use in your report•Format all numbers 6 decimal places, 10-pointfont minimum.•Label tabs (using designated labels such as OPA) and spreadsheets•Present each model (i.e., each result, such as OPA, OP1, OP2) in a separate spreadsheet•Working models are the ones that can be re-run with current or new numbers (e.g., risk-free rate)REPORT•The Report must be organized and presented in a professional format.•The Report must be typed with a minimum 12-point font, 1.5spaced, 10pages maximum for the text. Appendix is not included in this pagelimit.•You can present the results in any way to accompany your discussion and analysis in the report. No matter how you present the results, Templates (#1-#5) must be attached in the Appendix(in the format of given templates, 10-pointfontminimum).•Use designated labels to refer to your results, such as OPA, OP1, etc.•Tables, figures, and charts should be put in the Appendix and referenced in the text clearly. Results must be presented in 6 decimal places. The grading criteria are listed in the instructions for Assignment #1.•Any missing or reformatting of templates (#1-5), and/or violating the formatting requirements will carry a penalty of up to 30 points on the Report.
Creating excel workbook and report

prepare a presentation entitled Physician leadership: developing an effective leader

prepare a presentation entitled Physician leadership: developing an effective leader.

My presentation title is Physician leadership: developing an effective leader.please follow the instruction below:This week, assigned Presenters should post a PowerPoint presentation with detailed notes section that contains the following:Incorporation and analysis of the Learning Resources from this 2-week unit, including identification of any apparent gaps in the literatureAn original research topic related to the week’s literature (the proposed research topic can be related to the general topic for the week or to gaps in the literature for the week, or it can be related to a specific reading for the week)Background information on the research topic, including identification of principal schools of thought, tendencies in the academic literature, or commonalities that define the academic scholarship regarding your topicEvaluation of the main concepts with a focus on their application to business/management practice and their impact on positive social changeA minimum of 10 peer-reviewed, scholarly new referencesNote: The presentation must be in APA format and must incorporate direct evidence of addressing the Learning Objectives from this 2-week unit. Each of the content slides must include detailed notes/paragraphs with appropriate citation of peer-reviewed, scholarly references.Note: I’m attaching annotated bibliography for 5 articles, kindly use them and add 5 more to have a total of 10. I’m also attaching three articles provided by university to be used in addition to the required 10.Note: You need to use the power point template attached.
prepare a presentation entitled Physician leadership: developing an effective leader

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: