Get help from the best in academic writing.

NURS 306 West Coast University Nursing Concept Map Notes

NURS 306 West Coast University Nursing Concept Map Notes.

I’m working on a nursing spreadsheet and need an explanation to help me learn.

Hello!I need a concept made created for me which follows the rubric. I’ve supplied an example concept map, information on my patient and the blank template. Whatever infomation you feel i did not provide please make up or just message me :)Name: NURSING CONCEPT MAP RUBRIC Meets or ExceedsMostly MeetsApproachesDoes Not Meet ExpectationsHistory of PresentIllnessPoints:8 (8.00%)HPI explained in detail with accurate and in-depth understanding of chief complaint and supported by evidence based citations.Points:6.08 (6.08%)HPI explained in some detail with moderate understanding of chief complaint or no support from evidence based citations.Points:4 (4.00%)HPI explained in limited detail with marginal understanding of chief complaint and no support from evidence based citations.Points:2 (2.00%)HPI details limited with poor understanding of chief complaint and no evidence based citations to support.Physical Assessment, & Diagnostic tests/ proceduresPoints:8 (8.00%)Identifies comprehensive assessments parameters relevant to medical diagnoses with relevant diagnostic procedures supported by evidence based citations.Points:6.08 (6.08%)Identifies most relevant assessments parameters relevant to medical diagnosis with relevant diagnostic procedures supported by evidence based citations.Points:4 (4.00%)Identifies limited relevant assessments parameters relevant to medical diagnosis, relevant diagnostic procedures and vaguely supported by evidence based citations.Points:2 (2.00%)Fails to identify relevant assessments parameters relevant to medical diagnoses, relevant diagnostic procedures or not supported by evidence based citations.Past Medical &Surgical History, PathophysiologyPoints:8 (8.00%)Past medical/surgical history detailed with full explanation of Pathophysiology for each diagnosis & accurate details with specific detail related to the client’s history and symptoms and supported by evidence based citations.Points:6.08 (6.08%)Past medical/surgical history given with partial explanation of identified preexisting medical diagnoses & explanation accurate with some detail related to the client’s history and symptoms. supported by evidence based citations.Points:4 (4.00%)Past medical/surgical history given with minimal explanation of identified preexisting medical diagnoses & few details related to the client’s history and symptoms or not supported by evidence based citations.Points:2 (2.00%)No past medical/surgical history given without explanation; no pre-existing medical diagnosis identified or explanations inaccurate and not related to the client’s history and symptoms without evidence.Erikson’sDevelopmental StagesPoints:8 (8.00%)Identifies and defines correct stage with examples of meeting/not meeting tasks supported by evidence based citations.Points:6.08 (6.08%)Identifies and defines correct stage with examples of meeting/not meeting tasks supported by evidence based citations.Points:4 (4.00%)Identifies correct stage without adequate definition or example of meeting/not meeting tasks without evidence based citations.Points:2 (2.00%)Identifies incorrect stage without definition or inappropriate examples given, not supported by evidence based citations.Socioeconomic/ Psychosocial AssessmentPoints:8 (8.00%)Describes socioeconomic and cultural background in complete detail with references; Identifies 3 psychosocial concerns.Points:6.08 (6.08%)Describes socioeconomic and cultural background in some detail with references; Identifies 2 psychosocial concerns.Points:4 (4.00%)Describes socioeconomic and cultural background in vague detail without references; Identifies 1 psychosocial concern.Points:2 (2.00%)Describes socioeconomic and cultural background with no detail without references; Identifies no psychosocial concerns.InterprofessionalConsults & DischargeReferralsPoints:8 (8.00%)Lists 3 or more appropriate collaborative issues/concerns; Rationale demonstrates excellent understanding of consults and interventions.Points:6.08 (6.08%)Lists 2 appropriate collaborative issues/concerns; Rationale demonstrates satisfactory understanding of consults and interventions.Points:4 (4.00%)Lists 1 appropriate collaborative issue/concern; Rationale demonstrates vague understanding of consults and interventions.Points:2 (2.00%)Lists inappropriate collaborative issues/concerns; Rationale demonstrates unsatisfactory understanding of consults and interventions.Potential HealthDeviationsPoints:8 (8.00%)Identifies TWO prioritized risk factors in proper format; Writes 3 independent nursing interventions.Points:6.08 (6.08%)Identifies 1 prioritized risk factor in proper format; Writes 2 independent nursing interventions.Points:4 (4.00%)Identifies 2 prioritized risk factors but not in proper format; Writes 1 independent pertinent nursing intervention.Points:2 (2.00%)Does not identify prioritized risk factors; Writes 0-1 independent nursing intervention not pertinent to the diagnosis.PriorityNursing DiagnosisPoints:8 (8.00%)TWO (2) prioritized diagnoses written correctly with proper format with proper etiology with sufficient data to support the diagnosis.Points:6.08 (6.08%)One (1) prioritized diagnoses written correctly with proper format with proper etiology with sufficient data to support the diagnosis. Written correctly without sufficient data to support diagnosis.Points:4 (4.00%)Written incorrectly with sufficient data to support diagnosis, not a priority.Points:2 (2.00%)Written incorrectly, not in correct format, or without sufficient data to support diagnosis.Implementation andRationalePoints:9 (9.00%)Identifies 4 comprehensive nursing interventions which support each SMART goal and nursing diagnoses. Nursing interventions are appropriate and safe and demonstrates clinical reasoning. Includes nursing and pharmacological interventions. Includes at least 1 health teaching intervention that considers health literacy level and needs of patient/family. Includes psychosocial, spiritual, and cultural needs. Each is supported with scientific rationale using textbook or EBP.Points:6.84 (6.84%)Identifies 3 nursing interventions which support each SMART goal and nursing diagnoses. Nursing interventions are appropriate and safe and demonstrate clinical reasoning. Involved some independent nursing and pharmacological actions. Incomplete health teaching activities. Incomplete psychosocial, spiritual, and cultural needs addressed. Each is supported with scientific rationale using textbook or EBP.Points:4.5 (4.50%)Identifies 2 nursing interventions which support each SMART goal and nursing diagnoses. Nursing interventions are inappropriate, but safe and demonstrates poor clinical reasoning. Interventions were appropriate for the condition, but did not take into consideration the patient’s individual’s unique needs. Irrelevant health teaching activities. Does not individualize psychosocial, spiritual, and cultural needs. Each is supported with scientific rationale using textbook or EBP.Points:2.25 (2.25%)Identifies 1 independent intervtion with teaching Nursing interventions do not support each SMART goal and nursing diagnoses. Does not demonstrate clinical reasoning, were inappropriate or contraindicated the nursing diagnosis. Focused solely on physician orders and monitoring and did not include nursing actions . Did not mention health teaching activities. Does not include psychosocial, spiritual, and cultural needs. Are not supported with scientific rationale using textbook or EBP.Planning/Goals &EvaluationPoints:9 (9.00%)Goal is measureable, realistic, related to the problem; Data supports if goal is met, not met with appropriate revisions.Points:6.84 (6.84%)Goal is not measureable, realistic, related to the problem; Data somewhat supports if goal is met, not met with appropriate revisions.Points:4.5 (4.50%)Goal is not measureable, not realistic, related to the problem; Data vaguely supports if goal is met, not met with inappropriate revisions.Points:2.25 (2.25%)Goal is not measureable, not realistic, not related to the problem; Data does not support if goal is met, not met with inappropriate revisions.MedicationsPoints:9 (9.00%)Lists all MAR medications with relevant side effects and nursing considerations specific to patient and reasons why patient is receiving drug. Shows safe ranges by weight for infants and children or gives a rationale if it is out of range.Points:6.84 (6.84%)Lists all MAR medications but does not include relevant side effects and nursing considerations specific to patient and why patient is receiving drug. Shows safe ranges by weight for infants and children or gives a rationale if it is out of range.Points:4.5 (4.50%)Lists most of the MAR medications with relevant side effects and nursing considerations specific to patient and why patient is receiving drug. Shows safe ranges by weight for infants and children or gives a rationale if it is out of range.Points:2.25 (2.25%)Lists some MAR medications but does not include relevant side effects and nursing considerations specific to patient. Safe dosages by weight for infants and children are missing or incorrect.General OrganizationPoints:9 (9.00%)Accurate APA format; Appropriate citations & references; No spelling or grammar errors.Points:6.84 (6.84%)1-2 APA format errors; Some citations, references are appropriate; Minimal spelling or grammar errors.Points:4.5 (4.50%)Many APA format errors; Inappropriate citations or references; Many spelling or grammar errors.Points:2.25 (2.25%)No APA formatting; No citations or references included; Many spelling or grammar errors.
NURS 306 West Coast University Nursing Concept Map Notes

Summary: Submit a literature review of your chosen nutritional intervention. Include your understanding of the scholarly sources, how this

Summary: Submit a literature review of your chosen nutritional intervention. Include your understanding of the scholarly sources, how this intervention would best be implemented for a particular group/individual, and your works cited page. II. Requirements Core Requirements for the Week 6 Rough Draft · Length: 4-5 Pages (excludes title page and citation log) · Introduction · Thesis (stated in introduction and developed in body paragraphs of rough draft) · Focus on Organization and Readability of Work · Uses at least 5 quality sources, one of which is a primary source · Critical Analysis of Sources · Correct Use of Footnotes in APA Manual of Style. · Citation log which lists all your sources used in the rough draft III. Concluding Thoughts You should be able to lay the foundation of your research paper down in this rough draft. Performance feedback will be provided by your instructor after grading is complete. It is critical that you use your rough draft’s performance feedback to better your research paper prior to the submission of your final draft next week. I have included an outline though my thesis is a bit too broad, and some sources could be changed. thanks!

Niccolo Machiavelli versus Vladimir Putin

assignment writing services Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, closely resembles Machiavelli’s Prince. He was a private citizen who came to power in his own native land. Machiavelli refers to this as “Civil Principality.” Machiavelli says, “…this way of becoming a prince is obtained with the support of the common people or by the nobles….” (Machiavelli, 20) We will see how he had the support of both. Putin was born in a working-class family in Leningrad, USSR on October 7, 1952. He grew up in a Soviet Union-style communal apartment with two other families which was typical at the time. He studied law at Leningrad State University and spent 17 years as an agent working for the KGB, which was the equivalent to the United States’ Central Intelligence Agency. In 1991, when the USSR collapsed, he retired from the KGB with the rank of Lieutenant Colonel and went back to St. Petersburg (formally Leningrad, USSR) to work for the city’s first democratically elected mayor (and his former law professor), Anatoly Sobchak. Putin worked mostly behind the scenes and earned a reputation for his ability to get things done, and by 1994, he had risen to the post of first deputy mayor. In 1996, he moved to Moscow where he worked as the assistant to the Kremlin’s chief administrator, and with time, moved up in administrative positions. In July 1998, President Boris Yeltsin made Putin director of the FSB (successor to the KBG). In August 1999, President Yeltsin appointed Putin Prime Minister of Russia, the second highest ranking official. At this point in Putin’s career, he was virtually unknown. However, his public-approval ratings soared when he launched a military campaign against rebels in Chechnya. The public was tired of President Yeltsin’s inability to wipe out the rebels, and Putin was able to get the job done. In December 1999, when President Yeltsin named Putin acting president, the public voted, and Putin easily won the election for President in March 2000. In chapter 22, Machiavelli says, “A prince’s choice of minsters is important to him, and it’s up to him – to his intelligent foresight – whether he has good ones.” (Machiavelli, 48) When Putin won the presidential election, he started the task of consolidating his power. He divided Russia’s 89 regions and republics into 7 new federal districts, each headed by a representative he appointed. He also reduced the power of Yeltsin-era oligarchs by launching criminal proceedings against them. At the end of his second term as president, he backed Dmitry Medvedev to be his successor. As soon as Medvedev won the election in 2008, Medvedev appointed Putin as Russia’s Prime Minister. Even though Medvedev was president, it was widely speculated that Putin was still the main power in the Kremlin and Medvedev was doing as he was told by Putin. In 2011, Medvedev announced that if his and Putin’s political party would be victorious at the polls, the two would trade positions. In 2012, Putin was elected President for a third term and Medvedev was nominated Prime Minister. In Chapter 21, Machiavelli says, “A prince also gains prestige from being either a true friend or an outright enemy, i.e. says openly which side he favours in any conflict.” (Machiavelli, 47) In 2003, the United States and her ally, Britain, planned an invasion on Iraq. Putin joined Germany and France in opposing the invasion. Russia had extensive economic ties with Saddam Hussein’s regime, Moscow had billions of dollars’ worth of trade deals with Iraq, and Lukoil, a Russian owned oil company, had a large stake in the Iraqi oil industry. Russia gave Iraq and Saddam Hussein intelligence on the movements of American troops during the early days of the war. We also learn from Machiavelli it is important for a prince to preserve the appearance of goodness, but he must also learn to act immorally if necessary. “…it is necessary for a prince, if he wants to preserve himself, to learn how to not be good, and to use this knowledge and not use it, as necessity dictates.” (PPT slide 24) “…a prince who wants to keep his power must learn how to act immorally, using or not using this skill according to necessity.” (Machiavelli 33) While Putin has been president, there have been many accusations of the Kremlin acting immorally to silence opposition leaders and critics. A former Russian press minister was found dead in a Washington, DC hotel room due to blunt force trauma to the head. A British inquiry found that two FSB agents killed a former KGB agent in London after poisoning the victim’s cup of tea. A Russian journalist who accused Putin of turning his country into a police state was shot at point blank range near her home. Another journalist who worked with the one just mentioned was kidnapped from her home and later found in nearby woods with multiple gunshot wounds to the head. A human-rights lawyer who represented journalists was shot by a masked gunman. A former deputy prime minister accused Putin of taking bribes from oligarchs was shot four times in the back within yards of the Kremlin. An oligarch who threatened Putin after fleeing to Britain was found dead in his home in an apparent suicide by strangulation. Another journalist who wrote about corruption in the lives of wealthy Russians was killed in a drive-by shooting. A Russian politician who wanted to prove that Russia was behind a bombing of an apartment block was shot. The Kremlin has been linked to or accused of every one of these deaths, however, no one has been held responsible and no one has claimed responsibility. Works cited Burkeman, Oliver. “Russia Spied for Saddam in War – Pentagon Report.” The Guardian, 24 Mar. 2006, 19:49, www.theguardian.com/world/2006/mar/25/usa.russia. Cowell, Alan. “Putin ‘Probably Approved’ Litvinenko Poisoning, British Inquiry Says.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 21 Jan. 2016, www.nytimes.com/2016/01/22/world/europe/alexander-litvinenko-poisoning-inquiry-britain.html. Engel, Pamela. “How Vladimir Putin Became One of the Most Feared Leaders in the World.” Business Insider, Business Insider, 14 Feb. 2017, 10:04, www.businessinsider.com/how-vladimir-putin-rose-to-power-2017-2. “Third Presidential Term.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 21 Aug. 2019, www.britannica.com/biography/Vladimir-Putin/Third-presidential-term. Wilson, Jeremy. “Here’s a List of Putin Critics Who’ve Ended up Dead.” Business Insider, Business Insider, 11 Mar. 2016, 09:21, www.businessinsider.com/list-of-people-putin-is-suspected-of-assassinating-2016-3?r=UK

your choice

your choice.

Evidence-Based Clinical InterventionBy the due date assigned, submit your Evidence-Based Clinical Intervention to the Discussion Area.Your Evidence-Based Clinical Intervention should be submitted in a Microsoft Word document following APA style and should include the following:The medical problem/diagnosis/disease.Typical presenting signs and symptoms including:Onset, Characteristics, Location, Radiation, Timing, Setting, Aggravating factors, Alleviating factors, Associated symptoms, Course since onset, Usual age group affectedConcomitant disease states associated with the diagnosisThe pathophysiology of the problem.Three differential diagnoses and the usual presenting signs and symptoms in priority sequence with rationales.Reference to at least two current journal articles that show evidence-based practice as how to best treat this disorder related to the primary differential.The expected outcomes of the intervention.Algorithms if available.A typical clinical note in SOAP format.( subject what the patient tells you; objective what you observe or find on assessment; assessment plan )
your choice

Human Resource Management

Human Resource Management. Paper details Select an organization familiar to you. Explain the role of the human resource management process in a manager’s organizing function of the organization. Describe the process for acquiring competent employees in the organization. Explain how the orientation process is used for new employees. Explain at least two training items that the organization provides for their employees. Describe how the organization retains competent employees. Human Resource Management

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: