NSG 456 University of Phoenix the Power of Ai Research Paper.
Assignment ContentEvidence that supports a conclusion is part of the research process. Literature reviews often accompany research papers in the form of a summary and synthesis of the published information about the research topic. Although this week’s assignment is not a literature review, it is designed to familiarize you with the practice of finding appropriate sources and information on a topic.Find three original research articles that apply to your research topic. The articles must bepeer reviewed,recent (published within 5 years), andstatistically significant.Write a 260-word summary of each article in which you identifyparticipantsindependent variable(s),dependent variable(s),methods, andresults.Determine whether these articles are suitable for inclusion in a literature review for your research topic.If they are not, explain why. If they are, explain how the information can be used to inform practice.Compile all summaries in one document.Include a PDF of and APA citation for each article.Submit the articles and summaries.
Arguments for and against Human Genetic Engineering. Nora Sheskey Selective Genetic Engineering For millions of years, genetic selection has been the result of natural selection. Who someone is, natural abilities, physical characteristics, and a wide range of other personal attributes were the result of genetic recombination and accidental mutation. Furthermore, children are often born with hereditary conditions which are set by factors we have no control over. However, the advent of modern medicine has brought us to the brink of a time when we can choose to redirect nature and repair maladies in children, where we can artificially modify the very codes which guide their looks, which diseases they are resistant to, and even their personalities. Considering the facts concerning genetic engineering, the benefits which can be achieved far outweigh the potential risks with regard to both the reduction in human suffering and the likely increase in lifespan. The opponents of human genetic engineering often refer to a number of dangers involved in artificially manipulating genetic codes which result in such medical issues as Down’s syndrome, Hemophilia, and even anxiety and stress. With the completion of the Genome project, we can now more accurately map the human DNA than ever before, identifying the locations of defects that cause many of the maladies that have plagued mankind for millennia. Opponents of genetic manipulation are quick to point out that a slight error in the manipulation process can result in changing other sequences that could result in unforeseen and undesired effects. For instance, researcher Russell Powell has speculated that human genetic engineering might result in a lower genetic diversity which could lead to future generations that are more prone to having some types of diseases and which could, potentially, lead to the human race becoming extinct. Part of his research showed how genetic manipulation of crops in order to increase the availability of desirable crops increased the likelihood of catastrophic crop failure due to those crops becoming less genetically diverse over time and having reduced resistance to environmental factors which a wider genetic base would have prevented. He studied how such factors led to the nineteenth century Irish Potato Famine and how the organism Phytophthora was able to decimate much of the potato crop in Ireland due to this reduction in genetic diversity because of the farming methods in use in that region during that period of history. His research demonstrates that by reducing human genetic diversity through such techniques as genetic manipulation those human beings could set themselves up for a similar fate (Powell, R. 2012, pp. 204-5). Also, the work of Charles Gillespie, et. al., into how genetics affect the human stress response found that stress related genetic mutations in developing human fetuses increased the individual’s susceptibility to disorders such as depression and post-traumatic stress disorder later in life. They found that natural genetic manipulation due to a change in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal balance lead to an increase in susceptibility to stress related disorders in the associated human beings (Gillespie, C. F., 2009, p. 990). Opponents of genetic manipulation point out that accidentally manipulating the incorrect gene sequences could result in the same type of condition. Opponents use facts such as these in their outspoken aversion to the practice. Proponents of genetic engineering rebut the opponents by pointing out that the benefits of curing medical issues like Down’s syndrome and Hemophilia far outweigh the possible risks. They counter the opposition with a number of research studies. As part of his research, Powell determined that human genetic diversity is due to a combination of both mutation and recombination (Powell, R. 2012, pp. 215). He found that a number of different phenotypes can result from a single genotype which led him to conclude that accidental activation of inactive or incorrect sequences is unlikely to produce feared dramatic issues often spoken of by human genetic manipulation opponents. Additionally, he found that focusing on only DNA adaptive variation involved in human genetic manipulation would not result in an extensive homogenization of the human DNA feared by opponents and that other environmental factors play a significant part in human genetic diversity (Powell, R. 2012, pp. 207-8). In addition, Gordon and Hen found that properly utilized genetic manipulation can provide many useful results with an acceptable margin of safety. They studied twins to determine how anxiety response is genetically associated and how DNA sequencing and correction could help to treat the condition. They document that comparisons of fraternal and identical twins showed that 30% to 50% of risk of developing anxiety disorders comes from genetic factors with the remainder being attributed to environmental causes. They also used studies of rats and mice to show that anxiety is a genetic condition and could be treatable using genetic manipulation techniques (Gordon, J. A.,Arguments for and against Human Genetic Engineering
In this assignment, you will apply some techniques of the cooking as inquiry method by cooking one of your favorite recipes. Consider a recipe for a meal you enjoy. This could be a breakfast your grandmother cooked you when you were a child, a lunch you tried on a trip to another country, or a special holiday dinner. Before cooking this recipe, begin this assignment by writing down the exact recipe and why you selected this recipe. What is the importance or significance of this recipe to you? Next, cook the recipe and eat the meal. After the foodmaking and eating process, return to this assignment. Write about the cooking process, the ingredients you used, and how the recipe turned out on the plate. Then write about the eating process, what the meal tasted like, and whether or not you enjoyed the recipe. End your reflection by discussing any memories that emerged during the cooking and eating process. Be sure that your finished reflection is drafted in a 400-500 word document.
A Basic Unit Of Socialisation Sociology Essay. The family has been assumed by many sociologists as a basic unit of socialisation, which plays key function, such as socialising children. The functionalist view the family as a positive institution that has positive function, while feminists sees the family as negative and reproduces patriarchy. Marxism believes the family reproduce labour force while interactionists view families as different and unique. Functionalists focus on nuclear family and see the latter as the basic building block of family socialisation. They believe that the family is a positive and beneficial institution in which family members receive nurturing and care. They look at the family on a macro scale. Functionalist believe that society is based on consensus, this means we are all socialised to agree on how to behave known as norms, and what is right and wrong known as values. For example when there is no crime, society benefits by maintaining social order .They believe that each part of society has a function to make sure that society runs smoothly and everything stays in harmony, for example, the family’s function is to socialise children and, education has a function to make sure that people are educated to be good at the job they will get after school. (Taylor and Richardson et al, 2002) Murdock (1949) studied 250 different societies and concluded that the family is so functional to society, that it is unavoidable and universal that neither the individual nor society could survive without it. He argued that every nuclear family has these four essential functions without which society could not continue: sexual, reproductive, economic and education. Without sexual and reproductive, no member of society would be there. Life would stop if there was no economic function that is family providing for its members, and without education, socialisation would not be there hence absence of culture. Murdock has been criticised for not considering whether the functions of the family could be performed by other social institutions and he does not examine alternatives to the family. (Taylor and Richardson et al, 2002) Parsons (1955) studied the modern American family in the 50s. He argued that there are two basic and irreducible functions of the family. The first is the primary socialisation of children, which Parsons sees as a responsibility of the family to shape the child’s personality to suite to the needs of society. The second function is the stabilisation of adult personalities. The adults gets emotional support from family necessary to cope with the stresses of everyday life. Parsons, as with Murdock, has been criticised for showing the picture of the family as attuned children and compassionate spouses caring for each other’s needs. (Taylor and Richardson et al, 2002). There is a natural division of labour within the nuclear family, roles are segregated positively and everyone carry out different roles, for example the instrumental male, whose role is to provide for the family and thus the bread winner, and expressive female whose role is to provide warmth, love and care for children at home. Based on Biology the woman is the child bearer therefore has to look after the child. This role maintains social stability. Family patterns have changed with time such as cohabitation, rise of reconstituted families and increase in single or lone parent in western family life. Which has even made divorce easier to obtain. Functionalist theory has been criticised to have concentrated on the family being positive and gives little attention to its weaknesses, while in feminism the nuclear family is oppressive to women due to gender distinctions in domestic duties. Functionalists argue that the family is of equal profit to everyone, however marxists argue that society was developed by the need of the capitalist economy. It is the bourgeoisie who benefits not the whole society. Functionalists focus too much on the significance that the family has in society and disregard the sense family life has for individual. (Haralambos and Holborn, 2008) Radical psychiatric argue against functionalism for ignoring the negative aspect of the family like domestic violence. Functionalists also ignore different types of families by focussing mainly on nuclear family. Interactionist David Clark (1991) identified four types of marriage arguing against functionalist, saying not all families are the same. Functionalists depict everything as positive in the family while radical psychiatric looks at the negative side of the family. Feminism is a conflict theory that sees the family as patriarchal. They believe that men gain more in a family than women. They view the family on a macro scale. Feminists shows how men dominate social relationships, thus symmetrical conjugal roles is seen as an allegory. Feminists argue that men oppress women through domestic violence, the economic involvement to society made by women’s domestic labour within the family. Liberal feminist Wollstonecraft (1792) wanted equality for women in terms of rights, liberties and vote by the change of law and policy. A radical feminist like Millett (1970) argues that the organisation of society enables men to dominate women. They believed that gender distinctions are politically and socially constructed therefore wanted radical reforms and social change. Kate Millet invented the term “The personal is political” meaning everything in society is political. Radical feminists think not just patriarchal men that benefit from family but all men. (Haralambos and Holborn, 2008) Marxists feminist believe that the destruction of the capitalist society brings equality to everything. Lesbian feminists believe society forces women into heterosexuality so that men can oppress them. They challenge heterosexuality as a means of male supremacy. Humanist feminists argue that society only allows men to self-develop not women, and that society distorts women’s human potential. Marxist feminist Bentson (1972) argues that family responsibilities make male workers less likely to withdraw from labour, with wife and children to support. Ansley (1972) sees the emotional support in family, stabilises male workers thus making them less likely to take their frustration out on the system. Feeley (1972) sees the family as a dictatorial unit dominated by the husband. The family values teach obedience, children learn to accept hierarchy and their position in it. Greer (2000) is a radical feminist who believes that family life continues to disadvantage and oppress women. She points out Britain has very high divorce rate thus less stability in families. (Haralambos and Holborn, 2008) Marxist feminist, like functionalist tend to ignore the diversity of modern family life, assuming everyone lives in heterosexual nuclear family. They paint a very negative picture of family life possibly exaggerated. Functionalists see male and female roles being different but equal, Marxist feminists believe that men dominate family relationships. Feminist theory discards functionalist view, that society as a whole is benefited by socialisation in the family but rather men benefits more. Women are portrayed as passive victims of exploitation. It does not take into account women who abuse men by fighting back. Functionalists believe that norms and values benefits society while for feminist they benefit men more. Feminists focus on nuclear family only and the negative aspect of it. Marxism view family on a macro scale. The Marxist perspective is a conflict theory, which sees socialisation process of the family, results in the spread of a ruling class philosophy. Whereby individuals are deceived into accepting the capitalist system and the supremacy of the capitalist class thus hegemony.Bourgoisie benefits by creating a labour force and proletariat continue to be exploited. Engel (1972) argued that bourgeois nuclear family is an institution which oppresses women. They were seen mainly as children bearers, economically dependent to their husbands and remain faithful to them. According to Engels the family is designed to control women and protect property, thus men needed to know their children in order to pass on their property. (Taylor and Richardson et al, 2002) Marxists say the family serves capitalism in four ways. The family acts as a safety valve for the stress and frustration of working class men, the family plays as a unit of consumption, purchases the goods and services provided by capitalism. Women domestic work is unpaid which benefits capitalism and lastly the family socialises children thereby reproducing both labour power and acceptance of capitalism false consciousness. Zaretsky (1976) analysed that the family is one place where male workers can feel they have power and control. This helps them accept their oppression in wider society. Furthermore Zaretsky sees the family as a main prop to the capitalist economy. Marxists view of divorce in families is seen by increased economic pressure from unemployment, this may place added strain. Family members living longer could increase pressure on relationships. (Taylor and Richardson et al, 2002) Marxists decline the functionalist view that society is based on value consensus, and thus benefits all. Instead they see the welfare of powerful groups influencing the way society is controlled. Marxists view ignores family diversity. It sees the nuclear family as being simply determined by the economy. This theory reproduces conflict between classes, bourgeoisie and proletariat, while a functionalist family operates as united, everything benefits society. Capitalist system is dominated both economically by rich at the expense of the poor, but seen as a fair system by functionalists that works together in the interest of all members causing limited conflict in society. Anthropologists have suggested that the emergence of the nuclear family did not actually coincide with emergence of capitalism. Somerville (2000) argues that Zaretsky exaggerates the importance of the family as a protection from life in capitalist society. Contrary to functionalist marxists focus on the negative aspect of the family and ignores the positive function. (Taylor and Richardson et al, 2002) Interactionism also known as interpretive humans are seen as symbolic creatures, meaning we define what is around us through signs and language. They study families on a micro scale instead of generalising the whole population. They also look at what family life is actually like, rather than how it should be or how it is assumed to be.Interactionists view families as different and unique thus there is no one way of family life, like other perspectives would suggest. The way a family behaves and interacts is based on interpretation of meanings and roles. We are products of our culture what we take as common sense or reality varies according to the culture we live in. (Taylor and Richardson et al, 2002) Goffman (1969) compares life to drama, we are actors who take on roles and act them out as public performances. Each role has its own script which tells us how to act and what cues to expect from other members involved in our interaction. Bauman (1990) argues that roles and relationships learnt in the family are essential to shaping our future. Not all families are close and warm family metaphors are often used to represent closeness, for example using the term brother and sister amongst members of political organisations. (Haralambos and Holborn, 2008) Berger and Kellner (1964) looked at socially constructed roles in a marriage, argues that the reality of marriage is an ongoing construction which needs to be reaffirmed, negotiated and renegotiated. Clark (1991) conducted a study of how couples constructed a meaningful marriage. He identified four types of marriage. Drifting marriages, where meanings and ideas of the future are unclear, surfacing marriages often made up of people who have been married before, establishing marriages which newly wed couple plan for long term future, and lastly struggling marriages, with financial problems often from unemployment, which causes tension and anxiety. The conjugal roles in interactionism show that the roles of husband and wife are constantly evolving. For example both husband and wife working and sharing domestic tasks. (Haralambos and Holborn, 2008) Interactionist view families on a micro scale, discovering how individuals make family life based on interactions with each other. They are not interested in generalisations about family life but seek to understand how families are unique. They go further than the common sense view of families that functionalism believes in and look at the meanings of what family life is actually like. Unlike functionalism, Marxism and feminism, where there is a set function of the family, interactionism is different for there is no one set function of the family. Families can differ based on their interactions, meanings, roles and culture. The discovery of four different types of marriage offers an opposing argument to functionalism, not an ideal nuclear family. (Haralambos and Holborn, 2008) It has been criticised while concentrating on meanings, motives and action it ignores the wider structures in which families operate and are shaped. Sometimes generalisations of families are useful as they allow the development of political social policy. Interpretive approaches try to comprehend the family from the perspective of its members. This research has shown from different sociologist and approaches that the family life has evolved as modernity is progressing. The changes involved have made the family better suited to meeting the needs of society, and of family members. Theoretical approaches to the family, such as difference feminism and postmodernism, have emphasized the variety of family types and living arrangements that exist in contemporary society. A Basic Unit Of Socialisation Sociology Essay
NSG 456 University of Phoenix the Power of Ai Research Paper
CRM 332 Saint Leo Universtiy Organized Crime and Terrorism Essay
CRM 332 Saint Leo Universtiy Organized Crime and Terrorism Essay.
Please visit the following two websites and closely review the content: http://securityintelligence.com/why-organized-crime-and-terror-groups-are-converging/ and Convergence of Terrorism & Transnational Crime.pdf (chds.us) Following your review please (1) Provide a detailed and comprehensive commentary regarding all new and insightful information gained and place particular emphasis on your key take-aways regarding the growing nexus between organized crime groups and terrorists AND (2) Separately and distinctively identify the potential impact such partnerships can have on homeland security in the future. As always, provide APA style and format in-text citations in the body of your initial commentary connected to the web reference provided at the end of your initial post in order to potentially improve your scoring. Hopefully this is another informative and knowledge building assignment.
CRM 332 Saint Leo Universtiy Organized Crime and Terrorism Essay
Bloomfield College Selecting the Correct Verbs for a Sentence Paper
essay help online free Bloomfield College Selecting the Correct Verbs for a Sentence Paper.
Click “Share Access” to give free and unlimited access to this question for up to 3 friekaylajohnsonQUESTION 1Ana: (Yo)___________a la fiesta.3.031 points QUESTION 2–Pero nosotros____________________al gimnasio3.031 points QUESTION 3Eduardo estudia en su casa.__________________________________3.031 points QUESTION 4¿A dónde van Uds. mañana? ______________________________playa3.031 points QUESTION 5¿A dónde vas (tú) los viernes en la noche? ______________________________tiendas3.031 points QUESTION 6__________________________________________________________al parque (park)3.031 points QUESTION 7Pablo: Es el aniversario de mis abuelos y nosotros ____________a comer en un restaurante muy bueno.3.031 points QUESTION 8Pablo: (Yo) _________al cine.3.031 points QUESTION 9Tomas y Andrea trabajan el domingo______________________________________3.031 points QUESTION 10Ana: Tú ____________a gozar3.031 points QUESTION 11¿A dónde van Uds. mañana? _____________________________iglesia3.031 points QUESTION 12Lourdes descansa (to rest) en la residencia estudiantil________________________________________________________3.031 points QUESTION 13Ana: iHola, Pablo! ¿Adónde________ahora?3.031 points QUESTION 14¿A dónde vas (tú) los viernes en la noche? _____________________________________ cafetería3.031 points QUESTION 15–¿Qué ________________a hacer Uds?3.031 points QUESTION 16Pablo: No, (yo) no _________3.031 points QUESTION 17Ana: No, tengo que estudiar y después mi hermana y yo __________al parque.3.031 points QUESTION 18¿A dónde vas (tú) los viernes en la noche? _______________________________centro (down town)3.031 points QUESTION 19Pablo: ¿___________conmigo?3.031 points QUESTION 20Pablo: Tengo que ____________a la casa de mis abuelos3.031 points QUESTION 21¿A dónde vas (tú) los viernes en la noche? _______________________________________mercados3.031 points QUESTION 22Pablo: Mis padres _____________también.3.031 points QUESTION 23¿A dónde vas (tú) los viernes en la noche? _____________________________________escuela3.031 points QUESTION 24Rafael y yo practicamos baloncesto (basketball).____________________________________________________3.031 points QUESTION 25_____________________________________________________ fútbol con mis amigos3.031 points QUESTION 26Ana: Y tú, ¿ __________ a la fiesta también?3.031 points QUESTION 27_____________________________________________________ música3.031 points QUESTION 28David y Patricia comen en un restaurante colombiano_________________________________________________________3.031 points QUESTION 29–Tú __________________a la librería, ¿verdad?3.031 points QUESTION 30–Si yo _______________a la biblioteca3.031 points QUESTION 31____________________________________________________al concierto3.031 points QUESTION 32Pablo: ¿Qué_________a hacer el fin de semana?3.031 points QUESTION 33_________________________________________________________ libros en la librería (bookstore)3.031 points
Bloomfield College Selecting the Correct Verbs for a Sentence Paper
Miami Dade College Influenza Virus Community Disaster Preparedness Discussion
Miami Dade College Influenza Virus Community Disaster Preparedness Discussion.
Explore your community and find an advertisement that represents helping community members be prepared for a disaster- (ATTACHED) ITS AN ADVERTISEMENT FROM CVS PHARMACYDescribe the message the advertisement is conveying.Describe how the message impact preparedness.Next, identify one community setting that is impacted by the disaster advertisement you sharedSettings:Correctional facilitiesHome healthSchoolsForensic areasHospiceFaith communitiesOccupational healthAnalyze at least one nursing role (related to disaster preparedness in that setting. Example: In the school setting, what actions and interventions would be involved with the nurse as coordinator of disaster preparedness?Identify at least one key stakeholder related to the setting that a CHN could collaborate with regarding disaster preparedness. Include why this collaboration is important.Uploaded pictureParagraph one: Describe the message the advertisement is conveying and how the message impact preparedness.Paragraph two: Identify one community setting that is impacted by the disaster advertisement you shared. Analyze at least one nursing role related to disaster preparedness in that setting.Paragraph three: Identify at least one key stakeholder related to the setting that a CHN could collaborate with regarding disaster preparedness. Include why this collaboration is important.Resources: Where did you find your data? 1 SCHOLARLY OUTSIDE SOURCE AND TEXTBOOK: Nies, M. A., & McEwen, M. (2019). Community/Public health nursing: Promoting the health of populations (7th ed.). Saunders/Elsevier.
Miami Dade College Influenza Virus Community Disaster Preparedness Discussion
Industry Comparison of the Oil
Introduction Description of the luxury automotive industry in Canada This report seeks to explore the luxury automotive industry in Canada with a focus on comparison with the oil and gas industry. This comparison shall take on a number of factors analyzed in respect of the recent and future developments in these two industries. The Canadian automotive industry has continued to record tremendous improvements in terms of sales, growth of product portfolio, and overall profitability. Numerous companies dealing with the assembly, marketing, distribution and repair of luxury vehicles characterize the Canadian automotive industry. The luxury car industry is comprised of vehicles assembled with add-ons at an added cost. They include luxury minivans, convertibles, sedans, and SUVs (Desrosiers n. p). The luxury car industry includes all vehicles that feature added amenities at an additional cost. The category includes luxury minivans, SUVs, convertibles, sedans. This topic covers news on the luxury car industry, including details on some of the top manufacturers and brands. The global financial recession continues to shape consumer behavior across the industry. With the rising propensity to consume luxury automotives, the value of money will take a entirely new approach (Desrosiers n. p). The recent crisis shall leave a lasting effect on the car manufacturers to embrace the value for customers’ money and safety. A recent survey by Deloitte Consulting indicates that firms that prioritize value and safety will remain the most competitive and success in the future. The industry forecast indicates that the new class of luxury car buyers will dominate in most of emerging markets that shall focus on low-cost, low technology cars compared to the newly established wealthy segment of customers seeking extremely luxurious cars (Desrosiers n. p). Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Discussion Comparison between luxury Automotive industry and Oil