I’m working on a political science writing question and need a sample draft to help me study.
The paper should be a maximum of three pages, double-spaced, in 12-point type. Please write the topics listed below.Briefly summarize Chancellor Angela Merkel’s leadership style, as it is perceived by the German public. What does the public see as Merkel’s strengths, and what are her perceived weaknesses? In what ways has her image been shaped by the experience of leading a ‘Grand Coalition” government in partnership with the Social Democratic Party?The format of the paper is just like the first one, this is NOT a research paper. Please create sub-titles and make sure to answer all the questions above.
New York University German Politics & Chancellor Angela Merkel Discussion
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Psychology Essay
1. Introduction This essay will look at Post-traumatic stress disorder; Specific reference will be made to the Diagnosis, Epidemiology, Treatment, Stress- Diathesis Model and PTSD on other disorders. According to Grohol (2010) he stated that Post-traumatic- Stress disorder also known as PTSD forms part of anxiety disorder, being a weakening condition follows a horrifying, and traumatic event. The point after the event usually leads a person to recall the horrifying event of memory and can start becoming emotionally frozen with those they were once close too. A traumatic experience can be anything from mugging, attacks, witnessing an event that can be scarring, rape, natural disasters etcâ€¦ different people experience different events more traumatizing then others therefore it is hard to pin point exactly what specific event are traumatizing, as some children may experience a divorce as a traumatic event. 2. Diagnosis According to the National institution for mental health (NIMH) (2009) they looked at the signs and symptoms of PTSD and stated that it should always be a good starting point when looking at the possibility of someone having PTSD. NIMH (2009) stated that there are three specific seen as the main symptoms: ‘Re-experiencing symptoms’, ‘Avoidance symptoms’ and ‘hyper arousal symptoms’. The Re-experiencing symptoms are stuff such as scary thought, nightmares and recurrences. Carlson and Ruzek (2010) stated that some of the symptoms could be getting upset, flashbacks of the ordeal, Bad dreams, Getting upset when reminded, Anxiety or fear build up, Anger or aggressive, problem controlling emotions, issues thinking clearly . She went on saying that physical responses also noticed such has, unable to fall asleep, become shaky or sweaty, heavy breathing, always being on the lookout, not eating and heavy heart rate. Avoidance symptoms are depression, demotivated, emotionless, disconnected etcâ€¦ and lastly hyper arousal is tension and troubles sleeping. Re-experiencing the event can cause issues in one’s everyday life, avoidance can cause personal drifting from family and friends and hyper arousal makes a person become disinterested therefore their occupation starts paying the prices. Can (2006) looked at different aspects of avoidance in PTSD: Avoiding conversations, Trouble recalling parts of ordeal, Emotionless, Becomes affectionless, Find reality unreal, Feeling constantly weird, Feeling physically numb, Not feeling pain or other sensations and Losing interest in actives they once enjoyed. Simple material like this can provide a therapist with a clear base of diagnosis, therefore then looking further into the disorder by looking at the DSM-IV-TR. The national center for PTSD (2007) stated that the American Psychiatric Association in 2000 reviewed the PTSD diagnostic criteria in the fourth edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) and made some brush ups. According to the DSM-IV-TR there are six criteria that a practitioner needs to focuses on when diagnosing someone with PTSD. According to the DSM-IV (2000): Criteria A: stressor The individual experienced traumatic events in which both are present: 1) Experienced, witnessed, or confronted with an event or events that involve threatened death or serious injury. 2) The person’s reaction occupied complex fear, helplessness, or horror. In children: expressed by disorganized behavior. Criterion B: intrusive recollection The disturbing incident is insistently being re-experienced in at least one (or more) of the following ways: 1) Persistent and unpleasant recollections of the event, including images, thoughts, or perceptions. In children: recurring play themes connecting to event. 2) Recurrent dreams of the event. In children: nightmare without conscious awareness of content. 3) Behaving or feeling that event will be repeated e.g., flashes, illusions, memories induced due to intoxication etcâ€¦in children: trauma-specific reenactment may occur. 4) Powerful psychological distress at exposure (internal or external cues) that signify or look like an aspect of the event. 5) physiological reactivity upon exposure to number 4. Criterion C: avoidant/numbing Constant abstention of stimuli linked with the trauma, Three (or more) of the following should be present: 1) Attempts to avoid recalling or speaking about the trauma. 2) They keep away from behaviors, residences, or individuals that can bring about the reappearing of the trauma. 3) Cannot remember a significant part about the event. 4) Reduced interest in certain activities. 5) Sense of disconnection or alienation from people. 6) Loss of affection 7) feels the future shall be a nightmare. Criterion D: hyper-arousal Constant stimulation that occurs that was not present before the trauma, at lease two (or more) of the following should be noticed: 1) Trouble sleeping. 2) Irregular anger moods. 3) Lack of awareness. 4) Being constantly tense. 5) Overstressed frighten reaction. Criterion E: duration If symptoms in B, C, and D are longer than one month. Criterion F: functional significance If the event causes impairment in social, work and other significant function for a person. Stipulate if: Acute: if period of symptoms is less than three months. Chronic: if length of symptoms is three months or longer. Therefore for a person to be diagnosed they need to have the symptoms above present for at least a month or longer after the traumatic incident has occurred. The reason for these specific criteria is so that a mental disorder can be diagnosed correctly instead of their being a normal unhappy period so to say that causes general stress levels, which last for a week or so that could resemble PTSD but in actuality it is not. Griez et al (2001) said that there are 6 specific varieties of PTSD that the diagnosis root can follow:1) Borderline personality disorder, 2) Behavioral hyperactivity, 3) Dissociative disorders, 4) Somatoform, 5) Post-traumatic personality change or disorder and lastly the commonly know one 6) Post-traumatic stress disorder. Can (2006) said that there are common secondary and associated posttraumatic symptoms. Secondary symptoms: are issues that develop because of the re-experiencing and avoidance symptoms of PTSD. For example, one is avoiding communication about event therefore cutting family off and becoming a loner instead. Associated symptoms: Do not come straight from being frozen with fear; they happen because of other things that were going on at the time of the trauma. For example, a person who is mentally traumatized in a car accident might have physically gotten hurt and cannot do the things they use to therefore becoming or developing depression. Can (2006) listed some of the secondary or associated trauma symptoms: Depression, Aggression, Despair, hopelessness, shame, guilt, self-blame, interpersonal issues, detachment, loss of interest, identity issues, lower self-esteem, eating irregularity, alcohol and drug abuse etcâ€¦ 3. Epidemiology According to Barlow and Durand (2009) briefly stated that epidemiology is a researching process examining the disturbance, prevalence (number of people exhibiting the specific disorder) and disadvantages of having a specific disorder in the population. Gradus (2011) went on looking at the prevalence in connection with PTSD. To further expand on what prevalence is, it is the study of a percentage of people in a population that have a specific disorder at a specific period, therefore indicating the current cause of the disorder. This looks at a person age, gender, how long the disorder shall last, when the disorder will change etcâ€¦Looking at prevalence in PTSD Gradus (2011) said that no exact studies looked evaluated the prevalence among children; instead, it looked at the children that have a low threshold for developing the disorder. Schnurr, Friedman and Bernardy (2002) went on giving statistical prevalence’s for the different genders. They said that males are 10 percent more likely then females to experience a traumatic event, for every 20 percent of females that are more likely to develop post- traumatic stress disorder only 8 percent of males are likely to develop it. They continued saying that females are four times more liable in developing PTSD then males, also when it comes to races those that are non- white according to Schnurr et al (2002) are at higher risk of obtaining PTSD as appose to white. Lastly they mentioned that younger and little educated people also get PTSD quicker because they did not have the correct social support needed after experiencing a dramatic event. Griez et al. (2001) said that Epidemology of PTSD can also be describes by three specific aspects, one being the Demographics and Risk Factors, secondly the Comorbidity and lastly Natural Course of PTSD: The demographic and risk factors they stated as showing how widows and ladies that have gotten divorced show a high variability to getting PTSD. They are few characteristics that effect PTSD and can be the cause dude to demographic and the easier risk factor, stressor and exposure (re-experiencing the event), Gender ( Females usually more weaker to PTSD), Age ( Younger are at more risk), Developmental (if experienced in childhood usually becomes chronic), psychiatric history (other disorders such as depression) , family characteristics (whether is runs in the family) and cultural factors ( Specific culture group and religion and there view on PTSD can cause the internal and external expression). What Griez et al. (2001) picked up about Comorbidity is that 88.3 percent of males and 79 percent of females who have a present disorder and then exposed to a traumatic event can evidently develop lifetime PTSD. Lastly what Griez (2001) and his fellow collogues mention was Natural course; they briefly mentioned that more than one-third of individuals with a pilot incident of PTSD neglected to improve even after many years, hence becoming chronic. Griez et al (2001) went on explaining that a study was done to back up the statement that the increase of PTSD is starting to become lifelong. An analysis of 61 Vietnam combat veterans with PTSD disclosed that onset of symptoms typically occurred at the time of acquaintance to combat trauma in Vietnam and enhanced rapidly during the first few years after the war, Symptoms increased therefore becoming chronic. 4. Treatment Bennett (2003) closely looked at various treatment options for those suffering from PTSD. He stated that one way to prevent PTSD is by ‘psychological debriefing’. A psychological debriefing a typical therapeutic session, which is one-on-one with the client, this is best straight after the traumatic experience has occurred. By going for therapy straight after an event, it better helps the client cope with their build up emotions and therefore express and manage it in a suitable way that shall not cause future impairment or emotional numbness. According to Griez, Faravelli, Nutt and Zohar (2001) they showed that a study was conducted on victims of confirmed child abuse and neglect were evaluated and matched with a group of paralleled non-abused and non-neglected children and followed into adulthood. Victims of child abuse (sexual and physical) and neglect were found to be at a more critical threat of developing PTSD. This concluded how important therapy can be after a traumatic incident. Bennett (2003) went on looking at three alternative treatment options, namely ‘exposure technique’, ‘Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR)’ and ‘Pharmacological interventions’. Exposure techniques are re-exposing an individual to that memory of the event and all the emotions and feeling connected to that event. This should be done in a control and safe environment for the client and CBT (cognitive- behavioral therapy) can be useful and relaxation techniques such as meditation or deep breathing. Shapiro discovered EMDR in 1990 by accident, Shapiro (1995) stated that one occasion when she was having a stroll in the woods her troubling thought began slowly vanishing, and when she had extracted the memories, again it was not as distressing as pervious occasions. She concluded that this happened because of her spontaneous eye movement that was moving rapidly back and forward and the up diagonally. Bennett (2003) went on explaining the EMDR treatment which is having an individual recall the central trauma with a negative though in mind, then the client should find strengthening emotions to comeback the negative emotion. While this occurs the counsellor tell them to trace his/her finger moving back and forth, each minute the finger speed increases, usually occurs in 24 movements then the client need to stop and let go. The process is repeated until progress is seen of a weakening of the stress level toward the specific event. The last treatment option Bennett (2003) looked at was Pharmacological interventions, which in short is prescribing various types of medication to the client; the most popular form of drug that is given is antidepressant. Smith and Segal (2011) added two other types of treatment roots that one could follow namely ‘Trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy’ and ‘Family therapy’. ‘Trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy’ is CBT (Cognitive-behavioral therapy) for patients with PTSD and trauma includes wisely and slowly “exposing” oneself to mental, emotional, and conditions that recap the trauma. This is effective because it helps tame the irrational thinking and bring back that rational thought and showing the person there is in fact life after this event to look forward to. ‘Family therapy’, Smith and Segal (2011) said that seeing as PTSD effects not only the person experiencing it but also has an impact on the persons immediate family/surrounding this therapist journey should be considered. This aids family in gaining knowledge into the persons feeling and let them walk in those with PTSD shoes, there is also room for providing better interpersonal communication between the members of the family, forming a stronger support system for the client who has been exposed to that life changing event. Smith and Segal (2011) said that it’s important for a person with PTSD to implement self-help regulations in their life such as, avoiding alcohol, seeking out help, educated oneself about disorder and look at the advantages and disadvantages and aiming at converting those disadvantages to help benefit oneself. The Therapeutic databases involve relaxation, useful in the case of high levels of emotional arousal, avoided Situations or imaginings related to the trauma, and cognitive therapy. As stipulated by Griez et al (2001) six approaches have been intended: 1. Systematic desensitization – showing the dreaded agitations under relaxed environment. 2. Exposure in imagination- adjusting the patient to the repelled stimulus, by decreasing irregular reactivity and avoidance. 3. Stress management enforcing ways to help maintain anxiety levels and keep relaxed. 4. Cognitive therapy- similar to stress management and helping them deal internally. 5. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR)- which was discussed above. 6. Debriefing- Also discussed above about seeking out therapy in the early stages of when the event was experienced. When it comes to treating children, the task becomes a little different, van As and Naidoo (2006) said that when a child has become traumatized its important for not just the child to seek out counselling but also the primary care-giver mainly because it helps the care-give implement specific steps to help the child cope. The care-giver should enforce a safe environment, be supportive and gain better knowledge about how the child is feeling and how to react to that. The child on the other hand should be able to recall the story in a safe environment apart from their house, ensuring the child that they are not the cause of whatever has happened to them, as children love blaming themselves and just having a supportive figure through this rough time. They went on saying that the best root of treatment is in fact therapy, whether it is long term or short term. According to NIMH (2009) there are three main medication roots: 1. Benzodiazepines: for relaxing and sleep, negative: memory issues or become addicted medication. 2. Antipsychotics. For Control reaction, Negative: weight gain higher risk of getting heart disease and diabetes. 3. Antidepressants: Feel less tense or upset. Can (2006) said that there three basic line of medication, first line, second line and third line, she jotted down a list of medication that falls under each line for example: First-line Fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline etcâ€¦ Second-line Fluvoxamine, mirtazapine, risperidone, olanzapine etcâ€¦ Third-line Amitriptyline, imipramine, escitalopram Adjunctive: carbamazepine, gabapentin, valproate, clonidine, etcâ€¦ Cole (n.d.) concurred that using CBT and EMBR is on of the effect roots of treating PTSD; he specifically looked at three people in his center called The York stress and trauma center (YSTC) that personally underwent therapy in those two areas and have concluded that it was a great success. He looked at the cases of Emma, Steve and Trevor. Emma was a married mother of two, at 49 years of ages she had a full time position that expected her to drive a lot. June last year she was in a terrible car accident, she managed to make it out safely. Since this event has occurred she has be utterly afraid of driving or being driven. She began having nightmares and became anxious when she had to be in a car, after 6 months has passed she finally sought out therapy. Steve on the other hand was a Royal Marine sergeant, while serving out his duty; he was blown up by a mortar. 20 years had passed yet he still experienced minor post trauma symptoms. He developed severe PTSD when yet again he was blown up by a mortar in one of his training program. Lastly, Trevor as a child was sexually abused by a family relative, he was able to marry but his childhood trauma returned when they decided they wanted to start a family. What concerned him most was that the childhood event would destroy his relationship with his family or cripple him in starting a loving one. Cole and the York stress and trauma center (YSTC) Implemented CBT and EMDR into the therapeutic process and they saw results, within 6 sessions they where able to help Emma get rid of her fear of driving, Steve and Trevor took little more time to help overcome their trauma but in the end they did. Steve began duty again and Trevor started a family without the fear of his childhood experience. 5. PTSD on other disorders and Diathesis- Stress Model Friedman and Schustack (2009) explained that the Diathesis- Stress model is a predisposition, usually seen as heredity, of the body to a specific disease or disorder. They went on saying that this bring in the debate of the Nurture/ nature, they are not too sure whether the predisposition comes from a persons inheritance or their up bring. Barlow and Durand (2009) added to the explanation of the model saying that people inherit tendencies to express specific traits or behaviors under particular stressful conditions. Schnurr et al. (2002) said that researcher and therapist quarreled that the DSM-IV criteria does not fully portray sufficiently the symptoms that people with that traumatic background experience. They said that there are mutual ones such as ‘Complex PTSD’ or ‘Disorder of extreme stress’ (DES) that could also be part of PTSD. Vals (2005) said that when it comes to PTSD there could be many other disorders that have similar appearance such as acute stress disorder, Adjustment Disorder, Depersonalization Disorder, Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), Panic Disorder and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). Acute stress disorder: is an anxiety disorder that matures within one month after a harsh traumatic event. Adjustment Disorder: is an abnormal reaction to a life stressor e.g. Divorce. Depersonalization Disorder: is where a person scrutinizes his or her own physical actions or cognitive processes. Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID): is serious and chronic and may lead to disability and incapacity, seen to have a high suicide rate. Panic Disorder: makes the person trust that they are either seriously ill or going to die. This can become serious they can develop Agoraphobia (fear and avoidance of situations). Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD): constant worry and anxiety about your well-being, employment, wealth or personal life, last usually atleast six months. Yager (2007) when on concurring Vals statement and agreed that people with PTSD are vulnerable in getting more disorder on top of that. Meaning that it suggest that the great majority of individuals with PTSD intersect criteria for at least one other psychiatric disorder. Wenar and Kerig (2000) looked at the comorbidity of PTSD and said that usually four different aspects have common conditions of PTSD; the common four are drugs, alcohol, panic and depression. Drug, alcohol and PTSD are similar in the sense of the symptoms, those who are abusing alcohol and drugs can been seen to have a behavior change, starts leading to severe health problems, become withdraw, have work and family problems and start loosing their interpersonal skill, all similar trait of PTSD. When it comes to depression and PTSD they are similar mainly because a person with depression sees their selves as hopeless, they loose interest and focus, they become emotionless and usually suffer with insomnia. Panic and PTSD are similar in the sense that Panic disorder the individually usually finds it hard to catch their breath, they become shaken and sweaty and irritable easily and start avoiding places in an attempt to avoid a panic attack. Griez (2001) jotted down percentages of areas that can effect PTSD and the percentages are as followed: “Affective disorders (almost 50% of cases for major depression, 20% for dysthymia), other Anxiety disorders (16% GAD, 9% panic disorder, 30% specific phobia, 28% social phobia, 19% agoraphobia, Substance use disorders (52% alcohol and 34% drugs in men, 28% alcohol and 27% drugs in women) and Conduct disorder (43% in men and 15% in women) and Somatisation (the exact percentage unknown)(Griez et al., 2001, p.18).” 6. Conclusion PTSD is becoming a big disorder in the 21st century due to the increase of crime, natural disasters, bombing etcâ€¦ The currency is increasing each day and people do not have the money to seek out immediate therapy after a traumatic event has occurred and what has been discussed on the top is that instant therapy shall help intervention for the persons to not develop PTSD. With that said self-help is also important and avoiding alcohol and drug abuse can also prevent this disorder from developing, having a good support system enforced and always remembering that life doesn’t end after something traumatic, it just makes one wiser in life. This essay has looked at Post-traumatic stress disorder; Specific reference was made to the Diagnosis, Epidemiology, Treatment, Stress- Diathesis Model and PTSD on other disorders.
Joseph Stiglitz’s Making Globalization Work Essay (Book Review)
python assignment help Today the problem of globalization is one of the most discussed trends of the contemporary development of the economics, politics, and social life. Globalization is a multidimensional process which involves a lot of different aspects associated with the progress of the developed and developing countries. That is why there are many visions of the issue of globalization according to which the process is discussed as contributing to the progress of the world economy and as rather controversial with references to the global effects which it can have. Joseph Stiglitz’s book Making Globalization Work is the representation of the author’s opinion on the question of globalization in the context of the economic and political development of countries with determining globalization’s main challenges and their possible solutions with references to the results of Stiglitz’s prolonged research in the field. Thus, the main topic of Joseph Stiglitz’s work reflects the main themes of the author’s previous investigations. The title of the book Making Globalization Work provides the readers with the area of the author’s discussion. In his book, Joseph Stiglitz concentrates on presenting the key challengeable trends in the development of the phenomenon of globalization in the world and on providing the reasonable solutions to the issues with referring to the global economic and political processes in order to make globalization which is the key world process contribute to the global development of the both developed and developing countries. From this point, being published in 2006, the book determines the problems of globalization in the world context with focusing on the elements of the policy in the USA, and they are typical for the period between the late 1990s and the beginning of the 21st century. Developing the topic of the book and accentuating the positive and negative aspects of globalization as the worldwide process, Stiglitz argues that today globalization depends on the unfair rules which address the interests only of the developed countries, that is why this situation is based on the global instability and results in the global inequality of the countries in their economic development. Thus, Frieden states that Stiglitz “argues that globalization holds out great promise as a force for good, but that the rules of the present international economic order are designed and enforced by the rich nations to serve their interests” (Frieden). Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Furthermore, discussing the challenges of the globalization process, Stiglitz refers both to the economic and political sphere with accentuating the fact that the effective globalization depends on the effective policies within the countries. The author also determines the notion of democracy as the key one for providing the successful approach to solving the current problem associated with the issue of globalization (Stiglitz). However, is it possible to discuss Stiglitz’s point of view as the credible and developed argument? The author’s offers connected with the problem’s solution and his conclusions are based on the long-term economic research on the topic of globalization. Stiglitz uses the available economic reports on the progress of the developed and developing countries and refers to the opinions of the other researchers on the question which were presented during many conferences. Moreover, Joseph Stiglitz is an influential figure in the world debates on the problems of globalization as the field of economics, “he was a winner of the Nobel Prize in economics, for information theory. He was the top economist for President Clinton and after that, for the World Bank” (Ramsey). However, in spite of the fact the author uses a lot of evidences to support his idea, his vision of the problem is rather critical. He concentrates on the challenges of globalization without paying much attention to the positive perspectives which globalization provides for the countries’ development. Thus, speaking about the negative effects of globalization, Stiglitz indicates that “there is plenty of evidence from both developing countries and developed countries that there are many losers in both” (Stiglitz 9). It is possible to say that the author is inclined to support all the evidences which present the data about the inequality, poverty, and instability of the developing countries caused by the globalization process which is advantageous for the majority of the developed countries. Stiglitz also argues on the information about the improvements affected by the globalization tendencies. Nevertheless, according to Frieden, “Stiglitz uses his command of economic logic to good effect, offering clear discussions of dozens of complex issues, from patent law to abuses in international trade” (Frieden). We will write a custom Book Review on Joseph Stiglitz’s Making Globalization Work specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Joseph Stiglitz’s Making Globalization Work can be discussed as the effective critique on globalization as the multidimensional process which can have both the positive effects declared by the process’s supporters and numerous negative aspects caused by the imperfect policies. Moreover, the author’s critique is perceived as reasonable because Stiglitz focuses not only on the problems but also on their possible solutions which are presented in different chapters making the discussion of the issues well-organized. However, Joseph Stiglitz’s solutions to the problem can be discussed as rather difficult to implement because of the close connection of the economic, political, and moral aspects presented in them which influence each other greatly. Works Cited Frieden, Jeffrey A. To Have and Have Not. 2006. Ramsey, Bruce. Making Globalization Work: Nobel winner’s fresh views on globalization. n.d. Stiglitz, Joseph E. Making Globalization Work. USA: W. W. Norton
Meaning Making in the Childcare Setting Essay
Introduction The idea of meaning making, as explained by Dahlberg and Moss (2005), needs further clarification since its definition is unclear. Dahlberg and Moss observed that teachers should document and evaluate pedagogical practices. In this regard, pedagogical practices applied in any childcare center must be evaluated to ensure that they comply with the norms and standards set by the government. Meaning making in the childcare setting Meaning making is a process that entails evaluative participation whereby scenarios and judgments are interpreted to suit the needs of the child. For instance, teachers must come up with a preferred image of the child by appreciating the fact that children have a right to enjoy health, security and care in society. Furthermore, caregivers in the care centers should identify all needs of children in order for them to come up with strategies that would satisfy the demands of children. In the childcare center, education should be separated from care giving services. Meaning making in the childcare setting would perhaps entail making a contextualized, personal, and detailed judgment. Scholars of early childhood education suggest that democratic political practices should be given priority when making EC policies. This would ensure that the needs of children in the childcare centers are achieved. In the Saudi Arabian municipalities, the practices are made visible through certification of recorded notes and information produced by children, such as snaps and videotapes. Teachers are required to develop a collective and a democratic decision-making process regarding elucidation of the course material, assessment of students, and appraisal of the course content. This requires exchange of ideas, argumentation, paying attention to the needs of children, and reflection. If this were adopted, it would enhance understanding among various stakeholders. The model was borrowed from Loris Malaguzzi. The researcher observed that documentation is extremely valuable since it presents an extraordinary opportunity to teachers to embrace dialogue, exchange ideas, and distribute of information. In a childcare setting in the Saudi Arabian society, teachers, staff members, cooks, families, administrators, and members of the public have the responsibility of ensuring that children are taken care of in the school compound. Democratic decision-making process and information sharing facilitate this. References Dahlberg, G.,
Writers Choice Essay
For this assignment, you will write a two-page paper about the information you gained after interviewing an immigrant. 1. Select a person to interview who is an immigrant or has migrated to this country. 2. Interview/Talk to them about their experiences as an immigrant: What made them want to come to this country?, How did they did they come to this country?, What experience did they have on the journey?, How is life for them now that they are here? Is living in America what they expected? What effect has this move had on their relationship with other family members ie. those they left behind? How has the move to America effected their children? Do they regret their decision to come? The above are examples of the type of questions you should ask the person you interview. Remember to take notes or record the interview so you can go back and reference it while you write your essay. 3. Include information in your paper about the person’s country of origin. This means you must research a bit about the political and/or social issues that were happening when the person left their country. This is where your Works Cited page will come from. This essay represents a major portion of your final grade so please do your best. All papers should be in 12 point font in Times New Roman, 1.5 space – do not double space. Failure to use the correct font and size will result in reduced points. You must have a Cover page, three pages of writing, and a Works Cited page. That means there will be a total of five pages. DO NOT turn in a page and a half or less or points will be deducted. DO NOT turn in an essay that consist of your question and their answer as though it is a transcript. For example, Me: What country did you come from? Them: I’m from South Africa. This is not an essay format and you will loose points. DOSN’T HAVE TO BE A REAL PERSON