Get help from the best in academic writing.

New England College of Business and Finance Security Awareness Training Policy Essay

New England College of Business and Finance Security Awareness Training Policy Essay.

Lab #9: Assessing and Auditing an Existing Security Policy framework Policy definitionPlease, use your Lab manual to complete Lab 9. This lab manual features step-by-step instructions for completing the following hands-on lab exercises: Please, refer to your manual Lab 9.DeliverablesAs you work through each lab, you will be instructed to record specific information or take a screen capture to document the results you obtained by performing specific actions. The deliverables are designed to test your understanding of the information, and your successful completion of the steps and functions of the lab. All these documentation tasks should be pasted into a single file (MS Word .doc, .docx, or other compatible format) and submitted for grading by your instructor. You will create two deliverable files for each lab: Lab Report file(including screen captures taken at specific steps in the lab) Lab Assessment file (including answers to questions posed at the end of each lab)You may use either Microsoft® Word or any otherTask 1need lab report filetask 2need assesemnt worksheet answers with no plagrsim(sheet is attached under policy name)
New England College of Business and Finance Security Awareness Training Policy Essay

A Problem Statement Of Wireless Networks Information Technology Essay

A search process in unstructured wireless network generally employee whole network due to this it will generally carried out flooding problem. Existing system contains flooding algorithm to represent search process but this system address lack of search problem and inefficiency factors. The flooding algorithm needs to search on each node on over unstructured network to find out property which consumes an extra time. Energy Rate allocation and flooding problems are main aspects in unstructured networks. It leads high computational problems and which consumes extra processing time. To improve any wireless network environment performance it necessary to accessing structure in wireless network. The energy consumption is a key aspect in wireless network according to the random walk process will unbalance the energy and dynamic query search process. A native approach of flooding random walk algorithm will lead flooding problems and unbalanced energy rate allocation will be lead to network life time problems 1.2 Aim and Objectives Aim: The aim of this project is to design a distributed application to improve search efficiency in unstructured wireless network by reducing transactional cost Objectives To design a distributed application in unstructured wireless network using NS-2 simulator To take an advantage of biased random walk algorithm in on going distributed search application for avoiding number of transmissions To exploit a network model by using NS-2 simulator by representing uniform nodes and determine search protocol for calculating number of packets needed to represent search process To calculate time taken to cover the entire network after initiation of a search from a randomly selected initial node in designed network. To calculate the number of search items found after certain time steps from initiation of a search. 1.4 Proposed Methodologies This project mainly deals with unstructured wireless mobile network. An unstructured search has to potentially explore the whole network; as such, it is generally carried out by flooding. This project will improve a search process in unstructured wireless network by reducing flooding configuring uniform nodes using NS-2 simulator To analyze dynamic search and route discovery problems in various networks. To reduce number of transmissions during searching any property by establishing uniform nodes network using simulation methodologies. To reduce hitting time to the target node and expect number of transmission by implementing biased random walk by constructing uniform nodes in unstructured wireless networks. To evaluate a dynamic search efficiency by configuring uniform nodes for unstructured wireless network by applying simulation methodology. 1.5 Expected Artifact and outcomes: To design a distributed application to improve search efficiency in unstructured wireless networks and will evaluate this project results using NS-2 Simulator which will show dynamic search on over uniform nodes. 2 Research 2.1 General background to the subject: This research addresses the dynamic search problems in unstructured wireless network environment. The research considers search oriented problems and query computational problems in distributed dynamic applications. The high level data accessing could lead energy consumption issues. This research review the background study of location based spatial query processing on and snap shot query processing. The specified query processing supports only limited data level. To over come this difficulties here it need to review index method for managing static and dynamic data. This index process operates on over spatial query as well as snap shot which will be applicable on both data level. This research accomplish knowledge of query process in unstructured wireless network environment. Background knowledge of query monitoring in wireless broadcast environment . The background study will be conducted by reviewing various research papers, journals, books and websites. I will accomplish the relevant information by considering key words. Which might be use full gathering an appropriate data 2.2 Study on specific issues: The main aim of this project is to tackling dynamic search problems in wireless networks and to improve path discovery in wireless network during promoting dynamic search on over unstructured networks. To achieve efficient search on over unstructured network, it needs to review back ground study of various search algorithms such as flooding algorithm, random walk algorithm and dynamic search algorithm. This research mainly focuses on over unstructured wireless network by considering dynamic search problems 2.3 Technologies for implementation: The implementation of this project will be divided into various modules and layers. The entire implementation work will be carried out using NS-2 simulator. The simulator will design a wireless network with group of nodes. To configure network in terms of client- server architecture. Enhance the communication by promoting ad hoc protocol and compute energy rate level and consumption level by distributing message across client nodes. The entire code will be designed in Tool command language (TCL), C language and with combination of OTCL 2.4 Analysis of Existing Work: The problem statement address the search problem in unstructured network environment, to analyze the search process problems and flooding problem during evaluating dynamic search process on over unstructured network. To addresses such kind of problems by conducting an experimental review on over static and dynamic search process and evaluate various search process algorithm to measure performance factors. In this analysis which shows the resource consumption problems and computation problems during evaluating dynamic search. 3 Technical Requirements The proposed study analyzes the technical requirements by considering the problem statements and proposed study issues and which defines the functional requirements of proposed system. The functional requirements of proposed system should be classified into different processes; these processes have been configured in terms of input, transactions and output. The system should be capable to reduce energy consumption level and which is capable of distributing data across different sensor networks Proposed technical requirements are as follows Software Requirement: Ns2,Network Animator NAM, XGRAPH, TCL

Question 2

help writing Question 2.

During the 1990s, two controversial incidents became symbolic of excesses in federal law enforcement and raised new questions about FBI operations, particularly whether agents had used excessive force in effecting arrests. Both incidents involved standoffs with heavily armed groups that resulted in the loss of life. The first resulted in a shootout and 11-day standoff at a cabin in Ruby Ridge, Idaho in August 1992. FBI sharpshooter, attempting to arrest Randall Weaver, a survivalist, and anti-government activist, accidentally killed members of his family. The second incident occurred about six months later, near Waco, Texas. A 51-day standoff occurred involving a religious cult and agents from the FBI and ATF. On April 19, 1993, FBI agents launched a tear-gas assault on the group’s barricaded compound during which more than 80 members of the sect died. Serious questions were raised about the FBI’s power as a result of these two incidents. Had the Bureau become a paramilitary force? Could the FBI police itself? Was federal law enforcement out of control? Ruby Ridge and Waco were seen as “wake-up calls.” FBI Director Louis Freeh instituted several reforms in response to these public and congressional concerns. One reform was to establish the FBI Core Values, and it can be found at: http://www.fbi.gov/new_employees/employee_corevalu…
Question 2

Healthcare Bill 2010 Essay

Introduction Healthcare Bill 2010, also known as Obamacare has remained one of the most controversial issues in the American society for the past four years. A section of the society strongly believes that this Bill came at the appropriate time when people needed affordable quality healthcare for all the Americans irrespective of their financial capacities. On the other hand, a section of the society members believe that this was a retrogressive Bill that was designed to punish the hard-working Americans. This debate has been raging on for years, and it has been difficult to come up with a convincing explanation for either of the two differing opinions. This research seeks to analyze this issue with the aim of finding the truth about the impact of Obamacare to the lives of the citizens of the American society. Discussion Healthcare is one of the basic needs within a country, and the citizens of this country always expect the government to come up with policies focused on improving it. The current regime came up with the Healthcare Bill 2010, and it would be important to determine if it meets the expectations of the society. The research seeks to find an answer the following question. Was Obamacare relevant in improving health standards in the American society? In responding to the above question, the researcher will use two contemporary theories in order to help explain why different people have taken different approaches when analyzing this Bill. Conflict theory is one of the most appropriate theories that can be used to explain why different people have taken different approaches when analyzing this Bill. Johnson (2008) says, “Conflict theory emphasizes the role of coercion and power in producing social order.” This scholar explains that this theory has generally been associated by governments when trying to come up with policies considered unpopular. Those who have been critical of this Bill have always believed that because of the influence had on the congress, he was able to prevail upon it to ensure that the Bill sails through without much opposition. This is despite the contradicting views that a section of the society had towards the Bill. As explained in Conflict theory holds that coercion and power can be used to bring social order. As the president of the United States, Obama was convinced that it was necessary to have a Healthcare Bill that was able to cater for all the American citizens irrespective of their financial backgrounds. However, he was aware that a section of the society were opposed to it, especially the elites who considered this move as a way through which the government would force them to help in paying healthcare cost for the poor. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Given that the elites are influential, they managed to convince the society against the Bill. However, it was able to sail through the Congress, and the president assented to it immediately. This displeased those who were opposed to it as they considered that the government used its power to coerce them to accept this Bill. According to Tate (2012), many Americans who have been criticizing this Bill may not have substantial reason to consider the Bill inappropriate. However, they feel that they were coerced by the government, and this has made then very keen on identifying any convincing mistake from the Bill. The figure below shows a report by one of the journalists showing the rising cost of Obamacare. Source (Tate, 2012) Such critics have failed to be objective in their analysis of this Bill. It is a fact that this Bill has a number of weaknesses that needs to be addressed. One of the obvious disadvantages that this Bill had was the increased taxation it brought on Americans. However, we should take an objective approach; analyze both the benefits and the weaknesses of the Bill in order to come up with a way forward in its implementation process. Critical theory is another appropriate theory that can be used in explaining why this Bill has had varying views in this society. Buchanan (2010) says, “Critical theory is a type of social theory oriented toward critiquing and changing society as a whole, in contrast to traditional theory oriented only to understanding or explaining it.” This theory focuses critiques that are meant to change the way of thinking, or the approach taken by members of the society towards a given issue. A section of the society has taken this approach with this Bill. As mentioned above, the above Bill may not be the best that this country could have. Close to half of the Americans do not approve of this Bill (Tate, 2012). However, the most important thing is to define the way forward and find a way in which the Bill can be beneficial instead of being oppressive to the Americans. Taking the critical theory approach in analyzing this Bill, it is clear that Obamacare was a bill that was well-intended to help the poor members of the society who are unable to get access to affordable healthcare within the country. America remains the most admired nation in the world, and the government has been keen to ensure that the country remains attractive. We will write a custom Essay on Healthcare Bill 2010 specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More This country has the largest economy in the world, and the country has been extending a lot of support to various countries around the world. It is therefore, unfortunate that in this land of plenty resources, a section of the society are still dying of simple diseases because they cannot afford medical costs. This means that there is no difference between this society and that of the third world countries where such incidents are common. The Bill was intended to eradicate this. When using Critical Theory to analyze the Bill, it would be clear that the main problem has been the implementation and the attitude of the members of the society. A section of the society members have made a lot of effort to frustrate proper implementation of the Bill. Both the Conflict Theory and Critical Theory looks at some of the weaknesses of this Bill to the society. However, while critical theory seeks to find an approach that can be used to make the Bill more beneficial to the society, the focus of Conflict Theory is to find justifications to reject the Bill. Conclusion The analysis of Obamacare reveals that people have taken different approaches when analyzing this Bill based on what they want to believe. The two theories explain why we have different views on the Bill. However, the fact is that Obamacare was relevant in improving health standards in the American society if the implementation is done appropriately. References Buchanan, I. (2010). A Dictionary of Critical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Johnson, D. P. (2008). Contemporary sociological theory: An integrated multi-level approach. New York: Springer. Tate, N. J. (2012). ObamaCare survival guide. West Palm Beach: Humanix Books.

Communications Aduit due

Communications Aduit due.

Communication Audit Presentation (30 points) Outcomes 2 and 4 – ENTER DUE DATEWhat are the communication challenges organizations face today? Once they are identified, how does an organization overcome these challenges and improve their communication flow? In this three-part assignment, you will first conduct a communication audit to assess organizational communication within an organization of your choice. A communication audit is a method of research that reveals how your stakeholders view your organization’s communication methods and effectiveness.We will provide you with a survey (located in the Content> Course Resources> Assignment Resources area) that you will use to measure this perception, and you will administer it in your organization.You will then analyze and synthesize the results of the data obtained from your audit efforts and select one critical communication challenge in your organization, conduct research and develop suggestions for addressing that specific communication challenge. Last, you will present the result of your audit, your research, and suggestions for improvement in a presentation. Your goals:Administer the communication audit in your organization.Analyze and synthesize the results of the data from the communication audit.Based on the communication audit identify one critical communication challenge that needs to be addressed within your organization.Create and deliver a presentation that provides the results of your audit with suggestions for improvement based on the data obtained from the audit and the literature on organizational communication.Directions: Assume you are the Director of Human Resources at your chosen organization. You are tasked with conducting a communication audit and presenting the results to leadership. Your goal in conducting the communication audit is to identify one main communication challenge within an organization that needs to be addressed.You will complete the following tasks:Conduct a communication audit using the Communication Audit Survey located below. In order to obtain valid results, you want to survey between 8 to 10 people.You may print out the survey and distribute it in person for completion, or you may administer it online, for example, using SurveyMonkey or Google Form.The survey includes questions that tap six different areas of organizational communication: (1) Receiving information from others, (2) Sending information to others, (3) Following up on information, (4) Sources of information, (5) Timeliness of information, and (6) Channels of communication. Within these six areas of organizational communication, identify one major issue in one area to address based on the responses from the survey. Finally, research the scholarly literature for recommendations about how the organization can address this issue.Format:Communicate the results of the Communication Audit by developing a presentation, using APA format. Include a title slide with your project title (e.g., “Communication Audit”), the organization’s name, your name, class, instructor, and date.Present an introduction that describes your research methodology and provides details of the survey administration, response rate, and characteristics of the survey population. Develop a professionally-written narrative in which you describe the data using appropriate tables, charts, and graphs. Include a detailed analysis followed by a summary of your findings, using the example in the “Collecting and Analyzing Data” file below. Identify the top communication challenge from your survey, and present your recommendations to strengthen this communication challenge, based on the scholarly literature. In the appendix, present the survey questions and the number of responses for each question.Your presentation should be professional and creative. Adding audio and/or visual elements on the slides is highly recommended. Text should be the proper size for viewing during a presentation. Your presentation will need title and citation slides. You must have a minimum of 3 reliable sources in your citations. Use APA format for the in-text citations you use to support your arguments. Don’t forget to check your spelling! As a friendly reminder, all words must be yours and your own typing. You may not copy text directly from a source.You may use presentation software of your choice. Examples include (but are not limited to):PowerpointPowerpoint with audio recordingAnimot0Google Docs- presentationGoAnimatePreziPLEASE NOTE: Your presentation software should not incur any costs. You are responsible for understanding how to use the software. You will need to submit your work in a format that can be easily opened by your colleagues and the instructor.** Be sure to review the rubric for grading criteria before you begin working on and submitting this assignment**Due Date Dec 3, 2017 11:59 PMHide RubricsRubric Name: Communication AuditCriteriaNot Satisfactory0 pointsPartial1.5 pointsSatisfactory1.7143 pointsAdvanced2.14286 pointsIntroduction – Description of a Communication AuditNo description provided.Description is missing important elements. All required elements addressed in the description.Clearly and succinctly presents the purpose of the communication audit and the intent of the survey used to identify organizational communication patterns (e.g. to increase organizational effectiveness or as a result of a performance gap).Introduction – Description of OrganizationNo description is provided. Description is missing important elements. All required elements addressed in the description.Presented a detailed description of the department of the organization surveyed, including the purpose, number of employees, internal and external customers.Research Methodology – Description of AdministrationNo description is provided.Description is missing important elements. All required elements addressed in the description.Presented a detailed description of how and when the survey was administered (i.e. time and date, length of time for all surveys to be completed, facilitated or not facilitated, directions, survey format)Research Methodology – Description of Survey RespondentsNo description provided.Description is missing important elements. All required elements addressed in the description.Presented appropriate demographics to describe survey respondents (i.e. position titles, full-time/part-time, managerial/support) Data Analysis -Survey Administration – sample sizePresented a sample size of less than 3 respondents. Presented a sample size of 4-5Presented a sample size of 6-8 respondents. Presented a sample size of more than 8 respondents.Data Analysis -Charts, Graphs and TablesNo tables, charts, graphs were presented.Tables, Charts, Graphs are missing important elements to clearly and accurately represent the data.All required elements accurately represent and clearly highlight data trends/findings.The data analysis is clearly shown through the use of tables, charts or graphs. The data clearly shows how the main issue was identified. Data Analysis – QualityNo quantitative analysis of survey data is presented.The analysis is missing important elements to clearly and accurately represent the data/information.All required elements accurately represent and clearly present analysis.Clearly and accurately summarizes the results presenting a quantitative analysis. Comprehensively addresses weaknesses and strengths that the data shows. Identification of Communication ChallengesNo communication challenges are presented one communication challenges are not supported by the quantitative analysisCommunication Challenges are missing important elements to clearly and accurately represent the data/information. All required elements accurately represent and clearly present evidence-supported findings The critical communication issue in the organization is clearly identified and supported by the data. Solutions/RecommendationsNo description provided.Description is missing important elements. All required elements addressed in the description. Presents specific and appropriate solutions. The feasibility and priority of solutions is discussed. Appropriate facts and details are presented.Solutions/RecommendationsOne or Zero solutions were submitted.Presented two solutions.Presented three solutions.Presented three or more innovative solutions.Summary – Use credible reasoning and evidence in communication.Concepts and themes are not fully developed, presented in a cohesive manner or appropriately supported. Summary idea presentation is not cohesive. At times the writing forces the reader to determine the author’s train of thought.Concepts and ideas are developed and supported with credible sources. Concepts and ideas are fully developed and supported with credible sources. Reader can easily follow the author’s logic and reasoning.Summary – Accurate use of resourcesInsufficient use of appropriate research, supporting evidence, and relevant sources. Insufficient use of appropriate research, supporting evidence, and relevant sources. Limited characteristics of essential information and resources presented. Incorporate sufficient use of appropriate research, supporting evidence, and relevant sources. Does not describe all characteristics of essential information resources, including their limitations, and explains strategies for identifying and finding such resources. Incorporate sufficient use of appropriate research, supporting evidence, and relevant sources. Summary – APA Guidelines for in-text citations and ReferencesInconsistent or missing in-text citations; fails to attribute an author’s word through APA citations. References are cited but incorrectly under APA style. The student has either used another format or incorrectly applied the APA style guidelines.The majority of in-text citations and the reference are properly cited; formatting is inconsistent/inaccurate in a few cases.The paper correctly cites in-text and lists at least three resources on the References page. If additional sources are used, they are included correctly.Summary – Writing MechanicsDoes not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling. Over ten errors found.Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling. Over three errors found.Adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling. One to three errors found.Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including, but not limited to capitalization and punctuation and spelling. No errors found. No jargon used.Overall ScoreDoes not meet expectations0 or moreC21 or moreB24 or moreA27 or moreDoes not meet expectationsCBA
Communications Aduit due