Get help from the best in academic writing.

New England College Cloud Computing and Jurisdiction Issues Paper

New England College Cloud Computing and Jurisdiction Issues Paper.

In 500 words or more, consider this statement: For cloud computing to become multi-jurisdictional, it must be separated from politics.Use at least three sources. Use the Research Databases available from the Danforth Library not Google. Include at least 3 quotes from your sources enclosed in quotation marks and cited in-line by reference to your reference list. Example: “words you copied” (citation) These quotes should be one full sentence not altered or paraphrased. Cite your sources using APA format. Use the quotes in your paragaphs. Stand alone quotes will not count toward the 3 required quotes.Copying without attribution or the use of spinbot or other word substitution software will result in a grade of 0. Write in essay format not in bulleted, numbered or other list format.
New England College Cloud Computing and Jurisdiction Issues Paper

Memo On Internal Control Audit Accounting Essay. The purpose of this memo is to document the audit objectives with related planned audit procedures regarding the Faculty Professional Expense (FPE) accounts audit as well as to identify the internal control weakness and recommendations within the FPE process. The current concerns about the Internal Audit department will also be discussed at the end of this memo. Use of FPE Accounts: The objectivity of the use of FPE accounts is to provide faculty members reimbursements and credits for allowable expense paid that are directly related to the pursuit of faculty member’s teaching or research activities. Faculty members’ bookstore purchases claims are processed differently from non-bookstore purchases. The maximum entitled FPE account for each member per fiscal year is $3000. The board would want to ensure that all FPE accounts are being used as intended; that all expenditures being claimed must be legitimate and specifically meet the definition of allowable expenses. Thus, we need to examine the current control procedures and policies in place within the FPE process, then evaluate and document the effectiveness and sufficiency of controls over FPE process. Exhibit 1 provides three detailed Audit Objectives related to our internal control audit of FPE account and the related procedures that we would perform to provide a high level of assurance. Exhibit 1- Audit Objectives and Procedures Audit Objectives Audit Procedures 1. All expense claims (both bookstore purchases and non-bookstore purchases) are certified; that they are being properly authorized and approved to verify for its occurrence/existence. a) bookstore purchases : – Inquire bookstore managers and clerks whether they are aware of the list of allowable products that faculty members can purchase in the bookstore using their FPE account and whether there are policies and procedures that guide the bookstore clerks on how to deal with the FPE account. – Observe whether the clerks would refuse to initiate a purchase transaction(s) related to FPE account when the purchase consists of non-allowable products. Obstacles: Although the bookstore manager is aware of the policies and have knowledge about most professors taking advantage of the FPE account, but it seems that she didn’t properly train her staff of what items are allowable for FPE credits and further instructed her staff to be nice to the faculty members as these transactions would help them to increase store sales and do not want to dissatisfy long term customers. Thus, the integrity of bookstore manager is questionable and the information we get at the bookstore level is likely to be biased. – Inquire Maggie on the monthly generated report of bookstore purchases using FPE account. Whether the report consists of an automatic control by computers that would match the product codes of each purchase to its allowable product codes list for FPE claims and generate an exception report on any unmatched items. If automatic controls do not exist, then examine whether manual controls are in place to confirm allowable product codes for claims. – Inquire Maggie on product codes for any non-allowable product purchases using FPE accounts and send an invoice to the faculty members for any non-legitimate claims. b) Non-bookstore purchases – Inquire relevant Department heads on their normal practices of approving faculty member’s claims. – Interview with Department head on their awareness of the FPE policies that they should be experienced with the definition of allowable expenses. Obstacles: The Department head’s answers to our questions may be biased if using the FPE accounts for personal benefits is a normal practice for the faculty members and that approving these types of expenditures are acceptable for the most of the Department heads. – Randomly obtain copies of approved expense claim forms and ensure that all claims come with supported documents such as types of purchases, relevant receipt, and evidence of approval by their Department heads. – Consider randomly examining the large amount or usual claims and verify its appropriateness. For example, office furniture purchased could be verified by checking to see if the furniture is located at the office of the faculty member; Membership fees in professional bodies could be verified by checking if that the professional bodies are related to the home faculty where that faculty member belongs to. – Obstacles: Some expenditure may be harder to verify. For example, travel or travel related expenses and laptop could be claimed primary for personal use. 2. Controls are adequate to ensure that balance of FPE accounts are accurate and that they should be reconciled with reimbursements made to bookstore and/or faculty members. – Inquire Maggie on her procedures regarding the monthly reconciliation of FPE accounts. In the event of discrepancy is found, inquire about her follow up procedures to correct the discrepancy. – Randomly select the completed reconciliations done by Maggie and examine whether they are initialed by Darlene. – Check to ensure that no credit balances exist for all FPE accounts (i.e. faculty members could not use their FPE account for more than $3000 per fiscal year.) – Check to ensure that at year end (April 30), all remaining balances of FPE accounts are transferred to the Scholarship Trust Fund either automatically or manually. (i.e. FPE balances should be zero at each year end) 3. Management policies are in place that the FPE programs are being effectively managed and monitored. – Inquire The Human Resource Department on control procedures over termination of faculty members. That the lists of faculty members should be complete and up to date. Inquire HR department staff whether they would notice the Financial Service Department immediately after terminating any faculty member so that they could terminate the FPE account associated with the terminated faculty member on a timely basis. – Check to see if Financial Service would verify with HR department for a new faculty member when setting up a new FPE account associated with that member. – Ensure that the FPE program is being monitored for its effectiveness on a continuous basis and any major changes should be presented/ discussed with the board. Current Control Weakness The current control environment and general control over the FPE accounts are considered to be very weak mainly due to the lack of control procedures and policies in place in the bookstore level, poor quality of review/procedures before approving receipts by Department heads and lack of independent check/verification of approvals made by department heads including lack of segregation of duties in the Financial Service Department. Exhibits 2 identified these significant internal control weaknesses within the FPE process, described the implications of each weakness as well as recommendations for improvement. Exhibit 2- Control Weakness, Implication and Recommendation Weakness Implication Recommendation 1. Either no well established procedures and policies regarding the use of FPE account for bookstore purchases in place for manager and staff to be followed or Policies and Procedures exist but Royola Berterson, Bookstore manager did not follow and didn’t instruct her staff to follow. Instead bookstore manager instructed the staff to be courteous and helpful to faculty members because they are long-term customers and do not want to lose them and hence doesn’t really care of what allowable purchases to expense against FPE account. e.g. Brian Ross (professor) bought clothes, computer for personal use at home. This clearly shows the staff members credited FPE account for clothes bought at bookstore. Either it is possible that the bookstore staff does not have the list for allowable expense under FPE which they should have or if they have the list then they are just not following it. Most professors take advantage of the Bookstore for a number of purchases. These purchases included the non-allowable expenditures that were not supposed to be charged against the FPE accounts, resulting in misuse of the FPE accounts for the bookstore purchases. -Establish clear and enforceable policies and procedures at the bookstore to ensure that FPE accounts may only be used against allowable expenditure. -Implement an automatic system at sales terminal that would read the product code and match them to the pre-authorized categories of product code (i.e. books, equipments), so that non-allowable purchase such as clothing from the bookstore using the FPE account could be automatically rejected. -Book store clerks should confirm the identity of the faculty members before crediting the FPE account to prevent the misuse of lost cards. -Consider hiring another bookstore manager since Royola Perterson’s integrity is questionable 2. Poor quality of review of approvals for non-bookstore purchases by various Department heads. No procedures of how to review the attached receipts of non-bookstore purchases to check if those expenses are allowed to be deducted under FPE account or not. No procedures to check if those non-bookstore purchases were used for office or personal purpose. e.g. Brian Ross (professor) plan to travel for business and holiday purpose- expense related to business purpose and non business purpose needs to be segregated Misuse of FPE account can result in an increase of FPE expenses. Faculty members can claim reimbursements for purchase of items for personal use by providing those receipts. Faculty members can claim for items not allowable under non-bookstore purchases due to lack of control procedures. FPE expense can be maximum of $3000*195 faculty members= $585,000. Faculty members will be more inclined to deceive/ claim unallowable expenses if errors go undetected. – Require all division managers to review all the receipts submitted by faculty members to check if it’s an allowable expense to be reimbursed to employees for non-bookstore purchases. – Need to check the date on the receipt submitted by faculty members for allowable reimbursements to see if the expense incurred is in the current year for cutoff. -Need to check if non-bookstore purchases/expenses were solely for the purpose of office/university benefit (not personal benefit)- to segregate the personal expense from office expense (e.g. Travel expense related to business and personal use- to reimburse business related travel expense only) -Check for previous year’s receipts submitted by those faculty members who are found to claim unallowable expense by providing receipts to charge back those amounts. 3. Lack of independent check in the Financial Service Department of the receipts submitted by different department heads for its accuracy and reliability if it’s an allowable expense that is being claimed for reimbursement as Maggie just debits the expense account and initiates a cheque requisition for payment to the faculty members. Maggie shouldn’t do both reconciliation and writing cheques at the same time, which clearly indicates lack of segregation of duties. Intentional/ unintentional errors made by divisional heads will go undetected. This will result in reimbursing amounts that shouldn’t have been which increases the expense under “FPE account” which otherwise would have been transferred to a “Scholarship Trust Fund”. Faculty members will be more inclined to deceive/claim unallowable expenses if errors go undetected. Fraud may occur as Maggie can easily make adjustments at the year-end if the total university account posting related to FPE is not equal to the amount relieved from the faculty FPE accounts. -Requires Financial department to check for all claims/receipts that are being claimed to confirm if it’s an allowable expense under FPE account before initiating a cheque requisition for payment to the faculty member. -Hire a new employee in financial department to check all the receipts initialized by department heads. -Duties of reconciliation and writing cheques should be segregated by hiring a new employee. Current concerns about the Internal Audit department Structure- related Lack of independence as there is no direct presentation/reporting to the Board at their quarterly meetings. Responsibility- related Nature of job duties- Internal auditor working/replacing staff in the financial services during vacations violates independence issues and is not a part of responsibility of an internal auditor. Internal auditors should not prepare bank reconciliation for bank accounts. Independence rules will be violated if internal auditor assists Vice-president of financial services. Recommendations: Need to present/report findings, results and issues directly to Board of Governors at quarterly meetings rather than reporting it to VP to avoid independence issues. When employees in financial service department goes on vacation there should be employees within the financial service department to cover for them and they should be paid overtime to give an incentive to them. Only one financial employee should be permitted to take long planned vacation at a time which can be reserved by employees well in advance. Additionally, work done by the employee replacing the employee on vacation should be double checked by someone else for its accuracy. Duty of bank reconciliation for all bank accounts should be segregated so that employee responsible for bank reconciliation is not responsible for any other accounting department work (i.e. A/P or A/R department) to have proper segregation of duties. Internal auditor shouldn’t assist Vice-president of financial services to remain independent as internal auditor will be auditing the work of vice president, in case if internal auditor does assist Vice-president, it should be clearly disclosed in internal auditor’s report that is presented to external auditor. Conclusion Bloomington University does not have effective controls procedures in place for use of FPE account. Evidences have been found to prove the misuse of FPE account by faculty members because of lack of review by bookstore manager, department heads and financial department to allow reimbursing all claims. We recommend the Board to immediately take action to improve its control weaknesses over the FPE process. A list of our recommendations is provided in exhibit 2. An alternative way would be to eliminate the use of FPE account, because the integrity of FPE program seems to be very questionable. The procedures to replace the FPE accounts could be as followed. For book-store purchases and non-book store purchases, different department should be in place to order/buy on behalf of faculty members. Faculty members can just place an order to that separate department of their needs to carry out their job and that department will automatically take care of all allowable purchases to be made. Memo On Internal Control Audit Accounting Essay
Gonzalez Family Case Study Children And Young People Essay. He is experiencing many different changes in his body that are influencing his development during the early adolescent stage. This stage can be one of the most challenging times in a child’s life. Biologically, Luz is developing at a healthy rate of growth, which means he experiencing rapid spurts of growth in height and weight. This begins in boys around age twelve, along with other biological changes such as puberty (AshfordGonzalez Family Case Study Children And Young People Essay

Santa Monica College Importance of Making Customers Feel Appreciated Reflection

Santa Monica College Importance of Making Customers Feel Appreciated Reflection.

2 pages Double spacesone page narrative and one page reflection. Make sure they are 2 pagesYou can focus more on reflectionYour internship work will be evaluated by me based primarily on your journal entries.Your journal should be both a descriptive narrative of your internship experience (what it is that you are doing to accomplish the goals you and your sponsor have set) and a reflective narrative (what that experience means in terms of a larger learning experience). It should connect the practical work experience with your academic course work whenever possible.You can read last Internship Journal that you wrote. If you can’t find it, let me know.I still doing this work, so you can write something new.Like what Happened recently.This weekPrepare the implementation plan for the promotion of Thanksgiving Christmas activitiesSome of the plans are in Chinese, you can use Google to translate it.
Santa Monica College Importance of Making Customers Feel Appreciated Reflection

SOCW 6311 TCAT Obesity Intervention Program Evaluation Report

professional essay writers SOCW 6311 TCAT Obesity Intervention Program Evaluation Report.

I’m working on a sociology writing question and need an explanation to help me understand better.

Assignment: Designing a Plan for Outcome EvaluationSocial workers can apply knowledge and skills learned from conducting one type of evaluation to others. Moreover, evaluations themselves can inform and com`plement each other throughout the life of a program. This week, you apply all that you have learned about program evaluation throughout this course to aid you in program evaluation.To prepare for this Assignment, review “Basic Guide to Program Evaluation (Including Outcomes Evaluation)” from this week’s resources, Plummer, S.-B., Makris, S., & Brocksen S. (Eds.). (2014b). Social work case studies: Concentration year. Retrieved from , especially the sections titled “Outcomes-Based Evaluation” and “Contents of an Evaluation Plan.” Then, select a program that you would like to evaluate. You should build on work that you have done in previous assignments, but be sure to self-cite any written work that you have already submitted. Complete as many areas of the “Contents of an Evaluation Plan” as possible, leaving out items that assume you have already collected and analyzed the data.By Day 7Submit a 4- to 5-page paper that outlines a plan for a program evaluation focused on outcomes. Be specific and elaborate. Include the following information:
The purpose of the evaluation, including specific questions to be answered
The outcomes to be evaluated
The indicators or instruments to be used to measure those outcomes, including the strengths and limitations of those measures to be used to evaluate the outcomes
A rationale for selecting among the six group research designs
The methods for collecting, organizing and analyzing data
McNamara, C. (2006a). Contents of an evaluation plan. In Basic guide to program evaluation (including outcomes evaluation). Retrieved from…McNamara, C. (2006b). Reasons for priority on implementing outcomes-based evaluation.In Basic guide to outcomes-based evaluation for nonprofit organizations with very limited resources. Retrieved from
SOCW 6311 TCAT Obesity Intervention Program Evaluation Report

Storytelling Evaluation Report

Storytelling Evaluation Report.

ScenarioYou are a creative development producer at Olde School Advertising Agency, which is known for its traditional approach to advertising. Your boss, the founder of the company, has finally decided to retire, but there’s a new leader ready to take over: his son, who has been eager to finally incorporate some modern, innovative, even edgy advertising techniques into the agency’s repertoire. While your (now former) boss’ son is helping his father move into his new downsized home, he puts you in charge of evaluating the effectiveness of various contemporary ad campaigns with an eye toward making recommendations for tactics the company could implement in the near future.DirectionsYou receive an email from your new boss that includes 12 examples of branded content and new media storytelling, sponsored by a variety of brands. Some of these branded content campaigns have been more successful than others, and your goal is to evaluate what worked and what didn’t in order to help your boss make decisions as your company moves forward in this new direction. Choose three examples to evaluate from the 12 choices, making sure you include one of each type (i.e. two documentaries and one narrative or two narratives and one documentary).In a detailed report, you will need to address each of the following for each example you evaluate:Identify the message that the storyteller is communicatingDescribe the storytelling elements used to communicate the messageDescribe how the storyteller’s belief system has impacted their storyIdentify the strengths and limitations of the storytelling strategies used for each messageProvide an analysis of the persuasive strategies usedGive your overall assessment of the effectiveness of the storytelling concepts used to communicate the desired messageYou can deliver your report to your boss either as a 20-slide PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes or as a 7- to 10-page written report. The final slides of your presentation or last few paragraphs of your report should include recommendations to your boss on which storytelling strategies seemed to work, and why the agency should consider implementing those strategies for future development.Branded Content Examples for EvaluationDocumentary:“Saving Aslan”Sponsored by Fixodent, featuring Kevin Richardson, a.k.a. “The Lion Whisperer”“Using Technology and Bioscience to Fight Cancer”Sponsored by Intel, featuring an Intel employee“I Worked as a Cranberry Farmer for a Day”Sponsored by Ocean Spray Cranberry JuiceEpisode of Lucie Fink’s web show for Refinery29, Lucie for Hire“Can We Convince Firefighters to Eat Vegetarian?”Sponsored by Panera BreadPart of the Food Interrupted video series sponsored by Panera Bread“Nyle DiMarco: Beyoutiful”Sponsored by Convo Relay Service for the DeafDocumentary about Deaf actor and model Nyle DiMarco and his upbringing“Guinness Rugby: Gareth’s Story”Sponsored by Guinness“Puppyhood”Sponsored by Purina Puppy Chow“Notes: A Life Story, A Love Story” (sponsored by Take Note Store)Sponsored by Take Note Store, a pens and stationery store in Toronto, Canada“June: Life is Better When You Share the Ride”Sponsored by Lyft“Share the Load”Sponsored by Ariel Laundry Soap“A Love Story”Sponsored by Sandy Hook Promise“The Game Before the Game”Sponsored by Beats by Dre to SubmitEvery project has a deliverable or deliverables, which are the files that must be submitted before your project can be assessed. For this project, you must submit the following:Storytelling Evaluation ReportPresent your report as either a PowerPoint presentation or a written report.PowerPoint Presentation:20 slides
Slides 1-18+: Consider creating one slide for each point of evaluation for each example you’re evaluating.Final two slides: Your last two slides should contain your recommendations for which strategies seemed to work best and your recommendations for future implementation.Speaker notes
Speaker notes should include additional details to explain the main points expressed on each slide. Remember, it’s best to avoid excessive text on the screen in a PowerPoint presentation. Instead, try to include only a few brief bullet points that summarize the main idea you’re trying to communicate. Use speaker notes that contain about two paragraphs of information to further explain the information presented on the slide.Written Report:7-10 pages in Word, Times New Roman, size 12 font, double-spaced
Consider writing 2-3 paragraphs that fully explain each point of evaluation for each example you’re evaluating.
Storytelling Evaluation Report

Jump assignment for math

Jump assignment for math. Can you help me understand this Mathematics question?

What is the Biggest Risk of Your life?
Directions: Write your responses on a separate sheet of paper. Please remember that neatness
and completeness count! If Icannot read your paper, it will be difficult to give you credit for
your good hard work. If you would prefer to type your responses, please do so. Keep it under 2
pages double spaced.
Watch the following video and then respond to the writing prompts.
Steve Harvey-Jump
Video link:     
These are hard questions. Please think about them for a minute before writing.
1. What is the biggest thing you have ever had to jump for, and what was the result?
2. What is the next big jump in life that you think should make, and what do you hope to
accomplish from it?
3. What steps do you need to take in order to take your next jump?
Jump assignment for math

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service