Get help from the best in academic writing.

Multi-Denominational and a Multicultural Congregation academic essay help Agricultural Studies homework help

A discussion on the difficulty in and the reasons for creating a multi-denominational and a multicultural congregation.

This paper examines the difficulties in creating a multi-denominational and multicultural congregation. The author lists the major factors for creating such a congregation and provides an historical overview of Pentecostal, Christian, Caucasian and African-American, Roman Catholic, and Messianic congregation to support his opinion.
“Creating a truly multi-denominational, multicultural, congregation from the ground up is a difficult challenge. Part of this has to do with the fact that historically, a cultures identity gets lost in the loss of ritual and community. A charismatic congregation seems to have the most open forum for spiritual expression it allows for a good foundation for which to build a healthy non-restrictive congregation due to the fact that its doctrines and practices allow for the individual take part in an individual’s own representation of worship. Thirdly, some of its philosophies are very widely excepted, and easily translatable between denominations, religions, and cultures. However, charismatic congregations alone do not foster multicultural fortitude.

Along with the good foundation of charismatic ideals, there needs to be an active and dynamic set of standards to foster and nurture this sense of multicultural congruency within the congregation. In defining some of these ideas, as well as exploring the history of effective multicultural denominations and observing some the culture in these congregations, in particular Roman Catholicism, Pentecostal, in particular congregations with primarily Baltic Russian and African-American background, and Messianic Judaism, correlations can be made as to effective ideals, practices and doctrines for a charismatic multicultural congregation.”

Determining Truth Value of Complex Statements Determining Validity of Propositional Arguments

Determining Truth Value of Complex Statements Determining Validity of Propositional Arguments.

Section 1 – Determining Truth Value of Complex Statements For the following arguments, determine the truth value of the complex statement. Assume A, B, C are true and X, Y, Z are false. 1. B •Z 2. X v ~Y 3. ~C v Z 4. B  ~Z 5. (A v B) Z 6. ~(A •Z) 7. ~B v (Y A) 8. A  ~(Z v ~Y) 9. (A •Y) v (~Z •C) 10. ~(X v ~B) •(~Y vA) Section 2 – Determining Validity of Propositional Arguments For the following arguments, (a) provide the argument in propositional form. Be sure to indicate which letters represent which propositions. (b) Provide a truth table for the argument; (c) State whether the argument is valid or invalid. 1. If X is an even number, then X is divisible by 2. But X is not divisible by 2. Thus, X is not an even number. 2. Eddie can vote if and only if he is registered. But Eddie is not registered. Therefore, Eddie cannot vote. 3. If animals feel pain or learn from experience, then animals are conscious. Animals do not feel pain. Animals do not learn from experience. Therefore, animals are conscious. 4. Either the USS Arizona or the USS Missouri was not sunk in the attack on Pearl Harbor. Therefore, it is not the case that either the USS Arizona or the USS Missouri was sunk in the attack on Pearl Harbor. 5. I am hungry and I am not hungry. Therefore, I will eat my shoe. Section 3 – Cindy, Jane, and Amanda witnessed a bank robbery. At trial, Cindy testified that Lefty did not enter the bank, and if Howard pulled a gun, then Conrad collected the money. Jane testified that if Howard did not pull a gun, then Lefty entered the bank. Amanda testified that if Conrad collected the money, then Howard pulled a gun. (a) Show whether it possible that all three witnesses told the truth. (b) Assuming that all witnesses told the truth, what can we conclude about Lefty, Howard, and Conrad?

Essay Help “>Essay Help