Get help from the best in academic writing.

Mother Tongue Essay essay help free Law

I believe the message that Amy tan was trying to convey, is that language is not the best determinant to gauge intelligence of an individual. And perfect English is not the only English. There are multiple ways of expressing one’s thoughts? multiple “Englishes. ” Vocabulary can describe but language can express. Language can paint a more vivid picture with critical minutiae. Words are just the icing on the cake, although, the true meaning behind your thoughts lies in your language.

As Amy Tan says towards the end of the essay: “I wanted to capture what language ability tests can never reveal: her intent, her passion, her imagery, the rhythms of her speech and the nature of her thoughts. ” Tan was attempting to prove that descriptive words have limited potentiality. Language is meant to “pick up the slack” of where words fall behind. Language gives you the feeling that you are actually there. Emotions and feelings only become palpable through language. Only then, are you capable of accessing and understanding the true content of an essay, book, or article.

People frequently become preoccupied with vocabulary choice, they often lose focus on what truly matters? the message. . There are plenty of ways to convey your message, I just believe it’s most important that your message is totally understood. Tan realized that people often disregarded the power of language so she decided to compose “easy to read” books to not only reach a larger audience, but to allow the relationship she had were her mother to become tangible through language. In conclusion, I thought this particular essay was easy to understand, but had a deeper underlying message, which could be easily overlooked.

Amy Tan taught me that as a writer, through language, I could then expand my horizons. I learned that, being able to articulate with the use multiple “Englishes” is paramount to becoming an eloquent writer. I thought Mother Tongue was very interesting. That is why I think that there is a big significance to talk to someone over the phone than in person because feelings and emotions can be felt and over heard and my effect the listeners disposition. For example, when you send a text message, no one knows exactly how you feel and in terms of making your emotions tangible we are very limited.

Including smiley faces, excessive uses of exclamation marks, and intense capitalization can only do so much. Texting is too indirect. TFacial expressions coincided with language create a deadly match to allow people to understand. That is why personally why I hate talking over the phone. Because there may be some descrepencies with truly comprehanding my emotions. I feel that face to face contact is crucial. For example, if I call customer service a specific issue and I begin to yell my frustrations are transfered into lack of sanity.

That is why I feel that use of automated machines that answer your questions whenever you call should be prohibited. If I call about an issue with my MacBook, my frustrations about my MacBook won’t be taken seriously if there is no emotion behind it. If someone sees that I am immenlsy frustrated with the issues I am having with my laptop then it may be looked at as a capital priority. On the other hand, if I’m talking to a computer (as if it isn’t already crazy enought) and I begin to yell at it then it won’t understand why I am trying to say.