I’m working on a management case study and need an explanation to help me learn.
Question 1. Sochi Olympics—What’s the Cost of National Prestige?The Sochi Olympics was an example of project costs running out of control; so much so that the final price tag (estimated to be more than $50 billion), dwarfed the costs of every other Olympic Games to this point in time. In addition to picking a questionable, sub-tropical location for the Games, from the very beginning, the process of developing the site was subject to meddling from politicians, including President Vladimir Putin. Another major cost to the final price tag was related to charges of wide-spread corruption, as sub-projects for the Games (such as infrastructure, buildings, and roads) ended up with highly inflated price tags. This is a great case for general class discussion as we consider the purpose for Olympic Games, the challenges of cost control with critical deadlines that must be adhered to, and the fact that costs are rising for Games to the point where in 2017, Rome, Budapest, and several other cities withdrew their bids to host the 2024 Olympics because they could not trust the final costs and could not justify the value they would gain versus the costs of the project.Consider the following statement: “Government-funded projects intended to serve as ‘prestige projects,’ such as the Sochi Olympics, should not be judged on the basis of cost.” Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Why?Project success is defined as adherence to budget, schedule, functionality (performance), and client satisfaction. Under these criteria, cite evidence that suggests the Sochi Olympics project was a success and/or failure.When a project has a “hard gate,” like being ready on time, how does that affect normal success criteria? Is it fair to judge a project with a critical completion date by normal project success standards? Why or why not?Consider the problems with the Rio Olympics sites that quickly occurred following completion of the 2016 Summer Games. Access the internet to find evidence of the current state of the Sochi Olympic site. How is it being used and what are the current problems and opportunities for Sochi?Question 2 Reflect on the assigned readings for the week (chapter 8). Identify what you thought was the most important concept(s), method(s), term(s), and/or any other thing that you felt was worthy of your understanding.Also, provide a graduate-level response to each of the following questions:Imagine you are developing a software package for your company’s intranet. Give examples of the various types of costs (labor, materials, equipment and facilities, subcontractors, etc.) and how they would apply to your project.Think of an example of parametric estimating in your personal experience, such as the use of a cost multiplier based on a similar, past cost. Did parametric estimating work or not? Discuss the reasons why.
Monroe College Executing the Government Project Executing Questions
Goals of the Monetary Policy Research Paper
The latest statement by the Fed was released on 25 January 2012. In the statement, the Committee states that it kept the current fund rate at zero to ¼ percent (Federal Reserve, 2012). It also extended the average maturity of its holdings. Moreover, the Committee continued reinvesting principal payments from its holdings. The reinvestment saw the Committee continue to purchase agency-mortgage backed securities and increase the maturity of Treasury securities (Federal Reserve, 2012). The Feb decided to keep a low fund rate because it wanted to stimulate more activity in the economy. The subdued outlook of inflation over the next few years informed the Fed’s decision (Federal Reserve, 2012). In addition, the relatively high levels of unemployment necessitated the maintenance of low fund rates to increase of money supply in the economy. In its latest statement, the Committee notes that although household spending increased, there was no growth in the fixed income sector (Federal Reserve, 2012). Household expenditure affects the short-term demand of goods and services. On the other hand, fixed investments have a significant impact on unemployment levels. The committee was using the above knowledge, when it decided to keep low fund rates. The low fund rates would sustain the affordability of capital necessary for business fixed investments (Federal Reserve, 2012). In the last two years, the Fed was trying to achieve price stability and full employment in the economy, using its monetary policy. It purchased additional long-term securities in its long-term security purchase program (Federal Reserve, 2011). It also increased the amount of money circulating in the economy. The economic basis of the Fed’s policy action was to influence the supply of money in the economy to support investments and ease unemployment. The Fed also has the mandate to retain stability in prices. It offers low fund rates and purchases securities to offer guarantees to investors. Purchasing of securities by the Fed makes it possible for investors to predict future prices of investments, and this eases their short-term speculation. The desire to maintain low unemployment by increasing avenues for creation of jobs in the economy led the Fed to maintain a historical low fund rate of 0 to ¼ percent (Federal Reserve, 2011). Concerns Economic Growth The Fed holds the opinion that economic growth slowed down in 2011 because of the emerging weaknesses such as high unemployment. Nevertheless, the sustenance of the monetary policy would lead to a modest acceleration of the economic growth in 2012. The progression would come from lower commodity prices and increased spending because of easier credit conditions (Federal Reserve, 2011). The concern here is that the actual economic growth rate of 2012 would be lower than earlier expected. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More High Unemployment Concerns on high unemployment show that it is expected to slow down, albeit at a slower rate than previously anticipated (Federal Reserve, 2011). However, the economy will still witness high unemployment levels in the future as current monetary measures take time to shape the economy. We can conclude that the Fed will not be able to tame high unemployment in the coming few years. Price Stability The fed is anxious about the effect of supply disruptions from international producers such as Japan (Federal Reserve, 2011). It expects temporary inflation setbacks due to these disruptions. However, it still expects the projected economic recovery to subdue the brief pressures. Hitherto, the Fed is not sure whether there will be additional supply disruption to affect prices. International Balance The persisting fiscal snags in Europe are negatively upsetting the market emotion and have led to widespread investor pullback from high-risk assets (Federal Reserve, 2011). The Fed’s anxiety is that the longer it takes to resolve the international problems, the harder it will be for the US economy to recover fully. References Federal Reserve. (2011, July 13). Part 1: Overview: Monetary policy and the economic outlook. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/mpr_20110713_part1.htm Federal Reserve. (2012, January 25). Press Release. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20120125a.htm
Challenges of Leadership Group Assignment
essay writer Challenges of Leadership Group Assignment.
Group Project: Leadership Challenge You will be assigned to a group from within the cohort for this
project. Leadership Project groups will be different from the Book Group
Project groups. Expect to be working with no more than 2 other cohort
members. Group facilitator will develop groups and post groups to the
site. The Leadership Challenge IdentificationWithin your group, bring 3 identified leadership challenges from your
role, your function, your organization – try and identify challenges
that you have the power to impact. As a group, review all challenges and select one to work through. You can also combine like problems to have a bigger scope.The group will work together and identify what additional
information/research might be needed to be brought to the group
(example: has this happened to my company or anyone I know before and
what were the conditions under which it happened? What were the
limitations? What were the actions that were implemented and how did
that work? Where does it stand now?) The group will work together and strategize how to move through the
challenge, how to mitigate the challenge or how to totally resolve the
challenge. Develop a presentation slide deck that captures the groups
work.In one video presentation, have each member of the group present how
this challenge relates to their work world, what parts of the solution
can they implement and what impact they hope to have in their
organization. Both components (the slide deck of challenge, strategies,
actions, and impact, as well as the team’s video presentation) will be
submitted. Each individual will be responsible for reviewing the work of the
other groups (you will not review your own group) each individual will
need to comment once on each presentation with what their key learning
was from the challenge and strategies presented and add comment about
what this challenge looks like in their organization – no more than 2
paragraphs of text comments.Summary of Actions Required:Groups formed and published (groups of 3; no more than 4)Leadership Challenges (3) per member discussed, combined and one challenge selectedGroup works towards end productGroup prepares slide deck (presentation – get creative through use of pictures, voice over, etc.)Group prepares video – individual members share key learnings, and
actions they integrated into their world and the impact it had/is
having.Individuals in cohort review all teams’ challenges, comment on learnings.Each individual member will develop a solution to their own
challenge and submit proposal for moving forward based on their
learnings – executive summary is attached in the file below
Challenges of Leadership Group Assignment
Hult International Business School Privacy in the Work Place Analysis Paper
Hult International Business School Privacy in the Work Place Analysis Paper.
Students are expected to contribute to this discussion forum every other week. They summarize, analyze, develop, and critique arguments about ethical issues that they hear or read in the media and from other people. They also comment on the posts of their classmates.Grading criteria: This assignment assesses:students’ awareness of the ethical problems and discussions in the media and their everyday livesstudents’ ability to think critically and apply ethical concepts outside an academic settingRubric40% Regularity and quality of posting36-40Substantial, thoughtful, insightful posting every week. Thoughtful, supportive responses to other students’ posts every week.32-35Substantial posts in at least 8 weeks. Frequent supportive responses to other students’ posts.28-31Substantial posts in at least6 weeks. Occasional responses to other students’ posts.24-27Irregular but substantial posts.20-23Infrequent or superficial posts.10% Choice of topic9-10Appropriate, interesting, challenging ethical issues raised.8Topics usually appropriate7Topics often trivial or irrelevant to the course6Few topics of interest5Irrelevant issues raised40% Argument and analysis36-40Ethical problems or positions consistently accurately summarized, precisely analysed, persuasively criticized.32-35Ethical problems or positions usually accurately summarized, precisely analysed, persuasively criticized.28-31Ethical problems or positions often inaccurately summarized, imprecisely analysed, unpersuasively criticized.24-27Consistently poor summary, analysis, critique.5Little attempt at analysis or critique10% Organization, writing, proofreading9-10Organization clear and logical, writing precise, correct, engaging, proofreading meticulous, appropriate references in correct format8Organization and writing clear and comprehensible, if not always correct. Minor problems with proofreading and references.7Unclear or illogical organization, distracting problems with writing, significant weaknesses in presentation6Organization and writing weak enough to impair understand. Poor or non-existent proofreading or references.5Word porridge
Hult International Business School Privacy in the Work Place Analysis Paper
Read John Paul II encyclical and summarize in 8-10 sentences.
Read John Paul II encyclical and summarize in 8-10 sentences.. I don’t understand this Writing question and need help to study.
First reread John Paul II encyclical. Here is the link: http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyc…
4. Next summarize ideas expressed about dignity and work. Do not summarize the entire encyclical: only ideas about dignity and work in many aspects (immigration, Unions, Subjectivity, etc.)
5. Include a title.
6. Include a first sentence which includes the name of the article, the author, and the point being summarized; for example
In his encyclical “Laborem Exercens,” Pope John Paul II asserts the purpose of work must be first and foremost to promote human dignity.
7. Your summary should be 8 to 10 sentences, should be in your own words with just one brief quotation.
8. According to MLA style, cite the source after the quotation and at the end: Preview MLA Style
Read John Paul II encyclical and summarize in 8-10 sentences.