Get help from the best in academic writing.

Middle East College ?Digital Forensics Case Study and Analytical Report

Middle East College ?Digital Forensics Case Study and Analytical Report.

Aims:To provide students in-depth knowledge on practicing incidents response, analyzing selected cases, utilizing the tools that will assist in finding the accurate digital evidence for the purpose of assure its readiness for the legal procedures. Moreover, stimulating their thoughts about optimizing current incident response policy and its practical procedures.Learning Outcomes: Apply principles of digital forensic science to confirm digital evidences, Demonstrate knowledge of basic tools and techniques used in digital forensics sciences, Conduct fundamental digital forensic investigations and able to articulate the steps of the forensic process as applied to digital evidence, Analyze digital forensic evidence with open-source tools, Figuring opportunities for improving the incidents response and it related digital forensic procedures,Task:Based on the knowledge gained from the digital forensic module, students are advices to choose any real-world information system. The assumption here is that one of this system is targeted by a cyber-attack and you are as a digital forensic professional asked to develop a detailed forensic report about the case. The report is a detailed incident response and reflecting institutional digital forensic procedure to prepare for a legal procedure. The selected case study could be any of the listed systems below:• Databases Forensic• Internet and E-Mail Forensic• Mobile Devices Forensic• Network Forensic• Web Server Forensic• Biometrics Forensic• Human Resources Management Systems Forensic• E- Commerce System Server• Hospital Management System Forensic• Supply chain management SystemThen, the case study report should consist of a clear description about chosen system and might not limited to the following:• What are the major functions performed by this system?• Who is using this systems and user types and their access privileges?• What is the volume of data used within this system?• What is the storage type and where it is located (cloud/local)?• What is the network connectivity this system utilizes?• Medium of communication between systems?• How the incident happened and what is the founded evidence?Recommendations regarding suitable technical steps to be considered (Before – During – After) allocating digital evidence and what kind of mechanisms that should be adopted to assure best practice within digital forensic procedure with proper justifications.Detailed analysis about the attack by identifying the problems and their impacts in Organization function and its reputation.Design the network connectivity or communication channels of selected system and shed the lights a suitable mechanism to consider in term of tracing the attackers using suitable tools or simulator.Detailed Analysis about the performance of the selected case study before, during and after the attack occurred and assume suitable tools can be utilized in tracing digital evidence.Recommendations on suitable countermeasures to optimize, prevent or overcome the challenges with the analyzed cyber-attack and allocating the digital evidence.General Instructions:1. This is an individual assignment. Each student should select any of the real-world system and do elaborated research on the topics mentioned above and write a detailed report based on research done.2. The report should be concise providing the discussion on the above-mentioned topics with the word limit of 3500 words and should be submitted on or before the date of 18th January 2021 for the course work. A soft copy of the report should be submitted to the ‘Safe Assign software for originality checking on or before final submission.3. There will be a viva-voce after the report submission and to be arrange with module leader.4. The final report should cover the following sections in the given order: Cover sheet Abstract Table of Contents Introduction Chapters that covers the detailed analysis of the above given assumed incident response Conclusion ReferencesNote: Each section/chapter should begin on a separate sheet. Instructions for presentation in MS Word*** Words count = 3500 words.*** In-Text Citations and References using Harvard style.
Middle East College ?Digital Forensics Case Study and Analytical Report

Anthropology homework help

Anthropology homework help. This is a paper that focuses on the Health Information Technology Project application. The paper also provides guidelines to use for paper preparation.,Health Information Technology Project application,Week 9 Assignment: Health Information Technology Project, In previous Discussions and Applications, you have explored various aspects of health information technology systems: the historic development of HIT, how data flows across HIT systems, and standards and interoperability requirements including specific terminologies used in your practice setting. In this Application Assignment, you will have the opportunity to further develop your analysis skills by closely examining the implementation of a health information technology system.,As a doctorally prepared nurse, you may find yourself in the position of leading a HIT project team; to be an effective leader and move health information technology projects forward in your organization, you must be able to logically and critically analyze the many aspects and challenges of implementing such a system and then present your insights in a succinct and also professional manner. This exercise provides an opportunity to hone those skills., Carefully review the project requirements below and plan your time accordingly. Be sure to refer to the standards of nursing informatics practice as you develop this Application, which serves as your Major Assessment for this course.,Health Information Technology Project application,To prepare:, ·         Investigate a health information technology system or health information technology application in your area of interest. The health information technology system/application may be in any setting where health care information is developed or managed. Additionally, you may choose your system or application from any organization or virtual environment., o    Examples of health information technology systems or health information technology applications that are acceptable include but are not limited to:, Consumer health applications, ,Clinical information systems, Electronic medical record (EMR) systems in hospitals or provider offices, Home health care applications, School health applications,Patient portal/personal health record, Public health information systems, Telehealth (i.e., from facility to home), Simulation laboratories, Health care informatics research and also development centers, ·         Discuss your proposed health information technology system/application with your Instructor before proceeding with your final selection. You may visit a health care organization in person or virtually in order to make your final choice about the health information technology system or health information technology application of interest.,.Anthropology homework help

UCI Human Resources & Wrongful Termination Darryl Concalves Tweets Discussion

online assignment help UCI Human Resources & Wrongful Termination Darryl Concalves Tweets Discussion.

I’m working on a management report and need support to help me learn.

Hello,1. This is a case analysis, choose 1 from the 2 cases provided.2. Human resources management is constantly changing. As societal and technological advances evolve the workplace, human resources management must evolve as well. In many such cases, controversy arises as there are:a. Canadian laws that compete with each other, or b. grey areas in the Canadian legal framework.3. The structure of this analysis should be provided in the photo below. 4. 700 words, APA format.5. You need do the analysis from a HRM consultant perspective.6. Need at least 2 external sources.Thank you.
UCI Human Resources & Wrongful Termination Darryl Concalves Tweets Discussion

3 minute presentation(speaking) about autonomous vehicles, i basically have to relate multivariable calculus to autonomous vehicles in detail

3 minute presentation(speaking) about autonomous vehicles, i basically have to relate multivariable calculus to autonomous vehicles in detail. Need help with my Calculus question – I’m studying for my class.

I am doing a powerpoint presentation for my multivariable calculus class, with my group on monday in class, it is on machine learning. I will be able to attach it so you can get a feel for what its going to look like. But basically i need to talk for 3 minutes about the calculus of autonomous vehicles and what they are. I have to really focus on the math aspect part of it, it has to relate to the chapters on my class, so i will also be able to attach that aswell. There are two things i need,
1. notes to just add to the powerpoint (enough to fill 2 or 3 slides in bullet note formation).
2. A 3 minute written speech i can read off, on the information of autonomous vehicles (self driving cars) and how it relates to multivariable calculus, it really needs to be well detailed in a math sense, i will also be attaching a website link that has a lot of information you can get from aswell. Also make sure to introduce the topic of autonomous vehicles, so i can speak about this information smoothly when i present. Thank you!
3 minute presentation(speaking) about autonomous vehicles, i basically have to relate multivariable calculus to autonomous vehicles in detail

Ethical Interpretation of Unethical Studies

Ethical Interpretation of Unethical Studies. Mini Research Proposal: Ethical Interpretation of Unethical Studies Milgram’s obedience study is unethical for a few reasons, and one of them is the deception of the respondents about the nature of the research (McLeod, 2007). As such, the respondents were informed that the study would deal with the learning in general, focusing on the respondent as a person in charge of the learning-teaching interaction with another individual who is actually a researcher’s “accomplice” (McLeod, 2007). In fact, Milgram’s study was conducted to investigate the terrors of the Second World War in terms of the Nazi experiments and the readiness of people to harm (in any possible way, including emotional and physical destruction, and manslaughter) a person they do not probably know (McLeod, 2007). The study was based on the ability of a person to follow another person’s (experimenter or experimenter’s assistant) instructions and encouragement in continuing an experiment, which required punishing a learner for wrong answers (McLeod, 2007). On the one hand, the scenario of the study excluded any possibility that a respondent could think about the harm he brings to another person, because they thought that the experiment was about learning rather than about cruelty, obedience, and responsibility. On the other hand, the study made it possible to see that bearing responsibility for negative consequences of some actions may be the key element in obedience, connecting such a tendency in human behaviour to Nazi’s actions towards prisoners during the WWII. As stated in the study by McLeod (2007), which is aimed at summing up the methodology and results of Milgram’s obedience study, shock administered to a learner was increased with the help of prods given to a respondent by an experimenter: The teacher is told to administer an electric shock every time the learner makes a mistake, increasing the level of shock each time. There were 30 switches on the shock generator marked from 15 volts (slight shock) to 450 (danger – severe shock. (n.p.) While bearing in mind the information about the shock generator and the number of marks on it, it is actually necessary to remember only about the two marks (shock and severe shock) (McLeod, 2007). In this respect, one of the major research data collection methods employed by Milgram (McLeod, 2007), and applied in further analyses, such as the study by Beauvais, Courbet, and Oberle (2012), are based on experiments/trials. At the same time, experiments are an integral part of a psychological research, as stated in the studies by Eysenck (2009) and Coolican (2014) that emphasize the importance of ethical approach in any psychological research. An idea for an ethical research methodology, building upon Milgram’s approach would be far from adequate or accurate, because it would not help a researcher to receive correct results. The reason for this gap lies in the human nature and the desire of people to seem better and kinder than they usually are. No confidentiality would make respondents to reveal their actual violent behaviours unless an experiment is built in a way to reveal those. Zimbardo’s prison study also referred to as Stanford prison experiment is one of the unethical methods to show how human nature can be revealed when people are free to do whatever they want, and they are told nothing about negative consequences and responsibility for their actions. Ethical experiments are built on complete awareness of respondents about what they do and why they do it. There is no possibility that an ethically healthy study would deceive respondents or peers about the nature, methods, or tools of the study to make it look less inhuman, severe, or violent. The modern research on obedience could be found in the following three peer-reviewed articles reflecting during a search the Internet using an engine like Google Scholar. Coolican (2014) suggests statistics as a way for data presentation in the article “Statistics – organising the data,” Eysenck (2009) demonstrates Fundamentals of Psychology by revealing the most adequate methods of researching obedience, while Horcajo, Brinol, and Petty (2014) offered “Multiple roles for majority versus minority source status on persuasion when source status follows the message.” Even though observation may be more appropriate as a research data collection method for investigating obedience, it may be ineffective in its capacity to record all possible scenarios. In fact, a controlled trial is a more preferable study option for obedience study research, because participants should be fully informed about their roles and functions, as well as their rights and the actual purposes of the research (British Psychological Society, 2010). Based on the principles of the British Psychological Society’s (2010) Code of Human Research Ethics, a research that aims to investigate the obedience of individuals should incorporate “respect for the autonomy and dignity of persons, scientific value, social responsibility, [and] maximising benefit and minimising harm” (p. 7). In other words, there is no clear way to deceive a respondent and stay ethical during a research. Milgram’s experiment can be replicated in an ethical form, contributing to the modern research on human obedience essentially. Mini Research Proposal A study to investigate obedience should be based on a series of recorded interviews (questions adjusted during an interview depending on answers). Therefore, there can be a quantitative factor within the study, which would also contain Likert scale as a data measurement tool. Firstly, an interview should be synthesized using the most likely and unlikely scenarios of hypothetical and realistic situations that have happened and might happen under the most unlikely circumstances. For instance, a scenario of a participant being offered to join a gang that punishes criminals (known from a police database) that have escaped, or returned to criminal activities when on probation, or official law enforcement body cannot prove their guilt; a participant is offered anonymity when being a gang member, and money for every criminal punished (the participant should decide on the type of punishment). The most important part of the research should be assurance of the participants that all situations are hypothetical, and would not be used for judging their social responsibility, social skills, or psychological health. At the same time, respondents should complete a set of questions depending on their answers and options chosen as readiness to join the gang (ready or not; why? For the sake of justice or safety in the streets?), acceptance of money for every case (justice or financial reimbursement?), and the type of punishment (from catching to rather cruel actions). Finally, a respondent should be offered the same options in the same scenario, provided that he/she has accepted the gang membership with all the benefits and power, emphasizing that they would have a leader who would arrange everything with the authorities, or that the leader is given authority by the law enforcement units that cannot act in an explicit way against the organized crime groups. The method should contain a clear interview with the first stage of scenarios and answers to hypothetical situations, and a second stage of scenarios, evaluating the extent to which a respondent is likely to change his/her decision about the situation if he/she does not have to bear responsibility. The research should also feature situations that appeal to justice, and other ethically and socially accepted concepts, as well as something unethical, such as bank robbery. In this case, it is necessary to analyze whether a respondent associates himself/herself with a media/TV/book/etc. character that acts as an obvious protagonist or antagonist. This is essential to identify, even if this would be measured and research in a subsequent study, because this one should focus on obedience. The data should be analyzed with the help of statistical methods, including correlation and descriptive statistics. As such, after collection of data, it is necessary to measure whether respondents were likely to change their decision about situations when being informed about someone else bearing responsibility and giving orders/encouraging them to certain actions. The explanations also should be included, as it is essential to find out if a respondent were uncertain when giving answers in the first stage of the scenarios or he/she found lack of responsibility a reason to accept the scenario as interesting and worth participating. On the one hand, it is necessary to build a valid set of scenarios and interviews, train interviewers, and record the data correctly. On the other hand, interpretation of data might also involve analysis of the demographical aspect and the relation between obedience and gender, profession, age, or race/ethnicity, as well as social background. Independent variable. Responsibility added in the second scenario. Dependent variable. Acceptance/avoidance of the scenario when responsibility is added. The correlation between the differences in answers to both stages of scenarios should demonstrate whether respondents are likely to change their mind, and if this is connected to responsibility factor, as well as obedience to authority of a leader, and lack of consequences for the respondent himself/herself. The findings of the research could show the demographical component in case the sample size is sufficient, because the current proposed scenario of research requires a large sample size or with random participants representing diverse layers of the population, connecting to their backgrounds, and possible negative experiences related to obedience or disobedience. In this respect, sampling should exclude psychologically unstable and unhealthy individuals that might jeopardise a study by demonstrating violent or inadequate behaviour. The research methods used in the proposed study would incorporate British Psychological Society ethical standards in all stages of the research, starting with the sampling procedures, reception of written consent, and ending with the interactions between a researcher and a respondent. References Beauvais, J.-L., Courbet, D.,Ethical Interpretation of Unethical Studies