A summary of “MySpace not Responsible for Predators” The essay “MySpace Not Responsible for Predators” by Kevin Alexander made the claim in the case 14-year-old girl v. Solis, the internet should not be blamed for the things that happened to this girl. The girl was competent of what she was doing when she was meeting with a 19-year-old boy. A mother filed a lawsuit against MySpace, stating that MySpace’s lack of age verification allowed a 19-year-old man, Pete Solis, to lie about his age and contact her daughter. Where he convinced the daughter to meet with him; he took her to do dinner, a movie, and after raped her.
The 30 million dollar lawsuit and the claim, stated by Adam Loewey, the family’s lawyer, “MySpace is more concerned with making money than protecting children online,”(119) was quickly rebuked by Alexander. He stated that MySpace was not a babysitting business but rather a business, that making money was the intention of the website. Thwarting naive children or dementing people can happen anywhere, video games, music, and through television. It all came back to the mother not warning the daughter of predators, not monitoring the use of the internet, and allowing the daughter to physically meet a 19-year-old man.
The author said that the girl should be held responsible and supported his claim by going back to psychology and stating that at 14, a girl is capable of calculating her own risks, she could have prevented it. There are 80 million users and only 3 cases of molestation have hit the courts. There is a waiver you must agree and sign, stating that MySpace isn’t responsible for the conduct on or offline. There are tons of predators out there and there are tons of waiting victims. Its unknown which ones are more dangerous.
Write an essay on competitor analysis for cook medical – urology division
Write an essay on competitor analysis for cook medical – urology division.
Write an essay on competitor analysis. This analysis is focus on healthcare industry for cook medical – urology division and some of the competitors to be address will be Boston Scientific, Bard etc – urology division. The write up will be in marketing management approach but all points should be associated with examples in related to these companies with real market data and facts associated A guideline on points that must be included (at least but not limited to) will be the following: (An opening to the topic is not required. You may jump directly to content as below guideline but a closing in summary is needed. Kindly ensure all references are valid papers) 1. What are the major steps in conducting a competitor analysis for a medical device company? 2. How does the healthcare industry’s structure affect the intensity of competition? You are required to illustrate your explanation based on the impact of it for cook medical – urology division with example. 3. What are the major sources of competitive intelligence (CI) for cook medical? Some of the sources includes business news, patents, company quarter report, market report & FDA. Proper elaboration to be given for a nice flow of presentation. One paragraph on this is sufficient. 4. How would you design a CI system for your cook medical? 5. How far is it possible to predict your competitor’s response to your marketing actions? 6. Summary / closing
Essay Help “>Essay Help
https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/