I’m working on a java case study and need guidance to help me study.
For this Assignment you will write your own HashTable in Python or Java. Do not use any built in Hashing Structures (dictionaries, Maps,Etc). For Simplicity sake make the underlying structure a basic array or list.You will :Read in the file belowhttps://github.com/first20hours/google-10000-engli…Store each word in your HashTable for easy lookupYou will have to build a hash() function to give an integer value for your StringStore the String in that indexIf a Collision, use a collision mitigation strategyCalculate and report the percentage of collisions in your structureYour HashTable may not be more than 20% larger than the # of total words
Marymount University Creation of a Hash Table on Java Program
MGTS 7618 CU Extended Challenge Activity Report
MGTS 7618 CU Extended Challenge Activity Report.
I’m working on a business report and need support to help me study.
The Extended Challenge Activity Report is an account of preparation for, engagement in, and reflection on your Extended Challenge. At the end of the training period, you will write a 2000-word report in which you write your reflection after engaging in all aspects of the Extended Challenge. The report contains at least three sections. First, your report must show evidence of your continuous engagement in all aspects of the Extended Challenge. Second, your self-reflection section must contain three key learning points of growth from the Extended Challenge. You need to base your reflection on the surveys results and/or other reflection tools provided during class. You also need to engage with theories in the literature to critically evaluate how the Extended Challenge is related to your development in wisdom and leadership. The criteria of the assessment are as follow:Evidence of Participation (20%) The comprehensiveness of the evidence (the training activities, training buddy interactions, group interactions, and wise rewards / penalties). Quality of evidence that shows continuous participation in the Extended Challenge.Clarity and relevance of the evidence (understandable, readable, relevant). Learning and Growth (50%) Clear identification of three key points of learning Effective use of survey results and other reflection tools as the basis of self-reflection Use theories covered in the course to do a critical evaluation of how the self-growth and learning points can help you develop in wisdom and leadership Effective use of relevant literature to support the reflection Design and Planning (20%) Quality of the document and academic writing. The assignment is also going to be assessed based on the quality of writing and referencing (10%). In this section, you need to provide relevant, high quality, convincing evidence of continuous engagement in all aspects of the challenge. The criteria of assessment are:In this section, you need to write a self-reflection on three key learning points of growth from the Extended Challenge based on the surveys and reflection tools, and critically evaluate it to your development in wisdom and leadership. The criteria of assessment are:In this section, you need to design your own detailed Extended Challenge based on relevant theories and points of learning in the course. The criteria of assessment are:Clarity and quality of analysis of how theories in the literature are used to design the extended challenge Creativity & independent thinking, commitment, and detail of the plan The criteria of the assessment are:Appropriate use of academic writing style; comprising of structure and organisation; clarity of writing; and/or spelling and grammarProper and consistent use of APA Referencing Style in-text citation and reference list.
MGTS 7618 CU Extended Challenge Activity Report
Identifying a Researchable Problem
assignment helper Identifying a Researchable Problem.
Course Project: Introduction to Course Project Evidence-based practice involves a great deal more than simply reading nursing periodicals on a regular basis. Nurses can take a more proactive approach to evidence-based practice by identifying authentic problems and concerns, and then using that to guide their inquiries into current research. In this way, nurses can connect the results of relevant research studies to their nursing practice. For the Course Project, you identify and apply relevant research to a specific nursing topic or problem. You begin by formulating an answerable question that is relevant to nursing and evidence-based practice. In later weeks of this course, you continue the Course Project by conducting a literature review and then determining how the evidence from the literature can be applied to nursing practice. Before you begin, review the Course Project Overview document located in this week’s Learning Resources. Note: This Course Project will serve as the Portfolio Assignment for the course. In addition to submitting portions of this Project in Weeks 2 and 5, you will turn in all three deliverables in Week 10. Course Project: Part 1—Identifying a Researchable Problem One of the most challenging aspects of EBP is to actually identify the answerable question. Formulating a question that targets the goal of your research is a challenging but essential task. The question plays a crucial role in all other aspects of the research, including the determination of the research design and theoretical perspective to be applied, which data will be collected, and which tools will be used for analysis. It is therefore essential to take the time to ensure that the research question addresses what you actually want to study. Doing so will increase your likelihood of obtaining meaningful results. In this first component of the Course Project, you formulate questions to address a particular nursing issue or problem. You use the PICOT model—patient/population, intervention/issue, comparison, and outcome—outlined in the Learning Resources to design your questions. To prepare: Review the article, “Formulating the Evidence Based Practice Question: A Review of the Frameworks,” found in the Learning Resources for this week. Focus on the PICOT model for guiding the development of research questions. Review the section beginning on page 71 of the course text, titled, “Developing and Refining Research Problems” in the course text, which focuses on analyzing the feasibility of a research problem. Reflect on an issue or problem that you have noticed in your nursing practice. Consider the significance of this issue or problem. Generate at least five questions that relate to the issue which you have identified. Use the criteria in your course text to select one question that would be most appropriate in terms of significance, feasibility, and interest. Be prepared to explain your rationale. Formulate a preliminary PICO question—one that is answerable—based on your analysis. What are the PICO variables (patient/population, intervention/issue, comparison, and outcome) for this question? Note: Not all of these variables may be appropriate to every question. Be sure to analyze which are and are not relevant to your specific question. Using the PICOT variables that you determined for your question, develop a list of at least 10 keywords that could be used when conducting a literature search to investigate current research pertaining to the question. To complete: Write a 3- to 4-page paper that includes the following: A summary of your area of interest, an identification of the problem that you have selected, and an explanation of the significance of this problem for nursing practice The 5 questions you have generated and a description of how you analyzed them for feasibility Your preliminary PICOT question and a description of each PICOT variable relevant to your question At least 10 possible keywords that could be used when conducting a literature search for your PICOT question and a rationale for your selections
Identifying a Researchable Problem
Tourism and Sustainability: Whale-Watching Industries Report (Assessment)
Tourism and Sustainability: Whale-Watching Industries Report (Assessment). Characteristics for Development of Whale-Watching Industries On the social front, it is evident that although the community in the Vava’u area comprises of only 16,000 people, it has been on the forefront in whale conservation efforts and demonstrates a friendly nature to tourists. Additionally, the community has been effective in using promotional material involving the humpback whales to put Tonga on the world map. On the economic front, it is clear that tourism is the economic mainstay of the Vava’u area due to the fragile nature of other economic activities mainly in the manufacturing, agricultural, forestry and service sectors, hence making the area a fertile breeding ground for the development of modern whale-watching industries. Concerning the natural environment, the Vava’u Island group in the Kingdom of Tonga is not only located in a tropical climate with warm, sheltered waters but also prides itself for hosting one of the whale species most popular for tourism. The high-quality marine environments in the area ensure the availability of humpback whales, which often visit the area for mating, birthing, and raising young calves. Non-Economic Impacts of Whales and Whale-Watching As demonstrated by the author of the article, tourism activities occasion both economic and non-economic impacts in the destination area or country. In the context of the Island of Tonga, whales and whale-watching activities are likely to occasion difficulties in hosting large numbers of tourists, environmental pollution and degradation, conflict between operators, resentment in the local community fuelled by increasingly large numbers of tourists, and internalization of vices such as prostitution and gambling among the local people. Other non-economic impacts of whales and whale-watching activities likely to affect the Island of Tonga include inflationary pressure in the local economy, loss of local control on how local resources are managed and distributed, as well as environmental degradation due to the establishment of numerous whale-watching businesses in the area. However, a positive non-economic impact for the Island concerns the change of attitudes and value systems among the local community, especially in terms of valuing and conserving the humpback whales as a critical resource for social and economic development of the Kingdom. Factors influencing Potential Future Growth of Whale Watching Some of the factors that will guarantee the future growth of whale-watching industry in Vava’u Island group, as demonstrated by the author, include (1) developing adequate transportation, accommodation, and other elements of the tourism infrastructure, (2) attaining long-term political stability not only in the Island of Tonga but also in South Pacific region, (3) establishing convenient and reliable airline connections to boost tourists’ arrivals, (4) dealing with unsustainable whale hunting practices, (4) establishing proper management practices for whale-watching activities, (5) dealing with negative social, economic and environmental impacts associated with tourism, (6) maintaining a stringent code of practice for whale-watching operators to minimise negative impacts associated with competition, and (7) establishing adequate conservation initiatives for the humpback whales to maintain their health and value. It is important to note that several factors discussed in the article, including degradation of the natural environment, non-involvement of the local community and proliferation of unsustainable hunting practices may actually hamper the growth of the whale-watching industry in the future if immediate corrective measures are not taken. Overall, it can be suggested that the sustainability efforts undertaken to guarantee the expansion of the whale-watching industry in the Island of Tonga are bearing fruits. Tourism and Sustainability: Whale-Watching Industries Report (Assessment)
Rhetorical Analysis Assignment
Rhetorical Analysis Assignment. Can you help me understand this Writing question?
Write an introductory paragraph with several sentences that do the following:
1. Introduce the paper you plan to analyze. Identify the author and describe the circumstances under which the paper was written. (You may have to guess based on the content and purpose.) Give the full title of the paper, when it was written and who was the intended audience. Describe what you think was the writer’s purpose: What did he/she want to achieve? What do you think the author wanted the reader to think or do after reading this paper?
2. Identify the rhetorical appeals and strategies used by the author, and identify those that you plan to discuss in your analysis (preview statement). Note that you do not have to discuss in depth all of the strategies the author uses.
Each paragraph in the body should have its own topic sentence and a unified focus. For this analysis, you could write one paragraph on each of the rhetorical appeals/strategies you mentioned in the introduction. In each of these body paragraphs, it is useful to:
1. Define the rhetorical appeal/strategy you are going to write about (you may quote or paraphrase from your course readings)
2. Quote or paraphrase 2-3 examples from the paper that illustrate the use of that appeal/strategy
3. Explain how or why the example illustrates the appeal/strategy and how the appeal/strategy contributed to author’s purpose
The purpose of the conclusion is to (a) summarize briefly the main points of your analysis and (b) explain the significance of your analysis by considering the following questions:
1. Was the author successful in using the various rhetorical appeals and strategies for the intended audience and purpose? Give examples.
2. What changes might you recommend to the author to better achieve his/her purpose?
1. Your final draft should be approximately 1600 words, with 1-inch margins and 12 point Times Roman font. Use headings and subheadings for the sections to guide the reader.
2. Please number your pages.
3. Make sure you save your document as a Word document.
Please see the attachment for the artical that need to analysis, and some sample paragraphs before start your work.
Rhetorical Analysis Assignment
Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay
Review This Service