Input from group members with specialized knowledge and expertise rates a more complete basis for decision-making. I think participative leader involve one or more employees in the decision making process. I try to determining from other what to do and how to do it. However, take the final decision. I believe I am not expected to know everything.
Using this style is of mutual benefit as it allows them to become part of the team and allows you to make better decisions. 2. Face to face survey survey from 3 different persons, one from my close friend, friend and family member.I attached these surveys with my assessment. The result shows that eve strong leadership abilities and also need to improve in some areas. Use these surveys to help me to determine what skills and abilities I can continue to improve (Strengths) and what skills and abilities I need to develop (Opportunities for growth). One I knows my weakness, use the survey to help develop those weaknesses.
1. 2 Leadership theory Leadership style is the manner and approach of providing direction, implementing plans, and motivating people.I mention here three different current leadership styles: * autocratic or authoritarian * participative or democratic delegation or laissez-fair Although good leaders use all three styles, with one of them normally dominant, bad leaders tend to stick with one style (normally autocratic). Authoritarian (autocratic) This style is used when leaders tell their employees what they want done and how they want it accomplished, without getting the advice of their followers.Some of the appropriate conditions to use it is when you have all the information to solve the problem, you are short on time, and your employees are well motivated. Some people tend to think of this style as a cliche for yelling, using demeaning language, and leading by threats and abusing their power. This is not the authoritarian style, rather it is an abusive, unprofessional style called “bossing people around.
” It has no place in a leader’s repertoire. The authoritarian style should normally only be used on rare occasions.If you have the time and want to gain more commitment and motivation from your employees, then you should use the participative style. Participative (democratic) This style involves the leader including one or more employees in the decision asking process (determining what to do and how to do it). However, the leader maintains the final decision making authority. Using this style is not a sign of weakness, rather it is a sign of strength that your employees will respect. This is normally used when you have part of the information, and your employees have other parts.
A leader is not expected to know everything-?this is why you employ knowledgeable and skillful employees. Using this style is of mutual benefit as it allows them to become part of the team and allows you to make better decisions. Delegation (laissez fairer) In this style, the leader allows the employees to make the decisions. However, the leader is still responsible for the decisions that are made. This is used when employees are able to analyze the situation and determine what needs to be done and how to do it.You cannot do everything! You must set priorities and delegate certain tasks. This is not a style to use so that you can blame others when things go wrong rather this is a style to be used when you fully trust and confidence in the people below you.
Do not be afraid to use it, however, use it wisely! NOTE: Laissez Fairer (or alas;seer fairer) is the noninterference in the affairs of others. [French : laissez, second person Pl. Imperative of laissez, to let, allow + fairer, to do. ] (Big Dog, Little Dog. 1 995) 1. Leadership role model’s Steve Jobs Steven Paul “Steve” Jobs; February 24, 1 955 – October 5, 2011) was an American entrepreneur and inventor, best known as the co-founder, chairman, and CEO of Apple Inc. Through Apple, he was widely recognized as a charismatic pioneer of the personal computer revolution and for his influential career in the computer.
Steve Jobs was an unconventional leader. His management style wasn’t the stuff of university textbooks – he wasn’t known for his consultative or consensus building approach.He was a ‘high- maintenance who demanded excellence from his staff and was known for his blunt delivery of criticism. But it was his sheer genius combined with his ability to articulate his vision and bring staff, investors and customers along on the journey – plus the lessons learned in a major career setback – that made it work. The result was indisputable. REF Steve Jobs is regarded as a ‘visionary’ and that is how he is most often described in relation o Apple, the company he founded with high school buddy Steve Woozier in 1976,and after a decline renewed the company with a sense of purpose.REF Bill Gates William Henry “Bill” Gates is an American business magnate, investor, programmer, inventor and philanthropist.
Gates is the former chief executive and current chairman of Microsoft, the world’s largest personal computer software company, which he co-founded with Paul Allen. Bill Gates has a directive and participative leadership style and specifies what needs to be done to achieve productivity and morale in a given situation. A path goal leader such as Bill Gates attempts to clarify the path to a goal for a group member so that he or she receives personal payoffs.The leader who is directive emphasis on formal activities such as planning, organizing, and controlling. As a participative leader he consults with group members to gather their suggestions, and then takes these suggestions seriously when making a decision (Dublin, et al. 2006, p. 183).
This style is best suited for improving the morale of well motivated employees who perform no repetitive tasks. Comparisons of Bill Gates and Steve Jobs To start with, they were both dropouts of college. Bill Gates was a drop out of Harvard University and Steve Jobs dropped out of Berkeley University.Steve Jobs did not develop the original ideas of Apple; instead, Steve Wackier was the original inventor of the Apple Computer. Steve Jobs is a giant jerk to his employees. He makes them work 90 hours weeks, screams, and yells when they do not accomplish a huge task on a small deadline. He made an employee so mad one time that the employee jumped up and slammed Jobs’ face off the wall.
Bill gates on the other hand, is a very caring person when it moms to his employees, he is afraid to over work them and gives them lots of vacation time.In fact, their beginnings are similar: Jobs dropped out Of Reed to create Apple, and Gates left Harvard to start Microsoft. While both young men, Jobs and Gates both became immensely successful with innovative products. Both men lost their business partners as their success grew, Woozier left Apple after an accident and then to pursue his own interests and Allen departed Microsoft after successfully battling cancer. And in both cases, their secret to their success is in their leadership styles. Yet, this is where they part in similarity.Gates represents the ultimate business man, defined by competitiveness, opportunism, and efficiency.
In contrast, Jobs is an idealist, characterized by his unyielding commitment to his own vision. (Stories, 2011) MY ROLE MODELS My role models are Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, because they are most powerful people who suggest new definition of present and future for the people in the world. Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are the people who always think creatively and have a great insight to expect the future, which eventually changed the oral greatly.However, there are many differences between two in terms of their leadership style or speech style. Bill Gates, who barely knows failure, was the icon of ass. His perfectionist tendency is shown in many parts such as his presentation or even in his fashion style. I realized he was born as a genius.
I especially respect his excellent way of deciding his opinion in every situation. He had a few difficulties in his life, but every time he faces such difficulties, he knew how he had to do exactly, which eventually lead positive results in his overall business.Life is not fair, get used to it'( ) is one of my favorite quotes of Bill Gates. This makes people work hard, rather than expect fairy tale without working hard or noticing the reality. This also shows Bill Gates’ personality and effort, which were major criteria of his success. Compare to Bill Gates, Steve Jobs had to go through some obstacles and difficulties in his life but I believe those are the bases that made him stronger and more powerful than ever. Black shirt, blue jeans and new balance shoes are the main solely of Steve Jobs whenever he does his presentation.
SWOT Analysis Paper (Exxon Mobile)
SWOT Analysis Paper (Exxon Mobile).
Conduct an internal and external environmental analysis, and a supply chain analysis for your
proposed new division and its business model.
Create a SWOT table summarizing your findings. Your environmental analysis should consider, at a
minimum, the following factors. For each factor, identify the one primary strength, weakness,
opportunity, threat, and trend, and include it in your table.
External forces and trends considerations:
Legal and regulatory
Global
Economic
Technological
Innovation
Social
Environmental
Competitive analysis
Internal forces and trends considerations:
Strategy
Structures
Processes and systems
Resources
Goals
Strategic capabilities
Culture
Technologies
Innovations
Intellectual property
Leadership
Write a synopsis of no more than 1,050 words in which you analyze relevant forces and trends from
the list above. Your analysis must include the following:
Identify economic, legal, and regulatory forces and trends.
Critique how well the organization adapts to change.
Analyze and explain the supply chain of the new division of the existing business. Share your plans to
develop and leverage core competencies and resources within the supply chain in an effort to make a
positive impact on the business model and the various stakeholders.
Identify issues and/or opportunities:
Identify the major issues and/or opportunities that the company faces based on your analysis.
Generate a hypothesis surrounding each issue and research questions to use for conducting analysis.
Identify the circumstances surrounding each issue; classify the circumstances; attribute the
importance of each classification; and test the accuracy of the importance for each classification.
Essay Help “>Essay Help