Write a two-page double-spaced reaction paper to an article on emotion.First, you need to pick an article about emotion that was not discussed in class or covered extensively in the assigned readings. You can find good articles from journals such as Emotion, Emotion and Cognition, and Journal of Motivation and Emotion. The first paragraph of the reaction paper should be a summary of the article (like an abstract, but written in your own words). The remaining paragraphs should discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the article. For instance, you can discuss threats to internal validity, issues of external validity, and whether there was a manipulation check. The discussion can include both positive and negative comments. Your paper should also include original thinking. For example, did you come up with any new hypotheses or ideas for future studies? You will need to turn in the journal article along with your reaction paper.The paper must be in your own words, and should not be something you have written for another class.I take plagiarism very seriously. When you use words or ideas from another source, whether it is from your textbook, a journal article, lecture slides or a website, you must credit the original source. This also applies whenyou use other people’sideas inyour own words.If you are using direct quotes, you must place quotation marks around them and cite the source in parenthesis. If you are using ideas, cite the source in parenthesis after a sentence that was derived in part from that resource. Not including this information is considered plagiarism.
Article Toward a Cumulative Science of Emotion Reaction Paper
BackgroundConsiderations of exigency and kairos are critical as you judge which conversations and which discourse communities to engage with in your larger research project. After all, our readers are much more willing to listen to what we have to say if we can show them that doing so is critically important.PurposeIn this Writer’s Journal, you will have the opportunity to reflect on your topic’s exigency and kairos; additionally, you will be able to think about and formulate your central research question (CRQ) in terms of exigency and kairos.Skills and OutcomesExplain how the context surrounding your topic is exigent (Rhetorical Knowledge)Interpret the your topic’s inquiry as kairotic (Rhetorical Knowledge)Produce a new formulation of your CRQ that captures your project’s exigency and/or kairos (Rhetorical Knowledge; Critical Thinking, Reading, and Composing; Processes)Habits of Mind PracticedOpennessCreativityResponsibilityFlexibilityMetacognitionTasksIn your journal entry, you should explain how your topic is exigent. Why is it critical to explore your topic right now and/or dangerous not to do so?Next, you should explain how your topic is kairotic. This is moving beyond describing why it is important/critical to explore your topic now (exigency) and is instead an interpretation of how current events make it likely that exploring your project could result in some positive impact. In short, why is now the “perfect” or “opportune” time to explore your project?Finally, you should reformulate your CRQ in terms of the exigency and kairos you explore in this journal entry. Does your CRQ substantially change? Do considerations of exigency and kairos directly affect your CRQ’s formulation, or would it be more effective to address these concerns with your audience in a different place, like an introduction to your project or other textual frame? Why?*NOTE: There are many different ways to approach these tasks, but you should aim to be as thorough as possible in your response (approximately 500 words is a good target length).Criteria for SuccessIn each Writer’s Journal, you should: clearly address each question or task;employ many details, examples, and explanations in answering each question or task; and,create an internally organized text, employing sentences (or notes where applicable) that clearly relate to one another.
Arizona State University Crime Within the Community Writers Journal
Sociology Reading Journal – EASY
Sociology Reading Journal – EASY. I don’t understand this Sociology question and need help to study.
ASA format. 12 point font double spaced. 1 page for each reading minimum.
4 total readings. 4 pages. 4 separate quotes. Each reading on separate page.
Reading theory is challenging, to say the least. It often requires multiple readings, “googling” terms you do not understand, and a general tenacity that can be difficult to muster. Journaling will help with this.
Read the requiring readings:1.) Durkheim – Mechanical and Organic Solidarity2.) Durkheim – What is a Social Fact? 3.) Durkheim – Anomic Suicide 4.) Durkheim- The Human Meaning of Religion
After you have read the piece, identify with a quote that you believe best summarizes the main argument, or one of the main arguments, of each piece.
Title your journal entry with the author and title of the reading.
Type the quote you chose at the top.
Explain why you think this quote best summarizes the argument. This means you will write—in your own words— a paragraph or two on how you understand the piece and how the quote reflects that understanding.
Sociology Reading Journal – EASY
The Future of Psychological Testing and Assessment Presentation
term paper help The Future of Psychological Testing and Assessment Presentation.
Select a special population of interest from the following list:Domestic violence victimsClients with questions about their sexual orientationHuman trafficking victimsClients with suicidal ideationClients who self-harm Hypothesize the future of psychological testing for your selected population.Create a 7-10-slide presentation about your population that includes the following:A description of the tests and assessments currently in useChanges to the tests and assessments you would like to seeExplain any procedures related to reporting abuse, duty to warn, or victims’ rightsDetailed speaker notes as if you are giving the presentation in personWhile APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center1Unsatisfactory0.00%2Less than Satisfactory74.00%3Satisfactory79.00%4Good87.00%5Excellent100.00%70.0 %Content 20.0 %Tests and assessment currently in use for the selected populationThe presentation does not include the tests and assessment currently in use for the selected population. Presentation does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The presentation inadequately includes the tests and assessment currently in use for the selected population. Presentation demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The presentation appropriately includes the tests and assessment currently in use for the selected population. Presentation demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The presentation includes an advanced description of the tests and assessment currently in use for the selected population. Presentation demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The presentation includes an insightful description of the tests and assessment currently in use for the selected population. Presentation demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.20.0 %Changes to the tests and assessment the learner would like to seeThe presentation does not include a description of the changes to the tests and assessment the learner would like to see. Presentation does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The presentation inadequately describes the changes to the tests and assessment the learner would like to see. Presentation demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The presentation appropriately discusses the changes to the tests and assessment the learner would like to see. Presentation demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Presentation demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The presentation includes an advanced description of the changes to the tests and assessment the learner would like to see. Presentation demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The presentation includes an insightful description of the changes to the tests and assessment the learner would like to see. Presentation demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.20.0 %Procedures related to reporting abuse, duty to warn, or victims’ rightsThe presentation does not include an explanation of any procedures related to reporting abuse, duty to warn, or victims’ rights. Presentation does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The presentation inadequately includes an explanation of any procedures related to reporting abuse, duty to warn, or victims’ rights. Presentation demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The presentation appropriately includes an explanation of any procedures related to reporting abuse, duty to warn, or victims’ rights. Presentation demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The presentation includes an advanced explanation of any procedures related to reporting abuse, duty to warn, or victims’ rights. Presentation demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The presentation includes an insightful explanation of any procedures related to reporting abuse, duty to warn, or victims’ rights. Presentation demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.10.0 %Detailed Speaker NotesDetailed speaker notes that detail what would be said if giving the presentation in-person are not included. Presentation does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.Detailed speaker notes that detail what would be said if giving the presentation in-person are inadequately included. Presentation demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.Detailed speaker notes are concisely included and accurately represented what would be said if giving the presentation in-person. Presentation demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.Advanced and detailed speaker notes are included that represented what would be said if giving the presentation in-person. Presentation demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.This paper includes insightful and highly detailed speaker notes as if the presentation is given in-person. All speaker notes were in perfect unison with the content on the slides. Presentation demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.30.0 %Organization, Effectiveness, and Format 10.0 %Presentation of ContentThe content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.5.0 %LayoutThe layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total Weightage
The Future of Psychological Testing and Assessment Presentation
Reflection on Cultural Competencies
Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp Jon Teegardin Caring for a multicultural society is the name of the class I am taking this semester. It is only logical that part of learning about providing care to a patients of diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds is learning about my own perceptions of culture. By honestly and openly completing a cultural competency checklist, I was able to identify my own strengths and shortcomings about culture. This paper will analyze the results of my checklist, analyze my thoughts and feelings about my responses, and identify ways I can improve on my care of culturally diverse patients. Analysis and summary of the assessment results This assessment was completed by me, Jon Teegardin, RN. I currently work as an emergency room nurse at a local hospital. I strongly agreed with 77% of the statements in the assessment, agreed with 16%, and chose neutral for the remaining 7% of the statements. There were no statements that I disagreed or strongly disagreed with. The subjects with a neutral response included acceptability of the use of languages other than English, participation in insensitive comments or behaviors, and recognition of different English language dialects. Analysis of thoughts and feelings after taking assessment My initial impression of the assessment was that I was culturally competent and sensitive to culturally related differences among my patient population. As I looked closer at my responses though, I realized that I am less sensitive to non-English speakers and that I am prone to making insensitive comments. After realizing this, I wanted to analyze why I have a neutral view about those who may not speak English and those who speak a different dialect of my native language. Being 45 years old, I can distinctly remember a time in this country when the English language was the only language used by business and even the government. The United States Government still requires that naturalized citizens “read, write, and speak Basic English” (U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, n.d.). Television produced many shows that used racial and ethnic stereotypes as the basis for sitcoms. Shows like What a Country used language and cultural differences as the punchline for jokes set to a laugh track. Perfect Strangers went so far as to create a fictitious country of origin for the shows main character. This allowed the network to write scripts that utilized extreme stereotypical views of eastern Europeans without appearing to be offensive to the target audience of Americans (Amazon, 2014). This programming taught viewers that it was OK to laugh at those who spoke differently or those who had different traditions or values. We were taught that an accent was something to laugh at and imitate. I could cite even worse examples from the seventies. I actually felt ashamed when I thought about American Sign Language and deaf culture. I actually debated a previous instructor about deaf culture, based in part on the fact that American Sign Language is not just hand signals of English words or letters, but is actually a visual language of its own (Jay, 2008). I actually contradicted my own belief by limiting my definition of language. Not one of my finer moments. Areas of improvement needed after taking the assessment There are three areas of improvement that I identified by taking this assessment. Acceptability of the use of languages other than English, participation in insensitive comments or behaviors, and recognition of different English dialects. It is important to remember that while a person may speak Basic English, they may be more comfortable speaking their native language. There are 31.8 million U.S. residents that speak a language other than English in their home, and of that number, 54% are Hispanic (Cultural diversity and language issues, 1994). Even though there is a movement in this country away from the concept of the melting pot, it does not mean that people who choose to come here don’t want to embrace American culture. Learning a new language is hard and that difficulty is magnified as we age. I have encountered many patients in the ER who speak little or no English, but their child speaks both languages fluently. It is insensitive to demand that everyone who comes here speak only my native language. Insensitive comments or behaviors don’t need to be made in a negative manner to be hurtful. How many of us have spoken louder and slower to someone who speaks limited English? We may be doing so in an attempt to be helpful, but do we stop and think about how patronizing or belittling that behavior may be? It is important that I model my behavior in a manner that is sensitive to a language barrier in a manner that is still respectful. Part of my assessment of a patient needs to address communication barriers immediately and utilize my facilities language translation services earlier in the patient encounter. Recognition of different English dialects should include geographic influences. I have to admit that initially I was looking at dialect as simply poor grammar, when it is much deeper than that. Southern English is just as correct as Midwestern English, even though substantial differences can be found in the way people from these two areas speak. One researcher identified 24 different dialects of American English (Wilson, 2013). Suggestions for improving the provision of transcultural healthcare It is important that to let go of stereotypes or behaviors that were impressed on me at an early age. The first step towards modifying these behaviors is identifying them properly. The assessment is a good tool to identify areas that can be improved. It is also important to recognize that “transcultural research, as presently conducted, may depict a view of behavior that encourages expectations of stereotypes among health practitioners and this view may inhibit rather than enhance individualized practice” (Price
Essay on W.C Williams and Oliver Sacks
Essay on W.C Williams and Oliver Sacks. Need help with my English question – I’m studying for my class.
Write a well-organized Essay of approximately 800 words, that is responsive to the following question: How is the doctor/patient relationship reflected in the stories and poems of William Carlos Williams (or the “Afterword” by William Eric Williams or the “Introduction” by Robert Coles), as well as the clinical tales by Oliver Sacks? Be sure to make some reference to at least five works in each of these volumes (ten works in total). For W.C. Williams, be sure to include at least one poem, and for Sacks, choose at least one work from each of the four sections of his book.
1. William Carlos Williams, The Doctor Stories [Selections]. New Directions (1984). ISBN:0-8112-0926-1. [Selections]
Williams_A Face of Stone.pdf
2. Oliver Sacks, The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat [Selections]. Harper & Row (Perennial edition) (1987). ISBN: 0-06-097079-0. [Selections]
Essay on W.C Williams and Oliver Sacks