Get help from the best in academic writing.

IVC Vaccinations required for All Children Before Enrolling in School Speech Outline

IVC Vaccinations required for All Children Before Enrolling in School Speech Outline.

TopicShould vaccinations be required for all children before enrolling in school? Everything you need to know: Speech Construction/Submission InstructionsSPEECH ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS:1. Speeches must be 4-5 minutes long. Significantly shorter or longer will result in point deductions, so make sure to practice, and time yourself when you do, so there are no surprises!2. Speeches should include sources from five testimonies/organizations. This can be a news source, a quotation from an expert on your topic, or anything similar. It’s important to have sources in your speech, because they confirm what you’re saying. It makes you look credible to the audience! Refer to the research page for details about sources: Why we need to use research in speeches, and how to find it!3. Speeches should have three clear main points, that are each about a different part of your topic. An easy format to follow if you’re looking for one is talking about 1) What are the problems occurring in this topic? 2) What are the things that are causing those problems? and 3) How should we solve this issue?4. Following along with the template, referenced below, is mandatory. It helps you stay on track, and to be a clear speaker.THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PRACTICE AND FINAL SPEECHESIn this class you’ll give five speeches total. The first three are practice speeches. These are worth fewer points, because it is truly about practice and refining your skills before you work on your final speeches. Peer evaluations and self evaluations are completed for practice speeches.The last two speeches in this class are final speeches. Consider these your final exam: they are worth more points and are the culmination of all your hard work in this class! This is the time to show how much you’ve learned and how far you’ve come from your first practice speech. Peer evaluations and self evaluations are NOT completed for final speeches.Ready to start working on your speech? Here we go!FIRST UP, COMPLETE THESE STEPS:1. Pick a topic from the topic submission list, found here: Speech Topic ListThe topic list remains the same all semester – and you are welcome to use a topic of your choice! Just make sure it is approved by me first.2. Fill out the full speech outline template, found here: Full Speech TemplateFor your first speech only:3. Turn in that filled out template, so I can see that you’re on the right track, here: Speech #1 Rough Draft Turn-In.4. Once approved by me, follow the below steps!NEXT, IT’S YOUR TURN TO START WORKING ON YOUR SPEECH:A. First, put your speech on notecards.B. Speeches are NOT memorized in this class, but they are PRACTICED. This means that you are half-memorized, half-not. As your book talks about, eye contact is very important in public speaking, so you should not be glued to your cards the whole time you are speaking.C. Practice, practice, practice! To make sure you land an “A” grade, I recommend reading through your speech, out loud, as if you were performing it to the camera, at least three or four times.FINALLY, IT’S TIME TO SUBMIT! FOLLOW THESE STEPS:1. Film your speech as many times as you like, and pick the take that you like the best. Submit it through Canvas, just like you did for your tech check video. I know many of you do not have your own, quiet space to film a speech. If you need to sit in your car, or a bathroom, or any other unconventional space, that is perfectly okay, and no points will be deduced at all. Please note that you MUST caption the video. This is not just my own personal requirement, but rather a Federal Law regarding videos shown in class. I strongly recommend uploading your video through YouTube, unless you are familiar with another captioning service. YouTube does transcribe your video, however, it is not always accurate so you may have to edit the captions. YouTube provides a very useful article on captioning:… (链接到外部网站。) Once captioned, submit your video here: Speech #1 Recording Turn-In.To keep things consistent, speech recordings will always be due on Mondays.2. Your speech will also be sent to four other students, who will provide feedback to you, anonymously. You will also be in charge of providing feedback for four other students’ speeches. Details regarding peer reviews can be found here: Peer Review Instructions. Peer review are only completed for practice speeches.To keep things consistent, peer reviews will always be due on Thursdays. 3. Perhaps the most important part of speeches is self-evaluations. This is the last part of every speech you’ll do in this class. Very similar to your peer reviews, you’ll submit about a paragraph for each practice speech after you’ve submitted it, explaining what you thought you did well in your speech and what you can improve for your next one. To keep things consistent, self evaluations will always be due on Thursdays. Whew! That was a lot of info. Please message or text me with ANY questions you have.PS: If you’d like to see how you’ll be graded, the rubric can be found here – Instructor Evaluation Rubric and is also at the bottom of your syllabus. An example rubric will be posted shortly!
IVC Vaccinations required for All Children Before Enrolling in School Speech Outline

PSYC 436 UMUC Clinical Psychology the Neighbor Daughter Situation Case Study.

Your neighbor tells you that his eleven-year-old daughter has been having behavior and academic problems in school. “Her teacher recommended taking her to the pediatrician to get a prescription for Ritalin,” he said.In a well-thought-out paper integrating information from the text and the module readings, make an argument for why your neighbor should first have his daughter evaluated by a clinical psychologist. Discuss the types of assessment tools the psychologist might use in his or her evaluation and how these tools would help in guiding diagnosis and treatment. Make sure to use appropriate sources of information and reference them properly, in American Psychological Association (APA) style.This paper should be 3–4 pages and formatted in APA style.You Intro to Clinical Psychology information.
PSYC 436 UMUC Clinical Psychology the Neighbor Daughter Situation Case Study

Grossmont College Effect of PH on Enzyme Lactase Lab Report

Grossmont College Effect of PH on Enzyme Lactase Lab Report.

Enzyme Lab Write Up: This is Part I.You will submit this write up and graphs. You will be provided with comments and feedback.For Part II You may make changes based on these comments and feedback (or inspirations which come to you outside of this exercise) and submit a lab report. Produce a Lab Summary of the Effect of Temperature on Lactase Activity.I am providing you an outline, but your report should be in nonnumeric, paragraph form. Write an Introduction Section (1 or 2 paragraphs) State the purpose of the Effect of Temperature on Lactase Activity experiment.Write a hypothesis for the experiment.Identify the independent variable and dependent variable for the experiment.Background Research: Research your experiment. Graph your data.Analyze the temperature effect on lactase activity data. (at least 3 paragraphs)This as an opportunity to tie together any relevant information you brought into the Introduction section and the results (data).Some of the information you report in the introduction should prove useful as you try to explain your results.Refer back to the graph (For example, See Figure 7) when you point out important ranges or specific temperatures of importance If your actual experimental results did not match your expected results, write a paragraph suggesting one reason your actual results might have been different from the expected results. Write 2-3 paragraphs which give an overview of enzymes. Write a paragraph explaining lactase. Write a paragraph which states the expected results. Remember the x-axis should show the independent variable (in this example, temperature) and the y-axis should show glucose produced.You should produce a single graph showing temperature compared to glucose produced with lines for 4 minutes, 7 minutes, and 11 minutes,a graph showing the relationship oftemperature and glucose produced in 4 minutes, a graph showing the relationship oftemperature and glucose produced in 7 minutes, and a graph showing the relationship oftemperature and glucose produced in 11 minutes. You need to include a title for each graph.Use the format Figure 1:Title.Your title for each graph should be a sentence letting the reader know what the graph will tell them.(For example:Figure 2:Glucose production by lactase in 4 minutes at 5-20 0C , pH 7.0, initial lactose concentration 50 mg/dL )
Grossmont College Effect of PH on Enzyme Lactase Lab Report

Webster University Precarity Political Concept or Fordism as Exception Summary Paper

write my term paper Webster University Precarity Political Concept or Fordism as Exception Summary Paper.

I’m working on a global studies writing question and need an explanation to help me understand better.

I need someone to break down the article I listed and attached to this. I am writing a summary and analysis based on this, however do not completely understand the concept of the article and the point he is trying to get across regarding Precarity and Fordism.Can somebody give me a clear summary of the article explaining:-What is the author trying to say through the text?-What are his main points? What does he mean by these points?-What specific examples are listed to explain this concept?And anything you would like to add which you think would further explain and summarize the article. Please be as clear as possible. It can be written in several bullet points or a paragraph.
Webster University Precarity Political Concept or Fordism as Exception Summary Paper

STU Effective Communication that Promotes Cultural Competence Discussion

STU Effective Communication that Promotes Cultural Competence Discussion.

discuss the importance of effective communication that promotes cultural competence.Submission Instructions:Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sourcesYour assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.Discussion RubricCriteriaRatingsPointsIdentification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts5 pointsDistinguishedIdentify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.4 pointsExcellentIdentifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.2 pointsFairIdentifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.1 pointsPoorIdentifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.5 pointsUse of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines3 pointsDistinguishedEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.2 pointsExcellentEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.1 pointFairIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.0 pointPoorIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.3 pointsResponse to Posts of Peers2 pointsDistinguishedStudent constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.1 pointsFairStudent constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.0 pointPoorStudent provided no response to a peer’s post. 2 points
STU Effective Communication that Promotes Cultural Competence Discussion

Kepner-Tregoe Technique Application to Problem Solving Case Study

Introduction The success of many organizations depends on how well their managers address the challenges that affect them. Problem-solving is a skill that many managers acquire, based on their experiences on the job and, most importantly, their choice and adoption of problem-solving techniques (Hill, 2012). Depending on the type of problem affecting an organization and the resources available to solve them, managers have a selection of tools to address their corporate challenges. The Fishbone diagram, Duncker diagram, Kepner Tregoe diagram, and TRIZ are some problem-solving techniques available to managers. Researchers, observers, and commentators alike have often debated their efficacies and use in different management contexts. In this paper, we focus on the Kepner Tregoe technique as an effective problem-solving tool for manufacturing companies. To do so, we use a case study of its application in Toyota Motor Corporation (Japan). This case study highlights how the managers of the automobile giant continue to rely on the Kepner Tregoe technique to solve some of the problems associated with the implementation of the just-in-time (JIT) technique in its manufacturing and assembly processes. We have divided this paper into six key sections that include an introduction, problem identification, problem analysis, an analysis of the significance of the problem for local and international organizations, and an overview of the application of the technique selected for the problem. In the last section of this paper, we evaluate the solutions to the problem and review the underlying justifications for developing them. Identification of the Problem In the early 1970s, Toyota used the Kepner Tregoe technique to improve its manufacturing and vehicle assembly processes during the evolution of its manufacturing processes that hinged on the adoption of the JIT production process (Kaynak, 2013). The adoption of the JIT process was known as the “Toyota Production Process” and was intended to improve the corporation’s manufacturing efficiency (Kaynak, 2013). Outside of the automobile industry, other companies have also used the same technique to reduce waste and improve the quality of their production processes. Before the use of the Kepner Tregoe technique, Toyota often relied on a standard troubleshooting process that did not yield much success in identifying the main problems associated with its manufacturing and assembly process (Institute for Manufacturing, 2016). Consequently, the problems associated with the technique would reoccur because the company was not effectively minimizing them. More importantly, Toyota did not understand these problems in the first place. This challenge came at a huge cost to the company because it lost a lot of money through excess inventory and through reworking most of its products (Institute for Manufacturing, 2016). After suffering these production inefficiencies, the company chose to adopt a new technique – the Five Whys technique, which it merged with the Kepner Tregoe model to improve its operational efficiency. Indeed, experts who have investigated the company’s problems say the use of this problem-solving technique birthed the concept of the five why techniques to improve its manufacturing competencies (Institute for Manufacturing, 2016). To explain its application, Vilet (2014) says, “The premise of the five whys technique is to find the root cause of a problem or defect by carefully asking and repetitively asking why” (p. 6). By doing so, it is easy to understand the cause of a problem. Consequently, managers could effectively develop a countermeasure for solving it. The use of this technique was part of Toyota’s proposal to induct new processes into its production system. Originally adopted by Sakichi Toyoda, Toyota’s managers used the tool as a critical component of its problem solving and training methods (Kaynak, 2013). Taiichi Ohno headed the company’s production system and approved its use in the department (Kaynak, 2013). Its application involved the repetition of “why” five times to identify the company’s manufacturing and production problems (Institute for Manufacturing, 2016). According to Vilet (2014), Toyota adopted this technique to understand the nature of its problems as well as the possible solutions to them. By repetitively asking “why,” the company was able to peel off different layers of symptoms for the company’s production problems to identify the main issues affecting each department. Practically, asking this question repetitively led to a situation where the symptom of the problem was followed by another “why.” Although the standard criterion used to probe a company’s problems, asking five “whys” the Institute for Manufacturing (2016) says the probing may stretch beyond this limit of questioning to identify more symptoms of a problem. Toyota asked five key fundamental questions about its just-in-time production process that was designed to improve the delivery of its production goals. The questions appear below: Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Why is production running slowly? Why did the new widgets fit wrongly? Why is the hole too small? Why is that measurement specified in the drawings? What data is in the computer-aided design system? The use of the Kepner Tregoe technique to solve some of the implementation challenges of the JIT production technique is a current problem for Toyota Corporation because the organization’s culture mirrors that of the Japanese, which always strives for constant improvement (Institute for Manufacturing, 2016). In other words, employees are always willing to achieve higher levels of efficiency despite realizing some substantial levels of success with the JIT approach over the years. Therefore, although the company already meets high standards of production in the global automobile sector, Toyota still believes that it could achieve higher standards of the same. Since Toyota’s employees have worked with the company for most of their careers, they are constantly striving to hone their skills in the implementation of the JIT approach (Kaynak, 2013). These cultural dynamics of the organization show that Toyota still has room to improve the implementation of its JIT approach even today. Therefore, the Kepner Tregoe technique stands out as a valuable tool to guide the organization through its path to self-improvement. Analysis of the Problem According to proponents of the Kepner Tregoe model, the best recourse, or action, that managers could take in problem-solving is preempting a problem and solving it before it happens (Hill, 2012). However, this was not the case for Toyota because the company’s management started reporting significant challenges with its JIT model before it could preempt them. A significant challenge that they reported on the adoption of the technique centered on errors in multi-skilling (Institute for Manufacturing, 2016). This problem mostly involved a management challenge of allocating employees different types of jobs, based on existing workflow patterns. Another challenge reported by the management team centered on redesigning the vehicles to eliminate or widen, their tolerance (Institute for Manufacturing, 2016). This problem emerged from the fact that assembly line managers did not know which parts to use in the production process. At the same time, they had to minimize waste by using all of them. In line with the principles of the JIT approach, the employees also had to make sure that all parts fit perfectly. Lastly, Toyota had a problem of training its suppliers to adhere to the principles of the JIT approach by requiring them to make timely supplies and in good quality (Institute for Manufacturing, 2016). Collectively, these issues outlined the main challenges associated with its JIT approach. Significance of the Problem for Local and International Organizations The JIT production process is not exclusive to Toyota; different companies have always relied on the management philosophy to deliver their products to their customers on time and in the right quality and quantity (Lai

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service