Get help from the best in academic writing.

ITCC121 Article Summary

ITCC121 Article Summary. I need support with this Computer Science question so I can learn better.


Find one article on any course related topic (computer or information technology). The article should be relevant to a course topic and from a creditable source. Topics include:
Computer Basics and the Internet, System and Application Software, Hardware, Input and Output Systems, Communications, networks and Security, Personal Technology, Database and Information Systems, Systems Analysis and Programming.
You may choose your article from independent reading and research; or you may search the Internet. Also consider the following:


Summarize the article in your own words and include information in your paper on how the article relates to course concepts. Discuss the course material. Demonstrate you have read the course content and you understand how to relate your research to current events. Use the appropriate APA citation to illustrate when you move from the article summary to material from the course content.

Submission Instructions:
Written communication is an essential tool for any professional. As with any skill, writing well is the result of practice followed by feedback and the use of relevant and appropriate sources. Therefore, the quality of writing is graded as part of this assignment. See your syllabus for more guidelines. It is easy for students to plagiarize – cut and paste right into a text document.
ITCC121 Article Summary

Brite Divinity School of Texas Child Abuse and Neglect Laws Discussion.

I’m working on a humanities multi-part question and need an explanation to help me study.

ASSIGNMENT DETAILSAssignment DirectionsAssignment RequirementsChild Abuse and NeglectAs a result of the 1974 Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, every U.S. state requires that instances of child abuse and neglect be reported to the state’s child protective service agency. However, every state has different laws surrounding mandated reporting. For example, some states name specific mandated reporters — that is, individuals who, in their professional capacity, are obligated to report suspected abuse while others do not. To protect your clients and ourselves, you need to be aware of mandated reporting laws.Assignment DirectionsIn this assignment, you are to examine differences between your state’s mandated reporting laws and another state’s mandated reporting laws. You are to refer to the Child Welfare Information Gateway: Mandatory Reporters of Child Abuse and Neglect website. Click on the “State Statutes Search” to prepare for the assignment.Please respond to the following:Use at least two paragraphs and define mandated reporting laws in your state including the following elements: definition of child abuse and neglect, mandatory reporters of child abuse and neglect, penalties for failure to report child abuse and neglect, and immunity for reporters of child abuse and neglect.Use at least two paragraphs to define mandated reporting laws in another state of your choosing including the following elements: definition of child abuse and neglect, mandatory reporters of child abuse and neglect, penalties for failure to report child abuse and neglect, and immunity for reporters of child abuse and neglect.Compare and contrast your state’s mandated reporting requirements with the other state using at least 3 paragraphs. How are the 2 state laws similar? How are the state laws different? Why is it important to be aware of differences in mandated reporting laws?
Brite Divinity School of Texas Child Abuse and Neglect Laws Discussion

Load Youtube API and then Run a Script.

0favoriteI have an issue in getting the youtube API to load in time so that it works with slider script. Better if all scripts were loaded at same time so everything is ready.Found some info on google tho not sure how to appy this to my script: javascript has been applied here: everything works except if you play youtube video as page is loading the slider still scrolls thro whereas it should stop so you can watch video.It only happens on the first slide..So there is an issue of downloading the Youtube API script. IF you click on play button later as script is fully downloaded it works fine.It works sometimes but not others.Slider script is here: wp-content/themes/ravenswood/js/contentslider.jquery.jsand also called within head of page.Help greatly appreciated.
Load Youtube API and then Run a Script

Roberts Limited’s Expansion Decisions Essay (Critical Writing)

Analysis of Organizational Decision Making Decision making is very important in any given organization, but before a decision is made the administration needs to plan ahead on future expectations. Chris is the founder of Roberts Limited. He can not make decisions on his own which means he has to involve the entire workforce of this organization. This includes employees of all levels from juniors to seniors. The decision of establishing a branch at Kava is aimed at giving back to the society. Although Kava is prone to natural disasters that can not be intercepted by humans, the company must establish its roots in this region where nobody dares to explore. Success does not come easily but through hard work and taking the risk even when others think it is not safe to do so. All employees should be informed that the more one risks the higher the returns. The organization is therefore committed to providing its services where they are most needed. All should be bold enough in Kava’s expedition because after enduring the risks the organization will grow and thus that growth will be reflected on employees. If employees decide to boycott Kava’s mission for security reasons they should know that death is a must for all so staying away from Kava does not increase one’s lifespan. The demand for services from Roberts Limited has shot up. This has been evidenced by frequent requests by Kava’s government agencies. It is therefore important to respond to client needs as soon as possible. If the organization is reluctant to respond to client needs, the organizations competitors will take advantage of the current situation in Kava and this will not go down well with Chris. All employees are answerable to Chris should they fail the organization and that means that every one must do his/her best to achieve the desired results. Employees should know that growth takes a very long period to be achieved and once it has been realized it should be well taken care of because it is very delicate. A single mistake is what it takes to stain the credibility of an organization. It is recommended that employees look at Kava from a different perspective. The company’s door are open for suggestions and therefore employees should come up with their own creativity regarding the current situation in Kava and seek to establish a solution that will benefit both the organization and the citizens of Kava. The organization must also involve all the major stakeholders of Kava. This involves consulting other organizations that are well acquainted with Kava such as non governmental organizations, faith groups, and government agencies. Consultations will provide relevant information that will help the organization in making critical decisions. The organizations mentioned above are most likely to be more informed about the problems that are being experienced or were encountered by other participants in Kava. They will act as advisors because of their experience in working in this kind of environment. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Chris should hold a meeting with his organization’s management team. They should use the findings from Nik and Alex to establish what changes should be made to improve the organization’s productivity in Kava. The management should also identify the services and goods that are not needed in Kava and scrap them off but replace them with those that are mostly crucial to the people of this country. All reports and suggestions from the organization’s field officers should be evaluated to see if they are workable. Chris and his management team should not focus on the expenses that will be incurred by the organization because by doing so they will not notice the opportunities that could benefit the company. The organization should seek to execute ideas that are unique hence will make the company stand out from the rest. The economy of Kava is very promising but growth has not been realized due to frequent national disasters such as earth quakes and hurricane. However it is worth noting that there are very many natural resources that are in Kava which must be explored. The organization should analyze the opportunities of growth that are present in Kava and compare these opportunities with the threats. These resources are not only important to the people of Kava but also to other countries that require these resources. Kava’s natural resources are very valuable and can sustain its economy only if they are well managed. These resources include petroleum, coffee, bananas, sugar, and natural gas. All these resources must find their way out of Kava in order to reach their target markets. These resources must not lie idle since they hold the livelihood of citizens of Kava. For instance setting up a company to explore the oil deposits in Kava will create employment for quite a number of youths who are unemployed. The organization should also bank on the locally available cheap labor from Kava because hiring employees from other places other than Kava will impact on the company’s budget. This is because the new hires will have to be relocated. The local workforce can be more efficient because they are used to the national calamities in Kava and therefore can work without fear to accomplish the organization’s mission in Kava. The company should also identify the ideas that can be implemented within the shortest time frame as possible. The company’s human resources department should conduct interviews to identify people who reside in Kava but they have the relevant skills and abilities. The human resources department should make sure that they bring relevant talents on board. Failure to do so will undermine the company’s efforts in achieving its mission. The administrator in charge of human resources should be very keen in manning the workforce of the company as well as the equipments if any. The HR manager should motivate his staff by establishing good working relationships with employees. This is very crucial because if employees encounter any problems or have a suggestion to make, they can air it with ease. The HR should include the employees when making decisions because this will make them feel they are appreciated. The HR should also be quick to acknowledge any commendable effort that has been made by an employee no matter how small it is. If the employees’ efforts are not recognized at the present the workforce will feel like they don’t matter to the organization and fail to make personal decisions when the need to do so arises. We will write a custom Critical Writing on Roberts Limited’s Expansion Decisions specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More In essence, the company’s present achievements are owed to its employees and therefore it should appreciate the efforts made by its employees. The HR manager should make sure employees are not overwhelmed with duties. This is because some or most have families that need their time hence there should be a balance between work and personal life such as family. For the organization’s mission to be achieved all employees including the administrators must be fully dedicated to the success of the organization’s mission. This means that administrators should not just give orders verbally but they must fully participate in implementing organizational policies.

WR 121 University of Michigan Question at Issue Essay

java assignment help WR 121 University of Michigan Question at Issue Essay.

Choose one topic from the required readings. Only need to add about 450 words and need help with revision. The Q@I Essay looked at how others within your discourse community would respond to your Q@I in order to widen your field of inquiry. Now, Essay 1.1 shifts our exploratory approach to one that is argumentative. This means that you will: 1) introduce an enthymeme that responds to your Q@I and 2) develop a line of reasoning that includes the viewpoints of the writers whose articles we’ve read for class as well as your own to support your stance on this particular issue.Requirements:Total meet 1,250 words ( I have written 850 words)double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font, 1” marginsincorporate quotes or paraphrases from at least two!! articles to further develop your argument:”Are You a Mac or a Mac User? How the Language of Identity Persuades,” Julie Sedivy (pp. 230-234)”Politically Correct Animal Language,” Julie Sedivy (pp. 252-256)”The Complexity of ‘That’s so Gay,’” Mark McCormack (pp. 150-154)”Writing for an Audience,” Linda S. Flower (pp. 74-77)”When the Media is the Disaster,” Rebecca Solnit (pp. 237-244) “Washington State Sees Results from ‘Plain Talk’ Initiative,” Rachel La Corte (pp. 82-85)”The Art of the Police Report,” Ellen Collett (pp. 86-91)proper MLA in-text citations Formatting:Introduction: Use a “hook” to draw your reader into your paper. Next, provide context about this issue you are addressing to show why this matters. The last sentence should be your enthymeme.Body Paragraphs: Take as many or as little paragraphs to show the reader your line of reasoning. Remember to have clear topic sentences for each paragraph and transition sentences between each one.Somewhere in the body paragraphs, make sure to include:a counterargument: address one complication or loophole that your argument has not considered. This is not showing a fault in your argument, rather, it is an acknowledgment that your argument is not fool-proof (arguments never are). This adds some credibility to you as a writer as it shows that you have thought about what others may suggest in response to your argument.a rebuttal: Now that you’ve acknowledged a loophole in your argument, you can now respond to it. This does not mean you have to disprove the counterargument, rather, you can explain how your claim to this issue takes priority. In other words, there are many ways to approach an issue, and not all of them are good nor bad as it depends on context.Conclusion: This is not merely a summary of what you’ve just discussed. Leave the reader with an idea of where to go next. Your argument does not exist in a vacuum and as such should show its connection to the larger discourse on language. Leave a lasting impression with your reader.
WR 121 University of Michigan Question at Issue Essay

UCLA Limits Algebraic Limit Theorem Desired Inequality & Limit Theorem Worksheet

UCLA Limits Algebraic Limit Theorem Desired Inequality & Limit Theorem Worksheet.

I’m working on a calculus question and need guidance to help me study.

3. Let xn =
3n+7 .
(a) Prove, directly using the definition, that limn→∞
xn =
(b) Prove, using the algebraic limit theorem, that limn→∞
xn =
3 8. (a) Let (xn) be bounded (not necessarily convergent) and assume that yn → 0 as
n → ∞. Show that xnyn → 0 as n → ∞. (Why can we not just use the Algebraic
limit theorem?)
(b) What about if yn → y as n → ∞ where y 6= 0?10. For the following, provide an example or prove that no such request is possible. You
may appeal to results from lectures.
(a) Sequences (xn) and (yn) which both diverge, but whose sum (xn + yn) converges.
(b) Sequences (xn), which converges, and (yn), which diverges, but whose sum (xn+yn)
(c) A convergent sequence (xn), such that xn 6= 0 for all n ∈ N and (1/xn) diverges.
(d) An unbounded sequence (xn) and a convergent sequence (yn) with (xn−yn) bounded.
(e) two sequences (xn) and (yn), where (xnyn) and (xn) converge, but (yn) does not
UCLA Limits Algebraic Limit Theorem Desired Inequality & Limit Theorem Worksheet

Analysis of Two Versions of Walter Pater’s Text

The object of this essay is to identify the differences between two versions of Walter Pater’s description of La Gioconda as a means of exemplifying and exploring changes in meaning undergone by literary texts. In this case, its main concern remains the transcendence of a work of art within its canon and the allegorical imagery it evokes, a continuity that is nevertheless disrupted by later spatial rearrangement. Consequently, this analysis drives us to engage with a notion of authorship that values significantly the cultural heritage in which the writer finds himself, placing more weight on the text’s contribution to this legacy than on the figure of the author as sole creator. Firstly, one must note the chronology and structural form of the text. Pater originally published the passage in 1873 as part of his research on Leonardo da Vinci in Studies in The History of The Renaissance, with W. B. Yeats later incorporating it in The Oxford Book of Modern Verse, which he published in 1936. Hence, the most compelling change is its transformation from lyrical prose, undistinguished from the rest of the essay, into a separate poem in free verse. Through this remodelling, Yeats is constituting himself as an authority within the text and redesigning the context in which it is to be received. That is, he represents an instance of intervention that effectively changes the meaning after the author’s death. Additionally, the fragment features as the opening work in a collection of modern poetry. This not only conditions the way that the text is read, but similarly creates certain expectations from the rest of the anthology. Yeats himself defended both his choice of Pater and his style, writing that ‘only by printing it in vers libre can one show its revolutionary importance’ (1936: 8). However, in doing so, he was assuming that the reader would know the original scholarly backdrop of the extract and its cultural implications. Thus, he invites certain suppositions regarding Pater’s work and reputation, as well as Yeats’ own conception of modern poetry, that are not fully accounted for in the rest of his introduction to the volume. As for the alterations in the physical presentation of the text, Yeats removed a single sentence from Pater’s reflection on the Mona Lisa and published it as a poem in seventeen different lines, employing the original punctuation to divide them. As a result, they vary in length, and each one is introduced by a capital letter except for the initial ‘SHE’, which presides the poem in full capital letters and contains an ‘S’ in a significantly larger font. Yeats only added a comma after ‘the changing lineaments’, presumably to divide that line from the final verse. In Pater’s version, the passage is encompassed within a larger examination of his own associations upon the image rather than actual visual description, with phrases very similar in rhythm (Jeffreys 1993: 23). Here, his reaction to the famous piece serves the wider purpose of defining the author’s place within Renaissance artistry. In terms of paratextual elements, we observe its characterization as an academic text through the title, the seal and the clarification of Pater as a fellow of Oxford’s Brasenose College. The header of each page alternatively reads ‘The Renaissance’ or ‘Leonardo Da Vinci’, clarifying and contextualising the topic. In the 1936 version, the para-text includes the author’s name in capital letters with the dates of his birth and death. These are followed by the title that Yeats attributed to the poem, ‘Mona Lisa’, in cursive lettering, and the number one. The first page informs us of the title of the book and the fact that Yeats is the editor, but nowhere does it indicate that Pater did not conceive the text in the displayed format. This is because Yeats only mentions the change in the introduction, which is not available to us in the document we have received. Therefore, we face another layer of filtering in the form of photographs, as we have access to images of the texts but not the texts themselves. This suggests that yet another figure alien to the 1873 publication has had a say in the presentation of the text after Pater’s death. Following this line of thought, we must consider the number of voices present in the text and what these signify for a larger argument on authorship. Even in the original version, the text comprises the voices of both Pater as writer and Da Vinci as the painter of the Mona Lisa. Yeats’ adaptation inserts another one, but in neither case is the historical woman portrayed allowed to add her own. While she is necessary for Da Vinci to create his masterpiece, she must disappear to give way to the immortal image that she inspired, becoming a symbol of suggestion for the artist (Jeffreys 1993: 26). From this, we get the impression of a collapse of barriers between author and painter that accompanies the blurring of the individual and archetypal image that La Gioconda represents. Through his writing, Pater impersonates Da Vinci in a manner similar to what Yeats and Renaissance artists themselves did by reviving classical motifs. Pater’s conception of Da Vinci as an artist influences the way in which he relates to his own passage, establishing a paradigmatic relationship between artist and work that transcends a single discipline (Jeffreys 1993: 29-30). Intimately related to this is Roland Barthes’ theory on originality. He rejects uniqueness in favour of the text as a multi-dimensional space comprised of several other writings interacting and influencing each other. ([1967]1977: 148). This reinforces the multiplicity of voices found and expressed in Pater’s essay: ‘All the thoughts and experience of the world have etched and moulded there…to refine and make expressive the outward form’ (1873: 118). Though a painting instead of a manuscript, he conceptualises the Mona Lisa and her mythological counterparts in the same way that Barthes does, perpetuating the tradition by writing within it and providing the opportunity so that Yeats, unbeknownst to him, might do the same through his own text. Likewise, T. S. Eliot expands on this vision of authorship by characterising tradition as an ambition that is not merely inherited, but which the writer must strive towards. He disdains the notion of a poet or artist achieving meaning on his own, as his significance must inevitably be tied with that of his predecessors (Eliot [1919] 2008: 956). He accentuates this idea by asserting that authors require a historical sense that will recognize the presence of the past so that they will write ‘with the feeling that the whole of the literature of Europe…has a simultaneous existence and composes a simultaneous order’ (956). Hence, he advocates for a depersonalization of the poet that will permit us to think of his work as ‘a living whole of all the poetry that has ever been written’ (Eliot [1919]2008: 958). This is especially relevant to our text due to the similarities in Pater’s own conception of the role of the artist in the production of culture. His agreement with both Barthes and Eliot is evident in his description of the Mona Lisa always in reference to other symbolic women, as she is set ‘beside one of those white Greek goddesses or beautiful women of antiquity’ (Pater 1873: 118). Not only is she their equivalent in a modern setting, she also embodies their qualities so that we might find her undistinguishable from Mary or Helen of Troy but for her own contribution to the unbroken procession of artists’ muses (Jeffreys 1993: 25). This affords her semblance with both multiplicity and immovability, effectively reminding us of Eliot’s claim that the ideal order is both modified by new works and complete before these have been produced (Eliot [1919] 2008: 956). Notwithstanding this, we cannot fail to observe an essential difference between these theories. Whereas for Barthes language and the reader drive the performance and extraction of meaning, completely excluding the author, both Eliot and Pater ascribe him a part in the interpretation of the text. Eliot denies the centrality of the author in favour of the just evaluation of the poetry, but he does not argue for the dismissal of the author’s effort within the continuing literary doctrine and his replacement by the reader ([1919] 2008: 961). Similarly, Pater highlights the importance of an artist’s trajectory, if not the person of the artist himself. By stating that ‘Leonardo’s history is the history of his art’ (1873: 119) he is identifying the artist with his craft and the history embedded in it, making it unthinkable that he should be entirely disposed of. Furthermore, to eliminate the figure of the author would be to render this exercise useless. Pater’s writing of Renaissance artists provided a platform for him to develop a vision of authorship that he himself actively represents. His attempt at establishing its limitations mirrors our own quest to ascertain the meaning of changes made by a person to whom we attribute a degree of authority. In this case, we must recognise that these texts are in one way or another enabled by authors, with the subsequent attention that they merit because of it. In all, reading both versions of the text is not necessary. The original is part of a wider point on authorship working in conjunction with a cultural current that both influences and is contained in all new art. Equally worthy, the 1936 version stands on its own as a modernist poem with the same theme in a manner that goes unnoticed when reading the whole essay. Nonetheless, together they deepen the undercurrent of meaning present in Pater’s essay through exemplification of his argument. This is because both writers, together with Da Vinci, postulate La Gioconda as an emblem for the ages, utilising her to establish their own position in relation to an artistic canon that places the past as the driving force in the process of creation. Bibliography Barthes, Roland. [1967] 1977. ‘Death of the Author’ in Image-Music-Text, trans. by Stephen Heath (London: Fontana Press), pp. 142-148 Eliot, T. S. [1919] 2008. ‘Tradition and the Individual Talent’ in The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism, 2nd edition, ed. by Vincent B. Leitch (New York: W. W. Norton

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service