Many discussions have risen as to whether the war in Afghanistan and Iraq were necessary for United States to get involved in. Whether the wars were necessary or not, there are some effects that we have to live with that reminds us of them. To start with, both wars consumed an estimated $2.4 trillion; the effect of these wars was felt in many economies of the world especially Iraq and Afghanistan. American economy was not spared either; there have been numerous concerns on the amount of spending that is put into wars. Another debate that has also arisen is the effect of the war on the economy as well as the economic prospects. The effects of the wars are negative; the reasoning behind this is because the war was understated as the white house advisor had estimated the war would spend an estimated $ 200 billion instead an enormous $ 2.4 trillion was spent. A big difference therefore exists from the final figure that the war consumed as the government had to add more money meant for other developments. The understatement of the cost could be attributed to the fact that Bush administration thought it as a war that would take a small time hence inexpensive but to their surprise it took more time. The economy was hurt through the budget as a lot of money which would have been used to run the economy was used to fund it. An estimated $12. 5 billion was spent in Iraq in a month while another $16 billion was spent in Afghanistan every month as the operating expense (Bilmes Para 5). The operating expenses were funded by the funds from emergency appropriations: this amount of money could have been used to try and fight recession which was and still affecting the country. The budget of 2007 that was used to finance Iraq was $138 billion; such amount of money would have hired thirty thousand teachers, provided Medicaid facility for about 45 million Americans and also would be used to build about four hundred schools. The illustration shows the opportunity cost of getting involved in war in comparison with the services that could be availed to the public. Not only has the war affected the economy through the national budget but there has also been a decrease in household spending. Through an estimated by the Joint Economic Committee, by the year 2017 estimated $46,400 will be the increase in each household in terms of the taxation. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More The meaning of this is that the household would have a lesser amount of money to spend, as a bigger portion of it will be directed to supporting the war. According to the principles of economics, less income translates to decrease in demand, which also results to lesser production. A continuous trend leads the country having a lesser GNP (Teslik Para 4). Another way the economy is been affected is due to increase of commodity prices in the market due to increase in toll on prices. The mostly affected commodity is crude oil, which has increased consistently as a result of the war. The increase in oil can be attributed to the fact that Iraq produces an amounting 3% of the global oil production. Not only does this cause an increase in price but also there is notable instability in the prices in the recent years. With the continuing of the war, oil prices are likely to increase to such a price that will strain the users of this commodity. In turn, government is spending more than what it would have spent in importing oil if there was no war. In the long run, there will be a likelihood of existence of inflation caused by high fuel prices. The national debt is estimated to be about $13 trillion. The fact that the wars were financed through borrowing means that the will be an increase in the national debt. Again, the fact the debt has an interest means that the debt can only increase with time. Having a big national debt means that added borrowing has higher interest rates, the borrowed money for the war there has effect on American people as the government uses more money to repay it leaving the taxes payers with a lesser amount of money to spend. Though the effects of the war when it comes to taxation are not been experience now means that they will be increased later to cater for the increased national dept. Financing the war using borrowed funds also means that the country will be made more dependent to other counties investors in bid to reduce the national debt (Thiele Para 5). The long term effect of this will be that there will be a decrease in the standard of living and the country in future will strain in dealing with some economic challenges that may arise like the in the health sector. Clearly a lot of money is been spent in supporting the wars that United States is engaging itself into. The effects of the war are not only been involved in the three countries that are involved in the war but also other countries are also culprits of the same. A good example is when it comes to the prices of crude oil where the effect has been felt globally (Stiglitz Para 4). At the same time there has been a considerable increase the national debt since most of the money used to finance it is borrowed money. We will write a custom Research Paper on Iraq and Afghanistan wars impact on the USA’s economy specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The problems do not end there as the interest rates of borrowing increases with any additional borrowing. If nothing is done the country might face many problems in future with the government been forced to increases taxes to finance the dept. The effect of this may be a decrease in the national domestic product as well as lowering of the standard of living of the citizens. Quitting the wars and avoiding involvement in such wars can be of much benefit to United States economy. The money involved in the war would be channeled to promote development in other sectors as well as been used to reduce the national debt. The fact that there has been a recession means that the economy has already been hurt and there is no need of the war since it continually keeps in hurting the economy more. Almost all the sectors are being affected and there in need for the government to minimize the control the budget to avoid having an economic disaster in the near future (Sterngold Para 7). Works Cited Bilmes, Joseph Stiglitz and Linda. “The three trillion dollar war”. 2008. Web. Sterngold, James. “Casualty Of War: The U.s. Economy”. 2005. Web. Stiglitz, Joseph. “The Three Trillion Dollar War“. 2008. Web. Teslik, ee Hudson. “Iraq, Afghanistan, and the U.S. Economy”. 2008. Council on foregn relations. Web. Thiele, Everett. “Military Spending: Cost of Iraq War is but the Tip of the Iceberg“. 2005. Web.
Introduction Interior monologue, otherwise known as the inner voice, refers to a passage of text that is used to explain a character’s thoughts deep within (Heidel 6). In this case we are to look at the interior monologue of Urshanabi at his encounter with Gilgamesh at the time of crossing the waters of death. It is therefore important that we first have an understanding of this particular setting before conclusively determining his internal monologue (Kramer 84). From their encounter, we can come up with the following as the interior monologue of Urshanabi: Interior monologue of Urshanabi when he notices Gilgamesh You are so weak, have you eaten anything? Can you not even put a smile on your face? I bet you have come a long way Your face is so disfigured Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More How come you are walking all over looking this way? Interior monologue of Urshanabi when asked the way to Utnapishtim Do you not realize that the only way is across this Dead Sea, and that you are the one who has made it even worse? Yes, those stone things you smashed, they were to help us across, you have even gone to the extent of pulling out their retaining ropes Just imagine! Listen, the only option we have now is to acquire some punting poles, now that you have an axe that will be much cheaper Now you have to get to the forest as fast as possible, make sure you get at least three hundred punting poles. You better make sure each one of them is sixty cubits long We will write a custom Essay on Interior Monologue for Gilgamesh specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More After that strip them and place caps on each and use the most efficient way to ensure they reach the boat Interior monologue of Urshanabi at the Waters of Death Now, here you have to be very careful Gilgamesh, you see that punting pole? Yes, that one there, pick it up and use it to wade through the waters Remember to be cautious enough, and let not your hand pass over the waters of death Yes that is okay, now you can do the same with the remaining poles until you are safe on the other side Themes It is important in the analyzing of the themes of this story that we get to know an overview of what this particular passage is all about. To start with we will understand the background of the story and the circumstances that made this particular incident to occur. Gilgamesh is a Babylonian story about a rather patriotic leader who sets in motion an attack against a monster. In life he eventually meets Enkidu, his counterpart with similar features and of a common likeness as him. Urshanabi’s name symbolizes a number and when translated means either a priest or servant of two thirds. Enki refers to the number forty, which is two thirds of Enu (sixty). From this it is clear that he is supposed to be Gilgamesh’s priest or servant since Gilgamesh was two thirds divine. Not sure if you can write a paper on Interior Monologue for Gilgamesh by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Despite the fact that Urshanabi tries to prevent him, Gilgamesh goes ahead and attacks the ‘Stone things’ thereby destroying them. He looks at his eye and asks him his name as well as the reason as to why he appeared so shabby. When Gilgamesh tells him about his encounters and the fact that he needed to get to Utanapishtim, which is referred to as the far away one, he explains to him that his own hands were responsible for his failure to cross. This is because of his action of crushing the ‘stone things’ and in addition disposing them off into the river. These were supposed to help him cross by preventing him from stepping on the waters of death. Urshanabi was too determined to offer help to Gilgamesh that he asked him to get into the forest to cut the punting poles. They completed a voyage that would have otherwise lasted forty five days in only three days. On arriving at the shore Urshanabi discovers that the stone things and the fact that there was a stranger on board. Once again he expresses his concern for Gilgamesh’s terrible appearance and he narrates to him his tale all over again. The Faraway one hits the nail on the head by reminding Gilgamesh that he is going after sorrow. This sparks the conversation in which Utnapishtim attempts to unveil to Gilgamesh the mystery behind this. He explains to him how Enki had asked him to bring down his house and instead build a boat through which he would save life and forsake possessions. Death is one issue that is very outspoken in the literary passage. It is beyond reasonable doubt that after realizing that he too could die, especially after the death of his accomplice Enkidu, Gilgamesh decides to look for Utnapishtim. Gilgamesh believes that Utnapishtim could therefore be having the secret towards this eternity that he so desired. When he gets to the land of the gods, guarded by scorpion men, he finds Siduri, who is a divine-wine maker. She offers him shelter and persuades him to be contented with the fact that he is human and be able to enjoy life while he lives. His desire to live forever, however, causes Gilgamesh to hear none of Siduri’s advice. He goes on with the journey to meet Urshanabi, a boat man who is willing to ferry him across the Sea of Death. They head to the island in which Utnapishtim cohabits with his wife. Here he learns that Utnapishtim’s mortality was after survival from a flood that covered the whole world. In addition he also realizes that he cannot get much help from Utnapishtim since the flood only occurred once and there were very limited chances (if any) that the floods would occur again. Eventually Gilgamesh falls asleep for seven continuous days and Utnapishtim questions him as to how he can manage to live forever when he cannot remain awake for a week. His wife however has compassion on Gilgamesh and asks her husband to give him the trick of the sacred plant that could make him young but not to live forever. He gets into the sea to obtain the plant only for it to be later on stolen by the snake. An aspect that can be learnt from this is the fact that a hero cannot avoid death or try to prevent it but rather only learns the importance of life by embracing death. From these circumstances it is clear that death as the ultimate destiny of man is demonstrated. Death is inevitable and however much Gilgamesh tried to evade it, it would still come his way. The only way he could avoid it was by using the sacred plant that could make him young. This, however, could not guarantee him immortality since even young men die anyway. It could only help him to lengthen the period between then and the time of his death. Fate and destiny is yet another theme that is very much evident in this passage. Gilgamesh is a man that is strongly resigned to fate. The various challenges he goes through in life despite being the celebrated and patriotic leader can only be explained as having been destined for him. First and foremost, Gilgamesh was born of a mortal father and a goddess who was immortal (Oppenheim 36). If he could control the circumstances of his birth, of course he could have chosen to be born of both immortal parents. However, as fate could have it, Gilgamesh was a victim of circumstances due to the chance affair of his mother. This denied him the ability to claim the eternity that he otherwise so much desired. Later on in life Gilgamesh meets Enkidu with whom they become very close and do many things together. It is however later on saddening that his only trusted companion ends up dying. This is a perfect situation where fate is visible for both parties. First, one of the two has to die as punishment from the gods for the killing of the Bull of Heaven. Enkidu fatefully dies under these circumstances. On the other hand, Gilgamesh is left alone. Fate is also demonstrated in the sense that despite the much effort that Gilgamesh puts in to claim eternity and the challenges he faces on the way he does not find it. To make matters worse, the only glimpse of hope he has is taken away from him at the last minute by the most unlikely and undeserving being. Gilgamesh also faces the ultimate fate of man whereby he eventually kicks the bucket just like other men (Oppenheim 84). Works Cited Heidel, Alexander. The Gilgamesh Epic and Old Testament Parallels: A translation and interpretation of the Gilgamesh Epic and related Babylonian and Assyrian documents. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1946. Print. Kramer, Samuel Noah. History Begins at Sumer. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1986. Print. Oppenheim, Leo. Ancient Mesopotamia: Portrait of a Dead Civilization. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1964. Print.
Necessarily of Universal Healthcare Conclusion
Necessarily of Universal Healthcare Conclusion.
universal healthcare in the usbased on these 6 pros & 6 cons on the universal healthcare in the us, please provide a strong conclusion to support the necessarily of universal healthcare in the us, and, consider how to deal with the problems existing on these 6 cons. lastly, think about what efforts can the us government make to push to the establishment of universal healthcare and satisfy the related stakeholders(patients, medical providers, insurance companies, drug companies)? about 500 words.in a conclusion, you don’t need to cite them unless you get some external resources not showing on the attachment. You can use external resources if they are strongly related to these cons and pros .
Necessarily of Universal Healthcare Conclusion
Unrecognised States in The International System
essay writer In legal scholarship, a discussion already exists regarding the role that recognition of statehood plays in the process of state creation, involving a divide between those that argue that recognition merely involves acknowledging that a political entity has met the criteria of statehood (the declaratory approach), and those who argue that recognition is much more than an acknowledgement of statehood, but is rather itself a central component within the formation of a state (the constitutive approach). The declarative approach draws contrast with the constitutive approach as it maintains that recognition is almost meaningless because counties have little choice in defining the recognition of a state. The statehood position is based on circumstance and not the choice of the respective state (Brierly and Waldock, 1963). The constitutive approach states that it is not automatic to recognize an entity as a state. A state is only a state if it is accepted as such and other countries hold the power of this decision. Thus, the new state only exists after acceptance by those other countries, at least in legal context (Oppenheim and Roxburgh, 1974). Interest has arisen from modern theorists concerning the constitutive approach as it may be considered a more definite approach to establish statehood. The framework of international law is bound in the rules that define what a state is and is not. A difference between two specific uses of the word ‘ sovereignty’ is instructive in knowing international law concerning statehood and its importance for acceptance. Eli Lauterpacht explained that “sovereignty is…more commonly used in its…meaning to describe the jurisdiction and control which a state may exercise over territory, regardless of the question of where ultimate title to the territory may lie” ( Lauterpacht, 1956). How important is international recognition in theoretical terms? By looking at entities that are not internationally recognised, or de facto states, a better understanding can be achieved on how recognition benefits a state. These de facto states have retained sovereignty over an extended timespan with a degree of inner legality but not at an international level. Despite the fall of the constitutive concept of acceptance within international law, understanding of states and governments holds legitimate power. Entities that are not acknowledged as states may not remain entitled to these complete legitimate benefits granted distinguished governments and states, including jurisdictional and additional immunities. As Mikulas Fabry describes, “recognition is an indispensable precondition for a political community’s status as a sovereign state in international relations and law” (Visoka, 2018). This understanding exists as the very foundation of a state’s composition. Modern politics has been influenced considerably by the need or demand for recognition for marginalized states. State recognition proves valuable in the sense that member states engage freely with international organisations and institutions (Wilde, 2010). De facto states live in a state of limbo, of grey lines and unclear borders. Political progressions are simply dismissed, and athletes are unable to participate in international events representing the flag they deem their own. It is evident that international recognition has a strong significance in global acceptance and is probable to have excellent impact, for instance in aspects of identification or presumed safety. It is obvious that being an autonomous state is kept in high esteem in the contemporary world, if not for any other purpose, because it is the stated objective of significant components of culture in regions around the globe, including in representative Western countries (e.g. Scotland). Russia’s recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia’s autonomy in August 2008 marked a significant shift in the countries’ internal ties. This growth had an important effect on these organizations’ state capacity and political economy, as well as on their citizens ‘ livelihood opportunities. It was only in 2007 that Transnistria began to ratify its exercise of securing income from its portfolio by not charging for the gas it bought from Gazprom; within a few years, Russian aid has risen to encompass the majority of Transnistria’s expenditure, thus becoming a main enabler of the local welfare state. When countries administer territory, they often do so on the grounds that the region concerned is their own sovereign territory, or a shift to the present circumstances e.g. Iraq’s claim to title over Kuwait following its invasion in 1990, and Kosovo’s claim to statehood in territory creating part of Serbia on declaring independence in 2008 (Wilde, 2010. The vast opportunities that are associated with independent statehood and being a contributing member into international organizations are difficult to obtain (Visoka, 2018). From Kosovo declaring independence, it has since earned diplomatic recognition by 111 UN member states. While the United States, Britain and a portion of Europe have recognised Kosovo’s independence directing aid towards the state, other influential members such as Serbia, the USSR and China have not recognised this declaration (The Economist, 2010). States work and are capable when a critical mass of officials and citizens think that state institutions exist for good reasons and that state action is based on justified institutions (Risse, Börzel and Draude, 2018). In the light of international law, after its recognition by six UN member-states, Abkhazia can be regarded as a fully-ledged independent State and subject of international law. Its broad international recognition, which, in my view, is imminent, will undoubtedly serve the achieving of political stability in Western Transcaucasia and will create more favourable conditions for the economic and social development of this part of Europe.” : http://abkhazworld.com/aw/Pdf/2014-libre.pdf There is no linear relationship between degrees of statehood and effective governance. Effective governance in terms of both service delivery and rule-making is possible in areas of limited statehood where state institutions are too weak to implement and enforce decisions. Statehood is essential for “building islands of governance, particularly when it comes to broadening access to collective goods and services”. P14
ELECTROLYTIC Lab Report
ELECTROLYTIC Lab Report.
If you’re not chem major, please don’t attempt. If I don’t get 100/100 I will request a refund. Thank you!Hello there, this was a lab experiment. I have the data from the experiment which will be send you. However, due to time restraints I can’t complete the lab. I need someone to carefully go over each step. Answer questions 10, 11 1, 2, 3 and any other that’s asked. Please make sure all questions are answered. Please use word document (nothing handwritten). If you have any question let me know! The lab is from pg 68-70. Please check to see if the link is working! http://www.ars-chemia.net/Classes/102/manual/102_manual.pdfPlease make sure to put part’s letter designation and question number.
ELECTROLYTIC Lab Report
MDC Best Practices in Nursing Leads to Adoption of Standard Procedures Discussion
MDC Best Practices in Nursing Leads to Adoption of Standard Procedures Discussion.
DQ 8· Select one question as your DQ 1· Follow the discussion questions participation and submission guidelines.· Follow the 3 x 3 rule: minimum three paragraphs per DQ, with a minimum of three sentences each paragraph.· All answers or discussions comments submitted must be in APA format according to Publication Manual American Psychological Association (APA) (6th ed.) 2009 ISBN: 978-1-4338-0561-5· Minimum of two references, not older than 2015.Chapter 8: Safety and Quality Improvement in Professional Nursing Practice1. How do best practices contribute to quality and safety?2. How can the commitment to quality improvement be integrated throughout all roles and at all levels of professional nursing practice?
MDC Best Practices in Nursing Leads to Adoption of Standard Procedures Discussion