Get help from the best in academic writing.

Investigating The Five Second Rule Philosophy Essay

Almost everyone, at one point in there life has dropped food on the floor and still had the crave or wanted to eat it not considering if it had fallen. Most chaps quote the 5-second rule. This is randomly saying about how foodstuff will not be contaminated with germs if you pick it from the floor in less than five seconds. Many people do it not knowing this is it has become part of there human nature some just do it because the rule exist The 5-second rule has become attached to our culture and life in day-to-day bases that it forced scientists and myth blasters to test it. They were testing if there is any truth in what was being said but that is just what it was a myth no proof was fond to support the rule nor was there any type of evidence that would prove any facts in the what so called rule. The test did confirm that depending on what type of germs got in your system one would get sick it dose not mater if one picked the food five seconds or five minutes later. Just to clarify this so-called rule is not a written rule. This is, it is not written in any rule, law or regulation books, it is just a rule that people have come up with and is written in peoples head When I was young, I always used to drop food all over the floor only to pick it back again citing the five-second rule. I grew up believing that it actually was true germs would take five seconds when food fell on the floor but know I am not so sure is there any truth in this concept ? Some people say that the five second rule is a rule that make people fill good after eating food from the ground, to them it is but just a mare blind concept that dose not make any perfect sense. To some the five-second rule is just the perfect excuse to eat any thing. Some people actually say that germs run away once they see the food falling down. However, do imagine this, you have just got off job hungry and tired you have been waiting a whole day for this moment. You walk in to a restaurant and odder you favorite snack then as you are on the verge of putting it in you mouth it falls down and you pick it before five seconds are over what will you do? Will you throw it away because it fell or will you go right ahead and eat up thanking the Lord a five-second rule exists? Truth be said, people look for very weird rezones to do what they want. Its part of human nature its part of the world. It is why human are human. There is nothing like the five-second rule. Many individuals have done research and companies, people have used a lot of money to try to research on this rule to tray and come to a conclusion of this theory. The truth is that, for example, an article written recently in New York confirmed what is now turning out to be our worst nightmare yet. After a few test a research in article came to a conclusion that was both disturbing and astonishing. The five-second rule should really, to them, be a zero-second rule. this is because there test show that when food falls on the floor the time it uses to fall on the floor dose not at all change the risk involved in this in the first place. In fact, another research, which was done by a university here in the stats, showed that 97% of germs are transmitted almost directly. This is within a second of an object being exposed to germs. This is very amusing if ne would think of it. If it is possible for an object food to get that lot of germ per second how much dose it get in the five seconds. There are two very important aspects that one should think about when one before they pick up food from the floor and go right ahead to eat it this are clean looking surfaces are not inevitably clean and fast as some cases may not be fast enough This means shiny new clean floors are clean yes to the naked eye and not necessarily to the Microscopic germs that cannot be seen using ones naked eyes people assumer that just because they cannot see the germs they do not exist. There is a saying that says washed surfaces are just as clean as the mop that was used to clean them. Actually if we thought about that for a minute then you will see the sense in it if a mop was used to clean the toilet floors then cleaned the dinning room isn t picking food from the dinning floors the same as picking food from the toilet floors. Think about it is there any big difference and if there is which one? If conditions of germs to attach them selves to food are right, then it dose not make any difference how many minutes it is on the floor the germs will still get on the food. No matter how fast one was on picking it. Up in very dimple terms, germs have no taming; they will get to food as fast as they can. However, it is also true to say that the longer the food stays on the floor the more germs it accumulates. Not all of the germs are harmful. Well they are but not all of them is that bad some are just milled? However, some can drive one to that point of misery or torture some germs for example those that cause diarrhea can make one suffer or even at some extreme situations lead to death. Even if one cannot see the dirt on the food that one has just picked up it dose not mean the food is safe for consumption. One cannot be sure of what type of germs he is about to eat. Let us assume that a fruit one is having has slipped off one s grip. The safest way is to throw it away. There is another thing to consider even after the five second rule that does not search out the fact that the food might have landed in a place where someone parked his butt. Yes human binges have this way of turning things around so that they favor them but some of this thing go to far the five second rule should be scraped off completely it dose not make sense as it is how can food that has fallen down be clean. Especially wet food this is for example apples they do attract germs very fast Yes I do agree with many people that it is wrong to let some of this food go to waste just because it fell down for less than a few seconds but is it worth to get sick just because of some food. The rule is a sham and doses not apply at any level. Detailed biological research of the five-second rule: the notion that if you pick up a fallen portion of foodstuff before you count up to five, is O.K. to eat it. We are tolled about microbes on foodstuff every time there is an outburst of diarrhea or salmonella, and each time we examine the stickers on packages of raw beef. However, we do not have much incident to reflect back about the day-to-day practice of getting and consuming dropped portions of foodstuff. This research therefore concludes that the five-second rule is spurious and just but a belief. What the students proposed is that candy cay does contain a substantial bacterium that is harmful. It is never correct to eat food that has dropped anywhere on the ground. This will help reduce disease and by doing so money spent on buying painkillers or de-wormers can be used elsewhere. So one does not have to be ignorant of the fact that germs are not aware so if you drop food on the ground no matter how sweet it is one should throw it away and by doing this one will be free from many ailments.
PHI445 Employment Discrimination, Ledbetter Versus Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. I’m studying for my Writing class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

In the Week 3 Assignment, you engaged in a case analysis of a current business problem using some of the components of an argumentative essay. In this written assignment, you will write a complete argumentative essay as described in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Foster, Hardy, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). This essay will include a revised and polished version of your Week 3 Assignment, an objection to your thesis, a rebuttal, and concluding remarks. In order to benefit the most, you should start working on your Final Project from the time you receive your Week 3 Assignment back with comments from your professor.
Your assignment should include the following: A revision of your Week 3 Case Analysis Assignment. Your revision should represent a substantial edit of your work that fully incorporates feedback from your professor and goes well beyond correcting any grammatical or APA errors.
The strongest possible objection to your thesis. After the final paragraph of your Week 3 Case Analysis Assignment, start a new paragraph that introduces the strongest possible objection to your thesis. The considerations for this are detailed in Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). Make sure to employ the appropriate language to introduce the objection, such as “some may object to my thesis as follows” or “according to [so and so] the thesis presented here fails to account for X” [whatever he or she finds problematic]. You can find other language to do this, of course, but the key point here is to make sure that you indicate that someone else is speaking when presenting this objection.
It is also important to remember that you do research to discover good objections and not merely objections that are weak and thus easily rebutted. Look for peer-reviewed journal articles in the Ashford University Library, full-text articles in Google Scholar, or articles in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Present the opposing position fairly and in detail. This may take more than one paragraph.
A rebuttal. This is a refutation of the objection that you have just presented. Start this in a new paragraph following the objection paragraph(s). Once again, follow the indications of Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). You may point out an error in the objection. Or you may show that, while it is an important objection, it does not apply squarely to your argument, or does not account for facts that make it irrelevant. Above all, make sure to maintain philosophical decorum in your rebuttal. Toward this end, you should apply the principles of charity and of accuracy, first introduced in the Week 1 course material. See “Confronting Disagreement” in Section 9.4 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015).
Closing remarks. End your argumentative essay with a paragraph of closing remarks. Provide some reflections of what you have attempted to achieve by means of your essay. You could, for example, explain how your essay sheds light on the broader controversy that it addresses. Or you could point out how your essay addresses a frequently ignored point or the unpopular side in the controversy. You could also reflect on the related matters in the broader controversy that would be useful to examine by others. Do not merely summarize what you have done in the body of your essay, and do not add new information here that would support or contradict your essay since the body of your essay should have addressed all the relevant points. See “Closing Your Essay” in Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo (2015).
Requirements for your Assignment:

Your assignment should be between 1500 to 1700 words in length, excluding the cover and references pages.
Your examination should be both thorough and succinct. This is a combination that demands time and thought, so give yourself sufficient time to draft and revise.
Your assignment should include citations, as well as a list of references. Both must be in APA form.
Your references should include at least four peer-reviewed articles in addition to those that you will be carrying over from our Week 3 Case Analysis Assignment. These references should be drawn from the Ashford University Library, Google Scholar, or the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Your assignment should be submitted no later than the end of Monday (midnight, U.S. Mountain time).

PHI445 Employment Discrimination, Ledbetter Versus Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co

NRS 433V Chamberlain University Type I diabetes PICOT Statement and Annotated Bibliography

NRS 433V Chamberlain University Type I diabetes PICOT Statement and Annotated Bibliography.

For this assignment, you will create a clinical guiding question know as a PICOT question. The PICOT question must be relevant to a nursing practice problem. To support your PICOT question, identify six supporting peer-revised research articles, as indicated below. The PICOT question and six peer-reviewed research articles you choose will be utilized for subsequent assignments.Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” to complete this assignment.Select a nursing practice problem of interest to use as the focus of your research. Start with the patient population and identify a clinical problem or issue that arises from the patient population. In 200–250 words, provide a summary of the clinical issue.Following the PICOT format, write a PICOT question in your selected nursing practice problem area of interest. The PICOT question should be applicable to your proposed capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).The PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project.Conduct a literature search to locate six research articles focused on your selected nursing practice problem of interest. This literature search should include three quantitative and three qualitative peer-reviewed research articles to support your nursing practice problem.Note: To assist in your search, remove the words qualitative and quantitative and include words that narrow or broaden your main topic. For example: Search for diabetes and pediatric and dialysis. To determine what research design was used in the articles the search produced, review the abstract and the methods section of the article. The author will provide a description of data collection using qualitative or quantitative methods. Systematic Reviews, Literature Reviews, and Metanalysis articles are good resources and provide a strong level of evidence but are not considered primary research articles. Therefore, they should not be included in this assignment.While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
NRS 433V Chamberlain University Type I diabetes PICOT Statement and Annotated Bibliography

Module 01 Written Assignment – Compare and Contrast Two Mental Health Theories

essay helper free Module 01 Written Assignment – Compare and Contrast Two Mental Health Theories.

Submit a paper which compares and contrasts two mental health theories: You may choose your theories from the textbook or from other sources. Describe each theory, including some history about the person who
developed the theory and the major ideas and applications of the
theory. Describe the ways in which the two theories are similar, and how they differ. Include a statement of how each theory could be used in your
nursing practice. Include specific patient examples if you have them.
You may also critique the theory: Is there anything with which you
disagree or are there any problems you can identify? It is expected that this essay will be 2-3 pages in length (not
including the title page), double-spaced. Your paper should include an
introduction and conclusion and proper APA citations from any source
material you use, including your text.
Module 01 Written Assignment – Compare and Contrast Two Mental Health Theories

Keiser Career College Greenacres Stress Management for Optimum Health Discussion

Keiser Career College Greenacres Stress Management for Optimum Health Discussion.

Learning to Manage Stress for Optimum HealthPlease read the Psychology Discussion requirements fully, then read Read pages 419 – 422Coon et al. (2022) mentions the relationship between stress and health and the importance of learning positive measures to ensure our physical and mental well-being. Coon et al. (2022) explain a stressor is a condition or event that challenges or threatens a person. Coon et al. (2022) state that burnout occurs when workers are physically, mentally, and emotionally drained. This highlights the importance of knowing good coping skills and setting boundaries for ourselves where our obligations are concerned. Take the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRSS) on page 420.ReferencesCoon, D., Mitterer, J.O., & Martini, T. (2022). Introduction to psychology: Gateways to mind and behavior (16th ed.). Cengage Learning.For this week’s main post, answer all of the following questions after taking the SRSS on page 420 of your textbook. Be sure to include factual, properly cited information in your post.What did you learn about yourself?What stressors and or “hassles” do you recognize in your life?What measures can you take in order to lower your stress and optimize your health and well being?How will this enable you to become a more productive student? **You might also enjoy visiting: http://www.mentalhealthamerica.net/self-help-tools or here: http://marc.ucla.edu/ for more information and self-help.
Keiser Career College Greenacres Stress Management for Optimum Health Discussion

Cause and Effect of Poverty Research Paper

Table of Contents Effects of poverty on health Effects of poverty on educational attainment Effects of poverty on migration patterns Works Cited Poverty can be described in a number of ways. For example, the disparities in income and wealth are considered as a sign of poverty since the state is related to issues of scarcity and allocation of resources and influence. Although poverty is most prominent among developing countries, studies indicate that the condition is also noticeable among the developed countries. Poverty may also be defined as the combined status of poor individuals (John