Get help from the best in academic writing.

international economic and trade

international economic and trade.

Question 1:How COVID-19 effects the trade activities around the world. Please briefly explain with suitable examples. Question 2:Suppose that in the absence of trade, Home consumes two cars and nine TVS, while Foreign consumes nine cars and two TVs. Add the indifference curve for each country to the figures in Problems 3 and 4. Label the production possibilities frontier (PPF), indifference curve (U1), and the no-trade equilibrium consumption and production for each country. Question # 3:Suppose when Japan opens to trade, it imports rice, a labor-intensive good a. According to the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem, is Japan capital-abundant or labor- abundant? Briefly explain b. What is the impact of opening trade on the real wage in Japan? c. What is the impact of opening trade on the real rental on capital? d. Which group(capital owner or labor) would support policies to limit free trade? Briefly explain.
international economic and trade

MGT 514 GU Wk 6 Difference Between Legal Compliance & Managing Diversity Discussion.

Each week, you will be asked to respond to the prompt or prompts in the discussion forum. Your initial post should be 300+ words in length, and is due on Sunday. By Tuesday, you should respond to two additional posts from your peers. Please respond to one of the following questions:Question ACorporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is when businesses find ways to operate ethically. Businesses are no longer disregarding important social issues like environmental sustainability, animal cruelty, and the need to pay workers a living wage. Brainstorm three or four examples pf corporate social responsibility initiatives that are conducted through organizations. (If you are having trouble identifying initiatives, brainstorm with your classmates or contact your instructor.)Once you have 3-4 initiatives, identify at least two ways to which organizations support these efforts. Post your ideas.Question BIdentify and discuss the difference between legal compliance and managing diversity. What is generations in the workplace?View your discussion rubric.
MGT 514 GU Wk 6 Difference Between Legal Compliance & Managing Diversity Discussion

University of Waterloo Key Issues With Adoption of Undocumented Minors Research.

I’m working on a english question and need a sample draft to help me learn.

Choose one of the three research topics below: Population Growth and Natural ResourcesPoverty and HealthUndocumented MinorsProcedureYou will need to specify your topic further to create your thesis statement and facilitate your research. The topics, as they appear, are too broad. For example, if an assigned topic is linguistic discrimination, I could further specify it (as you’ll see in the sample) to address the effects of linguistic discrimination of African American English.Based on your topic, find two sources, one scholarly and one popular, that you will use to inform your outline and create your citations. Create a tentative outline for a ‘would-be’ paper. NOTE: you are not writing the essay/paper. The outline requirements are:No fewer than three body paragraphs, for a total of 5 paragraphs. Fully grammatical sentences for the thesis statement and topic sentencesSupporting details may be phrases (see the sample)In-text citations for at least two supporting details. A Works Cited with two full citations for your two required sourcesYour outline DOES NOT need to specify: a hook in the introductionconnecting sentences in the introductionminor details in the body paragraphsany of the elements of a conclusion
University of Waterloo Key Issues With Adoption of Undocumented Minors Research

The Quantitative Research Approach. Paper details Many quantitative methods required advanced training. However, you can incorporate some quantitative material into your papers by using data from publicly available sites like the Global Terrorism Database. Please review the publicly available databases presented in the lesson. Select one of these databases (or you may select another with which you are familiar) and explain how you would incorporate data from it into your research papers.The Quantitative Research Approach

CTUO Compare and Contrast two Organizational Designs Discussion

CTUO Compare and Contrast two Organizational Designs Discussion.

Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas. Focus your discussion on the following:Compare and contrast 2 organizational designs from the international or global perspective.Identify the design that is more appropriate for a global organization, and explain your decision. APA formatDeliverable Length: 400–600 words Please see the attachment for the already selected international organization.
CTUO Compare and Contrast two Organizational Designs Discussion

ENGL 124 Cuyamaca College Hidden Dragon Video Discussion

assignment writing services ENGL 124 Cuyamaca College Hidden Dragon Video Discussion.

What do you plan on changing? Why?What did your peers feel was the strongest part of your essay? Which suggestion that you received made you think the most about how to strengthen your essay?Did your peers identify or have you considered any additional details that need to be included in your essay? If so, where do you plan to add them?Did you receive helpful peer reviews? Do you wish they had done something differently? What can you take away from this peer review activity that will enable you to write helpful and meaningful reviews for your peers’ writing in the future?
ENGL 124 Cuyamaca College Hidden Dragon Video Discussion

HIS 03 UCSD Indian Removal Policy Native American Groups Sovereign Entities Discussion

HIS 03 UCSD Indian Removal Policy Native American Groups Sovereign Entities Discussion.

Begin by reading the section entitled “Indian Removal” in Section 10.4 of your textbook (within the chapter on Jacksonian Democracy).  Then watch the film for this week on the “Trail of Tears”.  Finally, review the background information and sources related to Indian Removal in the document pack (posted under the forum).
Initial Post 
In the United States, the policy of Indian removal is viewed as an unjust action taken by the American government, but there was debate over the policy at the time.  For the forum, respond to the following question:  What were the three best arguments against the Indian Removal policy?  How did the United States government justify the policy? Why did many native Americans choose to go along with the policy?  
In your initial post you should: 
1) take a clear position regarding the three best arguments against Indian removal; 
2) use at least two documents to explain and support these arguments; 
3) describe two arguments supporting Indian removal advanced by President Jackson, and explain why these arguments are invalid; 
4) discuss two reasons that native Americans went along with the policy of Indian removal based on sources from Elias Boudinot and Winfield Scott. Your post should be at least 250 words long.
This discussion shows special attention to reconstructing and refuting the arguments in favor of Indian Removal policy from document B and does a good job of doing that. Can you also address the arguments against Indian removal policy from Documents A and C? 
The textbook is a free open educational resource (OER). Links to the individual chapters can be found in the Learning Modules. The textbook can be linked here: OpenStax, U.S. History. OpenStax CNX. Jun 25, 2019 
Response to Colleagues
You should respond to the posts of two colleagues. (Note: These will become visible only after you have made your initial post). 
In each response to a colleague, you should 
1) discuss one point in their argument that you found persuasive – explaining the reason why; 
2) discuss one point that your colleague might improve or think about – explaining your reasoning.  
HIS 03 UCSD Indian Removal Policy Native American Groups Sovereign Entities Discussion

Reforms in the Constitutional Reform Bill

Reforms in the Constitutional Reform Bill. Will the reforms in the Constitutional Reform Bill achieve the aims set out in Lord Falconer’s statement of 26th January 2004? The Constitutional Reform Bill is the illegitimate progeny of the botched Cabinet reshuffle of June 2003 which led to the hasty removal of Lord Irvine and the appointment of Lord Falconer as Lord Chancellor with a mandate to abolish himself! Its principle limbs are: The abolition of the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords and its replacement by a new Supreme Court (separating Legislature and Executive); The establishment of a Judicial Appointments Commission to assume the functions of the Lord Chancellor in the appointment of judges (separating Judiciary and Executive) The abolition of the post of Lord Chancellor (separating Legislature, Executive and Judiciary). It is highly doubtful whether the proposed reforms will achieve Lord Falconer’s stated aims principally because the intended changes are susceptible to the colloquial criticism, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!”. It has to be admitted that the current role of the House of Lords in the judicial process is an historical anomaly. The Judicial Committee is the ultimate appellate court in the UK and Commonwealth but it continues to sit in the Palace of Westminster. More controversially, its members remain an integral part of the second legislative chamber. This has led to the apparently plausible criticism that the arrangement represents a breach of the doctrine of separation of powers and gives rise to the populist criticism that the Law Lords are making laws which in their judicial capacity they will then have to interpret and enforce. In reality, their Lordships have proved to be scrupulous in refraining from debate where this is likely to generate a conflict of interest between their judicial and legislative roles. The Government’s stance is that complete separation between politicians and the judiciary is essential in order to maintain public trust and it is sought to emphasise this division by the relocation of the ultimate appeal court to a new and doubtless stratospherically expensive building. This is costly window dressing. Nowhere in the current debate is there any compelling evidence of public disquiet at a system that has endured without significant criticism of this type for centuries. Further, Lord Woolf, the most senior judge in England and Wales has condemned the proposal as exchanging a first class final appeals court for a second class supreme court. The Supreme Court of the USA is extolled as a role model but it is conveniently forgotten that the proposed UK Supreme Court would not possess the power of its transatlantic cousin to strike down legislation and will therefore be bereft of much of the influence of the latter. At best a great deal of money will be spent in replicating for all practical purposes the existing set-up. Far from endorsing the independence of the new court, Woolf fears that it will reduce the judiciary to “a department of the Home Office” as a result of becoming answerable through the Department of Constitutional Affairs. This reform may be regarded as a product of the political dogma which dictates the dismantling at all costs of the ancient structure and operations of the House of Lords. The proposal to establish a Judicial Appointments Commission while not similarly politically motivated is equally flawed in its present form. Traditionally the Lord Chancellor is the head of the judiciary and responsible for the appointment and supervision of judges. Admittedly there has been criticism by the public and, in particular, members of the legal profession of the process of appointing High Court Judges with allegations of “secret files” and a lack of transparency in the recruitment process. It cannot be denied that the Lord Chancellor (at the very latest upon appointment) becomes a career politician with a seat in the Cabinet and thus at the very heart of the government of the day. While this is apparently unsatisfactory, criticisms of judicial appointments do not contain allegations that they are driven by party political considerations. This is in stark contrast to the position in the USA where appointments to the Supreme Court are in the gift of the President and there is intense interest in and scrutiny of the political composition of the court. In a lecture to the UCL Constitution Unit in November 2003, the Chairman of the Bar of England and Wales, Matthias Kelly, QC, expressed concern at the proposed operational structure of the Commission. He argued that it should be “a non-departmental public body with a supporting agency” accountable to Parliament for its activities but not specifically accountable for the selection of particular individuals. There is a danger that scrutiny of the activities of the Commission may become akin to unseemly American-style confirmation hearings. The DCA Consultation Paper, Constitutional reform: a new way of appointing judges, (July 2003) suggests that “the Commission should be a recommending Commission, putting up a short-list of candidates for appointment to the Secretary of State”. It is hard to understand how the involvement in this way of the Department of Constitutional Affairs would assuage the supposed public concern at political involvement in the judicial appointment process. Every discussion of separation of powers in the UK constitution (Legislature, Judiciary and Executive) highlights the anomalous position of the Lord Chancellor who (with remarkable physiological ingenuity!) maintains a foot in all three camps. It has to be conceded that given the strict prohibition of judges holding party political affiliations, the sight of a member of the government of the day dispensing justice in the ultimate appellate court is incongruous. This is a major reason why it was proposed to replace the Lord Chancellor with a Secretary of State for Constitutional affairs and remove him from the House of Lords and, in particular, its judicial function. However, again the necessity for this is questionable. Even Lord Hailsham – a thoroughly political animal – appeared to manage appropriate detachment from the political imperatives of the day when giving judgment in the House of Lords. It now seems that we are to retain a Lord Chancellor but that he need not be a Law Lord or even a lawyer. Enter a rehabilitated former Home Secretary perhaps? Bibliography BBC News, Lords Inflict Supreme Court Blow, 9 March 2004, BBC News, QReforms in the Constitutional Reform Bill