Get help from the best in academic writing.

Insurance and Negligence Critical Essay

What is negligence According to insurance policy, negligence is defined as any instance that on the part of the policy holder’s that could be blamed for the incidence that occurred, when there is negligent, then the incident was not merely from an accident, but some reluctance, ignorance or anything or such manner can be proved on the part of the policy holder’s. Depending with the insurance contact engaged, the insurer could cover the loss resulting from a negligence of the policyholder to a certain percentage or alternatively refuse to cater for any loss therein. To prove that a policyholder was negligent, there are four main elements to a negligent, they are: Existence of a legal duty to use reasonable care The insurer must prove that the policyholder by the terms and conditions of the contract was under legal obligation to take good care of the situation or the subject matter to avoid any case of damage. When signing an insurance policy, there are some conditions that are special to a particular case, in the case that they offer some duty of care to the policyholder, then in case of an incidence that occurred from the bleach of the duty of care, then the case can be said to be a case of negligence. Failure to perform that duty An insurance policy has some preset conditions that calls for some actions, certain behavior or certain way of handing situation on the side of the policyholder to enforce the contract. In the case that the policyholder has ignored or not performed the duty, then it can be concluded as a case of negligence and the contact can have issues in enforceability. failure to perform that duty can result to negligence and non-compensation of the policyholder. Damages or injury to the claimant To prove a case of negligence, there must have some damages that have been suffered because of the negligence, in the case of an insurance policy, the subject matter that had been issued must have been damaged or the peril that was insured against must have occurred. When the damage has occurred, the policyholder will be seeking to enforce the contract and get compensation that is the challenging part of the story; he suffered the damage, but the complainant (the insurance at this level) is claiming that there have been some negligence, thus the damage not enforceable. The insurer assumes that if the policyholder had taken such enough care, then the damage would not have occurred. Proximate cause relationship between the negligent act and the infliction of damages Under this heading, the law assumes that some acts on the side of the policyholder that might have triggered another thing that is responsible for the damage. In this case, there is the inclusion of third parties or other activities to functions that might be blamed for the damage. When proving this point, the insurance body must show the cause of events and the relationship that occurred in the entire situation to have the damage occur. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More The assumption of this element is that a damage can occur but there is not direct influence of the policyholder if the matters of the case are analyzed, then it can be seen that the policy holder was involved in the situation indirectly; the indirect involvement is the prove of negligence.
West Stanly High School President Bush 9/11 Speech SOAPS Analysis.

Using SOAPS, analyze the rhetorical situation in President George W. Bush’s 9/11 Speech, posted below. Refer to the chart for an example of the quality of work I’m looking for. 9/11 SpeechGeorge W. BushGood evening.Today, our fellow citizens, our way of life, our very freedom came underattack in a series of deliberate and deadly terrorist acts.The victims were in airplanes or in their offices — secretaries, businessmenand women, military and federal workers. Moms and dads. Friends andneighbors.Thousands of lives were suddenly ended by evil, despicable acts of terror.The pictures of airplanes flying into buildings, fires burning, huge structurescollapsing, have filled us with disbelief, terrible sadness, and a quiet, unyielding anger.These acts of mass murder were intended to frighten our nation into chaosand retreat. But they have failed. our country is strong. A great people has beenmoved to defend a great nation.Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but theycannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.America was targeted for attack because we’re the brightest beacon forfreedom and opportunity in the world. And no one will keep that light fromshining.Today, our nation saw evil, the very worst of human nature, and we respondedwith the best of America, with the daring of our rescue workers, with the caringfor strangers and neighbors who came to give blood and help in any way theycould.Immediately following the first attack, I implemented our government’s emergency response plans. our military is powerful, and it’s prepared. our emergency teams are working in New York City and Washington, D.C., to help with local rescue efforts.Our first priority is to get help to those who have been injured and to takeevery precaution to protect our citizens at home and around the world fromfurther attacks. The functions of our government continue without interruption.Federal agencies in Washington which had to be evacuated today are reopening for essential personnel tonight and will be open for business tomorrow.Our financial institutions remain strong, and the American economy will beopen for business as well.The search is under way for those who are behind these evil acts. I’ve directedthe full resources of our intelligence and law enforcement communities to findthose responsible and bring them to justice. We will make no distinction between theterrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them.PreviousNext
West Stanly High School President Bush 9/11 Speech SOAPS Analysis

Psychology Question

Psychology Question.

Pt 1 – Analyze methods to develop a research chart
This week, you will review the foundations of using a between-subject experimental method. This includes a review of sampling, group creation (including randomness), levels of manipulation, how variables may be measured, the nature of inferential statistics with comparing differences, applications of its use, hands-on exploration of statistical testing, and what outcomes may signify in response to the given research question(s) and hypotheses. 
In the chart, provide the name(s) of the method you reviewed, its primary use and when it should be used, strengths and limitations of the method, ethical considerations, and one example of when the method could be used (include your interests or something more general).
Pt 2
For this assignment, you will extend your examination of the between-subjects experimental method into two hands-on activities. Referring to page 331 and the SPSS in Focus: Two-Independent-Sample t-Test in your text, follow the steps for conducting this analysis. Then, on page 338, follow the steps provided for the SPSS in Focus: One-Way between Subjects ANOVA. 
Pt 3

For this week’s reflection, consider the following points: 

Explain the research situations that may require you to use between-subjects experimental methods (be sure to give examples/be specific).
Examine the limitations and benefits learned about these methods and their use.
Analyze any ethical considerations with implementing these methods.
Reflect on your experience with this week’s SPSS activity.
Include any questions you may have for your professor.

Psychology Question

Frederick Law Olmsted and the Dialectical Landscape Discussion

term paper help Frederick Law Olmsted and the Dialectical Landscape Discussion.

I’m working on a art discussion question and need a sample draft to help me understand better.

A discussion about readingsDiscuss some points or thinks in the reading, take it easy, each of the readings should be addressed in less than 150 wordsreading 1:https://siena2010.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/fred…reading2 in file blocksample:Robert Smithson, “Frederick Law Olmsted and the Dialectical LandscapeSmithson examined photos of the land set aside to become Central Park and saw the wasteland that New Yorkers had created with no value or regard for the land. He challenged the idea that Central Park was no longer relevant to a city that was constantly growing and evolving. Comparing Central Park to national parks out west such as Yellowstone & Yosemite, Smithson discusses how the more humble and degraded sites offer more of a challenge to art. An excellent point is made in that there’s no reason to recycle wilderness the way Central Park was recycled – you can’t improve wilderness, all that’s needed are access routes and accommodations. Smithson determines that “We cannot take a one-sided view of the landscape within this dialectic. A park can no longer be seen as ‘a thing-in-itself,’ but rather as a process of ongoing relationships….the park becomes a ‘thing for us’.Brit Fischer, Artists at Work: Marjetica PotrčBased in Ljubljana (Slovenia) and Berlin, Marjetica Potrč is a conceptuaI artist/architect who thinks outside of the box because she’s not linked to an institution. Potrč believes, while physical space is extremely important, it doesn’t need to be considered in the abstract. She emphasizes the actual site, the physical location of place and believes people who want to be recognized in society need a place to achieve this. This interview was conducted 9 years ago, long before the pandemic spread across the globe. Potrč then said it was about community space verses public space. She felt that people craved stronger, smaller communities even if they were living within a big metropolis. Even with social distancing, people are even more dedicated to their family, their neighbors and their community. Today, travel is discouraged so its one’s immediate surroundings that matter and connect one another. Potrč’s artwork and projects emphasize individual empowerment and consider strategies for the future. She references community gardens as a way people connect – exchanging vegetables as well as knowledge. The pandemic has made this truer than ever and may be the blueprint for our future.
Frederick Law Olmsted and the Dialectical Landscape Discussion

Articles on Psychological Studies Paper

Articles on Psychological Studies Paper.

STEP 1: Find a popular news article from within the past 10 years that reports on the results of a psychological study. This should not be a blog entry, but a published article from a news source such as Time Magazine, The New York Times, Newsweek, NPR, CNN, Fox News, etc.STEP 2: Go find the psychological study or studies that are mentioned in the news report. Sometimes those are not freely available online, so you may have to track down the original study through your library’s website. STEP 3: Write a paper between 250-500 words thatdescribes and summarizes both articlescompares and contrasts the key points, style, and purpose of the news article with that of the research articleexamines if the news article accurately describes the researchincludes correct APA citations (both in-text and in a reference page) for both of the articles
Articles on Psychological Studies Paper

Respond To 2 Diifferent Posts, *100 words each*

Respond To 2 Diifferent Posts, *100 words each*. I’m stuck on a Sociology question and need an explanation.

POST 1: One of the things that got my attention on this module, is about who influences our sexual behavior. This topic was very interesting for me because I have three children; two teenage boys 17 and 12 years old, and a 10 years old girl. One of the data that surprised me is that most of the teenagers don’t talk with their parents about sexuality. Data says, that even though, 97% of teenagers by the age of 18 have some knowledge of sexual education, the information is not provided by their parents. In addition, I learned that teenagers talk with parents more about sexually transmitted infections and how to prevent HIV. In addition, peers and sibling influence teenagers. The influence of peers of siblings can be helpful on some occasions, for example, older siblings can make a good impact on younger siblings when talking about their sexuality. Instead of prohibiting sex, older siblings can give good advice to the younger ones about safe sex, especially to boys.
Also, religion influences sexual behavior. For instance, I didn’t know that Evangelical students considered themselves virgins although they had oral or anal sex; they don’t consider it as “real sex”. Data shows, that 80% of teenagers who identify themselves as Evangelical or born-again Christians said that sex should be saved for marriage when for other religions teenagers lose their virginity at a younger age. All these facts made me feel related to the information. I considered this information very useful. As a mother of teenagers, I realized that this is information is true because I have done some of the things that were mentioned. I have always been very open with my children when talking about sex, however, as the texts mention I have always made emphasis about STD, safe sex or abstinence. Certainly, my perspective changed a lot after learning all these facts.

POST 2: The topic that interested me the most was “Who Influences Our Sexual Behavior: Family and Friends” because I think it is very important for us as parent teach our children about sex and sexuality. If they don’t learn it form us, then they will learn about it from somewhere else, and an opportunity to influence family values may be missed and most likely they will be misinformed.
I remember growing and not knowing nothing about sex because for my parents and family it was almost a sin to talk about it, so I obtained that wrong information from my high school friends and I don’t think it was the best option. Since that happened to me, I didn’t want my three girls to go with their friends and ask about sex. I wanted to be the one educating them in this topic. I wanted them to know about sex, birth control and Protection so they are aware and learn how to protect themselves.
Beginning a conversation with our children is not easy, but we have to make sure that the information we are providing to them is according to their age and for that I researched a lot, I saw a lot of videos and I also read some books. This way, it was easier for me and less uncomfortable to talk to them about this crucial topic. We just have to wait for the perfect moment to have this conversation. These conversations are easiest when they come out of a life experience, like seeing a pregnant woman. When we talk with our children about sex, they can make sure that they are getting the right information. We should be our children first source of information about sex. Understanding correct information can protect children from risky behavior as they grow up ad live their lives.
Having open communications with children about sex and other matters is healthy and safer for them. This does not mean that it will be easy or without awkward moments. Teens are still very private and especially to parents. However, speaking about sex increases the chance that our children will approach parents when difficult or dangerous things come up.
No matter how painful or shameful it is for us to talk to our kids about sex, doing so, and making sure they get the right information will keep them safer.
Respond To 2 Diifferent Posts, *100 words each*

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating: