Get help from the best in academic writing.

Instructions: 1.Download this assignment. 2.Read: Sarah King and Angela Logomansini’s “The Big Debate: Should Single Use Plastics Be Banned.” 3.Write

Instructions: 1.Download this assignment. 2.Read: Sarah King and Angela Logomansini’s “The Big Debate: Should Single Use Plastics Be Banned.” 3.Write 3 questions that came up while you were reading. Consider the kinds of arguments King and Logomansini used. What was their proof? Do you agree or disagree? 4.Choose a side. Who has the more compelling argument. 5.Write a topic statement that answers who has the more compelling argument and why. For example: In their article, “The Big Debate: Should Single Use Plastics Be Banned?” by Sarah King and Angela Logomasini. Topic Statement: In the debate over should single use plastics be banned, Sarah King is more persuasive than Angela Logomasini because she uses the rhetoric of logic and emotion effectively.
UIUC My Personal View Towards Nature Reflection.

1)In this assignment, you will continue to think about your own personal view toward nature.
There are many factors that contribute towards one’s personal values and views toward nature. Based on the information from this lesson, write one to two paragraphs identifying the factors important to your own views on nature and natural landscapes .250–300 words.
2) Each student must submit a Group Discussion 
A. State your Position
In the Subject line of your Post, state whether you (a) strongly disagree, (b) disagree, (c) agree, or (d) strongly agree with the following statement:

America could have developed its national identity without its natural landscapes.

B. Defend your Position
In the Message of your post, explain your position on the statement above. Your response must be between 250 and 300 words to be eligible for full credit (10 points). Also, there are no right or wrong answers; grading will be based on how well you integrate the material from the readings to support your position. Incorporate ideas from the following topics when defending your position: 
Include APA citation from the readings

Nash, R. (2014). Wilderness and the American Mind (5th edition). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Chapters 3 and 4, pp. 44-83.
Runte, A. (2010). National Parks, The American Experience (4th edition). Lanham, Md: Taylor Trade Publishing. Chapter 1, The American West (pp. 11-28).
The impact of European settlers in shaping the view of nature in the New World.
The role of artists and writers in portraying nature in the New World.
Emerging factors began changing American’s view toward nature.
How America used nature to form a national identity—nationalism

* Link of a Video: 
UIUC My Personal View Towards Nature Reflection

Education homework help. Thoroughly” answer the “two” end of chapter critical thinking or review questions from this week’s assigned reading (“one” question from the end of “each” chapter). Your choice which two, but one from “each” chapter).Special Notes: Before answering, first repeat the questions. Lastly, ensure you use your course text book via in-text citations with a matching reference to support and enhance your answers. Additional outside (non-course text book) sources (“properly” cited and referenced per the APA) are highly encouraged for superior scores.IMPORTANT / HELPFUL FORUM DISCUSSION NOTES: You will post one response to the forum discussion prompt and a ?minimum of two responses (more ?substantive? responses for a ?superior? score) to your classmates (or instructor, if a follow-up question is asked) each discussion week (weeks 1 ? 3 and 5 ? 7). ?Single space only? in forums. Importantly, to keep everyone on the same sheet of music, ?post only during the current course week? (do ?not? post in advance).The response to each forum prompt must be a minimum of ?500 words? in length (?excluding? the directions, questions, quotations, notes, or references).ÿ Each of the required two responses to your classmates (or instructor) must be a minimum of ?200 words? in length. Each forum discussion prompt response will be valued at ?70%? your forum score and each ?classmate/instructor response? will count as ?15%? of your forum score (30% in total).Forum Prompt Response/Classmate (instructor) Response General Information and Scoring Details: Essentially, the excellence of your effort is considered when grading your forum prompt responses and forum responses to classmates/instructor. It is critical that you ensure your forum prompt and forum responses to classmates/instructor are on time and meet the minimum lengths to avoid a loss of points. Although there are length minimums, your score is predicated on the quality of your thinking and writing – ?not? the length of your writing. Excess verbiage is usually a sign of poor editing and too few words are a sign of poor analysis. Forum prompt responses must reflect some new or original information ? do not just reiterate content or opinion posted by classmates.Your forum prompt response must reflect college-level comprehension, analysis, discussion, application (where appropriate), and learning. To demonstrate college writing, thoroughly discuss and relate your answers/responses in both source and anecdotal language. Paraphrase, quote ?only? when absolutely necessary, and provide examples, differences/similarities, analogies, etc. Forum prompt responses and responses to your classmates/instructor must reflect ?critical thinking? skills (critical, analytical, evaluative, etc.) ? not your ability to simply transfer verbatim text content to the forum platform. You must strive to apply, demonstrate, illustrate, relate, analyze, appraise, compare/contrast, criticize, deduce, debate, determine, differentiate, distinguish, estimate, evaluate, examine, and/or predict in your forum responses. Show you are able to synthesize and evaluate knowledge in a ?cogent manner.? This includes thoroughly explaining your positions/answers.Sources are required for quality, learning, and ?scoring? purposes. Specifically, supplement/enhance your forum prompt response content (which is generally drawn from the course textbook or directed sources), but outside sources (peer-reviewed journals, trade publications, government reports, legitimate/credible websites, etc.) to enhance your knowledge base are strongly encouraged. Use of the AMU Online Library and Security Management/Course Library portal is highly encouraged.Citation and Reference Style: This course requires students to use the citation and reference style established in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (sixth edition). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. A very good APA source is the The Owl at Purdue University: There is also a comprehensive Web video on APA sixth edition in general and how to format a formal research paper in APA sixth edition in particular located at: homework help
Evaluation Model Paper. I don’t understand this Law question and need help to study.

Assignment Content

Select an evaluation model that you determine has the most applicability and relevance to criminal justice policy today.

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper summarizing the model you have chosen and provide an analysis and explanation for your choice.

Include the following in your paper:

A summary of the model
An explanation of why your chosen model is the most applicable and relevant
An assessment of the effectiveness of your chosen model in evaluating a specific criminal justice policy

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Submit your assignment.

Evaluation Model Paper

Please complete the first question in 5 hours and rest in 20 hours

Please complete the first question in 5 hours and rest in 20 hours.

As per our conversation, please find attached the data file bearing the following: Part I [from column G to CA]- 413 respondents indicated their likelihood to purchase a particular shawarma sandwich profile that had been systematically varied on six attributes with two levels each. Of the total eight attributes, one was price, three were functional and four were social; whereby two social attributes were systematically varied and two were mirrored. The 64 possible combinations of the 6 attributes were developed and assigned to 8 sets of respondents in groups of 8. Therefore, each respondent evaluated 8 different shawarma sandwiches. Question 1 – Do consumers of the Middle Eastern street food shawarma dish value social benefits? Test the hypothesis that the likelihood of buyingincreases when there are social attributes offered in the shawarma sandwich profile. That is, identify the probability that an individual will choose a product based on whether or not a specific social feture is embedded in the product, every other feature – social and functional and price – held constant.Measure the willingness to pay, or the marginal dollar value of the social attributes.Classify the respondents as ethical or self-interested consumers. Those respondents whose choice for the social attributes were greater than any other variable should be classified as ethical consumer and the remaining respondents as self-interested.Re-run Logit Regression for the two groups of consumers – ethical and self-interested – and test the above hypothesis (a) against each of the groups in order to understand the influence of the presence of social features on the likelihood of purchase for both ethical and self-interested consumers.Identify the purchase intention for AED 7 and AED 15 sandwiches per consumer segment – ethical and self-interested.Identify the most important attributes for ethical and self-interested consumers. Part II [from column CB to CQ]- 413 respondents indicated their likelihood to purchase between two shawarma sandwich profiles that were each characterized as all good or all bad, socially and functionally. The functional and social attributes were the same used in Part I. The base prices were AED 7, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17, 20, 22 and 24; prices were marked up when all social features are good (cells 1 and 2 – Product Feature Mix – Part II worksheet). The Part II of the questionnaire included eight sets of two product profiles. For each of the eight profiles, respondents were asked the following question: Select between Shawarma A, Shawarma B, or neither product. Hence, each respondent made a total of eight choices for each question. The pairs were constructed as shown in Product Feature Mix – Part II worksheet. This implies four possible pairs: some that required choices with no dilemma – both the social features and the functional features were the same (cells 1 and 4) – and some that required a trade-off between the functional and social features (cells 2 and 3). Question 2 – What is the relationship between the consumers’ intention and their willingness to pay when faced with trade-offs against functional benefits? Generate the equivalent of demand curves for the social features based on the price premium demanded for receiving a good social product. The price premium is equivalent to the average price between AED 7 and AED 15 (= AED 11). Therefore, any price level above AED 11 (i.e. 12, 15, 17, 20, 22 and 24) presents a premium of AED 1, 4, 6, 9, 11 and 13 respectively. The price axis is the premium associated with receiving the product with “good” social features, and the quantity axis is the probability that the respondent chose the product with the good social features.Test the hypothesis that individuals will choose the product with positive social features when there is no sacrificing of functionality (the “no dilemma” case) but that any hint of poor functionality will cause demand to collapse. Show on average, and over the entire price range, the percentage that the good social products were chosen of the time in the “no dilemma” case, as compared to the cases when there was a dilemma and functionality was compromised.Show the percentage that the potential products are chosen when there is no price premium for the better social product.Show the percentage that the potential products are chosen when the premium approaches 100 percent of the average price (= AED 22). See below example for reference: Question 3 – Will consumers of the Middle Eastern street food shawarma dish sacrifice function benefits for ethics? What do people do when faced with the dilemma of bad functionality for good ethics? Show the percentage of the cases where individuals chose the product with good functional features despite the fact they were given the option of not making a choice (=neither product). Likewise, show the percentage of cases where individuals opted-out (chose “neither the product”) when they faced the dilemma of bad functionality for good ethics.
Please complete the first question in 5 hours and rest in 20 hours

Concepts and Sources of Motivation Essay

online homework help Concepts and Sources of Motivation Essay. Introduction Many factors, either internal or external, to individuals, drive how specific individuals act or behave. Although to some extent, one can guess the reasons behind the exhibition of certain behavioral patterns by individuals, in most instances, the same is a complicated undertaking. This is because different individuals have different factors, which drive there daily lifestyles and perceptions that they have of specific life issues and occurrences. In this regard, such factors or impels behind individuals’ behavior is what primarily makes a motivation. In common life scenarios, the majority of individuals perform best when they have expectations of some external rewards; however, the case is different when it comes to individuals whose acts are for personal satisfaction and achievement. For example, in job scenarios, the majority of workers’ performance depends on the number of remuneration gains managements have promised them. The case may be different when it comes to people with the heart to serve; mostly charity workers, due to variations of factors that determine the exhibition of their behaviors. Motivation Personal achievement and internal rewards (intrinsic motivation) are the main drives behind most individuals’ conduct, however; to some extent, external factors (extrinsic motivation) also have a role to play when it comes to the exhibition of specific conduct. Therefore, motivation is a combination of factors that make individuals act in certain ways whereby, the ultimate goal is the desire to realize some end attainments (McClelland, 1987, pp.3-6). Majority of sustaining achievements happen as a result of the natural need to perform, primarily because individuals who perform about their inherent drives will always have high self-esteem than those whose actions depend on external factors. Sources of Motivation The need to act or behave in a specific manner depends on many factors that are either internal or external to an individual. It is important to note here that, motivation is two way that is, individuals not only act in a specific manner because they expect something good out of their actions, but rather sometimes others may act to avoid objects that cause displeasure and discomfort. This is the case when it comes to painful experiences. On the other hand, it is also necessary to note that, the exhibition of certain behavioral patterns can be as a result of self-centered feelings or in some cases respect of specific living ideals. Personal set goals are the main basis of most individuals’ motivation. This is because; it is out of achieving specific goals that individuals develop their self-worth. This case is common in most school scenarios, whereby students struggle to achieve, goals they had promised themselves, parents, and teachers. Although this is the case, it is important to note here that, the need or impel to accomplish can be because of both inherent and extrinsic factors (EcclesConcepts and Sources of Motivation Essay

Impact of organizational change on employee’s commitment

Impact of organizational change on employee’s commitment. IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE ON EMPLOYEE’S COMMITMENT Employee commitment has been an important factor to determine the success of an organization. In the current section we are going to see the influence of organizational change on employee’s commitment. Many authors and researchers have concentrated on reactions closely associated with the change itself, such as participants openness to change (WanbergImpact of organizational change on employee’s commitment

context project Draft 3

context project Draft 3. I don’t know how to handle this Writing question and need guidance.

This is the third draft, please follow above instruction and the professor’s last comment( he hadn’t gave me the comment on your latest version but it’s better to see if there is any place can revise again): In the meantime, the biggest thing you need to work on is describing the PROBLEM that you’re trying to explain more clearly. In your title and at different moments throughout your paper, you seem to be focusing on the shortage of skilled labor in North Carolina in particular. But then at other moments, you seem to be referring to the US more broadly, and you also occasionally seem to be referring to other problems like the unemployment rate in the US….
Basically, you need to be MUCH clearer and MUCH more specific about the problem you’re trying to explain as well as who is being harmed by it and how. Then, you’ll see that sections like pp. 3-5 probably aren’t actually necessary for this paper, since they don’t necessarily relate directly to the problem in the present that you’re trying to explain….
In this draft, please focus on two main things (I’m assuming you’ve already produced a strong, specific, arguable problem-failure thesis, which we’ve focused on for the last two weeks):
1) Pay attention to the overall structure/arrangement of your essay, perhaps using your Reverse Outline as a guide. Are there clear topic sentences for every paragraph, using effective transitional phrases / signposts to orient your reader? Do these topic sentences make specific sub-claims that relate back to your overall argument? If not, well, make sure they do! And if you find that your overall argument has shifted or changed over the course of your essay, then rewrite your thesis to match this new argument. And once you’ve done that, go back and rewrite your paragraphs to make sure that they support the new thesis. (That’s what revision is all about: rewriting one part of your essay, which forces you to rewrite another part of your essay, which forces you to…you get the picture.)
2) Pay attention to the evidence you use to support your argument. Are you relying too much on one or two sources? Have you found scholarly, peer-reviewed articles and books to back up your claims? Do you use them effectively to support your argument? Do you have a good mix of scholarly, government, and popular sources? How about multimodal sources? Do you fully explore the historical context and causes of the current problem you’ve identified? Can you find better, more specific sources to back up your argument?
Look back over the CP Peer Review and Self-Guided Revision handout for more help on this. And re-read some of the high-scoring CP Samples to see how other students solved problems that you might have, too.
context project Draft 3