I’m working on a geographic information multi-part question and need support to help me learn.
IntroductionIn this activity you must define your own scope of analysis in response to the security problem assigned to you (CILO 1), identify factors relevant to your scope of analysis, evaluate their relationship, & propose a GIS-testable hypothesis (CILO 2), defend a chosen method, collect available data, and generate output using GIS software (CILO 3), and finally you will report on the results (CILO 4).TaskEach student will be given an open-ended security scenario. Follow the process below and answer questions on your problem based on the criteria given in the CILOs.ProcessStep 11. Find your assigned security scenario from your section pdf file.2. Open attached Portfolio Project Template. This will be your Project Portfolio document.3. Write down your assigned security-related problem.Step 21. Write a title: GIS Scope of Analysis2. Answer the following questions: i. Describe the background of the problem: you should be able to convert a vague problem statement or observation into a detailed and concrete description of relevant variables, properly contextualized in terms of both geography and policy. ii. Finding similar examples that have been researched in the past and using security science theory to create a framework for analysis. iii. Compare potential GIS analytical approaches to define your supported GIS question.Step 31. Write a title: Formulating a Hypothesis2. Answer the following questions: i. Identify factors (be they variables, parameters or whatever) pertinent to the scope of analysis. ii. create a statement proposing explanatory relationships should be constructed that is fully explained and clearly links back to the original problem and scope of analysis.Step 41. Write a title: Test Hypothesis2. Select and describe a method of GIS analysis that can be implemented through software3. Describe the necessary data from appropriate data sources that you would need to make a mapStep 51. Write a title: Propose Action Plan2. Propose action plan supported by your GIS analysis and relevant security science theory3. Discuss local (Saudi) implementation of your action plan4. Give references to international best practices that support your planStep 61. Upload completed document with four (4) titles and questions answered to Blackboard.AssessmentGrading is by rubric and is 15% of final grade.————————–Rubric DetailA rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.ContentName: ePorfolio RubricGrid ViewList View UnsatisfactoryBaselineDevelopingGoodExemplaryBackgroundPoints Range:0 (0.00%) – 5.9 (5.90%)No elements of the problem identified.Points Range:6 (6.00%) – 6.9 (6.90%)One element relevant to the problem identified.Points Range:7 (7.00%) – 7.9 (7.90%)Multiple elements relevant to the problem identifiedPoints Range:8 (8.00%) – 8.9 (8.90%)… and placed in the correct geographical, temporal and socio-economic contextsPoints Range:9 (9.00%) – 10 (10.00%)… and discussed in the context of policy objectives.ResearchPoints Range:0 (0.00%) – 5.9 (5.90%)No examples of similar problems described.Points Range:6 (6.00%) – 6.9 (6.90%)One referenced similar problem described.Points Range:7 (7.00%) – 7.9 (7.90%)Multiple referenced similar problems describedPoints Range:8 (8.00%) – 8.9 (8.90%)… with similarities and differences to current problem discussedPoints Range:9 (9.00%) – 10 (10.00%)… and interpreted within the framework of referenced security-science theories.ApproachPoints Range:0 (0.00%) – 5.9 (5.90%)No potential approaches described.Points Range:6 (6.00%) – 6.9 (6.90%)One potential approach described.Points Range:7 (7.00%) – 7.9 (7.90%)Multiple potential approaches describedPoints Range:8 (8.00%) – 8.9 (8.90%)… and GIS-ready question defined with chosen approachPoints Range:9 (9.00%) – 10 (10.00%)… explaining how the proposed analysis and approach improves upon alternatives and speaks to the underlying problem.FactorPoints Range:0 (0.00%) – 5.9 (5.90%)No factors identified.Points Range:6 (6.00%) – 6.9 (6.90%)One relevant factor identified.Points Range:7 (7.00%) – 7.9 (7.90%)Multiple relevant factors identifiedPoints Range:8 (8.00%) – 8.9 (8.90%)… and categorized by typePoints Range:9 (9.00%) – 10 (10.00%)… and discuss how identified factors are measured.HypothesisPoints Range:0 (0.00%) – 5.9 (5.90%)No relationship proposed.Points Range:6 (6.00%) – 6.9 (6.90%)Propose relationship between one pair of relevant factors.Points Range:7 (7.00%) – 7.9 (7.90%)Propose relationship between multiple relevant factorsPoints Range:8 (8.00%) – 8.9 (8.90%)… and a single GIS-testable hypothesis is formulatedPoints Range:9 (9.00%) – 10 (10.00%)… with rationale for hypothesis fully explained.MethodPoints Range:0 (0.00%) – 5.9 (5.90%)No methods identified.Points Range:6 (6.00%) – 6.9 (6.90%)Chosen method partially described.Points Range:7 (7.00%) – 7.9 (7.90%)Chosen method and implementation fully describedPoints Range:8 (8.00%) – 8.9 (8.90%)… and supporting theoretical framework explainedPoints Range:9 (9.00%) – 10 (10.00%)… and alternative/rejected method discussed.DataPoints Range:0 (0.00%) – 5.9 (5.90%)No data collected.Points Range:6 (6.00%) – 6.9 (6.90%)Some data collected.Points Range:7 (7.00%) – 7.9 (7.90%)All available data collectedPoints Range:8 (8.00%) – 8.9 (8.90%)… and conformance with source metadata verified and describedPoints Range:9 (9.00%) – 10 (10.00%)… and quality issues identified and addressed.ToolPoints Range:0 (0.00%) – 5.9 (5.90%)No data loaded.Points Range:6 (6.00%) – 6.9 (6.90%)All data loaded and one parameter set.Points Range:7 (7.00%) – 7.9 (7.90%)All data loaded with all parameters setPoints Range:8 (8.00%) – 8.9 (8.90%)… and output generated, and quality verifiedPoints Range:9 (9.00%) – 10 (10.00%)… and with full documentation to support replicability.Action PlanPoints Range:0 (0.00%) – 5.9 (5.90%)Plan not proposed.Points Range:6 (6.00%) – 6.9 (6.90%)Plan proposedPoints Range:7 (7.00%) – 7.9 (7.90%)… and supported by multiple aspects of the GIS outputPoints Range:8 (8.00%) – 8.9 (8.90%)… with reference to relevant GIS and security science theoryPoints Range:9 (9.00%) – 10 (10.00%)… and with a full discussion on local implementation to adequately solve the problem.Best PracticePoints Range:0 (0.00%) – 5.9 (5.90%)No reference provided to internatinal best practice.Points Range:6 (6.00%) – 6.9 (6.90%)The proposal is supported by one reference to international best practice.Points Range:7 (7.00%) – 7.9 (7.90%)The proposal is supported by multiple references to international best practicePoints Range:8 (8.00%) – 8.9 (8.90%)… that are evaluated for local relevance/feasibility/constraintsPoints Range:9 (9.00%) – 10 (10.00%)… and remaining areas of uncertainty or required future research discussed.Name:ePorfolio RubricCHIM_templateCHIM Portfolio Project
Your name â€“ ID number
State the security problem here
[Four paragraphs follow]
Copy & paste answers from Step 2: GIS Scope of Analysis here
Copy & paste answers from step 3: Form Hypothesis here
Copy & paste answers from Step 4: Test Hypothesis here
Copy & paste answers from Step 5: Propose Action Pla
Increased Death Cases Due to Accident Involving Bus & Truck Along Jordan Border Paper
Flannery O’Connor’s “A Good Man is Hard to Find”
Flannery O’Connor’s “A Good Man is Hard to Find”. Paper details Instructions: 1. Use 12 point font. 2. Have an appropriate title centered at the top of the page. 3. Double space between all lines. 4. Do NOT print on the front and back of pages. 5. Indent (by hitting the Tab key once) the first line of each new paragraph. 6. Write your final draft of an essay with a minimum length of 600 words. Assignment: . Based on Flannery O’Connor’s short story “A Good Man is Hard to Find”, argue that the grandmother’s behavior is responsible for her family’s fate. The essay should have a clear thesis statement (Review page 90 of Writer’s Reference”). The reader should have a clear understanding of the impression you are trying to convey. Use one central event in the story to make this impression clearer. Read and apply concepts on pages 87-100 of Writer’s Reference, A4 – Writing Arguments. Also, review the textbook, pages 6-13 and pages 21-24.Flannery O’Connor’s “A Good Man is Hard to Find”
Typical Limiting Nutrient in Freshwater Ecosystems & Contamination Discussion
term paper help Typical Limiting Nutrient in Freshwater Ecosystems & Contamination Discussion.
Several coastal areas of Florida has been impacted by major algae blooms in recent years. Some of these blooms are caused by various kinds of freshwater cyanobacteria, often referred to as blue-green algae. In addition, several coastal areas of southwest Florida, the panhandle, and, most recently, southwest Florida have been impacted by “red tides”, which in Florida area usually associated with a marine dinoflagellate called Karenia brevis. While the two types of algae blooms are quite different in how and where they form, both cause significant environmental harm – including large fish kills. Toxins from Karenia brevis and certain kinds of freshwater cyanobacteria, particularly Microcystis and Anabaena species, can also have adverse impacts on human health. Media and public discussions about these algal blooms have often been quite contentious, confusing, and, in some cases, outright wrong. Leading scientists have therefore attempted to communicate scientific knowledge directly to the public. For this discussion board exercise, you will think carefully about the (somewhat different!) thoughts of two well-respected scientific researchers: – Dr. Michael Crosby, President of Mote Marine Laboratory – https://www.heraldtribune.com/opinion/20180817/gue…- Dr. Karl Havens, former Director of the Florida Sea Grant Program – https://www.gainesville.com/opinion/20180815/karl-… After reading both of these articles, answer the following three questions:1) Based on what you have learned so far about the typical limiting nutrient in freshwater ecosystems (and, yes, Lake Okeechobee is freshwater), what nutrient would you generally expect to be the most likely limiting resource for Lake Okeechobee? 2) How do Crosby and Havens each describe the role of nutrient contamination, particularly phosphorus and nitrogen, in initiating freshwater cyanobacteria (aka, blue-green algae blooms) blooms in Lake Okeechobee? What other factors do either of these researchers cite as a potential “trigger” for the cyanobacteria blooms to form in Lake Okeechobee? 3) Based on your reading of both Crosby and Havens (as well as any materials from lecture or other sources), describe why and how severe freshwater cyanobacteria blooms frequently occur in normally brackish ecosystems like the St. Lucie River estuary (on the east coast) and Caloosahatchee River estuary (on the west coast). (Hint – freshwater cyanobacteria normally would not survive in a saltwater estuary environment.) This discussion board is worth 12.5 points. You can receive up to 10 points, which I will grade for completeness and thoughtfulness. You can also earn 2.5 additional points for responses to two other student comments (1.25 points per response).
Typical Limiting Nutrient in Freshwater Ecosystems & Contamination Discussion
Day In The Life Of A Nose English Literature Essay
In Nikolai Gogol’s, “The Nose,” Gogol writes this short story in order to satire the Russian culture in the nineteenth century. Gogol also concentrates on the issues of the different social classes and how significant it is to have a rank. This short story seems to become a dream after Kovalev wakes up to find that his nose is missing. The title plays a crucial role, “Nos” spells “Son” backwards, which translates to “dream” in Russian. This short story also touches on the portrayal of woman in the nineteenth century. In this story, the plot plays an important role. The story starts off by an introduction, “On 25 March an unusually strange event occurred in St. Petersburg” (page 1). This shows when and where the story is taking place, which is the day that a barber, Ivan Yakovlevich, discerns an unusual nose in the middle of his bread. He doesn’t know what to do with it so he decides to get rid of it by dropping it in the street, “His one idea was to rid himself of the nose, and return quietly home” (page 2). Yakovlevich identifies the nose to be Major Kovalev’s nose, a collegiate assessor whom he shaves. Another date his repeated in the third paragraph, “The date was 7 April, and when, that morning, the major awoke as usual, and, as usual, threw a despairing glance at the mirror, he this time, beheld before him, what? – why, the nose again! Instantly he took hold of it”(page 18). This quote shows when Kovalev and his nose are reunited, on April 7th. There is a thirteen day gap in which the nose went missing and reappeared. While this occurred, Kovalev was always in the process of waking up, so could it be that he was “dreaming” all along? This short story can evidently be compared to a dream. It seems impossible for the barber to get rid of the nose because every time he tries to do so, he gets caught. This can be compared to a dream, because usually in a dream it is hard to escape or to run away from a situation. A constable stops him and says, “No, no, friend. That is rubbish. Already I’ve got three barbers for the purpose, and all of them account it an honor. Now, tell me, I ask again, what you have just been doing?” (page 3). In this case, the constable is observing Yakovlevich as he tries to get rid of the nose, but just like in a dream, he cannot dispose of it because he gets caught everytime. At some point, he succeeds to drop the nose and at last get rid of it but a policeman catches him and says, “”Pick it up again! You’ve lost something” (page 2). Dreams are often repetitive and towards the end of the story there is a recurrence of the same prospect. When Kovalev is at once reunited with his nose, he tries to attach it back to his face but experiences some difficulties because it always seems to fall off. As the doctor tries to readjust Kovalev’s nose he states “Of course, I could stick it on again – I could do that for you in a moment; but at the same time I would assure you that your plight will only become worse as the result”(page 15). Kovelev replies saying, “Never mind, stick it on again, pray. How can I continue without a nose? Besides, things could not possibly be worse than they are now” (page 16). This shows that he constantly drops it, but tries again, just like in a dream when we try to repeat our actions when they don’t succeed the first time. This short story also portrays the attitude of woman, as Ivan’s wife shows dominance and authority in the very beginning of the story, “”You brute!” she shouted frantically. “Where have you cut off that nose? You villain, you! You drunkard! Why, I’ll go and report you to the police myself. You brigand, you! I have already heard from three men that, while shaving them, your pulled their noses to the point that they could hardly stand it”(page 1). As soon as she find out about the nose, she starts to criticize and insult him which demonstrates that Gogol believes that women have a higher role than men in society. Furthermore, Kovalev believes that Madame Podtochina, his staff officer’s wife, was the reason why he lost his nose in the first place. He supposes that she was mad at him for not marrying her daughter and casted a spell on him to make his nose disappear. “Yes, the truth must be that out of revenge the Staff-Officer’s wife had resolved to ruin him, and hired a band of witches for the purpose, seeing that the nose could not conceivably have been cut off” (page 13). Furthermore, this shows that men were afraid of women and believed that they were witches. Moreover, Gogol demonstrates issues of social class. He characterizes Kovalev’s rank by symbolizing and emphasizing his facial hair and his clothes, “Major Kovalev was in the habit of taking a daily walk on Nevsky Prospekt in an extremely clean and well-starched shirt and collar, and in whiskers of the sortâ€¦… such whiskers run across the exact center of the cheek” (page 4). Kovalev has moved to St. Petersburg on order to achieve a higher rank and wealth. Kovalev is focused on moving forward with his career and is very confident, so confident that he demands people to call him “Major”. However, his nose becomes a civil councilor which has a higher rank than being a collegiate assessor. This is seen when Gogol quotes, “The Nose did return, two minutes later. It was clad in a gold-braided, high-collared uniform, buckskin breeches, and cockaded hat. And slung beside it there was a sword, and from the cockade on the hat it could be inferred that the Nose was purporting to pass for a State Councilor” (page 5). I believe that by ranking a plain nose a civil councilor, Gogol is poking fun at the Russian society to show that even a simple body part could have a higher rank than Major Kovalev. He is representing the higher class to have no more power than any other classes. When Kovalev asks his nose to return to his face, the nose seems offended and says that he had nothing to do with him, “My dear sir, you speak in error,” was its reply. “I am just myself – myself separately. And in any case there cannot ever have existed a close relation between us, for, judging from the buttons of your undress uniform, your service is being performed in another department than my own” (page 5). It is clear to see that the nose was looking down upon Kovalev, and had no type of admiration for him. The adventure of the nose can be considered as a mockery. Social rank and power were one of the most important aspects in Russia and if a person didn’t have a high rank then they were not important at all. Kovalev’s nose wanted to detach itself from the rank that its owner has. The detachment of the nose symbolizes the release from power and freedom. As soon as Kovalev gets his nose back, he decides to apply for a job with a higher rank. “Next, he sought the chancery of the department where he was agitating to obtain a Vice-Governorship (or, failing that, an Administratorship), and, whilst passing through the reception vestibule, again surveyed himself in a mirror. As much in place as ever the nose was!”(page 19). When he obtains his nose back, he obtains his confidence back. Gogol’s short story, “The Nose,” focuses on how crucial it is to obtain a social rank. It satires the Russian culture by giving life to a “Nose”, who has a higher rank than a regular human. The women’s attitude symbolizes the authority and influence they had on the men.
FNP Ana G Mendez Healthcare Reform Affordable Care Act Essay
FNP Ana G Mendez Healthcare Reform Affordable Care Act Essay.
I’m working on a nursing presentation and need support to help me understand better.
Please write an essay on that topic with arguments and support it with the literature. The amount on your statement includes pros and cons, depending on your point of view. Overview: A literature review is a survey study conducted on the literature for a specific topic. Includes texts, articles, research studies, and/or thesis. The literature review is used to write and describe a specific topic and support the argument of the writer with the literature statements. A literature review makes a paper accurate and relevant. Activity Instructions Topic: US Healthcare Reform–Affordable Care Act 1. Conduct a literature review about the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). 2. Write a paper on that topic with your arguments and support them with the literature. 3. Among your statements include pros and cons, according to your point of view. 4. Remember to use strict APA citation and format style in your paper and avoid plagiarism. SafeAssign Tool will be activated. 5. Criteria; minimum of 500 words and 4 primary references.
FNP Ana G Mendez Healthcare Reform Affordable Care Act Essay