This is a discussion questions, not a paper, per se. Cite all work.Indicate whether the following characteristics represent perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, or more than one market structure.Explain why in a few words. Begin indicating the market structure (it could be one or more than one)Note: if there is more than one answer wrong, you have an U.1. More than 10 different products.2. More than 10 sellers.3. Competitors competing by price.4. Competitors that tell the customers that their products are better.5. Easy entry and exit in the market6. Only three sellers with different products.7. Only three sellers with the same product.8. An electricity company that sells in a market that is not regulated.9. An airline that can charge different prices to different customers for the same kind of seats
Market Structures, economics homework help
Consequences of Misallocation of Financial Resources on Cost Management
Consequences of Misallocation of Financial Resources on Cost Management.
Consequences of Misallocation of Financial Resources on Cost Management Literature Review Instructions The purpose of this research project is for you to create a scholarly piece of graduate-level research and writing, which conforms to current APA format. You will research and write a literature review on a topic relevant to Cost Management. Your topic should be based on an applied business problem and research questions developed to address the applied business problem. Your research paper will be a comprehensive thematic review of the scholarly literature related to your topic. What is a literature review? “A literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area, and sometimes information in a particular subject area within a certain time period. A literature review can be just a simple summary of the sources, but it usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis. A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information. It might give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations. Or it might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates. And depending on the situation, the literature review may evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant.”[i] How is a literature review different from an academic research paper? “The main focus of an academic research paper is to develop a new argument, and a research paper will contain a literature review as one of its parts. In a research paper, you use the literature as a foundation and as support for a new insight that you contribute. The focus of a literature review, however, is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of others without adding new contributions.”[ii] The academic research paper also covers a range of sources, but it is usually a select number of sources, because the emphasis is on the argument. Likewise, a literature review can also have an “argument,” but it is not as important as covering a number of sources. In short, an academic research paper and a literature review contain some of the same elements. In fact, many academic research papers will contain a literature review section. But it is the aspect of the study (the argument or the sources) that is emphasized that determines what type of document it is. Why write literature reviews? “Literature reviews provide you with a handy guide to a particular topic. If you have limited time to conduct research, literature reviews can give you an overview or act as a stepping stone. For professionals, they are useful reports that keep them up to date with what is current in the field. For scholars, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the writer in his or her field. Literature reviews also provide a solid background for a research paper’s investigation. Comprehensive knowledge of the literature of the field is essential to most research papers.”[iii] What is the format for literature reviews? “Just like most academic papers, literature reviews also must contain at least three basic elements: an introduction or background information section; the body of the review containing the discussion of sources; and, finally, a conclusion and/or recommendations section to end the paper. Introduction: Gives a quick idea of the topic of the literature review, such as the central theme or organizational pattern. Body: Contains your discussion of sources and is organized thematically. Conclusions/Recommendations: Discuss what you have drawn from reviewing literature so far. Where might the discussion proceed?”[iv] What is a thematic literature review? “Thematic reviews of literature are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time.” “Sometimes, though, you might need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. Put in only what is necessary. Here are a few other sections you might want to consider: Current Situation: Information necessary to understand the topic or focus of the literature review. History: The chronological progression of the field, the literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology. Methods and/or Standards: The criteria you used to select the sources in your literature review or the way in which you present your information. For instance, you might explain that your review includes only peer-reviewed articles and journals. Questions for Further Research: What questions about the field has the review sparked? How will you further your research as a result of the review? Important Points to Consider The paper is to be written in strict conformance to current APA standards, and must contain 15 pages of content (excluding the title page, abstract, and references), utilizing at least 12 scholarly sources. A SafeAssign draft check will be provided for you to use to improve your Originality Score prior to your final submission. Three levels of current APA headings must be used throughout the paper, as this is a graduate-level research paper. Some students do not fully understand the difference between plagiarism and paraphrasing. Paraphrasing is when you take a source or someone else’s idea and say it in your own words. When you paraphrase, you must still give the author’s name, date, title of the source, the scholarly journal where it came from, and the exact website address or book. However, when you directly quote a source, it must have quotation marks around the quote, or (if 40 words or more) it must be set in block quotation format. You must also give detailed information of where you acquired the quote. For the purpose of this academic paper, adhere to the follow rules when quoting or using a source: Do not directly quote more than 120 words from any one source.If the source is 2,000 words or less, do not directly quote more than 50 words from any one source.Do not use the same source more than a total of 3 times within the whole document for quoting or paraphrasing.Quotes must contain the section (if provided) and paragraph or page numbers of the quote, and this information must be placed in the reference.In all instances, use current APA guidelines for citations and references. The paper must not be a series of quotations.Quotes should be used sparingly in doctoral level writing assignments.It is better to paraphrase and cite than to quote.
Consequences of Misallocation of Financial Resources on Cost Management
Irizar: Innovation implementation Essay
order essay cheap Table of Contents Introduction Knowledge management model Culture of innovation References Introduction Irizar is a luxury coach developer and a division of big limited company with share investments in other nations. Irizar experienced problem in the early 1990s due to alterations in the intrinsic and extrinsic settings. To survive in the problem and reclaim competitiveness in the industry, Saratxaga was hired as the new manager of the organization. Saratxaga made innovative alterations (i.e. alteration in key values and enterprise framework via participatory administration) and was capable of achieving increasing growth level in turnover and extension into other markets (Forcadell
Probability Math 114 on Webwork
Probability Math 114 on Webwork.
https://webwork.math.nau.edu/webwork2_files/tmp/EA… If a member of the department is chosen at random to serve on a university committee, what is the probability (in decimal form) that the chosen representitive will have between 10 and 25 years of service? Answer: .48(c) What is the probability the representative above will have less than 25 years of service given that the person has less than 35 years of service?
Probability Math 114 on Webwork
The Historical Powers of the American Presidency Essay
Table of Contents Introduction Controversy over Powers of the President Powers Currently exercised by the President Conclusion References Introduction Constitution refers to a set of laws on which a state or a nation is governed. It outlines the provisions for the powers of the arms of the government as well as the responsibilities of the government to the governed population. This paper seeks to discuss the constitution of the United States of American with respect to the powers of the arms of the government. The paper will look into the historical powers of the American presidency in comparison with the provision for separation of powers among the arms of the government. Controversy over Powers of the President The presidential powers in the United States of American have been surrounded with a lot of arguments with respect to whether or not such powers are consistent with the initial meaning as was provided for in the first amendment. The lack of agreement as to the consistency has led to a wide perception that the powers are being exercised with respect to convenience of solving emerging problems rather that according to the constitution. The executive branch of the government whose powers are vested in the president has in most cases been realized to overstep its mandate assuming the roles that were meant to be undertaken by the other arms, that is, the judiciary and the legislative arms. The powers of the president as was initially provided for were viewed to be limited with the only prerogative of approving legislations after such have been deliberated upon and passed by at least two-thirds of representatives from each of the house of the representatives. Powers of appointment of diplomatic representatives were also vested on the president subject to approval by the congress. The presidency was only offered full powers being the commander in chief of the armed forces together with the role of receiving diplomats from other countries. Even representations in international agreements such as treaties were subject to approval by the congress. Such provisions are however, not what Americans witness today with respect to the powers that are exercised by the president. Contrary to the provisions, the presidency has fully assumed the roles that were primarily vested in the congress or were supposed to be shared between the executive and the congress. Prerogatives such as “foreign affairs powers, war powers, fiscal powers, legislative powers and administrative powers” (Kurland, 2006, p. 4) are currently identified as active roles of the executive contrary to the constitutional provisions. Powers Currently exercised by the President The increased authority that has been adapted by the presidency has been due to the direct of implied provisions that have been made by both the congress and the judiciary under the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has, for instance, pronounced that the president, under precedence from the system in the Great Britain has the prerogative to appoint foreign diplomats. This has been contrary to the initial constitutional provisions. Foreign relations with respect to international agreements have also realized a deviation of powers from the original provisions. Treaties were originally supposed to be negotiated by the executive but approved by the congress on the basis of the two-thirds majority rule. In this setup, the congress had a basis to offer checks on the decisions of the executive. This has also been significantly altered by the Supreme Court through its decision that distinguished executive agreements from treaties. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Though failing to offer a distinction in meaning between the two, the court has provided that the president has the power to make executive agreements without the need for congress approval. The lack of difference has thus allowed the office of the president to enter into international relations without the approval of the congress on the ground that they fall under executive agreements and not treaties (Kurland, 2006, p. 6). The office of the president has equivalently assumed powers over declaration of war by the United States of America. Timely evolution of systems since the first amendment has witnessed the adopted capacity of the president to declare war on another nation without an approval by the congress. The congress is itself identified to have also played a role in delegating its duties to the president by assuming silence whenever such powers have been exercised and even amending the constitution to allow the president have such prerogatives. The congress, for example, passed a resolution in the year 1973 to allow the president to make war declarations against foreign powers and inform the congress of the decision within two days. Powers over fiscal policies which were basically restricted to the congress have been to the contrary associated with the president following significant involvement of the executive in influencing such policies. This has again been made possible by the congress that now appears dormant as compared to the executive over fiscal policy matters. The legislative process has also been compromised and transformed from the congress dominant process to one that is highly influenced by the executive through coercion (Kurland, 2006). Conclusion Constitutional provisions of the first amendment laid out roles of different arms of government to ensure that each arm of the government was checked by others. The current excessive powers of the president, however, exceed the provisions causing a threat to the checks and balances which can be said to have failed. References Kurland, P. (2006). From encyclopedia of the American constitution. New York, NY: Macmillan.