Consider the organization you work for or an organization with which you are familiar. Using that organization, answer the following questions in your discussion post:
Describe the organization you have selected to your classmates and instructor in a short summary.
How have technological trends helped the organization innovate its business processes?
How has IT technology caused disruption in the organization? Explain.
How did the disruption facilitate a competitive advantage?
2 PEER REVIEWED REFERENCE, 15 LINES, 2-3 PARAGRAPHS AND NO OUTLINE
Organization is IT SOLUTION
A nonconducting spherical shell of inner radius R 1 and outer radius R 2 contains a uniform volume charge density ρ throughout the shell. Use Gauss’s law to derive an equation for the magnitude of the electric field at the following radial distances r from the center of the sphere. Your answers should be in terms of ρ, R 1, R 2, r, ε0, and π.(a) r < R 1(b)R1 < r < R2(c) r > R2
Physics Homework question 6
Mobile Device Security discussion
Mobile Device Security discussion.
Resources:Lynda.com®: “Mobile Device Security” Lynda.com®: “Mobile Application Security” Mobile device security continues to increase in importance and has become a key security focus as organizations and individuals protect their information assets and IT technology.Discuss how you would approach mobile device security for employees, customers, stakeholders, and partners as they use mobile devices to access technology and software applications in the organization you chose in Week 1? How would you integrate mobile devices with security-enhancing solutions to reduce the risk of hackers targeting them to exploit security vulnerabilities?note: this is discussion no more than half a page
Mobile Device Security discussion
Purdue University Leadership Problems at the ABC Bank Case Study
custom writing service Purdue University Leadership Problems at the ABC Bank Case Study.
I’m working on a writing question and need guidance to help me study.
PART 1: CASE STUDY STAGES OF CONSULTINGINTRODUCTIONTo practice the steps of a consultation project, you will apply some of the course models and principles to the case study you created in the Unit 3 discussion.ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONSThis assignment is the first component of your course project. Using the case study you developed in Unit 3, complete the following:Provide a clear description of the case study from Unit 3.Compare and contrast the problem versus the strength-based approaches for the discovery phase of consultation with your case. Be sure to cite peer-reviewed journal articles on each of the two approaches.Conduct an in-depth analysis of each model. For example, include your critique of the strengths and limitations of each model.Provide a synthesis or a set of guidelines you would use for the discovery phase of this consultation. The guidelines should have the best elements from each model.List five or more consulting competencies needed for this consultation. For each competency, make an in-depth analysis of its importance and include scholarly literature that informs your analysis.Discuss the strengths and potential challenges you may have as you prepare to move forward with this consultation.Include a summary of your paper that covers all of the key topics you have discussed in the previous pages.HOW TO ORGANIZE YOUR PAPEROrganize your paper in the following format:Subheading 1 – Case Study: Description of the case study or background.Case study: A leadership problem has developed at ABC Bank. Jerry, the sales director of the mortgage division, was just fired for engaging in poor ethical behavior and for losing the confidence of his staff. As a result, there are negative rumors circulating around the bank. Human resources director Pam thinks Jerry’s situation is the perfect example of why ABC Bank needs to implement a leadership development program. There has been very little, if any, ethical leadership development or training at the bank.Bob, the CEO, told Pam to develop a framework for critical values, knowledge, and skills necessary for the kind of leadership the bank would like managers to practice—ethical, skilled, and proactive leadership. Pam presented her framework to the executive team, and they voiced mixed opinions about investing in such a leadership development program. However, the program has been approved, and you have been selected as the consultant who will implement this project. Pam is hopeful that you can help prevent other leadership problems from developing through executive coaching and team leadership development work with executive management team.You are considering a plan to include a series of training, team development sessions, and individual coaching sessions over the course of a year. ABC Bank has agreed that Bob, the CEO, will work closely with you and attend all team trainings and meetings. You are would like to conduct quarterly evaluations of progress.As you report to ABC Bank, Bob greets you in the lobby and asks that you sit in on the executive team meeting right away. He wants you to hear their discussion of what they see as the most critical issues today and to observe their teamwork.Bob opens the meeting by explaining that he wants the team to start thinking more strategically about the company’s processes for developing leaders. He explains that is important to get out of the reactionary mode and start thinking about development, and asks the team to consider best practices in leadership development.Right away, you notice that the most vocal member is Paul, manager of the senior lending division, who answers almost every question based on “this is how we have always done it.”Paul says, “I will be honest, I do not believe leadership development is an important focus—all of our management members are experienced leaders who know how to give directives and get the job done.” He is much more concerned about the new regulations, which will require more documentation and paperwork with the same amount of resources that were already overtaxed. It is not realistic to require this level of documentation with the current staff./Bertha, manager of compliance, is responsible for ensuring the bank’s practices match organizational, state, and federal practices and laws. She speaks up after Paul’s point about regulations. She says, “We have a plan for how this can be accomplished, but it will take the involvement of this entire team and I will need your direct staff to work with me more closely.” Paul jokes that Bertha is being “pushy.” Laughter follows Bertha’s comment, but Bertha is not laughing.Ken, manager of the investments department, states that he believes some leadership training would be helpful. After all, Jerry got into trouble because he did not have the respect of his employees and he tried to gloss over some spending that occurred rather than account for dollars spent accurately. Had he put everything through Bertha’s compliance department, the problem would have been caught. However, it appears that the compliance department is not being used in a way that helps mitigate risk at the bank. Perhaps, if Jerry had had some leadership training, this disaster would not have occurred.Paul says that training is not a bad thing, but there is no time. Spending time in this meeting right now is preventing them all from actually getting work done.Team members agreed on only one thing; they are all under a lot of pressure that requires some strategic thinking. The new federal regulations requiring greater documentation and tracking of processes and procedures will likely take many hours of time and if they are not going to be able to hire more staff, they need a strategy to get this done. Matthew, manager of technology, agreed that they spend a lot of time in meetings with too many items on the agenda; thus few decisions are made.After the meeting, Bob and Pam ask your opinion about how the team functions and what strategy you have in mind for individual coaching, as well as for team development work. Bob emphasizes his hope that dialogue about leadership development and some training occur quickly so that the company can be more proactive in developing leaders.As you walk out of the conference room, you glance up at the framed notice: ABC Bank, a place for teamwork, respect, dedication, and valuing diversity.Subheading 2 – Discovery Approaches: Compare and contrast the problem-based versus strengths-based approaches or models for the discovery phase of consultation with your case. Be sure to cite peer-reviewed journal articles on each of the two approaches. Provide enough details that give an in-depth analysis of each model. Include in your critique both the strengths and limitations of each model. You may choose to incorporate some of the resources and ideas from your Unit 4 discussion post, Stages of Consulting – Discovery, which focus on approaches to discovery in this section.Subheading 3 – Guidelines for Discovery: Develop a set of at least three guidelines based on your work in the previous section that include the best elements of each of the two discovery approaches you described. These guidelines should identify and describe critical actions and mindsets important for consultants to consider in the discovery phase.Subheading 4 – Consulting Competencies: Provide a list of five or more consulting competencies needed for this consultation. For each competency listed, do an in-depth analysis of its importance and include scholarly literature for each competency that informs your analysis. Conclude this section with a discussion of the strengths and potential challenges you may have as you prepare to move forward with this consultation.Subheading 5 – Conclusion: Provide a brief summary of your paper. This summary should serve as a recap of the paper and should not include any new material that has not been previously covered.References: Provide your list of sources used in the paper using current edition APA style for correct documentation.ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTSYour assignment should meet the following requirements:Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current edition APA style and formatting.Number of resources: A minimum of six peer-reviewed journal articles or other scholarly articles.Length of paper: A minimum of 1500 words or about 5–7 double-spaced pages.Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.Requirements: 5-7 pages or 1500 words
Purdue University Leadership Problems at the ABC Bank Case Study
MGT 560 Saudi Electronic University Mod 5 Leadership Development Discussion
MGT 560 Saudi Electronic University Mod 5 Leadership Development Discussion.
I’m working on a management writing question and need a sample draft to help me understand better.
Module 05: Critical ThinkingundefinedCritical Thinking: Leadership Style (100 points)undefinedundefinedDr. Wassmiah is a leader in a local hospital and works well in the environment. The hospital’s environment is characterized by well-defined individual roles where each employee knows what is expected of him or her. Employee conflicts are minimized as everyone understands his or her responsibility, and the coordination of all activities leads to goal attainment. There is no duplication of work. Dr. Wassmiah encourages people to perform well and rewards positive behavior to boost productivity. Most goals Dr. Wassmiah sets are short-term, making them easier to fulfill, less intimidating to achieve, and as a result, employees are interested in obtaining the various rewards. When a problem arises, Dr. Wassmiah directs the employees in what to do and is quick to point out if the employee does not deliver results. However, Dr. Wassmiah suspects that employees are not working when there is no supervision.undefinedWhat style of leadership is most likely described in this case and why have you reached that conclusion? What are the advantages of this type of leadership and what examples from the case support your position? What are the disadvantages of this type of leadership and what examples from the case support your position? What are the implications for employee motivation with this type of leadership? What other styles of leadership might be complementary to that described in the case and why?undefinedDirections:undefined Write an essay that includes an introduction paragraph, the essay’s body, and a conclusion paragraph to address the assignment’s guide questions. Do not address the questions using a question-and-answer format. undefinedYour well-written paper should meet the following requirements:undefined Be 3-5 pages in length, which does not include the title and reference pages, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements. Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines. Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least two current, scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles. Current articles are those published in the last five years. undefinedIn advance of submission, review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.
MGT 560 Saudi Electronic University Mod 5 Leadership Development Discussion
Freakonomics: The Hidden Side of Everything by Steven. D. Levitt and Stephen. J. Dubner Essay (Critical Writing)
Table of Contents Executive Summary Problem Definition Information used Interpretation Conclusion Executive Summary The authors of Freakonomics: The Hidden Side of Everything, Steven. D. Levitt and Stephen. J. Dubner, have gone out of their way to challenge conventional wisdom using simple analysis in what they term as the ‘economic’ side to reality. Though the article does not have a baseline plot, the authors lay down several ‘truths’ which they use to test conventional wisdom. These fundamental ‘truths’ are; according to the current life we live in, a cornerstone of Incentives, conservative wisdom is at times wrong, staged effects have distant causes, professionals use their advantage in information to serve their own agenda, and finally, Knowing what to gauge and how to measure it makes the world less complex. Using these ideas, they analyze in Chapter 4, the sudden drop in crime from the late 90’s against earlier predictions that crime rates would soar. First, the authors tear apart several opinions given for the sharp decline in crime using a realistic and sensible approach that relies on facts and statistics. They find that the reason crime reduced so drastically was because of the legalization of abortion through Roe v. Wade, and this fact has more weight than any other explanation. Problem Definition The authors of Freakonomics begin Chapter 4: Where Have All the Criminals Gone?, with a brief summary of Nicolae Ceausescu’s communist regime in Romania, which they use as a reversed image of the American scenario. While Ceausescu prohibited abortion leading to a huge population growth, the US at around the same time legalized it through Roe v. Wade. The large number of teenage youth in Romania finally led to Ceausescu’s execution in 1989. Similarly in the US, the reduced number of teenage youth led to a lower crime rate. Through the way the authors frame their arguments, they clearly define the issues at hand. They begin by showing rising trends in crime before the early 90’s and the prediction of various criminologists such as James Alan Fox that crime would eventually spiral out of control as the years progressed. The authors then show us the folly of experts such as criminologists, police, economists and politicians attempting to explain the decline while none had foreseen it. They then systematically analyze each of the opinions given as per the information available in the LexisNexis database and find flaws in the arguments. Finally, they show why abortion is the most logical reason for the sharp decline in crime after the 90’s. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Information used The authors rely on studies and other relevant research materials to justify their arguments. In Chapter 4, they first obtain all the expert opinion articles published on the decline of crime from the year 1991 to 2001 available from ten of the largest circulation papers in the LexisNexis database. The authors then analyze each opinion on the probable cause of the decline is analyzed using research studies e.g. a 1977 study called On Behalf of a Moratorium on Prison Construction which the authors use to counter the opinion that increased reliance on prisons is one of the reasons for the crime decline. They also use crime statistics obtained from various police departments in the US. Interpretation One thing that is strikingly interesting about Chapter 4, Where Have All the Criminals Gone?, is the authors’ analysis and interpretation of issues in a logical sequence. Perhaps another ingenious analysis technique is the way the authors frame the issues into a larger context without leaving room for doubt as to the sustainability of their argument. Again, their interpretation differs from that of the so-called ‘experts’ since they approach the topic from an economic sense and not a moral one. A good example of this is the analysis of a strong economy as a good explanation for the crime drop. The authors begin by accepting that there was a significant improvement in the economy in the 1990’s. They first show that this rationale only applies for non-violent crimes, which is true. Secondly, they rely on studies to show that a drop in unemployment rates reduces non-violent crime by a mere 1%. They kill off the rationale by comparing the scenario to the 1960’s where the economy grew at the same rate as crime. The analysis of the impact of Roe v. Wade and how it led to a lower crime rate separates the authors’ interpretations of the issues from those of the experts. They first take statistics of the number of abortions carried out after Roe v. Wade and the impact this had in terms of lowering abortion costs, preventing unwanted children who would most likely have turned into criminals and finally, the link between causality and correlation in the issue of crime and abortion. While other experts have preferred ‘positive’ and easily explainable explanations such as better policing and stricter gun control laws, the authors have diverted from this appealing ‘moral’ view to a more realistic solution. We will write a custom Critical Writing on Freakonomics: The Hidden Side of Everything by Steven. D. Levitt and Stephen. J. Dubner specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Conclusion Freakonomics is well researched and analyzed but has some flaws such as its disregard of positive crime reducing measures. While the authors have ‘expertly’ analyzed the drop in crime using economic realities, they agree that the other opinions are not too far fetched. They also do not state that the decline was as a consequence of one act, but instead, they seek to establish the most logical explanation. Their finding of the legalization of abortion as being a major cause of the crime drop though vexatious to many is shockingly accurate, judging on the convergence of statistics and the support by facts such as the corresponding years between the US and Romanian cases.