Get help from the best in academic writing.

Ideas between Carnie and Marx

Ideas between Carnie and Marx. Social structure is the deciding factor of competition. The poor classes have always tried to compete with the wealthier classes in order to take the wealth and power from them. On the other hand, the wealthy have exploited the poor to raise more wealth. The bigger the economic gap between the two different classes, the more intense the competition between them. Andrew Carnegie and Karl Marx created their own theories to address and resolve tensions between the classes. Carnegie and Marx have similar negative opinions about the inheritance and its effects on the receiving generation. At the same time, they have different opinions about competition and distribution of wealth. Carnegie argued that competition is something that is welcomed and accepted to develop society. A society without competition does not change. According to an example in The Gospel of Wealth, pre-industrial products were made in small stores (Carnegie, p364). The owners and apprentices worked together under the same conditions, and their lives have little or no change. In other words, there was social and political equality between the owner and the apprentice. However, the result was expensive, but low-quality products. Conversely, products that are made in competition in today have high quality at low prices. When people start competing to make better quality products at cheaper prices, the means and processes of manufacturing products evolve and advances. Competition can also work as unjustly as inequality, creating a gap between rich and poor. Nevertheless, Carnegie argues that the law of competition brings about far greater advantages than disadvantages to society, allowing society to develop and progress into the future. Unlike the positive opinion about the competition, Carnegie’s thought about inheritance is negative. Carnegie allows to remain a little bit of inheritance for the family, but he cautions the burden and unhappiness stemming from the improper use of inheritance from one generation to another. According to The Gospel of Wealth, Carnegie says men should hesitate to leave behind an excessive inheritance, more than merely to providing a moderate source of income for their wives and daughters, because large amounts of money become a burden to its recipients (Carnegie, p368). This large amount of wealth bequeathed to the next generation that has not learned how to live a proper livelihood can lead a dependent, weak, and uncreative life. Therefore, parents should not pass on to children if they consider their children’s true happiness. Parents may think their fortune will pass to the next generation without damaging the fortune, but in reality, the value of that legacy can be squandered through the foolishness of successors or falling land prices. Carnegie warned that “giving a huge amount of money to my children is like leaving a poison or a curse” (Carnegie, p368). He also negatively viewed legacies for the public interest, because when an inheritance is used for a common public purpose, it may not be used according to the original intention of the deceased person. In many cases, the true purpose of the bequest is not fulfilled, and the true wishes of the bequest are ignored. To be truly beneficial to society, the rich must strive to the best of their ability to properly use their wealth during their lifetime, rather than leaving the wealth when they die to become something of a burden that is not praised or appreciated. After all, in many cases, the legacy is only used as a monument of their folly (Carnegie, p368). Carnegie argued that the distribution of wealth is accomplished when the rich gives their fortunes to charity for the public, and not for individual purposes. According to him, the rich have a responsibility to properly manage their trust property. Thus, the wealthy should use their capital to create surplus wealth larger than the profits of the poor. And if this surplus wealth is managed for the public good, it can be divided into properties of the many (Carnegie, p369). The wealth spent for public purposes can benefit all the public, from the very poor to the rich. The benefits are then sustained and become permanent. For example, suppose a rich man uses his wealth to create a public library, the library will provide the knowledge of mankind contained in books to the masses for free as a public good forever. However, if he distributes his property divided up equally in a small trivial amount of money to the millions of the public, most of his wealth would be wasted fulfilling their small needs and pleasures, such as appetite and vice. Also, charity should not be given to anyone indiscriminately, but to those who help themselves, or those who are valuable. When a great wealth is passed on to someone who truly needs it and they eventually produce good results, countless people with a difficult lifestyle, including street alcoholics, benefit from the results. Therefore, the rich need a wise eye that can identify and select people who can ultimately benefit and improve society. Only those with a potential for improvement should be partially helped, leaving room for self-improvement from one’s own effort. Helping a person as he or she wishes without confirming anything is giving the strength to unfitted people and ignoring the fitted people. In contrast to Carnegie, Karl Marx thought competition created an economic crisis that heightens conflicts among social classes. Productivity continues to develop through manufacturing and knowledge. However, the amount of property remains unchanged, and the amount of property available to buy is limited. This hinders the sale or distribution of goods. For example, suppose there are 40 people and 40 goods made by each company. Forty products will be sold out without surplus. In the following year, companies A and B each make 30 products to sell more products and to make more profit. People is 40, but the products are 60, so 20 products inevitably remain. In other words, the companies overproduced. For the profit of the company, the companies will try to sell them at a cheap price. By lowering the prices of goods, companies make less profit than before, and will eventually go bankrupt. A crisis occurs because of overproduction. Competition between bourgeois and the crisis that emerges from the competition makes workers’ wages more fluid, and the mechanisms of machinery that develops continually and improves more rapidly make workers’ living conditions more precarious (Marx, p344). As a result, competition intensifies the conflict between bourgeois and workers by weakening the economy through overproduction and making workers’ lives even poorer. Unlike Carnegie who allows a small inheritance for the family, Marx argued all rights to inheritance should be abolished. In The Communist Manifesto, Marx called for the abolishment of private property. In his eyes, inheritance is a type of private property that parents ultimately give to their children. Marx claims that the bourgeois private property is the final and most complete expression of output and acquisition based on exploitation (Marx, p348). Workers work but do not make money, and conversely, the bourgeoisie does not work but make money. Bourgeois private property is thus accumulated through the exploitation of the workers. Marx’s answer to abolish or greatly weaken the right of private property owners to decide on the disposition and distribution of property at death in order to attack private property rights. The abolition of the right of inheritance allows the property of the Bourgeois to be owned by the state, which stops the differences between social classes from being passed down, creating an equal environment for the future generation. This results in a society that has achieved an equal distribution of wealth after the eventual death of the previous generation. From this moment on, everyone begins life with the same material advantages, equality of opportunity is realized, and the disparity in wages is no longer acceptable to future generations. In Marx’s opinion, the distribution of wealth is either by the government or by the struggle of the working class. Unlike Carnegie, Marx’s bourgeoisie is a negative being that oppresses and exploits workers. Contrary to Carnegie’s bourgeoisie who distribute the wealth through charitable giving benefiting the public, Marx’s bourgeoisie concentrates the wealth in their hands in order to make the working class submit to their control. Marx concluded that all capital and property should be distributed equally to the working class. The workers should rise up and become the ruling class through class struggle and revolution. By using political domination as the ruling class, they take all the capital from the bourgeoisie and put all the production instruments in the hands of the state. Therefore, the distribution of wealth can be done fairly by the government, not bourgeoisie. He calls for the state to place limits on the acquisition of private property and work to gradually convert it into social assets. For example, taxes are levied depending on the amount of property. More taxes are imposed on people who own more property and fewer taxes are imposed on the poor. And, the state limits the right of inheritance to the benefit of the state. Ultimately, the state brings the wealth of the bourgeois and distributes it back to the proletariat. The views of Carnegie and Marx clearly clash in regard to competition and distribution of wealth. While both harbor negative feelings on the institution of inheritance, their ideas ultimately lead to two different conclusions for the distribution of wealth at death. Carnegie argued that competition improves civilization and society, and that inequality in competition is the price for social development. He asserted that leaving a reasonable legacy to support the lives of one’s surviving children is fine, but too much inheritance will make children lazy and dependent. Finally, fortune bequeaths to society for the public good is often used differently. Donations must be made for public purposes, not for individuals, and such donations are an effective distribution of wealth that has a lasting effect on a large number of people. Marx, on the other hand, argued that competition which makes overproduction is a factor that eventually causes a crisis that makes the social conflict between bourgeois and proletariat. Marx opposed private property and he asserts that the abolition of the right of inheritance would bring equality after the death of inheritor. The distribution of wealth should be made by the government, not by the bourgeois, and ultimately, the wealth becomes the property of the working class. Conflicts between classes are a social problem that has not yet been resolved. These problems have been part of history for decades, or centuries, and may not be easily solved. There is no definite answer. But if people continue to think and agonize about solving these problems, people will find ways to reduce social conflict and live happily together. Works Cited Carnegie, Andrew. “The Gospel of Wealth.” A World of Ideas, 10th edition, edited by Lee Jacobus, Bedford, 2013, 364-373. Marx, Karl. “The Communist Manifesto.” A World of Ideas, 10th edition, edited by Lee Jacobus, Bedford, 2013, 337-356. Ideas between Carnie and Marx
Table of Contents Introduction: France and the European Union France and the EU Deficit Target France and Germany Developing a New Fighter Jet Maintaining the Connection with the EU Works Cited Introduction: France and the European Union The European Union (EU) is an organization that was established in 1958 as the means of cementing the peaceful relationships between 28 states of Europe and promoting further international cooperation (Hartley 3). France, being one of its members, has been facing certain issues while trying to remain a part of the EU. The identified issues can be explained by autonomy and exceptionalism of the French culture (Hancock et al. 204). France and the EU Deficit Target The process of integrating into the EU is fraught with numerous challenges, and meeting the set deficit levels is one of them. According to a recent article published at, while seemingly being an attempt to meet the high standards of the EU the identified step implies that France is not quite comfortable with the current demands. Indeed, a closer look at the discussion of the problem will reveal that France was practically pressured into making the said decision: “It was seen as a warning to new President Emmanuel Macron, who will produce his first budget in the autumn” (“France Pledges to Meet EU Deficit Target, Despite Strong Headwinds”). Therefore, Macron’s endeavor at complying with the rigid standards that the EU sets can be viewed as not purely voluntary but, instead, dictated by the necessity to align with the policies that the EU sets. The identified decision seems to reflect the skeptical attitude of France to the concept of the new Europe. As the authors of the article stress, there has been a significant concern about France not meeting the standards set by the EU for the deficit levels. France and Germany Developing a New Fighter Jet It is quite remarkable that, while having been a part of the EU for quite a while, France has been maintaining impressive integrity as far as its own development is concerned. The identified phenomenon can be attributed to the propensity among French citizens and, therefore, the members of the French government, to maintain their national integrity and choose their own track in political, economic, and technological development. In fact, the latter can be traced easily in the recent attempt by the French government to take the initiative and join forces with Germany to produce an innovative fighter jet (Hepher and Thomas). The authors of the article point quite clearly to the fact that, with the United Kingdom leaving the EU, France is willing to safeguard its position in the global community and promote stronger partnership: “The move also reflects efforts to give fresh impetus to Franco-German relations in the aftermath of Britain’s decision to leave the European Union and was described by defense experts as a snub to Europe’s leading military power” (“France and Germany to Develop New European Fighter Jet”). Therefore, the article points to the fact that, while showing the propensity to develop independence, France also tends to secure its bond with the EU as the foundation for its further economic growth and political support (Stefanova 127). Maintaining the Connection with the EU Despite the fact that France has been a part of the EU for quite some time, it needs to adjust to the new standards set by the organization. Furthermore, the French government will need to make sure that the EU demands should not conflict with the French traditions and national identity. Therefore, there is the need to support France in its endeavor at building a connection with the EU and determine the common ground on which these relationships will be designed. Works Cited “France and Germany to Develop New European Fighter Jet.” Euracdtiv. 2017. “France Pledges to Meet EU Deficit Target, Despite Strong Headwinds.” Euracdtiv. 2017. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Hancock, Donald M. et al. Politics in Europe. CQ Press, 2014. Hartley, Trevor C. The Foundations of European Union Law: An Introduction to the Constitutional and Administrative Law of the European Union. Oxford University Press, 2014. Hepher, Tim, and Leigh Thomas. “France and Germany to Develop New European Fighter Jet.” Reuters. 2017. Stefanova, Boyka M. The European Union beyond the Crisis: Evolving Governance, Contested Policies, and Disenchanted Publics. Lexington Books. 2014.
CUA Prima Facie Duty Monistic and Absolutist Ethical Theories Discussion.

Assignment Description:
Post at least one discussion question about the material assigned since
the previous discussion board assignment. Offer tentative answers that
will stimulate further discussion. You may write your own questions or
use the discussion questions on FE pp. 255, 275; the questions following
the excerpt from Philippa Foot’s Natural Goodness; and EL pp. 141-42, 154. You may also modify the discussion questions, but indicate if you have done so. The primary focus of your own post each week must be completely different from the topics of your analytical essays. Textbooks (FE) The Fundamentals of Ethics
Chs. 16-17 (EL) The Ethical Life
Ch. 11 RossCh. 12 Aristotle
Other Assigned Readings
Philippa Foot, Natural Goodness

Judith Jarvis Thomson – The Trolley Problem

CUA Prima Facie Duty Monistic and Absolutist Ethical Theories Discussion

Provide a picture for each device and explian how you would troubleshoot it 1- Whistling sound in a bubble humidifier. Provide a picture for each device and explian how you would troubleshoot it 1- Whistling sound in a bubble humidifier ? How would you in -detail- would troubleshoot it? 2- How is the proper function of a a wick humidifier checked ? 3- When providing a hand held nebulizer (HHN) what sound indicates that the solution has been nebulized? What is the optimal flow? 4- What may be a cause a Large Volume Nebulizer(LVN) not to mist enough ? Provide 3 possible causes. 5 – What can cause the FiO2 to change during Large Volume Nebulizer(LVN) therapy ? How can be fixed? 6 – Describe the mode of operation of an Oxygen Concentrator? How often should be check for proper funtioning during -at-home services?Provide a picture for each device and explian how you would troubleshoot it 1- Whistling sound in a bubble humidifier

Industry Study ( Saudi Arabia Telecommunication Industry)

Industry Study ( Saudi Arabia Telecommunication Industry).

Kindly create around 20 powerpoint slid with the subject of (Saudi Arabia Telecommunication Industry Study). Please check the PowerPoint attached and use it as sample or guideline for your work. Also please check the assignment requirements attached. For References: You can use the two article submitted in the attachment. The first one is an industry study by IBM which is supposed to be the main source of information for the slides. The Second one is information technology study on the Saudi market and user segments. Looking forward to work with you and get best result. Thank you
Industry Study ( Saudi Arabia Telecommunication Industry)

Supermarkets. The Machinery of Capitalism Essay

nursing essay writing service Supermarkets are the best places to see the declining influence of nature in our lives. The vast variety of edibles kept here for sale is entirely processed under the close expertise of men. In fact, all of this has been brought in consonance with the machinery of capitalism. The items, which are most compatible with capitalism for being processed, flourish here and others become the history. One can see the various manifestations of the mode of the modern economy here. The sheen of artificiality to persuade us of the genuineness of each eatable is obvious. In an attempt to churn out new varieties of eatable, molecules are maneuvered from the same plants. Corn has tremendously been able to fit itself to the vicissitudes of capitalism. American supermarket seems to be irrelevant to nature because of its artificial ornamental nature. It is all but man-made. It is not just some sections of the market but the whole one looks like this. However, when we see the produce wet with dew, nature comes to the fore. There are various other produce sections out there. Even the meat, which is placed in the market, seems to be losing the imprints of nature, as it is boneless and entirely processed out of human hands. It is cut into systematic shapes. In the flora and fauna section, one need not become a naturalist but essentially a food scientist. If we go further, it is extremely difficult to even identify the species. Cereal, peas, snacks; soft drinks have entirely undergone see changes and are quite a travesty of their original. If all it is seen through the prism of a naturalist, the first impression that this entire scene conveys is that it is abound with biodiversity. Plants and animals have been placed here for human consumption. Even this market rivals some natural places like forests when seen from the prism of biodiversity. Hundreds of diverse species are lying in the produce section and the same is the case with meat corners. One can only see this diversity increasing with greater advancement. Many new species have made their way here, which were not seen a few years back. The foreign species have captured the markets. Naturalists pay great deferential to biodiversity. Every eatable placed here is just a link in the food chain, which is very long, and sometimes beyond comprehension. For the processed foods, one must have ecological instincts. The foods kept here are of so much complex nature that one needs the assistance of experts to pick and choose. The ecology of the foods is so much emphasized here that one begins to think of what ones’ were about. If one starts finding the origins of these foods, one must travel thousands of miles away from the supermarket and even to other continents. Corn has become an integral part of many edibles. If we, take chicken nuggets along with soft drinks, corn is a must which we will be galloping and placing in our tummy. All of the processed foods have the same ingredient. It happened especially after 80s’. There are thousands of items here and one-fourth of them are littered with corn in some way or other. It is in so much quantity that we can be dubbed as corn people. The supermarket has beautifully convinced us of the originality of the species both old and new. So many items are making their way into the market, and we are convinced in a very lucid style that everything here is new and not the manipulation of the molecules taken from the same plants. We consider ourselves very clever; but corn seems to be cleverer than has dominated our lives so successfully. Once the white men brought their own species along with them to entirely colonize these lands but corn has done exactly opposite to it. It has certain traits, which help it to survive and adapt to every climate. Even a prominent write says that corn helped to a great extent the settlers in the domination process as they knew all the potentials and secrets of it, they were no longer in need of the help of the native Americans. It has a dual function that of food and commodity, which changed it from subsistence to market. Though the plant has been able to survive in a number of habitats its most important distinction is to live and compete successfully in the supermarket. It has adapted itself now to machines by growing according to their own peculiar requirements. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More

Instructions Learning Objectives Examine the process involved with problem formulation. Apply critical thinking to problem identification. Determine factors affecting

Instructions Learning Objectives Examine the process involved with problem formulation. Apply critical thinking to problem identification. Determine factors affecting decision implementation. Evaluate ethical implications of a decision. Evaluate decision-making outcomes and processes. Prompt Explain the impact of language on critical thinking and decision making. Make sure you include the challenges presented by language and how one can manage these challenges. Include detailed speaker notes explaining the content on each slide Instructions Develop a 10 to 15 slide PowerPoint presentation Include detailed speaker notes to explain each slide content OR present your slides via Video and submit the link for the video with your slide deck. Support your presentation with at least 3 credible academic references beyond course materials Follow APA format where appropriate

A Budget Airline In Hong Kong

Budget airlines have become a trend in aviation industry over a few decades all over the world, however, as a Asian cosmopolitan city- Hong Kong hasn’t have one yet, therefore a research need to be set up to explore on its feasibility. This project proposal aims to assist to accomplish a research by developing a plan beforehand. Firstly, the background of budget airlines and problem statement would be stated out, then a literature review would be carried out in order to find out its research value, after that, the research aim and objectives could be set up as a research goal, last but not least, research method and project plan could be discussed on how, where and when to carry out this research. 2. Background/ problem statement: Before Deregulation: In the United State before 1978, all airline passenger services were regulated and controlled by the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB). Only 10 trunk airlines were authorized to issue a “grandfather” certificate by CAB at that time. Underneath this certificate, all major scheduled airlines’ route structures and fares were controlled and ruled. For an airline’s route structure, stops and intermediate stops were specified and passengers carrying between stops were limited, a new promoted route needed to go through a lengthy procedure and hearings, even a stoppage of a route service was still needed the CAB’s approval. For an airline’s fare, all fare prices were strictly controlled by the CAB. (John

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service