Get help from the best in academic writing.

I need help with my FIN 571 Week Three Assignment Two

I need help with my FIN 571 Week Three Assignment Two.

FIN 571 WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT 2:Using the Payback Method, IRR, and NPVoDue Feb 03, 6:00 PM (PST) oNot Submitted oPOINTS 6 Practice/Simulation/Homework/Game no new messages Objectives: 3.1 3.2 Instructions Assignment Files Grading Purpose of Assignment The purpose of this assignment is to allow the student to calculate the project cash flow using net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and the payback methods. Assignment Steps Resources: Corporate FinanceCreate a 350-word memo to management including the following: Describe the use of internal rate of return (IRR), net present value (NPV), and the payback method in evaluating project cash flows. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Calculate the following time value of money problems: If you want to accumulate $500,000 in 20 years, how much do you need to deposit today that pays an interest rate of 15%? What is the future value if you plan to invest $200,000 for 5 years and the interest rate is 5%? What is the interest rate for an initial investment of $100,000 to grow to $300,000 in 10 years? If your company purchases an annuity that will pay $50,000/year for 10 years at a 11% discount rate, what is the value of the annuity on the purchase date if the first annuity payment is made on the date of purchase? What is the rate of return required to accumulate $400,000 if you invest $10,000 per year for 20 years. Assume all payments are made at the end of the period. Calculate the project cash flow generated for Project A and Project B using the NPV method. Which project would you select, and why? Which project would you select under the payback method? The discount rate is 10% for both projects. Use Microsoft® Excel® to prepare your answer. Note that a similar problem is in the textbook in Section 5.1. Sample Template for Project A and Project B: Show all work.
I need help with my FIN 571 Week Three Assignment Two

ASU Rachel Leadership and Engaging in Transformational Leadership Discussion

ASU Rachel Leadership and Engaging in Transformational Leadership Discussion.

I need you to respond to the discussion question about 200 words with referenecs . What is it about Rachel’s leadership that clearly suggests that she is engaged in transformational leadership?Northouse (2019) describes transformational leadership as a process that transforms people. It is being concerned with followers’ needs, valuing them as individuals, and having such an influence that encourages followers to achieve more than what’s expected of them. Transformational leaders create a connection with their followers that increases motivation and morality (Northouse, 2019). Rachel demonstrates transformational leadership through her concern for working mothers. She offers an on-site childcare program, flextime scheduling for mothers with young children, and full health coverage offered to part-time employees (Northouse, 2019). As the company grows, she’s not satisfied with the distance that is developing between her and her employees. As a transformational leader, she values the connection with her employees. Viewing this from the stakeholder perception, Rachel’s behaviors lead me to believe that she identifies her employees as stakeholders. Mitchell et al. (1997) uses the definition by Freeman “a stakeholder in an organization is any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the organization’s objectives”. The relationship that exists would be a mutual power-dependence relationship; her employees depend on the company to achieve their personal goals and the company depends on their expertise in exchange (Mitchell et al., 1997).Given the problems Rachel is confronting as a result of growth of the company, what should she do to reestablish herself as a transformational leader at ICCR?According to Northouse (2019), strong moral values are a personality characteristic of transformational leaders. Rachel exhibits this with her desire to connect with her employees and creating a great organizational climate. Jones (1991) explains that moral intent is acting on moral judgment. Rachel must balance the moral factor of being present for her employees against the other factor of traveling excessively. The company is successful and while she wants it to continue to grow, she needs to develop a plan that will allow her the opportunity to connect more with her employees. Viewing Rachel’s situation using the Attribution Theory, external factors would be attributed to the disconnect that is occurring. Those external factors would be the excessive travel required and the time that it takes away from her ability to be present. Shonda Rimes’ TED talk goes hand in hand with Rachel’s situation. She needs to stop and evaluate her priorities and make time for those at the top of her list, her employees. It sounds as though she needs to rediscover “the hum” that Shonda Rimes described. Rachel also needs to meet with her department heads on a regular basis and reinforce the values and vision that she has for her company.ReferencesJones, T.M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2). 366-395. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., and Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4). 853-886.Northouse, P.G., 2019. Leadership theory and practice. SAGE.TED. (2016, March 4). Shonda Rhimes: My year of saying YES to everything [Video]. YouTube.
ASU Rachel Leadership and Engaging in Transformational Leadership Discussion

The Globalization Of Market Helps Ikea Marketing Essay

essay writing help Economic of scale, by providing a fixed standard of product to customer worldwide, IKEA can producing their product in a large amount to earn the benefit that bring form economic of scale, it means the average cost of one product is reduced. Cost reduction, most of the product, store, and advertisement of IKEA are similar or even the same when it is promoted so IKEA does not need to invest extra additional cost in developing new product, new advertisement. By using such method the cost of designing, advertising could be lower. Process simplifying, because of the standardized of products, the procedures of producing product and promotion could be simplified, as IKEA does no need to design a new product for a different market and promote it, with such strategy the time of production could be shorter, then the efficiency of operation is increased, thus the competitive of IKEA would be increased. Easier to build up company image, globalization of market make IKEA to build up their image easier, as they are using the same marketing strategy among the world, for example, they open large warehouse stores festooned in the blue and yellow color, to make the consumers to remember IKEA easily and enable IKEA to apply their image worldwide, and also other purpose, such as advertisement. Then increase their soundness. Globalization of market enables IKEA to lower the sales price of their products, and increase the efficiency therefore to increase their competitive, therefore to attract more customers to purchase from them, as a result increase the income that earn IKEA and enable it to grow. Globalization of production means a company source goods and services from place around the world to catch the differences in the cost and quality of factor of production like land, labor and capital in different country(International Business: An Asian Perspective, Charles W.L. Hill, Chow-Hou Wee, Krishna Udayuasankar, Page 7). For example, to reduce the cost of the cotton slipcovers, IKEA has concentrated production in four suppliers in Europe and China so the price of the Klippan, one of the product producing by IKEA, could be reduced by around 40% between 1999 and 2005. Globalization of production is all concerning about to reducing the cost, increasing quality and how to make the production more effective, like IKEA was manufactured their product in their home country, Sweden, but soon they transferred their production to lower-cost supplier in Poland. It is because they using the concept of globalization of production, and seeking the lower and higher quality and efficiency in producing their product. The benefit bring from globalization of production: Cost reduction, it may be the most significant benefit brought by globalization of production, as the example we discuss above, through the globalization of production process IKEA can produce the product with a lower cost as the labor and martial in certain country maybe cheaper. Increased efficiency, the other reason of globalization of production may be the better support in other country and technology or even the higher efficiency of transportation. In such situation IKEA can produce goods with higher quality and deliver the goods around the world as soon as possible. Globalization of production makes the procedures of the product more effective, increases the quality and reduces the cost of production so that IKEA to make their sales price lower and lower and attract more customer with better qualities of goods. It would directly raise the competitive of IKEA and make them become one of the most successful global retailers in the world. Even IKEA had established a well-developed globalization plan for the market, there are still some limit in the market, there is no way that IKEA can really treat the whole world as one market, there would always some problem would appear that make IKEA to take action to fix it, there is always differences among different countries. The limit of globalization of market to IKEA: Country may own their specified features, in such situation adjustment is required in order to make the product or goods fulfill the needs of customer in different country. This problem becomes one of the main limitations to the globalization of market. IKEA had first discovered in 1990s when they are expanding their business in the USA. They found that the size of their product is not suitable for the customer in United State, so they need to redesign their offerings in USA which limited the plan of globalization of IKEA. After the adjustment, the sales revenue of IKEA in USA stronger. It means no matter how your plan of globalization plan is planned, it would always something other than your expectation, and it is very difficult that to try to treat the entire world as a single integrated global marketplace. Even globalization of market is practicable in certain situation, however we should always consider other factors that are possible and design alternative to ready for such situation. For example, whether the weather the martial that IKEA is using to produce their product suit the weather in all their market countries? Should they adjust the price of their product to fit the living standard in different countries?

discussion paper business ethics

discussion paper business ethics.

The discussion paper must be at least three pages in length (double-spaced, 12-inch Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins). I expect the paper to be at least that length. Do NOT write less than this or use bigger margins or fonts. I also want to emphasize this is NOT a research paper. You should not use any outside resources or attempt to do research to write this paper. Simply read the assigned readings, reflect on the questions below, and write a paper that responds to those questions.For this assignment, please read the two files I uploaded. The discussion paper should respond to each of the issues/questions below:We have recently considered the question of whether it is ethically permissible to be deceptive in business, or whether there is an ethical obligation to be honest/truthful. Holley discusses the ethical issue of deception and truthfulness in a particular area of business: Sales. He argues that a seller has some degree of obligation to disclose information and tell the truth to a buyer. However, the question is what degree of information disclosure/honesty is required? Holley presents five different degrees or levels of requirement, ranging from a low/undemanding requirement, all the way up to high/very demanding requirement.1) Briefly explain which level of requirement Holley endorses.2) Do you agree or disagree with Holley? Why or why not?3) If you do not agree with Holley, which alternative level of requirement would you endorse and why?4) What would the requirement that Holley endorses say about the World Camera case? Did the sales person do anything ethically wrong? Why or why not?5) If you endorsed a different level of requirement than Holley, what would the requirement that you endorse say about the World Camera case? Did the sales person do anything ethically wrong? Why or why not?
discussion paper business ethics

Arguments For and Against Vaccinations

Vaccinations Benjamin Franklin once said, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” (Bartolotti, 2009). Even though Mr. Franklin was talking about fire prevention, it applies to the affirmation that all children that are medically able to be vaccinated. It is smarter to prevent a child from getting a disease rather than dealing with the disease itself and its effects. The definition of vaccine is “a biological product that helps humans or other animals develop immunities that protect them from one or more diseases” (Blume, 1942). Vaccines are given to infants, children and adults to help protect the individual from obtaining certain diseases. There are some who do not believe in vaccinations for various reasons, but the majority of the people do choose to vaccinate their children. There is good reason for this position. In spite of concerns of autism, vaccine safety and unnecessary immunizations, it should be mandatory by law to vaccinate every child who is medically able in the United States because of the protection it gives our children against preventable diseases, the protection of those who cannot receive vaccinations and for financial savings. Vaccines are vital to protect our children against infectious diseases. A good example of this is the chickenpox vaccine. The proof is in the numbers. Offit and Moser (2011) describe how the chickenpox vaccine was introduced in 1995 and the number of reported cases of chickenpox dropped by 90% after the first year of children receiving the vaccine! They go on to state the rotavirus has dropped from about three million cases a year to only 300,000 since 2006. Other preventable diseases such as meningitis, polio and measles also show much-reduced numbers since the vaccines for them has been introduced (Offit