Get help from the best in academic writing.

HUMI 01 writing assignment

HUMI 01 writing assignment. I need an explanation for this History question to help me study.

Topic:
Pick a historical period Ancient Greece, Qing China,Modernism, the Renaissance-­‐and describe the creative forces at work in that period. What factors helped to shape the creative production during that particular period?
Requirements:
1. Do not use first person review to write this paper
2. Use footnote for work cited
This is a website for footnote formatting
http://www.oberlin.edu/faculty/svolk/citation.htm
3. 6 pages and double lines
HUMI 01 writing assignment

shanki-assignment1. I’m studying for my Computer Science class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

Chapter 1 provided a high-level overview of the need for a national framework for protecting critical infrastructure. For some additional reading, take a look at the latest Presidential Order that relates to strengthening cybersecurity that relates to critical infrastructure:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/pr…
After reading chapter 1 and looking at the link above, you’re ready to participate in the first discussion.
Let’s look at a real-world scenario and how the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) plays into it. In the scenario, the United States will be hit by a large-scale, coordinated cyber attack organized by China. These attacks debilitate the functioning of government agencies, parts of the critical infrastructure, and commercial ventures. The IT infrastructure of several agencies are paralyzed, the electric grid in most of the country is shut down, telephone traffic is seriously limited and satellite communications are down (limiting the Department of Defense’s [DOD’s] ability to communicate with commands overseas). International commerce and financial institutions are also severely hit. Please explain how DHS should handle this situation.
You must do the following:
1) Create a new thread. As indicated above, please explain how DHS should handle the situation described in the preceding paragraph.
attached is the PPT
shanki-assignment1

Market Potential Score Summary.

I’m working on a business question and need support to help me learn.

Answer the questions in PARAGRAPH format. DO NOT write your answers in a bulleted format.Your response to each question should be at least 225 words.DO NOT restate the question in your response. DO NOT use a setup or filler words at the beginning of your answer.The answers you provide are submitted to Turnitin (www.turnitin.com (Links to an external site.)); therefore, DO NOT copy and paste content from the Internet, periodicals, journals, publications, articles, or students’ papers. Answers that are not your own, will result in a ZERO (0).questions: Cruz Furniture Manufacturers (CFM), located in the US, is a medium-sized company that manufactures home and office furniture. CFM currently sells its furniture only in the US. CFM’s CEO, Gerardo, wants to expand internationally and is contemplating entering Canada, United Kingdom, Chile, or Australia. Research shows that the market potential score (out of 100) for office furniture in each country is as follows:Canada: 49United Kingdom: 86Chile: 88Australia: 93What country do you recommend CFM enter? Why? What mode of entry do you recommend? Why? Explain your answers in detail.
Market Potential Score Summary

Italian Sculptures of 16th Century Research Paper. Alpheus and Arethusa, Battista Di Domenico Lorenzi 1568-70 at the Velez Blanco Patio Figure 1: Alpheus and Arethusa. Source: met museum. Alpheus and Arethusa is a marble sculpture created by Lorenzi during 1568-70. The height of the sculpture is 58 5/8 inches, width is 32 5/8 inches and depth is 23 ½ inches. The sculpture weighs 782 pounds. It was designed for a garden owned by Alamanno Bandini. It was initially erected in his villa near Florence. According to Roman mythology, Arethusa was the daughter of Nereus. The literal meaning of Arethusa is “the waterer” and the tale on which this sculpture of Alpheus and Arethusa is based, has its origin in a river. Mythology suggests that one day when Arethusa was having a bath in a river, Alpheus, the river God, expressed his love for her. Arethusa was not interested in his advances because she wanted to remain chaste in her worshipping of Artemis. She got frightened and tried to flee from there. When she noticed that Alpheus was continuously pursuing her, she requested Goddess Diana (Artemis) to come to her rescue. Diana responded back and transformed Arethusa into a cloud, but since she was very frightened, she started perspiring and as a result, took the form of a stream. She (in the form of a stream) travelled underground and appeared at the island of Ortygia. Alpheus followed her and mingled with her waters (Remington, 1940). The sculpture being discussed is a depiction of Alpheus and Arethusa in an arrested position. Alpheus is shown trying to hold Arethusa with his left hand while she attempts to get herself free from the tangle. Arethusa is shown holding her clothes in her left hand; probably she might have taken them off in order to have a bath. Alpheus is shown holding a vase in his right hand; the vase is believed to be a source of water (Wardropper, 2011). This sculpture might seem to be static but actually it was the sculptor’s initiative towards depicting figures in motion. Lorenzi depicted both Alpheus and Arethusa as if they were moving forward. Alpheus is shown to be moving forward while Arethusa is diverting sideways. The sculptor used checks and balances to create the sculpture. Alpheus’s chest is facing the viewer while Arethusa is standing diagonally. While Alpheus is looking towards Arethusa, she, in an attempt to look towards Aretheus, is facing the viewer. Lorenzi has aptly depicted the emotions of both the figures and that too in accordance to the mythological story. Alpheus’s expression is that of a person making an earnest attempt to persuade his lady love. He is looking towards Aretheus in a very loving manner. On the other hand, Aretheus’s expression is that of a person pleading someone for help. She is probably requesting Alpheus not to follow her and at the same time she might be requesting Goddess Diana to rescue her. Further, Lorezi has depicted clothes in Aretheus’s hands, which makes us believe that she has taken them off to have a bath. The vase in Alpheus’s hand gives us an idea of his being the river God. According to Wardropper (2011), “… in his right hand Alpheus holds an up-ended vase, the conventional emblem of a river God, from which water once flowed into the basin below” (p. 89). Also, Alpheus’s strong built is an indication of his being some powerful personality; Aretheus is shown to have a tender body. The sculpture suggests that Alpheus has caught Aretheus and is trying to restrain her from running. The posture of Aretheus’s legs depicts her action of running. The sculpture portrays the exhilarating moment just before the transformation of Aretheus. The sculpture was apt for the purpose for which it was made. It was erected on a high base behind a huge basin in a decorated grotto. The picture below depicts the grotto where this sculpture was initially installed. Figure 2: Grotto where the sculpture was installed. Source: Metropolitan Museum of Art bulletin Orpheus, Cristoforo Stati (Cristofano Da Bracciano), 1600-01 Figure 3: Orpheus. Source: english-speak-english. Orpheus is a marble sculpture created by Cristoforo Stati during 1600-01. The height, width and depth of the sculpture are 77 1/8, 38 and 23 7/8 inches respectively. The sculpture was specially made for Palazzo Corsi. According to Greek mythology, Orpheus was a musician. His caliber was such that he could lure both humans and animals with the same intensity; not only this, he could charm trees and lifeless things as well. Mythology suggests that once while Orpheus’s wife, Eurydice, was being pursued by her would be paramour, she was bitten by a poisonous snake that resulted in her death. Orpheus was grief stricken and decided to bring his wife back to life with the power of his music. He entered Hades and persuaded Pluto to allow him to take his wife back to earth. Pluto gave in to his pursuance but on a condition that Orpheus would not look back at his wife (who would follow her) until he reached earth. However, out of curiosity, Orpheus looked back to confirm that his wife was following him. At this instance, his wife disappeared and since then his only relief was music (Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1987). The sculpture depicts Orpheus as a personification of music. He is shown playing a “lira da braccio” and donning a “laurel crown”. Such a crown was awarded to winners of poetry and music contests in ancient Greece. This again confirms the mythological assertion that Orpheus was a musician. The sculptor has successfully been able to link the mythological story with his work. The sad expression of Orpheus in this sculpture is clearly visible. According to the mythological story, after the death of his beloved wife, Orpheus played his music instrument in order to plead Pluto to send her back. The pain experienced by Orpheus at that time is reflected on his face in the sculpture. A Siren, Anonymous Sculpture, 1571-90 Figure 4: A Siren. Source: met museum. Siren is a bronze sculpture carved by an anonymous carver during 1571-90. The sculpture is 32 1/8 inches high, 44 ¾ inches wide, 13 3/8 inches deep, and weighs 130 pounds. The statue depicts a nude woman who seems to be aquatic towards lower part of her body. She is holding a scaly tail each in both her hands. Her long hair takes the shape of gills towards the end. Figure 5: Hair of Siren taking the shape of gills towards the end. Source: (Wardropper, 2011). The statue is shown wearing a crown; it is believed that this crown was added at a later stage probably due to loss of the previous one. This assumption emerges from the fact that the upper part of her head (pate) is flat and even her cranium (part of skull) is kept open in order to hold a crown (Wardropper, 2011). The crown gives an impression that the person depicted in the statue must have been from some specific dynasty of high stature. The statue was so popular during that time that one of the greatest families of Rome, the Colonna, made it their symbol. Owing to such adaptation, the statue was erected at various significant places such as on their tombs, ceilings, and furniture. Wardropper (2011) claims that, “A siren appears on his armour in a painting and tops two rostral columns on a stone relief memorializing the victory at Lepanto” (p. 90). Here, Wardropper is referring to the conquest of Marcantonio Colonna over the Turks. Wardropper (2011) suggests that the statue would have given a better impression had it been installed on a column since a round column like structure was earlier a family symbol of the Colonna family. In such a case, the gills of the statue would have wrapped the column in a circular manner. Such a structure would have been more appealable from a distance. Inspiration From Michelangelo’s Sculptures Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni, usually referred to as Michelangelo, was also a famous sculptor from the 16th century but his sculptures were made earlier than the aforementioned ones. He is regarded as one of the greatest sculptors of all times. Most of his works (that include paintings and sculptures) are considered to be the best among the existing ones. Previous work is always an inspiration for further development. Moreover, Michelangelo’s work depicts characters from various walks of life. He portrayed them according to their profession, stature and beliefs. The sculptures mentioned in this paper namely, the Alpheus and Arethusa, the Orpheus, and the Siren can be compared to Michelangelo’s statue of David (shown below). Figure 6: Michelangelo’s statue of David. Source: daily mail. Firstly, likewise Michelangelo’s the David all the three sculptures are depicted nude. The structure of the body of the David resembles those of Alpheus and Arpheus. All of them are shown to be well built. The only difference seems to be the size of the sculptures. While Michelangelo’s the David stands tall at 14 ft, the other two look miniature; Alpheus and Arethusa is almost 4.75 ft tall and the height of Orpheus is around 6.5 ft. Secondly, the medium of most of Michelangelo’s sculptures was marble. In this regard, Alpheus and Arethusa and Orpheus qualify to be influenced by Michelangelo’s work. A third resemblance that is noticed among the works of Michelangelo and those mentioned in this paper is that all the characters are holding something in their hands. While David is shown holding a sling shot, Alpheus holds a vase and Orpheus holds a playing instrument. Likewise the sculptures discussed in this paper, Michelangelo’s sculptures also relate to some mythological stories. Like for instance, the David is depicted holding a sling shot (ready to fight). The position of his legs also suggests that he is very impatient to move forward. The stress on his face is clearly visible. All these sculptors have been able to successfully depict the expressions of their characters (as per mythological tales). Considering all such points, it is evident that the sculptures discussed in this paper were actually inspired by the works of Michelangelo. References Metropolitan Museum of Art. (1987). Renaissance in Italy and Spain. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art. Remington, P. (1940). Bulletin of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. JSTOR, 35(3), 61-65. Wardropper, I. (2011). European sculpture, 1400-1900. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art. Italian Sculptures of 16th Century Research Paper

Mobile Commerce Technology Essay (Critical Writing)

Table of Contents Introduction Paper Summary Critique Reference Introduction In the article “Mobile Commerce Technology” by Chung-wei Lee, Wen-Chen Hu and Jyh-haw Yeh, the authors set out to discuss the mobile commerce technology on business. Mobile commerce technology has emerged as a distinct and important entity influencing the traditional business environment significantly. This technology promises to revolutionalize the manner in which business is carried out thereby changing the businesses world profoundly. An understanding of the technology that makes mobile commerce possible is therefore important. Paper Summary The paper begins by highlighting how the World Wide Web revolutionalized commerce and paved the way for electronic commerce. It notes how advances in mobile networks have made possible mobile commerce. In a few years, mobile commerce has gained ground with millions of users engaging in e-commerce activities using their mobile devices. The article goes on to describe a mobile commerce system, which involves a wide range of disciplines and technologies. The major components of the system are mobile commerce applications, mobile stations, mobile middleware, wireless networks, wired networks, and host computers. An explanation of how the six components work together following the submission of a request by a mobile user is provided. The mobile commerce application provides the client-side and server-side programs that will be used. The mobile station relays user requests to the other components in the system and displays the results of the processing to the end user. The mobile middleware makes the interaction between the internet contents and the mobile station seamless. It does this by supporting a wide range of software standards and operating systems thereby making it possible for mobile stations to understand a wide variety of content. Mobile middleware also enhances security by providing some encryption standards for communication. Wireless networks are networks that use radio waves for communication. They make use of the wireless access point or a base station to deliver user requests. Wired networks are not a mandatory component for the mobile commerce system but they may be used by the server computers that are used to process user requests. The host computer is the machine that has software that processes the user requests. Considering the wide scope of each individual component, the authors proceed to explain the elements in components that are related to mobile commerce. The first element is mobile commerce applications and this many of these applications have been developed and implemented in many phones. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More The applications have the capabilities of electronic commerce applications and additional functions such as inventory tracking and dispatching. The mobile station is the handheld device used by the end user. This device has features of computers, telephones, and personal information managers. However, the mobile station has significant differences from a personal computer or laptop. The mobile devices have limited bandwidth, limited power and processing capabilities, and mobility features. The authors observe that the limitation in bandwidth makes it impossible for most multimedia material to be displayed correctly on the microbrowser present in the mobile station. The paper defines middleware as “the software layer between the operating system and the distributed applications that interact via the networks” (Chung-wei, et al., 2009, p.2586). The middleware later provides transparency by hiding the network environment complexities and enabling diverse systems to work together. The middleware is able to translate requests from mobiles stations into a form that the host computer can understand and translate the host computer responses to a form the mobile station can understand. As of the year 2000, the most widely used middleware by wireless internet users was i-mode with 60% of users followed by WAP which had 39% of users and lastly Palm with 1% of total users. Wireless networks are interconnected computing devices where the nodes are capable of communicating with each other without the need of physical connections. The network infrastructure provides the medium through which communication takes place. The move from electronic commerce to mobile commerce necessitates the use of wireless networks to support the mobility of mobile devices. Wireless local-area networks (WLANs) and wireless cellular networks are the two major wireless networks technologies used in mobile commerce. WLANs are well suited for office and home networks as well as personal area networks and ad hoc networks. The wireless environment can be made up of mobile devices and an access point that acts as a router. The article explains that in a one-hop WLAN environment, the mobile stations connect directly to the access point through radio waves. The Access point relays data packets from the transmitter device to the receiver device. The mobile devices can communicate amongst themselves without an access point in what is referred to as a wireless adhoc network. We will write a custom Critical Writing on Mobile Commerce Technology specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More In addition to the WLAN products available in the market, Bluetooth technology can also be used for wireless communication although this technology has a very limited coverage range and throughput, which makes it only useful in personal area networks. The most popular wireless networks currently use industry standards such as the IEEE 802.11b. However, standards with much higher transmission speeds such as the IEEE 802.11g are predicted to replace this popular standard in the near future. Cellular system users can make use of their cellular phones for mobile commerce. The phone connects to the nearest base station and the requests are forwarded to a fixed network. The authors advance that while cellular systems were originally designed for voice-only communication; they have evolved from analog to digital and are capable of transmitting data packets, which makes them usable for mobile commerce. The standards used by most cellular networks are 2g and 2.5G although it is predicted that 3G systems will dominate future wireless cellular services. The article states that CDMA (WCDMA) and CDMA2000 are the two main Wideband standards for 3G The host computer acts upon the user requests by processing and storing the information for mobile commerce applications. This component has three major parts; a web server, database server, and application programs and support software. The host computer is unaware of the nature of the client and it provides the same kind of response for mobile devices and personal computers. The mobile commerce application programs have to structure the information in a format that is usable for the mobile station. The article then sets out to discuss future trends in mobile commerce technology. It begins by noting that 26% of the 50million wireless phone users in the US used their devices to take part in some mobile commerce activity in the year 2006. Mobile commerce has risen to prominence because of its effectiveness and convenience. The user can engage in commerce at anytime and from any place. The potential for mobile commerce has led many companies to start offering mobile commerce options to their customers. Majority of the big US companies plan to implement mobile solutions in future. The article reveals that security will play a major role in the future of mobile commerce. Potential customers will be wary of using mobile commerce systems that do not guaranty security of information and exchange over the mobile network. Security issues encompass the entire mobile commerce system. The article discusses the WAP security system, which is provided through the WTLS protocol. This system ensures data integrity and guarantees privacy in the system through data encryption. However, the system has a loophole since the encrypted messages appear as clear text on the WAP gateway during processing. This problem can be solved by having the WAP gateway reside on a server network with major security mechanisms implemented on it. Not sure if you can write a paper on Mobile Commerce Technology by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The authors state that the Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) protocol is used to provide security in the IEEE 802.11 standard. In this security protocol, each mobile host has a private key shared with the base station. An encryption algorithm based on RC4 is used to generate the ciphertext in the encryption process. However, this method is not very secure since there are methods of breaking the approach. Future systems need to employ standards that provide better security. Payment presents another challenge in mobile commerce since there is not global standard. The Secure Electronic Transaction (SET) protocol currently favored requires processing and memory capacities that are too much for most WAP client devices. A “thin” SET wallet approach is proposed for future systems since it will have less processing and memory demands therefore making it usable by all WAP client devices. The paper concludes by reasserting that wireless and mobile networks have extended electronic commerce. Critique The article sets out to provide an informative discussion on mobile commerce technology. Considering the space limitations of the paper, it does a good job of explaining the multiple components of a mobile commerce system. The article is able to provide a brief yet informative enough description of the components of a mobile commerce system therefore providing adequate background information for a person who is not familiar with the components. The authors are able to prioritize on the components that are most important for a mobile commerce system and provide more information on the same for the reader. The article makes use of graphical figures that are very important in enhancing understanding on the topic. The authors make use of a lot of expert opinion on the subject. This increases the credibility of the statements and arguments made in the article. The reader can therefore have confidence in the material presented in the article since reliable experts in the field of mobile application technology are referenced all through the paper. However, the article introduces too many technical issues that a person who is not conversant with computing technology cannot understand. Without background information on concepts such as IEEE standards, Wideband systems, Access points, and encryption algorithms, the non-technical reader will not have a good understand of what is being discussed. While the authors attempt to take care of this by providing a definition of key terms at the end of the paper, the descriptions still introduced other terms that the layperson will not be familiar with. In overall, the article is well written and very informative. A person gains significant knowledge concerning mobile commerce technology from reading the article. Reference Chung-wei, L., Wen-Chen, H.,

HIST 1101 SMC Washington Relentless Pursuit of Their Runaway Slave Ona Judge Report

best assignment help HIST 1101 SMC Washington Relentless Pursuit of Their Runaway Slave Ona Judge Report.

The book that you will be reviewing: Never Caught: The Washingtons’ Relentless Pursuit of Their Runaway Slave Ona Judge (2017) In order to write a good review, think carefully about the book. Since reviews are to be no more than 1600 words long, take pains to organize and present thoughts with precision, clarity, and conciseness. Instead of starting off the paper with a title, begin with the author, title, and facts of publication for the book under review using standard bibliographical form, for example:J. Benjamin. A Student’s Guide to History. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2013. Answers to the following seven sections must form the substance of the review. Answer each of them in the order given, each with a separate paragraph or series of paragraphs.1. What is the author’s purpose in writing the book? (Use verbs such as “seeks,” “wishes,” “desires,” “wants”) 2. What is the book’s thesis? (Use verbs such as “argues,” “contends,” “asserts”) 3. How does the author organize material? What is the logic behind the topics of the chapters, and how do the chapters go together to form the book? There is almost always a fit between the thesis of a book and the logic of the book’s organization. Each points to the other. Thus, if in doubt about the thesis, pay attention to the organizational logic. In the review, include an explicit statement about the fit between the book’s organization and its thesis. This section can also include a brief summary of the book, but make sure that the summary is tied to the issue of organization. 4. To what subfield of history (such as social, political, economic, foreign relations, or cultural and intellectual history) does the book belong? How so? Does the book fit into a particular school of history? How so? Does the author discuss employing or being guided by any notable methodologies (particular ways of studying history, such as quantitative history) or academic theories (particular ways of thinking, such as feminist or postmodern theories), and, if so, which ones? If the author does not discuss methodology or theory, note their absence. 5. What primary sources (sources created during the time of the book’s subject) does the author use to develop the thesis of the book, and why does the author use these particular sources? Do not give just a list of sources; discuss types of sources used and the reasons for relying on certain kinds of sources. Include an explicit statement about the book’s most significant primary sources in light of the author’s thesis. What are the most important secondary sources (sources created after the time of the book’s subject) for the author? Why? 6. Does the author discuss the historiography (the past writing and arguments by historians) of his or her book’s subject matter? If yes, how so? If no, note its absence. How is the book similar to or different from the textbook? Beyond adding more detail, how does the book fit in with the issues raised and discussed in the course reading? In particular, does the book add a different perspective? How so? Does anything discussed in the book connect to an issue in present-day America? 7. How well does the author accomplish the purpose? This section provides an opportunity to make an original, critical evaluation of the book. Address the issues of what is well done, poorly done, and originally done. What are the book’s overall strengths and weaknesses? Are the author’s arguments and uses of evidence, in particular, clear or unclear, strong or weak, convincing or unconvincing? Should a reader agree or disagree with the author’s thesis and conclusions? If a reader is curious about the book’s subject, should he or she choose this particular book?Writing Guide For the basic formatting of the paper, look at the sample review in J. Benjamin’s A Student’s Guide to History.Do not print the numbers and questions from the instructions in the paper itself; have the final draft’s format look like an essay.Number the pages of your paper and use parenthetical citations to make reference to the book’s page numbers, such as (Benjamin, 23-24).Turn in a printed copy of the paper (no electronic versions accepted).Print the paper on single-sided pages with black ink. Double-space the text.Do not skip a line between paragraphs. No title page or report cover is necessary for a short paper.Write in complete sentences; avoid sentence fragments. Avoid the first- or second-person point of view; write instead in the third person. Write in the present tense when referring to a book’s author (“Benjamin describes the various forms of evidence”) and write in the past tense when referring to past events (“The candidate traveled thousands of miles during the campaign”).Write in the active voice rather than the passive voice.Avoid using contractions in a formal paper.With abbreviations, use the full name for the first reference (such as, Federal Bureau of Investigation) and abbreviations for subsequent references (FBI).But use “US” (meaning United States) only as an adjective and not as a noun.When referring to a person’s name, use the first and last name for the first reference and the surname for subsequent references.Use two hyphens–with no spaces before or after–to form a dash.The past tense of “to lead” is “led.”Put a space between the two words in “a lot.”The book under review is nonfiction; therefore, it is not a novel.Avoid dropped quotations: quotations without reference to a speaker or a writer.Avoid block quotations in short papers. Block quotations are long quotations separated out from the main text of the paper.In general, try to limit the use of quotations, but be sure to cite any information taken from the book. The following are guides that can be useful for further reference: Diana Hacker, The Bedford Handbook; Kate L. Turabian, A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations; William Strunk, Jr., and E. B. White, The Elements of Style. All three are available in the campus library. “The Fumblerules of Grammar”by William Safire, 1978 Avoid run-on sentences they are hard to read. Don’t use no double negatives.Use the semicolon properly, always use it where it is appropriate; and never where it isn’t.Reserve the apostrophe for it’s proper use and omit it when its not needed.Do not put statements in the negative form.Verbs has to agree with their subjects.No sentence fragments.Proofread carefully to see if you any words out.Avoid commas, that are not necessary.If you reread your work, you will find on rereading that a great deal of repetition can be avoided by rereading and editing.A writer must not shift your point of view.Eschew dialect, irregardless.And don’t start a sentence with a conjunction.Don’t overuse exclamation marks!!!Place pronouns as close as possible, especially in long sentences, as of 10 or more words, to their antecedents.Hyphenate between sy-llables and avoid un-necessary hyphens.Write all adverbial forms correct.Don’t use contractions in formal writing.Writing carefully, dangling participles must be avoided.It is incumbent on us to avoid archaisms.If any word is improper at the end of a sentence, a linking verb is.Steer clear of incorrect forms of verbs that have snuck in the language.Take the bull by the hand and avoid mixed metaphors.Avoid trendy locutions that sound flaky.Never, ever use repetitive redundancies.Everyone should be careful to use a singular pronoun with singular nouns in their writing.If I’ve told you once, I’ve told you a thousand times, resist hyperbole.Also, avoid awkward or affected alliteration.Don’t string too many prepositional phrases together unless you are walking through the valley of the shadow of death.Always pick on the correct idiom.”Avoid overuse of ‘quotation “marks.”‘”The adverb always follows the verb.Last but not least, avoid clichés like the plague; seek viable alternatives.The review itself should be no longer than a total of 1600 words and, instead of a title for the paper, I want you to start with the bibliographic information for the book you are reviewing:Author. Title. City: Publisher, Year.(On the Canvas page, I use a reference book as an example.) The body of the review should reflect the seven numbered questions on the instructions. I want you to write a paragraph for each number, so the finished paper should have at least seven paragraphs. The paragraph do not have to be all the same size, and if you need more than one paragraph to answer a particular section, that is fine. Start the review by answering the first question: What is the author’s purpose in writing the book? This question asks you to describe the motivation the author has for writing the book, so your answer should use tentative verbs (the author seeks, desires, wishes, and so on). Oftentimes, authors explain their purposes in an introduction or preface to a book. Perhaps the author felt unsatisfied with books written by other authors or felt that historians had neglected a particular subject. The second question asks: What is the book’s thesis? A thesis is the main idea or argument of a book, so in describing the thesis, you are describing what the author wants readers to take away from reading the book. This question is related to the author’s purpose. (Sometimes I describe the first two questions as two sides of the same coin.) But the thesis is more solid and emphatic compared to the purpose. Use more assertive verbs (the author argues, contends, asserts). Answers to the first two questions can each be brief as they are closely connected. A great way to get started is to sit down, give yourself ten or fifteen minutes, and see what you come up with. Getting effective answers down for the first two questions will make the rest of the review easier, because much of the rest of the paper is dedicated to aspects of the book that aid the author in making the book’s thesis convincing to the reader. Question three relates to this goal by asking you to describe how the author has organized the book. Does the author use chapters or parts or sections or some other way? History books often have a chronological order, but not always: some books have a more thematic organization. Eric Foner organizes Give Me Liberty! mostly along a chronology but some of the time periods of the different chapters overlap as a chapter may focus on a particular topic, like the economy or foreign relations. This part of the review also can include a summary of the book’s chapters, but don’t go into great detail. Use this more as illustration by describing the topics of the chapters. The fourth question can be a bit tricky as some students may not have had to answer this type of question before. Start with a description of what subfield of American history the book fits into; think of the subfields as shelves in a library: here is the shelf for books on the history of politics, and here is the shelf for books on the history of the economy. Other subfields are social history (history of society including demographic groups in society); history of culture and ideas (this would be especially for the history of books, art, movies, music, and so on); and the history of foreign relations (meaning connections the United States has with other nations in the world. The topics of some books can fit into more than one subfield, the history of immigration, for example. That is ok, just describe why the book you are reviewing fits into a particular shelf or shelves. The other part of the fourth question asks about schools of history, methodology, and academic theory. These are all somewhat similar. An author might identify with a certain cohort or tradition of other historians, might use a particular approach in studying a topic, or may be inspired by particular ideas of how to interpret the world. What I want you to do for this part of question four is to look in your book to see if the author brings up a school of history, a methodology, or an academic theory, and then I want you to describe what the author says. If the author of your book does not mention these topics at all (and some authors won’t), that’s ok. Just write that the author does not write about these topics. Question five is about sources, the types of evidence for a historian. Primary sources are those from the time period of the book’s subject. So if the subject of the book is the era of Reconstruction, primary sources would be those created in the 1860s and 1870s. Just about anything can be a source, but typically, primary sources are newspaper articles, government documents, letters and diaries, and so on. Secondary sources are those created after the time period of the book’s subject. These are usually books and articles written by historians years, decades, or even centuries later. To answer question five, I want you to describe what the most important, the most critical, primary and secondary sources are for your book’s author. Your book may have page after page of sources listed, so you don’t have space to discuss them all. Focus on sources that the author especially relies upon (perhaps again and again) or sources that the author uses for the most critical parts of the book insofar as the part helps advance the book’s thesis. Question six starts off with historiography. To use the Reconstruction example again, if we somehow brought together in one library all of the books and articles historians have written about Reconstruction since it ended, that would collectively be the historiography of Reconstruction. And if we organized those books and article based on when they were published, we might see that historians in different eras had different ideas about how to understand Reconstruction. A book published in 1900 might interpret Reconstruction differently than a book published in 1950 or 2000 would. So in answering this question, I want you to describe what your book’s author says about the subject matter’s historiography, the arguments and opinions of earlier historians. If your book’s author does not bring up earlier historians, then write that the author doesn’t discuss historiography. Next is to compare your book with the textbooks. Your book will most likely have more detail and more information about the subject matter than the textbooks do, because the textbooks cover a long period of time. So focus on the big picture: is the discussion of your book’s subject matter in the textbooks similar to how your book’s author discusses the subject matter or is it different, and how so? Finally, you can include discussion as to how, if at all, the book’s subject matter fits into the discussion of any present-day issues. The last part of the book review is question seven, and it differs from the earlier questions. In answering the earlier questions, you were describing what the author did. You were almost like an interviewer asking the author: why did you write this book?; what is the book’s main argument?; how did you organize the book?; and so on. Question seven is when you finally bring out your own opinion as to how well, or not so well, the author did in writing the book. Give yourself plenty of room to answer question seven, because it is what the whole paper has been building up to: when you present your evaluation of the book. If your paper is running long, cut back an earlier section (question three is usually the easiest to cut), but never cut your answer to question seven. Instead explain everything you think is effective in the book and everything you think is not effective.
HIST 1101 SMC Washington Relentless Pursuit of Their Runaway Slave Ona Judge Report

University of Bristol Themes and Aims of the Exhibition of Uri Dotan Discussion

University of Bristol Themes and Aims of the Exhibition of Uri Dotan Discussion.

I’m working on a art question and need a sample draft to help me understand better.

Should be 750 words long. 150 word abstract. 900 words total. Make sure its a review on a virtual online art exhibition.You should write a review targeted at a specific readership (art magazine, broadsheet press, scholarly journal). Your review will need to be headed by a c.150-word abstract (not included in wordcount) that sets out your argument, intellectual rationale, and specifies audience (national newspaper, art magazine, scholarly journal). Explain why you have written for this audience.The review should include discussion of the following elements:theme(s) and aims of the exhibition;overall narrative or argument of the exhibition (if there is one)up to three objects or a grouping of your choice that illustrates your thesis;design of exhibition environment and presentation of the works in it (e.g. display, sequence, lighting, densiity of material);intellectual impact of the exhibition on the theme(s) it addressesaudience(s) for the exhibition and how they are addressed It is up to you decide what you will argue, but as a critical piece of writing it must do more than simply describe the exhibition. You will receive a full briefing and a chance to work through an example exhibition in your workshop. It is recommended that you discuss which exhibition you’d like to review with your workshop leader before you begin writing it.
FormatReviews should be double spaced on a word processing programme. References, if appropriate, should appear as short footnotes for scholarly journal reviews, or short paranthetical citations for newspapers and art magazines (see examples in Week 2). You may include up to 3 illustrations. The review should be uploaded to Blackboard through the usual submission point by the deadline.
University of Bristol Themes and Aims of the Exhibition of Uri Dotan Discussion

Complete Strategies Discussion Post

Complete Strategies Discussion Post.

Thinking StrategicallyPlease respond to EACH of the following discussion topics and submit them to the discussion forum as a single post. Your initial post should be 75-150 words in length. In the strategic thinking article we read this week, the author gives multiple examples of strategic thinking. Describe an incident in your life when you used strategic thinking. Did it work? Be sure you reference the reading at least once and properly cite your sources.Strategic ThinkingRead these article on Strategic Thinking:Strategic Thinking:http://www.changemakingsystems.com/strategic_think…Sun Tzu and the art of strategic thinking:http://ezinearticles.com/?Strategic-Thinking-From-…
Complete Strategies Discussion Post