Get help from the best in academic writing.

HRDV 5630 WU Management As a Major Aspect of Individuals & Organizations Report

HRDV 5630 WU Management As a Major Aspect of Individuals & Organizations Report.

I’m working on a management writing question and need a sample draft to help me study.

Indicate how the project would help the organization address its problems and improve the future.Describe five major lessons learned from the project that will be useful in your personal, professional, or educational endeavors along with a brief rationale for each choice.Summarize the major points of your final project. Explain why these points were the most influential of your report. There will be more guidance for this but I wanted to bring it to your attention so that we have enough time and is not late. I will attach all the previous examples that you have helped me with.
HRDV 5630 WU Management As a Major Aspect of Individuals & Organizations Report

Southern New Hampshire University Lueders Medical Clinic Financial Ratio Analysis.

I’m working on a writing project and need an explanation to help me understand better.

ScenarioYou work for Healing Thyme Hospital. The hospital’s board of directors is looking to purchase Lueders Medical Clinic, a local medical practice, and has asked you to provide them with insights on how the clinic is performing financially. You will need to analyze the clinic’s performance and recommend whether purchasing the clinic is a good investment.DirectionsThe board of directors for the hospital has asked you to complete the financial analysis workbook and then write a brief that interprets your calculations and evaluates the clinic’s business performance. You will send your financial analysis to the board of directors to support your recommendation on whether the hospital should purchase the clinic.Financial Analysis WorkbookFirst, read the Lueders Medical Clinic 2017–2018 Financial Statements, which is linked in the Supporting Materials section. Then, perform the financial analysis of the clinic using the Financial Analysis Workbook Excel spreadsheet, which is also linked in the What to Submit section. This way, you can apply the ratios and vertical and horizontal analyses to the clinic’s annual financials.The board will review your report to verify that you:Use the base amounts from the financial statements to perform the vertical analysisCalculate the ratios accurately using the formulas provided in the workbookValidate the accuracy of the ratios by showing the calculations and using the appropriate unitsAs you complete each section, it may be helpful to take notes about what you learn. Then, you can use your notes to evaluate the business’s financial status and write your brief to the board of directors.Brief to the Board of DirectorsOnce you have completed your financial analysis, interpret the ratios and vertical and horizontal analyses to evaluate the business performance of Lueders Medical Clinic.In your brief, make sure to refer to your financial analysis workbook. It is important that you explain what each ratio tells you about the clinic’s performance. Then, recommend whether it is a good investment for the hospital to purchase the clinic. Use your financial analysis workbook to explain your decision.Specifically, address the following in your brief: Examine the clinic’s financial performance.How does the clinic’s financial performance compare against industry averages and past performance?What are the strengths and weaknesses of the clinic’s financial performance?Recommend appropriate actions using your financial analysis as support.Is purchasing the clinic is a good or bad investment?What are some potential areas of improvement?What to SubmitFor this project, you must submit the following:Financial Analysis WorkbookDownload and complete the Financial Analysis Workbook Excel spreadsheet with two worksheets. Use the first worksheet to perform the horizontal and vertical analyses. Use the second worksheet to perform the ratio analysis. Refer to the Lueders Clinic 2017–2018 Financial Statements to calculate each ratio. Your workbook must include two completed worksheets (Horizontal and Vertical Analysis and Ratio Analysis). It should be presentable and annotated for your audience.Brief to the Board of DirectorsYour brief to the hospital’s board of directors should be 250–500 words or about 1–2 pages in length. Cite your sources appropriately
Southern New Hampshire University Lueders Medical Clinic Financial Ratio Analysis

SOC 333 Ashford University Wk 3 Value of A Qualitative Research Paper Essay.

Note: The instructor does not accept direct quotes, please summarize or
paraphrase material to respond to questions. Please use the following APA
examples when citing material- (Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D., 2018)
or (House et al., 1988). I have provided the course material (chapter 9) but additional research of scholarly articles is required. For additional research, please provide reference so I can locate information. If you have trouble with the links, please notify me.Refrrence for chapter 9Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Retrieved from https://content.ashford.eduWeek 3 – AssignmentDue Oct 26 by 11:59pm Points 25 Submitting an external toolUnderstanding the Value of Qualitative Research[WLOs: 3] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6]Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read Chapter 9: Qualitative Methods, watch the Week 3 Assignment video,and read the following resources on Dr. Loïc Wacquant’s research:“Habitus as Topic and Tool: Reflections on Becoming a Prizefighter”“A Fleshpeddler at Work: Power, Pain, and Profit in the Prizefighting Economy”“Whores, Slaves, and Stallions: Languages of Exploitation and Accommodation Among Professional Boxers”“UC’s ‘boxing sociologist’ / Combative French Professor Spent 3 Years in Ring (Links to an external site.)”A Professor Who Refuses To Pull His Punches (Links to an external site.)Boxing Proves a Hit for French Sociologist (Links to an external site.)An important part of analyzing research approaches includes understanding the positive and negative aspects of varied forms of social research. Ethnography as an approach allows a researcher to immerse in a unique social world in order to experience the lives of those who live there. The most intriguing aspects of this type of qualitative research is how the researcher maintains an ethical and neutral stance, how the experience can impact them, and how they use the experience for positive social change.In your paper, you will present the benefits of ethnographical research in terms of understanding a unique social world, as well as understanding the qualitative researcher’s role in performing and reporting on ethnographic research. You will do this through the resources provided, your own research of immersive ethnographical approaches, and also through critiquing Dr. Loïc Wacquant’s work.In your paper, include the following sections/components:Role of Researcher (One to two pages)Explain the researcher’s role in qualitative research in general and specifically in an ethnographic approach.Discuss the unique issues that researchers should be concerned about in qualitative research.Explain the challenges researchers face in ethnographical research.Discuss specific actions researchers can take to ensure they retain their ethical and neutral stance in performing qualitative research and reporting their qualitative research results.Loïc Wacquant’s Research (One to two pages)Summarize what Loïc Wacquant’s research was about.Determine whether or not Wacquant maintained an ethical and neutral stance.Justify the research approach Wacquant chose to take.Explain whether or not this could have been possible with a quantitative research study.Impact of Research (One page)Discuss how qualitative research and, in particular, ethnographic research, can inform our understanding of unique social worlds.Describe the potential impact of research in supporting positive social change through public policy.The Value of Qualitative Research paperMust be five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.)Must include a separate title page with the following:Title of paperStudent’s nameCourse name and numberInstructor’s nameDate submittedFor further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.).Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice (Links to an external site.) resource for additional guidance.Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions (Links to an external site.) as well as Writing a Thesis Statement (Links to an external site.), refer to the Ashford Writing Center resources.Must use at least two scholarly sources in addition to the course text.The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.Must document any information used from sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.)Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. See the Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications.Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
SOC 333 Ashford University Wk 3 Value of A Qualitative Research Paper Essay

Nike case study

Nike case study.

For this assignment, review the Nike case study, located at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5uYCWVfuPQ.
Youtube : Nike Sweatshops: Behind the Swoosh.
Once you have viewed the case scenario, respond to the following questions, with thorough explanations and wellsupported
rationale.
1. These workers state the “only thing they have is their work”. This statement suggests that without this work, they
would have a lower standard of living. Should we inflict western values on this society? Bring in the concepts of social
responsibility, integrity and other business ethics practices.
2. From Nike’s standpoint, is this a fair assessment of their ethical standards? Explain the some of the ethical issues
that Nike is facing in the case.
3. Explain what Nike has done to improve this situation since this 2011 video. Include the use of codes of ethics and
other ethical standards implemented within the organization.
4. Is your opinion of Nike any different now after viewing this video? Would this change your buying behavior with respect
to Nike products?
Your response should be a minimum of two double-spaced pages. References should include one credible source
Nike case study

Health Psychology

write my term paper Health Psychology.

Mortality Report: Figure 1.1 (page 4) in your text lists the ten leading causes of death for 1900 and 2013. I have linked the table here for those of you who may not have received your textbook: mortality table More recent data is available on the Web. Locate the more recent national data and compare it to the 1900 and 2013 data. Then locate the data for your county of residence from your state health department. (If you cannot locate the county data just use your state data).If you do not live in any of the states listed below, search the web for your state health department, it should have a link for mortality data by county. NVSS – Mortality Data from the National Vital Statistics System (Links to an external site.)http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/deaths.htm Alabama Department of Public Health Statistics (Links to an external site.) http://www.adph.org/healthstats/ Florida Major Causes of Death by County (Links to an external site.)http://www.floridacharts.com/charts/SpecReport.asp…This is a nice tool you can use for any state, make sure you click “all ages” and it will sort the causes:http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/georgia-cause-of-death-by-age-and-gender (Links to an external site.)Write a brief report of your findings. Your report should contain the latest national data compared to your text and your county or state data compared to the national data.
Health Psychology

Accounting standards Setting Approach: principles-based vs rules based

Accounting standards Setting Approach: principles-based vs rules based. Rules-based accounting is generally a list of detailed rules that must be followed when preparing financial statements. Principle based standards derive from a conceptual framework that provides for broad ‘principles’ to be adopted within standards and also requires professional and managerial judgment in relevance to particular transactions and events. US secretary Heary Paulson had once said “We must rise above the rule based mindset that asks Is it legal?, and adopt a more principle based approach that asks Is this right?”. This essay discusses the principle based approach and rules based approach for accounting and critically examine the more appropriate standard of accounting. According to Bennet et al (2006) the difference between rules-based and principles-based standards is not clear and is subject to a variety of interpretations. But there is a generally held outlook that the FASB’s standards are rules-based and the IASB’s standards are principles-based. The commencement for the current principles versus rules debate is sited in section 108 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was a result to the failure of Enron and the blow to the capital market system that Enron induced. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 instructed SEC (The Securities and Exchange Commission) to carry out an investigation into the implementation by the United States financial reporting system of a Principles-based Accounting System. The preliminary effect of Enron was primarily that things have to change (ICAS 2006). Immediately prior to the fall down of Enron the Chairman of FASB was not sure that accounting principles or rules were achieving the required goals. Schipper (2003) points out that the U.S. rules are frequently based on principles. The standard setters use principles in order to create the rules for the preparers of financial statements. According to Nelson (2003) cited in Nobes (2005) said that a particular standard should be seen as rules-based standard. He also add that rules can increase the correctness with which standard setters communicate their requirements and can reduce the sort of vagueness that leads to forceful reporting choices by management. According to Schipper (2003) and Nelson (2003) cited in Nobes (2005) say that rules standards has some potential advantages. Those identified by them include: · increased comparability, · increased verifiability for auditors and regulators · reduced opportunities for earnings management through judgements, and · improved communication of standard setters’ intentions. Many accountants favour the outlook of using rules-based standards, because if there are no rules then the accountants could be brought to court of law if their judgments of the financial statements were wrong. But when there are strict rules that have to be followed, then the possibility of lawsuits is reduced. Rules-based standards include important and specific rules to meet as many potential contingencies as possible. Principles-based accounting such as generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) is used as a theoretical or conceptual basis for the accountants. A simple set of key objectives are set out to enable the companies to build a good report. The following section includes the discussion on the rules based standards and principle standards. Professional judgment, Enforceability, Comparability, Complexity, Creative accounting and Economic reality are used as the indicators of the discussion (ICAS, 2006). Views on professional judgement are separated into those who consider that rules strangle judgement and those who believe that rules act as a check on creative judgment. Professionals themselves prefer the defensive comfort of a rules-based system and are uncomfortable with the probable exposure from exercising judgement based on principles. Enforceability is an argument which has been set forward to support rules-based standards. It is said that rules offer a clear statement for regulators and for those who focus on regulation. The criticism is that rules-based standards do not prevent dishonest practice. Manipulated fulfilment with rules makes auditing more complicated because mangers can justify their manipulation as fulfilment. Comparability is a difficult notion because it covers a range of different meanings. Those supporting rules-based standards argue that they do provide comparability but in some other cases this comparability gets equated with uniformity. Those who oppose rules based standard argue that they detract from true comparability because they force dissimilar situations into similar treatments. One of the strong arguments against rules-based standards is that they cause complexity and overload and which causes delay in the process of responding to changing situations. Supporters argue that rules-based standards respond to difficulties by setting a obvious pathway for dealing with complex dealings. According to Kivi et al. (2004) cited in ICAS (2006) if investors find it difficult to know the financial information in the financial statements this is not due to the complexity of rules-based standards but to the complexity of the business models which operating in the market. The presence of creative accounting has been raised to indicate the limitations of rules-based standards because instances can be cited of professionals using the wording of the rules to produce a required solution. The ‘roadmap to avoidance’ is seen as a outcome of rules-based accounting but well-written rules can reduce the opportunities for flexible explanation of principles that could lead to creative accounting with the help of earnings management. According to Benston et al (2006) this happened in the case of Enron and as a result of the misleading accounting procedures exposed in the investigations of Enron’s failure, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 included a provision, Section 108(d). Representing economic reality is seen as a advantageous aim of financial reporting but there are divisions of outlook. It could be argued that principles allow demonstration of the ‘bigger picture’ but it could also be argued that in many cases the existing rules based standards have led to loyal demonstration of economic reality in a reliable approach. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) felt that rules-based standards were too long and complex. Other critics of rules-based standards have pointed out that rules can turn out to be ineffective and, worse yet, dysfunctional when the economic environment changes or as managers produce new transactions around them (Kershaw, 2005 cited in Benston et al (2006)). Principle based accounting standard is better than rules based approach as: It is simpler than rules-based standards Supply broad guidelines that can be useful for many situations Broad guidelines may get enhance the representational truthfulness of financial statements Allow accountants to use professional judgments Principles make structuring transactions in a particular manner more difficult to justify After the debacle of Enron using rules based standards the enthusiasm of principle based standard approach emerged from different quarters. In 2002, FASB gave a report that “in accounting standards developed under a principles-based approach, the principles reflecting the fundamental recognition, measurement and reporting requirements of the standards would continue to be developed using the conceptual framework. The main differences between accounting standards developed under a principles-based approach and existing accounting standards are (1) the principles would apply more broadly than under existing standards, thereby providing few, if any, exceptions to the principles and (2) there would be less interpretive and implementation guidance (from all sources, not just the FASB) for applying the standards”. According to SEC Chief Accountant Herdman an ideal accounting standard is one that is principle-based and requires financial reporting to replicate the economic essence and not the form of the matter. The European Commission has strongly promoted the use of strategy based on a principles-based approach to financial reporting which is designed to reflect economic reality and therefore giving a true and fair view of the financial position and performance of a company. Principle based approach will help protect the long term interests of the investors and other stakeholders and will help the director of the companies to make a professional judgement in selecting and applying the most suitable accounting policies. Most of the sections of my essay are based on the survey reported by Mike Ng a senior accountant with Enron Credit Corporation. In 2004 he reported that evidence did not support the adoption of principle based standards but the evidence that was presented shows the problems of collecting opinions by using survey methods. The responses were sometimes fully dependent on the nature of the question asked. When asked whether companies could apply and interpret rules-based accounting standards in a way that does not properly reflect the economic substance of the transaction, 93% of respondents agreed to it. However when they were asked whether general principles would produce better results in forcing companies to report the economic substance of a transaction, 80% disagreed. Only 13% of the companies believed that principles would achieve a better result than rules. The critics of a principles-based approach argue that financial statements would likely lose their comparability and steadiness across industries and issues regarding income measurement and recognition would always remain divisive. Nobes (2005) argues that rules are based on the principles. Rules exists because the standards are based on the lack of principle because of which the rules are needed and if the principle were more appropriate than the need of rules would be less. Benston et al (2006) consider two shortcomings of the SEC proposed principles-based (objectives-based) standards. The standards are dependent on the contents of what the standards regulate. The more judgement an accounting principle requires, the more difficult it is to draw up a standard without direction. A true and fair is a necessary requirement for any type of standard that is more than ‘principles-only’ to tackle with the inconsistencies between principles and regulation in order to sustain the main objectives of financial statement. CONVERGENCE, COMPARABILITY, CONSISTENCY AND CULTURE: This section covers convergence, comparability, consistency and culture as four issues that infuse any debate on ‘principles versus rules’ (ICAS 2006). Convergence, consistency and comparability all lay on different ranges of meaning. The focus on convergence has its implications for establishing adequate principles as a source for setting converged accounting standards. According to Andrew Bailey, the deputy chief accountant of SEC said that Principles based standards will only work if everyone is loyal to understand the objectives of the principle standards, rather than using the language of the standards themselves to structure around the requirement. This change will require a cultural shift. According to the Commissioner Cynthia Glassman of SEC the principles are not so broad that they fail to provide enough direction to those who prepare and audit financial statements. He said that the principles must be suitably well defined so that they can be applied in a manner that will allow a sense of comparability across companies. FASB emphasizes that a principles-based approach to standard setting would need changes in the processes and behaviours of all participants in the US financial accounting and reporting process, if adopted by them and not just by the FASB and other standard-setting bodies. Thus, in order for that principle standard approach to work, all participants must be equally committed to make the necessary changes. The purpose of this review of is to provide background which is relevant to the work of the ICAS Principles versus Rules standard approach. The debate mainly started after the failure of Enron Credit Corporation when Sarbanes-Oxley Act section (108) cited this problem of rules based standards versus the principle based standards. The review does not provide a definitive conclusion to the question. I agree with the analysis and support the move towards principles-based standards suggested by the SEC that principle based standards are appropriate than the rules based standards. Principle based standards are simple than the rules based standards and allows professional judgement for the accountants. But Benston et al (2006) believes that the more judgement an accounting principle requires, the more difficult it is to draw up a standard without direction. According to Bennet et al(2006) rules are based on principles. Schipper (2003) and Nelson (2003) also points out the advantages of the rules based standard accounting. In ICAS (2006) it states that convergence, comparability, consistency and culture are the four issues that infuse the debate of rules based and principle based standards. SEC and FASB also agree to the four issues and state that all participants must be committed to work in the same direction. Both rules and principle based accounting standards have their own advantages and disadvantages but principle based standards are clearly more appropriate and have the backing of the boards from different countries than the rules based accounting standards. Accounting standards Setting Approach: principles-based vs rules based

West Los Angeles College Additional Properties of Real Numbers Paper

West Los Angeles College Additional Properties of Real Numbers Paper.

(1) Identity for addition(2) Identity for subtraction(3) Identity for multiplication(4) Identity for division(5) Zero property in addition(6) Zero property in subtraction(7) Zero prop. in multiplication(8) Zero property in division(9) Property of opposites10) Property of reciprocals(11) Rounding(12) Inequalities(13) Absolute value(14) Interval notation(15) Not listed2. Justify the statement (−19)+19=0 (1) Identity for addition(2) Identity for subtraction(3) Identity for multiplication(4) Identity for division(5) Zero property in addition(6) Zero property in subtraction(7) Zero prop. in multiplication(8) Zero property in division(9) Property of opposites10) Property of reciprocals(11) Rounding(12) Inequalities(13) Absolute value(14) Interval notation(15) Not listedJustify the statement − 1 7(−-54)+ 1 7(−-54)=0(1) Identity for addition(2) Identity for subtraction(3) Identity for multiplication(4) Identity for division(5) Zero property in addition(6) Zero property in subtraction(7) Zero prop. in multiplication(8) Zero property in division(9) Property of opposites10) Property of reciprocals(11) Rounding(12) Inequalities(13) Absolute value(14) Interval notation(15) Not listedJustify the statement 0 −20=20− 0(1) Identity for addition(2) Identity for subtraction(3) Identity for multiplication(4) Identity for division(5) Zero property in addition(6) Zero property in subtraction(7) Zero prop. in multiplication(8) Zero property in division(9) Property of opposites10) Property of reciprocals(11) Rounding(12) Inequalities(13) Absolute value(14) Interval notation(15) Not listed, incorrect.Justify the statement −79+ 0 = −79(1) Identity for addition(2) Identity for subtraction(3) Identity for multiplication(4) Identity for division(5) Zero property in addition(6) Zero property in subtraction(7) Zero prop. in multiplication(8) Zero property in division(9) Property of opposites10) Property of reciprocals(11) Rounding(12) Inequalities(13) Absolute value(14) Interval notation(15) Not listed, incorrect.Justify the statement ( 1 17 ) ⋅ 0 = 0 ⋅ ( 1 29 ) (1) Identity for addition(2) Identity for subtraction(3) Identity for multiplication(4) Identity for division(5) Zero property in addition(6) Zero property in subtraction(7) Zero prop. in multiplication(8) Zero property in division(9) Property of opposites10) Property of reciprocals(11) Rounding(12) Inequalities(13) Absolute value(14) Interval notation(15) Not listedIf ( 1 a ) ⋅ 0 = 0 ⋅ ( 1 b ) then a = b. True or false? Why?(1) True because the two sides of an equation must be equal.(2) True because the two sides of an equation must be 0. (3) True because the two sides of the equation are 0. (4) False because the two sides of the equation are 0 regardless of whether a = b or not, as long as a ≠ 0 and/or b ≠ 0 Justify the statement 1 ⋅ (5.6 ) = (5.6) ⋅ 1(1) Identity for addition(2) Identity for subtraction(3) Identity for multiplication(4) Identity for division(5) Zero property in addition(6) Zero property in subtraction(7) Zero prop. in multiplication(8) Zero property in division(9) Property of opposites10) Property of reciprocals(11) Rounding(12) Inequalities(13) Absolute value(14) Interval notation(15) Not listedJustify the statement 1 ÷15=15÷ 1(1) Identity for addition(2) Identity for subtraction(3) Identity for multiplication(4) Identity for division(5) Zero property in addition(6) Zero property in subtraction(7) Zero prop. in multiplication(8) Zero property in division(9) Property of opposites10) Property of reciprocals(11) Rounding(12) Inequalities(13) Absolute value(14) Interval notation(15) Not listedEvaluate 0 a where a=84.(1) 0(2) undefined(3) no solution(4) infinityEvaluate a 0 where a=2.(1) 0(2) undefined ( or infinity)(3) no solution(4) 1Justify the statement ( a b ) ( b a )=1 where a=7 and b=71 (1) Identity for addition(2) Identity for subtraction(3) Identity for multiplication(4) Identity for division(5) Zero property in addition(6) Zero property in subtraction(7) Zero prop. in multiplication(8) Zero property in division(9) Property of opposites10) Property of reciprocals(11) Rounding(12) Inequalities(13) Absolute value(14) Interval notation(15) Not listedSubtract the opposite of 37 from the reciprocal of | − 1 | b where b=79Every real number has an opposite.Group of answer choicesTrueFalseEvery real number has a reciprocal.Group of answer choicesTrueFalseAccording to the definition of absolute value | x | = { x if 0 ≤ x − x if x < 0 Explain in your own words why | − 9 | = 9, Refrain from “negative and negative is positive”. Use your calculator to evaluate the quotient of a 2 + b 2and 6.7. Use a=-10.7 and b=2.9.Round to the nearest tenth.Solve | x | = -4(1) x = -4(2) x = −-4(3) x = ±-4(4) x is undefined.Assume a ≤ b and b ≤ 0, Then (1) a ≤ 0(2) a = 0(3) 0 ≤ a(4) 0 < aMr. Baba earns at most $300 per week while Ms. Dede earns less than $200 week . Can Mr. Baba add his salary to Ms. Dede’s to buy a vase that costs $500 and they have no other source of revenue during the week and no additional expenses? (1) Yes because 200+300 = 500(2) Yes because Ms, Dede may only be a penny short, Mr. earns exactly $300, and the sales people want to make a commission.(3) No because Ms. Dede and/or Mr. Baba may be substantially short.(4) The answer is ambiguous. Case (2) and case (3) are possible.A number is rounded to the nearest hundred. After rounding the number is 71,300. What could have been the largest number before rounding?A number is rounded to the nearest hundred. After rounding the number is 31,300. What could have been the smallest number before rounding?
West Los Angeles College Additional Properties of Real Numbers Paper