Get help from the best in academic writing.

How does salvation in Christ shape and affect your life?

Possible topics for discussion are: What is the nature of salvation? How is salvation accomplished? How does the Old Testament sacrificial system point to the person and work of Jesus Christ? What is the doctrine of justification by faith and why is it important? How does salvation in Christ shape and affect your life? You do not need to write on all of these topics – they are merely suggestions for reflection on salvation in Jesus Christ. In your paper, you are welcome to draw from material from the videos or study guides, but make sure to include Scripture. also note the different images of salvation in this section (e.g., redemption, reconciliation, justification, conquest).

Miranda rights: Research case Ragland v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Miranda rights: Research case Ragland v. Commonwealth of Kentucky.

 Step 1 Research a case Ragland v. Commonwealth of Kentucky 191 SW 3rd 569 2006 Through Internet research, locate and select the case and complete the following: Step 2 Write a summary of your findings. With respect to the case Ragland v. Commonwealths of Kentucky 191 SW 3rd 569 2006 please write a paper covering each of the following: The facts of the case The procedural history of the case The question(s) of law before the court The court’s ruling Why you either support or oppose the court’s ruling.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

Human factors errors in Chernobyl.

How does salvation in Christ shape and affect your life? Human factors errors in Chernobyl..

 Description, use three sources provided by me to write an essay talking about the human factors mistakes made in Chernobyl Nuclear accident. Firstly,  dedicate one paragraph to explain what is human factors. Then  use the sources provided by me to talk about what went wrong in the accident of Chernobyl. Basically, You have to first know what human factors(Ergonomics) is pretty well. And you must learn the sources well to write this short paper. The source is basically all the paper on this website. http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~meshkati

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

Dr. Geiger leadership characteristics

Dr. Geiger leadership characteristics.

Description Review the video clip of Dr. Jack Geiger discussing community health centers and share your thoughts. What leadership characteristics do you see in Dr. Geiger? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EErX-gtHdRg Your response must be at least 400 words. You must write in a scholarly voice using APA 6th ed. format.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

Part 1: Chart This chart will formalize principlism and the four-boxes approach by organizing the data from the case study according to the relevant principles of biomedical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.

Part 1: Chart This chart will formalize principlism and the four-boxes approach by organizing the data from the case study according to the relevant principles of biomedical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice..

This assignment will incorporate a common practical tool in helping clinicians begin to ethically analyze a case. Organizing the data in this way will help you apply the four principles of principlism. Based on the “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” and other required topic study materials, you will complete the “Applying the Four Principles: Case Study” document that includes the following:

Part 1: Chart This chart will formalize principlism and the four-boxes approach by organizing the data from the case study according to the relevant principles of biomedical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.

Part 2: Evaluation This part includes questions, to be answered in a total of 500 words, that describe how principalism would be applied according to the Christian worldview. Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials. APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

“Watching TV Makes You Smarter” Journal

“Watching TV Makes You Smarter” Journal.

 In “Watching TV Makes You Smarter” how has modern storytelling expanded itself and in what mediums? (Video games, streaming services, etc). Offer examples from several mediums. The development of the anti-hero has evolved in today’s programming and in movies. Define what an Anti-Hero is. What evidence in the article speaks to the development of flawed main characters? Offer connections by quoting from the text. According to the author’s reference to shows like “24,” how is the story itself impacted by our post 9/11 world? How does it differ from the shows prior to 9/11?

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

Individual Report: Dysfunctional Performance Measurement

Individual Report: Dysfunctional Performance Measurement.

Click here and consider this done.

The aim of the individual assignment is for you to research a common dysfunctional issue that arises when measuring performance in organisations. You will be required to submit a research report that describes your chosen issue, presents a real-world example of its occurrence, and suggests how it could be fixed. Your research report should also be accompanied by some documentary evidence of the real-world example that you describe

Objectives:

This task relates to the following subject objectives:

  • Critically analyse the institutional, organisational and individual influences on management accounting systems
  • Form professional judgments about the appropriateness of the design and operation of management accounting systems
  • Apply theory to design management accounting systems in real-world organisational contexts

Individual report components

Final Report

There are many different problems that can occur when measuring performance in organisations. These include:

  • Short-termism (myopia)
  • Lack of controllability

Prepare a report which addresses the following sections and components:

  1. Dysfunctional performance measurement in theory
    1. Define and describe your chosen problem .Your description should provide sufficient depth on the topic and be clearly explained so that it is easy for the reader to understand your main points. This section should contain references to relevant academic journal articles on the topic.
    2. Explain why the problem occurs. Your explanation should include all of the relevant factors that can contribute to the occurrence of the problem, as well as a clear explanation of how those factors cause the problem to occur. You should draw on your references and management accounting theory to support your explanation.
    3. Explain the consequences of the problem for organisations and individuals. Your explanation should include all of the relevant dysfunctional consequences or outcomes of the problem, both for the organization as a whole as well as for individual employees. Again, you should draw on your references and management accounting theory to support your explanation.

It is expected that you will conduct your own independent research, reading a wide variety of sources from both academic and practitioner literature to expand your knowledge about the problem. A useful starting point is the suggested weekly reading material; however you are expected to conduct your own research and draw upon other sources.

When preparing your report, think carefully about what academic sources you actually would like to refer to in your report. It is expected that you will demonstrate a deep engagement with a selective group of sources rather than providing superficial reference to a larger group of sources. In your reference list refer only to sources that you engage with in-text in your report.

You are expected to show sufficient depth of understanding of the topic and to clearly express your ideas in a way that makes it easy for the reader to follow the main point of your argument. The main points you make should be explicitly stated in the body of your report – you should not assume that the reader can read your mind! However, you may assume that your reader has a basic understanding of the topic.

Report formatting requirements

Formatting of text:

  • Font: Times New Roman, 12pt
  • Line spacing: At least 1.15 line spacing (no single line spacing)
  • Margins: At least 2cm for top, bottom, left and right margins
  • Table of content
  • Sub-heading
  • Executive summary

Page limit

The report is to be no more than 5 pages in length. This page limit includes all sections of your report except for:

  • A cover sheet
  • The reference list (bibliography)
  • Attached evidence of real-world example

Referencing:

All sources must be properly acknowledged using the Harvard referencing style. Any source that is referenced ‘in-text’ must be listed in the reference list at the end of the report. Any report that contravenes the referencing policy will not be eligible for a grade (and may draw severe penalties or be referred to the Faculty Student Conduct Committee).

Documentary evidence of real-world example:

Your report must be accompanied by some evidence of your real-world example. This can be evidence from some secondary source (e.g. news media article, blog entry, report) or evidence that you have collected yourself (e.g. a case description that you have written up with verifiable facts, transcript of an interview with relevant organisation member). Please attach this as an appendix, after your reference list.

Useful resources

Dysfunctional Consequences of Performance Measurements
F. Ridgway

Administrative Science Quarterly

Vol. 1, No. 2 (Sep., 1956), pp. 240-247

The Performance Measurement Manifesto by Robert G. Eccles

Harvard Business Review, January–February 1991, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 131-137.
Andy Neely, Mike Gregory, Ken Platts, (1995) “Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 15 Iss: 4, pp.80 – 116

Marking Template – Individual Research Report

Marking Concern Below criteria Meets criteria Exceeds criteria
Define and describe chosen problem:

 

 

Does not provide a clear, valid description of problem in performance measurement. Does not reference appropriate academic sources, fails to cite sources appropriately, or does not engage with sources in-text (e.g. superficial citing of sources). Discussion may be superficial or not clear. Provides a valid description of problem in performance measurement. Appropriately references some relevant academic sources. Demonstrates effort to engage with referenced material to develop report. Overall discussion is clear and coherent. Provides a valid and comprehensive description of problem in performance measurement. Appropriately references a carefully selected range of relevant academic sources. Demonstrates deep engagement with chosen referenced material to develop report. Overall discussion is clear, detailed and coherent.
Explain why the problem occurs: Does not provide an explanation of how or why the problem occurs. Alternatively, explanation is unclear, implausible, and/or unsupported by academic research or management accounting theory. Discussion may be superficial or not clear. Provides an explanation of how and why the selected problem occurs. Explanation outlines some contributing factors and/or causal mechanisms. Explanation is clear, plausible, and supported with reference to relevant academic sources. Overall discussion is clear and coherent. Provides a sophisticated and complex explanation of the factors and causal mechanisms which contribute to the occurrence of the problem, as well as consideration of the conditions under which the factors arise. Explanation is clear, convincing, and supported by deep engagement with relevant academic references. Overall discussion is clear, detailed and coherent.
Explain the consequences of the problem: Does not provide adequate explanation of the consequences of the problem for organisations and/or individuals. Alternatively, consequences identified are unclear, unlikely, and/or unsupported by academic research or management accounting theory. Discussion may be superficial or not clear. Provides an explanation of the consequences of the problem for both organisations and individuals. Consequences identified are clear, likely and supported with reference to relevant academic sources. Overall discussion is clear and coherent. Provides a sophisticated explanation of the consequences of the problem for organisations and individuals. All relevant consequences are included in explanation and are supported by deep engagement with relevant academic sources. Overall discussion is clear, detailed and coherent.
Apply the problem to organisational practice:

 

Fails to appropriately relate problem to real organisational practice. May provide irrelevant example or fail to explain linkage between problem and example. May fail to include documentary evidence Relates problem to real organisational practice. Provides relevant real-world example and explains, in general, how the problem applies in this context. Includes relevant documentary evidence. Relates problem to real organisational practice. Provides relevant real-world example and clearly explains how the problem applies in this specific context. Includes relevant documentary evidence.
Recommend a solution to the problem: Does not provide a valid or credible recommendation for how the problem could be fixed in the real-world example. Recommendations may be generic, superficial, impractical or not directly relevant to problem and/or example. Provides a valid and credible recommendation(s) for how the problem could be fixed in the real-world example provided. Provides a clear and plausible justification for why the recommendation would overcome the problem. Provides a specific, valid and credible recommendation(s) for how the problem could be fixed in the real-world example provided. Provides a clear and persuasive justification for why the recommendation would overcome the problem. May also identify and discuss second-order consequences of recommendation.
Written communication:

 

Information is not conveyed clearly or fluently, which may be the result of errors in written communication, imprecise language, or poor structure. Written form is of poor quality, and may appear unprofessional, unfinished, or inappropriate for the intended audience. Information is conveyed clearly and fluently in high quality written form appropriate for the audience. Information is conveyed with exceptional clarity and fluency in high quality written form that is appropriate for the audience. Report is very well written, structured, and presented in a professional and coherent manner.

 Click here and consider this done.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

Science in Today’s World – Reflections

Science in Today’s World – Reflections.

When writing this essay, be aware that your work has to show significant effort, creative thought, and research from sources inside the modules. Use APA style citations within the text and complete references in your reference page. This assignment will be a 750-1000 word (3 page) essay. It must include: A title page, including the title of your essay, your name, the course, and the date 3 pages of text Include in-text citations for all quotations and any information paraphrased from sources. Only ideas from your brain do not need citations! Please see the EC Library tutorial on plagiarism (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. . A reference page with complete references in APA style. Topic: We wish to bring together all the things you have learned in this course. Thus, please address the following questions in your essay: What is the “take away message” from this course regarding the identification of reliable sources of scientific information? Give specific examples from the course readings. What have you learned about the job (both good and bad) popular publications, such as newspapers, magazines, and websites, do in “translating” scientific research into articles targeting the average reader? Identify specific characteristics you look for to determine the reliability of these popular publications. Give specific examples from the course readings. What have you learned about locating and evaluating reliable scientific sources, such as publications from government agencies, international agencies, and professional scientific organizations? Identify specific characteristics you look for to determine their reliability. Give specific examples from the course readings. Identify at least two scientific topics from the course that you feel you have learned more about and, if possible, where your experiences in this course have changed your mind about those topics. Give specific examples from the course readings.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

Making sense of organisations ( BBA level )

Making sense of organisations ( BBA level ).

Making sense of organisations ( BBA level )

 

Paper details:

Subject : Making Sense of Organisation Essay ( Length 3000 words +- 10%) Summary You are required to write an essay which explores the notion of organisation and management using a variety of theoretical perspectives and supported by example from your own experience as well as from your reading of academic work and from contemporary organisations. This will require you to use the lecture material, books and articles, and contemporary news sources. The emphasis is on writing a persuasive essay which builds a case for a particular point of view and which is drawn together in the conclusion.Your account should be analytical and critically informed, and not simply a description of an organisation. You must use the Harvard referencing system and reference all authors and dates referred to in the text. This assignment requires you to address the following question in the form of an essay: To what extent has our understanding of organisations and management progressed since the beginning of the 20th century in theory and in practice? ( From 1900s to now, provide theory and evidence supporting ) Given that organisations are in an inescapable part of all our lives it becomes important that we develop an understanding of what they are and how they work ( or do not work). The lecture programme has emphasized the idea that organisations are not a single entity and that making sense of them requires us to examine them through a variety of theoretical perspectives as well as our own perceptual lens. This postmodern understanding argues that organisations are socially constructed phenomena, so question like,” what the organisation is ” ” why it is there” and ” how it works (or doesn’t) ” why “, “who should manage and how should be addressed from these different, but interrelated theoretical constructs. This is quite different from the views of scientific management theorists. The various perspectives offered during the lectures can all be employed to help you make sense of organisations and the management of them. These may include the following but you are not confined to these: Historical Sociological Rational technical political psychological Cultural (organisational and national) Symbolic And additional implication of the postmodern understanding is that the person making sense, (you ), must acknowledge their own influence on the sense making process, that is , you are also involved in socially constructing the organisation even as an analyst, and are not examining it from a distance. This will involve you in a consideration of your own background and life experience. You are encouraged to offer insights of your own, and given that we are understanding organisations as any community of people, large or small and with whatever purpose, you should used your own experience. This may include any organisations of which you have experience, for example , part time or full time work , schools and other educational establishments, leisure time organisations, political organisations. Finally, you are also required to use examples from contemporary organisations to support and illustrate your points. These might come from your reading of contemporary events, from news sources or television documentaries. requirement: 1. Employ multiple metaphors to analyse personal organisational experience 2. Apply key organisational concepts and theories to specific organisational in order to identify organisational issues. 3. Evaluate the interconnections between apparently diverse organisational activities. The student will demonstrate a reasonable, through at time limited, understanding of relevant theories and concepts relating to organisation studies. He or she will demonstrate a limited ability to apply this knowledge to the question set. he or she will only present limited evaluation of evidence and arguments relevant to his or her conclusions.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

The Authenticity Paradox

The Authenticity Paradox.

 Begin with a summary of the article and then address the following issues. Expand on the idea of being “adaptively authentic.” What exactly does that mean? Relate an example of a moment when it was difficult for you to remain “authentic.” How could the tactic of being “adaptively authentic” help you?

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/