kills needed to complete this project: Introduction to Access (Skill 1.1)Working with Security Warnings (Skill 1.2)Organizing Objects in the Navigation Pane (Skill 1.4)Understanding and Viewing Table Relationships (Skill 1.3)Navigating Records (Skill 1.6) Creating a New Record in a Table and Entering Data (Skill 1.7) Finding and Replacing Data (Skill 1.12)Deleting Records (Skill 1.13)Adjusting Table Column Widths (Skill 1.9)Sorting Records in a Datasheet (Skill 1.8) Creating a New Record in a Form and Entering Data (Skill 1.10) Deleting and Renaming Database Objects (Skill 1.14)Using Compact and Repair (Skill 1.20) Open the start file AC2019-ChallengeYourself-1-4. If necessary, enable active content by clicking the Enable Content
button in the Message Bar. The file will be renamed automatically to include your
name. Change the project file name if directed to do so by your instructor. Change the organization of the Navigation Pane to use the Tables and Related
Views category. Open the Relationships window and show the Vaccines table. Save the changes to
the layout, and then close the Relationships window. Open the Vaccines table and browse the records using the record navigation
buttons and keyboard shortcuts. Enter the following record into the table. Note that the TargetAudience field
is a lookup field.
Table displays the information for a record in Microsoft Access.
Find the record with the value TD in the VaccineID field and change the value of the TargetAudience field from Adults to Teenagers. Find and delete the record with a VaccineID of JE. Change the width of the VaccineName column to exactly 28. Sort the records in the table alphabetically from A to Z by values in the VaccineName field. Save and close the table. Open the VaccinesForm form and enter the following as a new record: Table displays the information for a record in Microsoft Access.VaccineIDVaccineNameTargetAudienceMALMalariaAt-risk persons Close the VaccinesForm form. Open the Locations table and use the Replace command to replace all instances of Angola with: Republic of Angola AutoFit the width of the Country column so all the names are visible. AutoFit the width of the City column so all the names are visible. Sort the records so they are sorted by values in the Country field alphabetically from A to Z and then by values in the City field alphabetically from A to Z. Hint: Remember to sort the innermost sort first. Save and close the table. In the Navigation Pane, rename the Shipments form to: ShipmentsForm Observe the file size of your database. Use the Compact and Repair Database command and check the file again. How much did the file size decrease? Close the database and exit Access. Upload and save your project file. Submit project for grading.
Santa Monica College Access Chapter 1 Project
Impact of The Storm on The Operations Section Letter
Impact of The Storm on The Operations Section Letter.
Question 1. Look at the list below to see if you have an ICS assignment. If so, answer question 1. If not, answer question 2.1. The scenario is a category 3 hurricane. That hurricane has now made landfall in Liberty County. Each class member will be assigned an ICS position by faculty. Assignments are listed below. Based on your assignment, each of you will have a “discussion” with the Incident Commander about how the storm has impacted your section. In 250-500 words, summarize the important points of that discussion. If you are the Finance Section Chief, don’t be concerned with dollar amounts, just the reasons why those dollars will need to be spent.Begin your memo as follows:Dear Dr. Management,As the ——Section Chief (or PIO, Security, Liaison Officer etc), I have reviewed our situation. Here are my findings and recommendations.SECTION CHIEFS AND OTHER COMMAND STAFF SHOULD DIALOGUE WITH EACH OTHER.Safety – someone else PIO – someone else Ops Chief – it’s me here we goLogistics Chief – someone else Finance / Admin Chief – someone else Liaison – someone else Finance / Admin – someone else Planning Chief – someone else Technical specialist – someone else 2. Discuss the role of a technical specialist who might be needed to advise the IC in this setting. Choose any specialist you think appropriate. Be specific and thorough when you discuss the role.READING ASSIGNMENT1. Liberty County Plan EOP – ESSD Section 82. ESSD Section 9 – Resource Management Plan2. Relevant appendices
Impact of The Storm on The Operations Section Letter
5- to 7-page proposal/research plan for single-system (subject) evaluation for your work with Paula Cortez. Identify the problems that you will target and the outcomes you will measure, select an appropriate intervention or interventions (including length of time), and identify an appropriate evaluation plan.
best essay writers The steps at the heart of single-system (subject) research are part of the everyday practice of social work. Each day social workers implement interventions to meet clients’ needs and monitor results. However, conducting proper single-system (subject) research entails far more than these simple day-to-day practices. Proper single-system research requires a high degree of knowledge and commitment. Social workers must fully understand the purpose of single-system (subject) research and the variations of single-system (subject) design. They must develop a hypothesis based upon research and select the right design for testing it. They must ensure the reliability and validity of the data to be collected and know how to properly analyze and evaluate that data. This assignment asks you to rise to the challenge of creating a proposal for a single-subject research study. To prepare for this Assignment, imagine that you are the social worker assigned to work with Paula Cortez (see the case study, “Social Work Research: Single Subject” in this week’s resources). After an initial assessment of her social, medical, and psychiatric problems, you develop a plan for intervention. You also develop a plan to monitor progress in your work with her using measures that can be evaluated in a single-system research design. As a scholar-practitioner, you rely on research to help plan your intervention and your evaluation plan. Complete the Cortez Family interactive media in this week’s resources. Conduct a literature search related to the chronic issues related to HIV/AIDS and bipolar mental disorder. Search for additional research related to assessing outcomes and theoretical frameworks appropriate for this client. For example, your search could include terms such as motivational interviewing and outcomes and goal-oriented practice and outcomes. You might also look at the NREPP database identified in Week 1, to search for interventions related to mental health and physical health. Include a description of: -The problem(s) that are the focus of treatment -The intervention approach, including length of time, so that it can be replicated -A summary of the literature that you reviewed that led you to select this intervention approach -The purpose for conducting a single-system (subject) research evaluation -The measures for evaluating the outcomes and observing change including: -Evidence from your literature search about the nature of the measures -The validity and reliability of the measures -How baseline measures will be obtained -How often follow-up measures will be administered -The criteria that you would use to determine whether the intervention is effective -How the periodic measurements could assist you in your ongoing work with Paula References for Assignment to include: http://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/2dett4d/Walden/SOCW/6311/CH/mm/case_study/index.html
Different Bird Species’ Foraging Preferences in Hammond Woods
Different Bird Species’ Foraging Preferences in Hammond Woods Results The experiment was held at Hammond Woods in Newton, Massachusetts, where three species of birds were observed: black capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus), white-breasted nuthatch (Sitta carolinensis), and tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor). During the 22 hours of data gathering, 624 total birds were observed. By statistically comparing preferences using χ2 tests, we will learn if our observed data is significantly different from the expected data. If it is significantly different, then this will mean that the avian species have a preference in food type and habitat type. Based on the collection of the class’s data, the black capped chickadee preferred a closed habitat (Table 1; χ2 = 104.094; df = 2) and sunflowers as the seed type (Table 1; χ2 = 5.333; df = 1). The observed white-breasted nuthatch also preferred a closed habitat (Table 1; χ2 = 99.817; df = 2) and sunflowers (Table 1; χ2 = 25.352; df = 1). The class’s data also reflects that the tufted titmouse preferred a closed habitat (Table 1; χ2 = 308.821; df = 2) and sunflowers (Table 1; χ2 = 88.276; df = 1), as well. Table 1. Bird Preferences and χ2 Summary. Each bird specie’s respected preferences for habitat and seed type are shown, as well as χ2 results. Bird Species Habitat Preference; χ2 value Seed Type Preference; χ2 value Black Capped Chickadee Closed; 104.094 Sunflower; 5.333 White-Breasted Nuthatch Closed; 99.817 Sunflower; 25.352 Tufted Titmouse Closed; 308.821 Sunflower; 88.276 The most frequently observed bird was the Tufted Titmouse, which recorded 290 visits in total (class). The frequency bar graph in Figure 1 shows a visual of each bird species preferred type of habitat. The x-axis is defined by the different site categories (open, closed, and edged) while the y-axis is labeled as the frequency of visits. There is also a legend in the figure that differentiates the species of bird by color. As shown in Figure 1, there is a vast difference between the number of closed site visits compared to edged and open site visits. In the edged and open sites, very few birds were observed relative to the frequency of visits in the closed canopy site. On the contrary, in the closed site, each species of bird accumulated at least 100 visits (Figure 1). The least frequently visited site by all the birds was the edged site. According to the class data, there were 469 closed canopy site visits compared to 46 edged site visits and 109 open canopy site visits (BI 107 Section B8, 2019). Clearly, the data collected supports the idea that these birds of interest located in the Hammond Woods compliment the ideas of the optimal foraging theory. Figure 1. Frequency of Bird Visitations to Each Canopy Site. The amount of bird visits to each site is recorded and graphed as a bar graph; each bird species is color coded with the legend provided. As demonstrated in the collected data, all three species of birds preferred sunflower seeds when given the option between two feeders that held either sunflowers or kernels. As displayed in Figure 2, the x-axis is defined by the type of seeds that the feeders held, while the y-axis is the frequency of visits to each feeder. There is also a legend in the figure that differentiates the species of bird by color. The tufted titmouse demonstrates the largest difference in preference between the kernels and sunflowers, heavily favoring sunflowers as the seed type (Figure 2). According to the class data, there were 438 sunflower feeder visits compared to just 186 kernel feeder visits (BI 107 Section B8, 2019). Figure 2. Frequency of Bird Visitation to Different Feeders. The bar graph illustrates how many birds visited sunflower feeders or kernel feeders; each bird species is color coded with the legend provided. Discussion The main objective of this study is to examine the foraging behaviors between avian species of the Hammond Woods and to determine whether our data is significantly different, which will prove that the birds have a preference in food type and habitat type. More specifically, the goal of this experiment is to analyze what type of food (seeds or kernels) and habitat (open, closed, or edged) different birds prefer and to determine whether their behaviors agree with the optimal foraging theory. We initially hypothesized that if birds were to follow the optimal foraging theory, then they would prefer a closed habitat and sunflowers as their food source. Evidently, our results strongly support this hypothesis. The birds preferred closed canopy sites due to the lack of risk factors concerning predators; they also preferred sunflower seeds due to the optimal handling time. As shown in the results, each species of birds strongly favored sunflower feeders and closed canopy sites. Frankly, the optimal foraging theory proposes that organisms will forage so that they minimize their energy and risk factors while maximizing energy intake and consumption (Spilios and Kieswetter, 2019). With this being said, our data strongly supports our hypothesis. The data collected slightly reflects the experiment conducted by David N. Bonter, Benjamin Zuckerberg, Carolyn W. Sedgwick, and Wesley M. Hochachka. In their experiment, their objective was to quantify the daily foraging patterns of black-capped chickadees, tufted titmouse, white-breasted nuthatches, and houses finches during the winter to test models of the optimal foraging theory. However, rather than studying food and habitat preference, they analyzed when their feeding habits occurred. Using radio-frequency identification receivers built into feeding stations, they were able to quantify and record the activity of the four species of birds. Their results yielded the conclusion that the birds foraged before sunrise and continued at a steady to increasing rate throughout the day until sunset. This suggests that their energy levels were drained by the end of the day; it also shows that the birds are driven between the risks of starvation and predation, which all supports the theory that the birds will continue to forage until they burn a certain amount of stored energy (Bonter et al, 2013). This experiment’s results are significant to our data because it shows how the same species of birds optimize their foraging efforts in various aspects. Additionally, Liam Dowling along with Frances Bonier developed a theoretical model that would estimate and predict distances at which a parent bird will flee from its nest in response to an approaching predator. They set up the model by estimating the parent bird’s fitness with relation to its characteristics, the nest, and the incoming predator; this developed a scenario that could be tested to see whether the parent would stay or go. Essentially, they were able to develop a basis that would explain the variation of flight initiation distance among nesting species, such as birds (Dowling and Bonier, 2018). This relates to our own experiment because it demonstrates that there are various reasons and biotic factors that influence a bird’s choice of habitat. In our case, most birds were comfortable with foraging in the closed canopy sites most likely to reduce their chances of being preyed on. Our data also doesn’t take into consideration the effects of other biotic and abiotic features. For example, our experiment does not consider if weather or the time of day affect the birds’ foraging habits. This would provide more context to the birds’ foraging habits because more data (relative to the experiment) would be gathered to support or refute the hypothesis. Additionally, it would be interesting to observe the effects of hanging feeders at different heights, which could be performed in a future experiment. These factors should all play a role in the birds’ optimal foraging strategies because it will examine how they value risk factors, handling time, and energy intake. The overall conclusion that this experiment elicits is that the optimal foraging theory is applicable to various species of birds (black capped chickadee, white-breasted nuthatch, and tufted titmouse) that were observed in the Hammond Woods of Newton, Massachusetts. Literature Cited BI 107 Section B8. 2019. Principles of Biology I. Biology Department, Boston University, Boston, MA. Bonter DN, Zuckerberg B, Sedgwick CW and Hochachka WM. 2013. Daily foraging patterns in free-living birds: exploring the predation-starvation trade-off. Proceedings. Biological Sciences 280.1760: 20123087. Dowling L and Bonier F. 2018. Should I stay, or should I go: Modeling optimal flight initiation distance in nesting birds. PLoS One 13(11): E0208210. Spilios KE and Kieswetter CM. 2019. Principles of Biology I. Harden-McNeil, LLC, Plymouth, Michigan. Lab 3, pp. 43.
Smart solution to detect/prevent bridge accident-IOT
Smart solution to detect/prevent bridge accident-IOT. I don’t understand this Computer Science question and need help to study.
In this section, a discussion of the social and ethical impacts of the project on the project environment and on the society as whole is given. The sections must also discussthe legal implications of carryingthis project in the Sultanate of Oman:
1.Social Issues (1 page)
2.Ethical Issues (1 page)
3.Legal Issues (1 page)
-Kindly make sure of, zero similarity in turn it in
-Use easy language
Smart solution to detect/prevent bridge accident-IOT