Below is attached the start of the rest of the assignment that you’ve been helping me with on immigration. It will be the same as before where I will have to send you the screenshots as they open up. I did include the screenshot that shows how many parts will need to be sent for speaker notes on the presentation. This one will need pictures included and when I submit the information in the templates it will create a powerpoint presentation once I download it from webtext to submit to the teacher.
HIS 110 Strayer Lesson from Immigration Policies of Late 1800s & early 1900s PPT
1. Which political party do you more closely associate with and why? Can’t say you don’t care anymore – time to tell me which way you lean. Your choices include Republican, Democrat, Green Party, Libertarian, Communist – you don’t even have to stick with these if there is another one out there you identify with – just tell me why. For the purposes of this assignment you can’t just say moderate or independent. Take the quiz at http://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz. Even if you are pretty sure of who you side with, it is fun (and required) to take because it will give you percentages of how much you agree with each party on certain issues and tell you which candidate is your best match. No one is 100% anything. Include your results in your paper.
2. Who or what influenced that decision (examples may be a parent, teacher, friend, event). Do you have friends or family that hold the opposite beliefs from you? If not, why not? Do you have debates with this person or do you only talk to people who agree with you? If so, why?
3. If you could run for office, what would you run for – Judge, Congress/Legislature or President/Governor – and why? Read the explanations of all three below to help you answer this:
What office you might want to run for says something about your personality:
Judge – You are comfortable making decisions that may make some people unhappy, but you try to settle disputes by finding middle ground – all while remaining in the confines of the law. You understand that your decisions may not change the world, but they are important to the people and the case in front of you. You right wrongs and mete out appropriate justice – and you can only do so because you follow the rules yourself.
Legislator/Congress – You like to represent people and fight passionately for their issues. Making laws is ugly work, but you will fight in the trenches for what you believe in and make only the concessions necessary to create a bill that will help your constituents and your ideology win the day. You realize you don’t need to make everyone happy – just the people in your district and your party. The executives (governor/president) talk a lot, but you actually get to the details and get stuff done.
Governor/President – You are the big picture person. You announce broad initiatives and let congress or the legislature figure out how to pull it off. You need to have a thick skin because just under half of your constituents resent the fact you got elected. You have little to no say in the details of how your vision is pulled off – you just provide leadership and motivation. You get the credit when it works, but you get the blame when it doesn’t – you probably deserve neither the blame nor the credit. People look for you to lead them in both good times and bad.
The rules: Remember, this needs to be at least two pages of solid, thoughtful material in order to even be considered for full credit. Students receiving full credit usually turn in papers of at least 2.5 pages. Have some fun with it, but remember this is an academic paper. No cussing or slang, use proper grammar and proof-read before sending, use the spell-checker, do not end a sentence with a question mark (you are supposed to answer questions, not ask them), et cetera.
Type this in MS Word and upload it to Blackboard so it can be checked for plagiarized work. I will not accept e-mailed assignments. You must agree to submit your work to the global reference database.
Hi, just to let you know I hate politics but I stated in a previous post that i’m democrat, so i’m not sure what party your with but if you could please write this paper as if you are democrat, if you accept, thank you!
Unit Two Writing Assignment: Who are you and why?
Family Therapy Model and Application: Structural Family Therapy Case Study
Family Therapy Model and Application: Structural Family Therapy Case Study. Abstract Families comprise different people who influence one another in unpredictable ways. This interrelationship makes family therapies difficult. The structural family therapy offers a theoretical and practical model that guarantees order to build and maintain a long-lasting and positive relationship. In theory, the appreciation of the existence of a family structure is founded on the view that members of a family show some consistency in terms of their behaviors. From this theoretical paradigm, this paper confirms that families comprise living systems, which grow and undergo some changes with time. Failure to adapt to the changes threatens their viability and the coexistence of the individual family members. From the basis of a case study, which involves Mr. and Mrs. Brown’s family, this paper identifies the structural family therapy as a therapeutic approach that recognizes that families have different strengths where each member plays a role to boost or bring down the family bonds. Introduction Families encounter a myriad of problems, which may lead to psychological challenges among couples and their children. Families, which look for help from therapists or chancellors, are usually concerned about a specific problem. The problems may range from misbehaving children to couples who fail to get along with one another. When therapists face such situations, they look beyond the provided specifics of the problems that affect a family by evaluating the efforts of the family unit to deal with the challenges. This strategy determines family interaction dynamics. For example, misbehaving children may be brought up by parents who repeatedly engage in scolding behaviors without rewarding any change of conduct. In such situations, scolding, which is an attempt to resolve the child’s behavioral problem, contributes to further destruction of parent-child relationships. Some parents may differ in opinions and/or cannot engage in an open debate without using destructive arguments. In such a situation, destructive arguments increase the couple’s conflicts, although the underlying problem is a variation of opinions. This observation suggests that through the deployment of the structural family therapy, therapists intervene to resolve family problems both in an organized and systematic way. Indeed, the structural family therapy borrows its basic theoretical tenets from the systems theory. This paper discusses the structural family therapy together with its theoretical tenets that help to resolve familial problems. It first establishes a case study that forms the basis of discussion for this paper. The applicability of the structural family therapy to the case is based on the assertion that a family comprises a system, which is a part of a social grouping. Since family members regulate each other, a change of an individual leads to a corresponding change in the family dynamics. Hence, in the process of administering family therapy, problems that arise from an individual can be solved. The model influences the behavior of other members by building long lasting positive family relationships. Case Study Description Several cases have been registered in schools where teens turned violent to the level of killing their fellow students and teachers. For instance, in 1999, on 20 April, Dylan Klebold and his friend Eric Harris staged an assault in a school that is based at Colorado. In the assault, 13 people were killed while 23 others were critically injured. They later turned bullets against themselves. It is perhaps impossible to establish what caused this attack or even other recently established children-executed crimes. However, in the case of Dylan Klebold and his friend Eric Harris, a possible cause of the violent attacks was a video game that had brutal themes and characters (Ward, 2011). Children‘s abusive behaviors towards their peers are commonplace in schools and in various other social settings. As it is revealed in the case of Mr. and Mrs. Brown’s family, abusive behaviors among children may be tracked from the familial structural problems. Mr. Brown’s family consists of his wife (Mrs. Brown) and their two children, James and Anthony. However, the couple has divorced. Their separation is now turning two years. The divorce occurred because Mr. Brown engaged in repeated abusive behaviors towards his wife. The children witnessed all the abusive sessions before Mr. Brown shifted to a different state when the divorce decision was finally granted in a family court in New Jersey. The children, Anthony (seven years old) and James (four years old), meet their father thrice annually. Mrs. Brown has a full-time job while Anthony attends school as his brother goes for the daycare. On 27 January 2015, Anthony’s principal called referring Mrs. Brown to a therapist who was based in the school. Anthony’s behavior while in school underlined the reason the therapist requested Mrs. Brown’s family to undergo a counseling session. For more than two months, Anthony’s class teacher reported that he had been attacking his peers without being provoked. Anthony also withdrew from social skills forums and any activities that could bring together all children to build their cognitive skills and/or foster social development. This conduct only occurred in the school settings. Mrs. Brown indicated that Anthony did not show the behavioral problem in the home settings. His brother, James, neither showed such behaviors while at home nor school. The investigation by the therapist into Mrs. Brown’s family structure indicated that when the divorce occurred, Mrs. Brown had seized a sizable amount of power of family control. She had also been attempting to adapt to numerous changes that her family had experienced. The therapist identified that her family had been incredibly flexible and organized in such a way that Mrs. Brown would adapt to changes following her divorce. Due to many cases that the school therapist handled, the chancellor felt it was wise to refer Mrs. Brown’s family to an external family therapist in the attempt to resolve Anthony’s unwelcome behavior. In February 2015, Mrs. Brown and her two sons visited a New Jersey-based family therapist. In a preliminary assessment, the therapist noted Mrs. Brown’s possession of the power to control her family as evidenced by her two sons’ high degree of respect towards her authority. For instance, when she requested them to do some task, they obeyed diligently without hesitation. She noted that she insisted on her children to maintain high standards of discipline while at the same time advocating any disciplinary action in any situation that involved deviance from authority. However, in school settings, this discipline was never witnessed. Anthony did not respect authority. He could bully and beat weak targets and his peers. An emerging question is whether structural family therapy can successfully help to deal with this deviant behavior challenge. The Historical Context of the Structural Family Model and its Founders Salvador Minuchin founded the structural family therapy. Since its establishment, it has constituted a central model for family therapy. The model addresses problems of family functionality. This goal is accomplished through its attempt to gain access to a family system with the objective of identifying rules that regulate the functioning of a family. For example, in the context of the case study about Mrs. Brown’s family, the chief rule that regulates the conducts of the children is strict obedience to her. Under the structural family therapy model, therapists “map the relationships between family members or between subsets of the family, and ultimately disrupt dysfunctional relationships within the family, causing it to stabilize into healthier patterns” (Vetere, 2008, p.138). Indeed, Minuchin asserts that pathology only rests within a family system, but not within an individual. Writers such as Charles Fishman support the propositions of the structural family therapy by claiming that family structures have restrictions, which can be inflexible, apparent, and defined by tasks and connections (Vetere, 2008). Other concepts of the model are that the family comprises hierarchies, substructures, cross-generational partnerships, and nurtured kids. The historical development of the model relates to its main concepts since the model views a family as a system that bears other subsystems that need to interact positively to ensure collective change to the system. To this extent, one of the primary tenets of the structural family therapy is that therapists get into a family in the capacity of a catalyst that serves the purposes of inducing positive changes. This claim suggests that changes occur when a therapist builds a positive relationship with the family. He or she becomes integrated into the family boundaries such that any incepted changes can influence all components (individuals) that make up the family. The theory regards families as structures that are organized as subsystems that have bendable or strict limits. The boundaries can permit or discourage contacts between different family members. An equally valuable concept in the historical development of the structural family therapy is the enactment technique. Under the technique, family members are “encouraged to deal directly with each other in sessions that permit therapists to observe and modify their interactions” (Vetere, 2008, p.134). Therefore, every person’s influence in the behavior of a given family is inseparable from the other family members. This situation has introduced the significance of the complementary concept in administering therapy interventions within families. Could the behavior of Mr. Brown (abusing a weak target, Mrs. Brown, in the presence of Anthony) have influenced Anthony’s bullying behavior that was directed towards his peers in school settings? Based on the ideas of the structural family therapy, this case is most probable. The Role of the Therapist or Counselor in the Structural Family Therapy Model The primary goal of therapists entails heralding repetition of sequences. This goal is accomplished through interruptions of familial hierarchical structures. This process involves power shifting through the alteration of interaction styles. However, in the case of structural family therapy, the therapist plays the role of changing dysfunctional structures of a family by facilitating growth of various individuals with the objective of inducing positive transformation of the whole (family) as the strategy for developing new ways of interaction. Through the structural family therapy, therapists also play the role facilitating system restructuring. They also act as choreographers and directors of the desired change. For example, in case of Anthony, a therapist has the role of building the cognition that Mrs. Brown is not the only source of power in the family. Secondly, the therapist needs to demonstrate to Anthony that targeting weak peers with his violent behaviors is an unacceptable norm. Therefore, he can realize that his father was wrong when he was abusing his mother and that such behaviors have bad consequences on both, including divorce or suspension from school. The structural family therapy closely relates to the theory of change. It advocates the alteration of family relationships to build different schemes that then influence all components of the family system. The manner in which a parent’s past shapes the social development of a child is widely not predictable. Thus, “parenting can be viewed as a longitudinal trajectory–accumulative, sequential pathway in which continuities and/or changes occur across time” (GutmanFamily Therapy Model and Application: Structural Family Therapy Case Study
ESL 262 De Anza College The Great Depression Midterm Exam
essay help online ESL 262 De Anza College The Great Depression Midterm Exam.
Hello Students,If you are reading this, that means the midterm is available now– yay! You can choose whether you want to use the PDF or PPTX that I emailed to you, or you can use the link below to access the midterm:https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1bf0P1T5C3V0uSGHaELRjiGEIbs47HZed6qduVfE47gc/edit?usp=sharing (Links to an external site.)Please note the link above is not edit-friendly. This means if you decide to use the link to access the midterm, you must go to “File” –> “Make a copy” –> “Entire presentation” in order to edit the file directly with your answers.I understand it can be challenging to “write” onto a PDF or PPTX, so feel free to be creative in how you choose to write your answers– you can delete the wrong answers, you can highlight the right answers, you can make a check mark onto the right answer, you can put a circle or underline or box around the right answer… it is up to you.It doesn’t matter how you choose to indicate the right answer as long as it is obvious to me that you have one answer choice. If your submission does not clearly indicate the right answer, I won’t be able to give you points. So, please avoid using ambiguous or vague ways to show your answer to the question.
ESL 262 De Anza College The Great Depression Midterm Exam
WCC The Famous Dominican Juan Luis Guerra and The Caribbean History essay
WCC The Famous Dominican Juan Luis Guerra and The Caribbean History essay.
CARIBBEAN HISTORY We are going to write about the famous Dominican Juan Luis Guerra. PLEASE IF YOU KNOW HIM OR IF YOU ARE DOMINICAN THAT WILL BE BETTER AND MORE EASY!!JUAN LUIS GUERRAWrite a 750 word (or more) paper discussing a celebrated person or event that exposed the world at large to the culture of the region. This paper must be submitted with a cover sheet, in-text citations and a works cited page according to either MLA or APA formatting. At the end of the paper answer the following question. ( BRIEF SUMMARY WHAT YOU WROTE )how this person introduce the rest of the world to Caribbean culture ??
WCC The Famous Dominican Juan Luis Guerra and The Caribbean History essay
homework
homework.
Question 1
A newly formed dance group, Mega Max has released a single,
Economexy. Assume that the download price for their new single is $1.20
and the number of downloads per day world-wide is 5,000. What will
happen to the market for this single if the following four events occur:
(i) The population of dance music fans decreases AND the productivity in
the music production increases.
(ii) Dance fans switch away from dance music to R&B music AND the
price of MP3 players increases.
(iii) The number of other dance singles decreases AND income increases.
(iv) One of the artist’s in Mega Max is rumoured to have died AND
the download price of rival group’s Techno New Syd West’s single, Bang,
decreases substantially to $0.20 .
Each event (i, ii, iii and iv) occurs independently (ceteris paribus).
For each of the following events, explain what will happen to the
equilibrium price and the equilibrium quantity for the download of
Economexy. For each part, you must:
• Draw an appropriately labeled diagram,
• Show the adjustment process from the original to the new equilibrium,
• And a detailed written explanation of this adjustment process.
Question 2
A. Show how the imposition of a tax on either the buyers or sellers in a
market has the same effect on equilibrium price and quantity. Make sure
you use appropriate diagrams in your answer.
B. Assume that the demand and supply curves in a market for cigarettes
are represented by the following equations: P = 200 – 0.5Q and P = 0.5Q.
The government then decides to impose a tax of $20 per unit on sellers
in this market. Assume that the market is already efficient prior to the
imposition of the tax.
a. Calculate the equilibrium price and quantity before the imposition of
the tax, and draw the demand and supply curves in this market, showing
all relevant information.
b. Show what the tax does to the market in the diagram drawn in (i)
c. Calculate the equilibrium price and quantity after the imposition of
the $20 per unit tax.
d. Calculate the tax revenue collected by the government, and the tax
incidence of this tax on buyers and sellers.
Question 3
Assume the production of coal involves the generation of a negative
externality.
A. Explain how the equilibrium level of output would be determined in
the market for coal, assuming no attempt is made to internalise the
externality. Is that equilibrium efficient? Use a diagram(s) as part of
your explanation.
B. What is a Pigovian Tax? Explain how the imposition of a Pigovian Tax
could alter the equilibrium in this market. How does the tax impact on
the efficiency of this market? Use a diagram(s) as part of your answer.
You are free to augment the diagram you used in (a) in your answer to
(b).
C. What other solutions could be used to remedy this negative
externality? You do not need to describe these remedies in detail.
Question 4
Assume that there are two categories of goods: protein shakes and all
other products.
A. Show using diagrams how a consumer’s demand curve for protein shakes
can be derived from an indifference map and a budget constraint diagram.
Make sure you explain your answer in detail.
B. Using a different set of diagram/s deconstruct the price effect into
the substitution effect and the income effect. Take note to define each
effect.
homework