Evaluation of the theory: (this section is to be supported and linked to the
definition of the criteria for analysis (Total: 45 points)
• Scope, comprehensiveness or range: significance of the theory: (30 points)
• Explication/ parsimony/ clarity
• Social utility and significance
• Logical development; clarity
• Credibility/ reality convergence
• Its ability to generate theory if a conceptual model or if a theory, its testability
• One journal article are to be presented and discussed that have utilized the theory/model as an underpinning for research demonstrating evidence-base practice. (15 points)
I will also attach the rubric, please take a look as the instructor follow it very close!
Zero Tolerance Immigration Policy
Zero Tolerance Immigration Policy.
Final Paper: Public Service Paper (Zero tolerance immigration Policy) SOURCE 1: http://theconversation.com/us-zero-tolerance-immigration-policy-still-violating-fundamental-human-rights-laws-98615 EXTRA SOURCES: Any other ones o 6-8-page Public Service Paper. ▪ APA o Apply a public service perspective to explain, interpret, and analyze the links between a specific policy and public service values. For example, the Zero Tolerance Immigration Policy violets the IV Amendment. ▪ explore and explain two important public service values which arise in this law (i.e. diversity, inclusion, public participation and engagement, accountability, equity and equality, etc.). ▪ Add an Implication and or limitation. (For example, not all the illegal immigrants cross the Mexico border, there are some illegal immigrants in the USA who came with a Visa and decided to over stay the permanence period as well. ▪ Paper must follow: Introduction (With topic Sentence and Thesis Statmennt) 1st Reason: 2nd Reason: 3rd Reason: Implication and/or Limitation or both Comclusion PS.: Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the main issues in the topic. Presents insightful and thorough analysis of all identified issues; includes all necessary links. Supports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and well documented evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is reasonable and objective. Makes appropriate and powerful connections between identified issues/ problems and the strategic concepts studied in the course readings and lectures; supplements study with relevant and thoughtful research and documents all sources of information. Demonstrates clarity, conciseness and correctness; formatting is appropriate and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. – Include a Presentation of SLIDES o Use PowerPoint Slides must include the 3 Reasons, The violation of the law in such a policy (Public Values), Implication and/or limitation. Just bullet points. No text and huge paragraphs
Essay Help “>Essay Help
Focus on some policy aspect
Hi! This is a group project and my part is as described below: Evaluation of the theory: (this section Focus on some policy aspect.
Overview During this course, we only scratch the surface of many important topics. The final paper requires you to go deeper into one of the energy-related topics from the course and tell us what you learned. Selecting a Topic You are encouraged to pick an energy topic that is related to your major. For instance, if you are a policy major, your final paper might focus on some policy aspect of a course topic. If you are in business or economics, your paper might focus on the business or economic aspect of energy. If you are in marketing, your paper might focus on a marketing issue related to renewable energy. If you are in dentistry – well, dentists use energy also.
There is no major or field of interest that does not have some tie to energy. If you have not yet chosen a major, no worries, think about what major or field you are most interested in and write about a related energy topic. General Criteria You have two options for this paper. The following requirements below apply to both options. Other criteria for the two options are found in the next sections. Energy: The topic MUST be related to energy! Your major: The paper topic should also be related to your major or field of study. Required structural elements: Each paper option has separate requirements for organization and content—see the following sections for specifics.
Paper length: The paper must be a minimum of 2000 words to get full credit. We will count off points for papers with less than 2000 words (3 points off for every 100 words missing). Papers with less than 1200 words will not be accepted. Sample papers: Sample papers are in Module 31 of the course Canvas site. Late Submissions: Submit your paper on time! You will lose 5 points for each day your paper is late
Essay Help “>Essay Help
Midterm Review Sheet,-What is ‘relativism’ in his sense of the term? (Remember it’s not merely the claim that there are cultural differences with respect to beliefs or practices.) -What is his main argument for relativism in this paper? (Hint: This is th
Midterm Review Sheet,-What is ‘relativism’ in his sense of the term? (Remember it’s not merely the claim that there are cultural differences with respect to beliefs or practices.) -What is his main argument for relativism in this paper? (Hint: This is th.
Answer these from the reading provided
s objectivist theories. For example, he thinks objective morality or moral truth can’t be based on God’s commands, or human nature, or reason…)
-What are the three conditions on an adequate theory of truth, according to him?
-Why does he think there could be no truth if there were no consciousness?
-Two objections to the coherence theory of truth: (1) There could be more than one coherent system of beliefs, and (2) The idea of coherence depends on the idea of truth.
-What is “correspondence” and why does Russell think that a correspondence theory best satisfies his three conditions on an adequate theory of truth? (Remember that we are not going to be concerned here with the details of his “multiple relation” theory of correspondence–this is just a specific version of correspondence, not essential to the general idea.)
– The problem of skepticism. (How can we know or reasonably believe anything about the external world when our evidence could be just as it is even if we were brains in a vat?)
– Nagel’s objections to various ideas about how we manage to ‘represent’ or refer to things. (For example, resemblance is not necessary or sufficient because the words ‘Winston Churchill’ do not resemble Winston Churchill but the ant’s lines in the sand to resemble him.)
– Why isn’t it enough that one intends to refer to something? (For example, the human artist intends to depict Churchill but the ant doesn’t?)
– Why does Nagel claim that if we were brains in a vat we couldn’t wonder whether we were brains in a vat?
– The justified true belief analysis of knowledge. (Remember his aim is not merely to show that a belief can be justified but not true.)
– Two principles about justification, discussed in class. Know how these apply in his two stories.
– How do the stories show that a person can have a justified true belief but not knowledge?
– The analysis of knowledge in terms of appropriate causal relations. How this is meant to solve Gettier problems.
– Simple cases such as perceptual knowledge: here the appropriate relation is that the belief is caused by the fact that makes the belief true.
– How does he deal with memory-based knowledge?
– The role of inference (i.e., reasoning) in Goldman’s theory. What does he mean in saying that, when you have inference-based knowledge, you have ‘correctly reconstructed’ the causes of your belief? (Think of the story about the lava, for example.)
Essay Help “>Essay Help