Get help from the best in academic writing.

HCA 430 Pima Medical Institute Tucson EHR Technology Presentation Essay

HCA 430 Pima Medical Institute Tucson EHR Technology Presentation Essay.

This assignment needs a script as I am giving a speech for minimum of 10 minutes. (Do not need video)Communication with staff is a critical component of being a health care manager. This assignment will help you refine how to do that. You are the CEO of ABC Medical Center. Your facility has just purchased a very expensive and comprehensive EHR system. You must now convince the staff of the merits and functionality of your new system. You are trying to convince the staff this is a help to them, and get their buy-in on using the system. You will accomplish this outreach to staff by creating a YouTube video.The video should address the staff and discuss all the functions and advantages of your new system, including how you will have more engagement with patients, use various social media tools in communication, and allow more interaction with patients.Your talk will focus primarily on the use of peripheral technology. This includes use of social media to broadcast health information (e.g. smoking cessation; being compliant with medications), advantages of Personal Health Records Tool (e.g. MyChart), and M-Health technology (e.g. mobile phone apps). There may be others to discuss as well, and these are outlined fully in your textbook readings.Creating your video:
·
Your
video should be around 10 minutes.
·
You
can have some notes, but should not read from a script. That would not come across well to your
staff. Just have some reminder topics in
front of you.References
HCA 430 Pima Medical Institute Tucson EHR Technology Presentation Essay

CHC The Creation of An Antibiotic Resistant Tobacco Plant in 1983 Discussion.

Create a post in this discussion board providing your opinion about whether you believe the consumption of GMO products are either harmful and unhealthy or innocuous, not unhealthy. There is a solid contingent of individuals and advocacy groups in the US that would prefer GMOs products be banned from the marketplace. Several countries have done so including France, Germany, Austria, Greece, Hungary, the Netherlands, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Bulgaria, Poland, Denmark, Malta, Slovenia and Italy. The United States allows the sale of GMO products and does not require GMO products to be identified by food label. Most companies place a “non-GMO” label on their product even though in some cases that product would not be manufactered from any GMO ingredient. It’s a marketing ploy. I largely believe GMOs are not harmful. I do have concern with GMOs that have the BT toxin gene cassette but a product like Golden Rice has overwhelming value as a nutrient. Which ever side you fall on, harmful or not harmful, provide at least two examples from the information in this Module that led you to your belief, particularly a specific citation from the documentary Genetic Roulette. Also, do you think some of the testimonials on specific personal cases of the what is believed to be the harmful effects of GMOs credible and/or heartfelt? Do you think GMOs should be banned like most countries in Europe, should the US at least mandate the identification of GMO containing products? GMO products generally result in lower product prices, is there a trade-off, no GMOs higher prices or allow GMOs for lower product prices?
CHC The Creation of An Antibiotic Resistant Tobacco Plant in 1983 Discussion

University of Phoenix Students Learning Statistics Annotated Bibliography.

Write the Annotated Bibliography in a Word Document.2. Each annotation must include the following information: (a) main scope of the study (b) methodology (includes the type of statistical analysis) and main points; (c) findings and conclusions; and d) brief note of how the article contributes to the field of the topic.3. Four scholarly journal articles.4. All articles MUST be published within the last five years.5. The articles must be from Academic Journals (i.e., they will have the word Journal in the title of the source). No websites or books are allowed. They must be scholarly journal articles.6. The annotations MUST be 150-250 words long.7. Also, the formatting must be in Annotated Bibliography format. 8. There must be an APA formatted cover page.9. A reference page is not required (because the reference precedes annotations in APA formatting of an Annotated Bibliography).Topics of choice:Visual and Auditory RecognitionAttention and ConsciousnessLong-Term MemoryProblem Solving and Creativity
University of Phoenix Students Learning Statistics Annotated Bibliography

POPF P8640 COLUMBIA Program Evaluation Logic Model & Process Evaluation

POPF P8640 COLUMBIA Program Evaluation Logic Model & Process Evaluation.

P8640 Methods in Program EvaluationTake Home Assignment 1Part 1: Logic ModelConsidering your chosen program case study “CONNECTIONS TO CARE” (C2C), develop a 1-page logic model, using the template below. Part 2: Process Evaluation Considering your chosen program case study “CONNECTIONS TO CARE” (C2C), respond to the following questions: Part 2 can be a maximum of 2 pages. 1.) Based on the activities/processes identified in your logic model, in your own words, provide a definition for a) Dose delivered; b) Dose received; c) Reach and d) Fidelity, related to these program activities. Make sure you identify the activities you are referring to.2.) In the chart below, list 4-6 process evaluation questions that could be asked about the program. Determine what indicators you will use to answer your questions and where this information can be found. Be specific about your primary or secondary data sources, including whether they are qualitative or quantitative, and how the data have been/will be collected. Determine who is best positioned to support data collection and what timeline is feasible.Part 2: Assumptions annex:If you encounter additional ‘unknowns’ as you develop the log frame, process evaluation, or final evaluation proposal, make and state your assumptions in an annex. Assumptions can address inputs, activities, or other aspects of the case study. The annex can be a maximum of 1 page. Bulleted statements of assumptions are adequate.
POPF P8640 COLUMBIA Program Evaluation Logic Model & Process Evaluation

Columbia Southern University Decision Making Across the Organization Questions

online dissertation writing Columbia Southern University Decision Making Across the Organization Questions.

This assignment is a critical thinking and decision-making exercise that will allow you to practice and apply what you have learned from your unit lesson and required unit resources for this unit.
Review the Decision-Making Across the Organization (CT7.2) case on page 7-43 of the textbook, which speaks on Ermler & Trump. Review the scenario, and then respond to the questions below.

Identify the special journals that Ermler & Trump should have in its manual accounting system. List the column headings appropriate for each.
What control system and subsidiary accounts should be included in Ermler & Trump’s manual accounting system? Why?

Columbia Southern University Decision Making Across the Organization Questions

University of San Francisco Personal Leadership Assessment and Self Development Analysis

University of San Francisco Personal Leadership Assessment and Self Development Analysis.

What to include in your written or video report:Utilizing the concepts and information that we covered – Submit your Personal Leadership Assessment & Self Development Report to include the following: Your greatest strengths, motivations, and values.The entrepreneur or leader you want to be,Please identify the observations you would make about your interpersonal skills and your participation in group dynamics, and communication style. Please evaluate your management tendencies and changes or adjustments you would make, and your leadership skills. Please identify areas: for development, action plan, challenges that will hold you back, how you will overcome them,How you will succeed in the future. Which concepts were most relevant to you and that you will use the most. Which of these will you most readily utilize in your new venture? Any other thoughts or comments that you feel are relevant re: your leadership personal leadership style. Written Report If you choose to do a written report – I recommend you …..Review the 10-15 key concepts belowWatch all of the required or related lecture videos onlineEvaluate the questions above on your leadershipCreate a report (using graphs, bullet points, examples; include any graphics or siting work etc) to support your key points.
University of San Francisco Personal Leadership Assessment and Self Development Analysis

Happiness and Positive Psychology: Reflective Essay

Happiness. We all strive for it through material gain, prestige, relationships and often through religious affiliation. Britain as a whole is reported to be less happy today than they were in 1957[1]. Happiness seems to come so easy for some and is a constant struggle as a goal to obtain for others. While some can be happy when they are in a relationship, for example, within a year that wonderful level of happiness seems to wane, even if the relationship is fulfilling and even more wonderful and loving than it had been when the happiness level went up the year before. The module reviewed in class on happiness and positive psychology was extremely illuminating for this writer. In many ways it served to answer questions this writer has always had that remained unanswered, such as why am I not as happy in general as many others I see. When reflecting back to my parents and grandparents, it never dawned on this writer that their dour demeanours would be the genetic basis for my personal happiness set point. Other concepts in the module, such as effective tools or analytical measures such as the various psychometric instruments gave me pause for introspection. Given the many topics covered in the module, this essay will reflect on my personal growth and the personal knowledge gained through the use of both psychometric instruments covered in class and others investigated for purposes of this essay. Through the incorporation of personal reflection for a personal case study, the following topics will be discussed: Personality and set point Optimism Personal Strengths- what yours are, how they applied, how you might Apply them, what limiting factors exits Approaches to happiness- pleasure, eudemonia , methexis ABCDE General level of happiness (Fordyce) Gratitude exercise (reflections on the exercise, not the text itself) Random acts of kindness Personality and set point When looking at the set point concept, that of the genetic establishment of our overall happiness level[2], it is a sad reality for me. Genetically neural transmitter imbalances are known to be hereditary, causing issues with clinical depression, anxiety and psychosis, however, it was not until the infamous study with conducted with identical twins that demonstrated only a 40 -50 percent similarity in happiness between the two siblings[3], that it was determined approximately 50 percent of our happiness is set by our genetic makeup[4]. Researchers tell us that happiness is “genetically influenced, but not genetically fixed” leaving room for personal intervention[5] with some of the tool identified in the current module such as ABCDE and performing random acts of kindness that can boost one’s happiness quotient. Clifford[6] tells us that the set-point concept is like a psychological immune system, limiting or repairing emotional damage and preventing us from dipping too low. Set-point is an interesting concept with regard to happiness, for example, research tells us that wining the lottery may make an individual happier, but only for the short term before returning to the individual’s normal set-point[7]. My personality is upbeat, personable and generally very positive as it appears to others, whereas from a personal stance, a much more serious attitude, that of taking life seriously is more evident and within the core of my being, happiness is not a common element. Not that sadness is either, but overall I am a relatively comfortable individual, not necessarily content in my lot, but doing the best I can. I experienced a particularly memorable situation of profound happiness caused by an extrinsic event – that of buying a dream car, only to have the euphoria and excitement of driving it on the open road become mundane, as the fine automobile became nothing more than a normal car after about six months. I wasn’t not happy, but the profound feeling of happiness and excitement getting behind the wheel was no longer there. Dean Hammer[8] comments that personality is what can temper the genetic predisposition towards happiness or sullenness, by virtue of our character. For example, based on my personality, the car which provided the happiness boost was a Mustang convertible. It has been said that when I’m in my 70s, my personality is such that I shall still be driving a sports car as a senior. Hammer[9] goes on to state that the reality of set-point science has to do with the serotonin transporter that controls how much free serotonin is available in our system at any one time. Serotonin transporters are made by specific genes, such that Hammer states some people produce a lot, others have less effective serotonin transporters[10]. Of interest is Hammer’s statement[11] that two-thirds of people have genes that can make us more depressed, anxious or angry. While set-point is equated with a happiness quotient, I also believe that there is a corresponding set-point, or predisposition, towards depression, anger and anxiety. If I’m not attentive, it is easy for me, with a more serious personality, to fall prey to the depressive genetic tendency that I have. Optimism Having a general optimistic outlook is a healthful tool and effective intervention for leading a happier life. If one looks at the glass as half-full rather than half-empty you tend to see the sunnier side of things, the brighter side. Perhaps it’s my genetic makeup, perhaps it’s my slightly lower happiness quotient, but remaining consistently optimistic requires considerable effort. Optimism is not something that comes naturally to me. As a child it did, but through life events I tend to see things more realistically; although given the subjective nature of such concepts as happiness or optimism, perhaps my reality is tempered with the depressive and anxious predisposition I have. One of the tools I have utilised, however, in order to remain optimistic at times, is having lists with me of things that I know I can take pride in, such as my school work or various domestic abilities, such as cooking and baking. When I am seeing the glass as less than half-full, I pull out the list and have cause for reflecting on my positive achievements which provide factual evidence to whatever it is I would like to be optimistic about. For example, if I would like to remain optimistic about a grade in a particular class, I can site evidence for the grades I have received in that class up until the particular test or particular semester end. If I would like to remain optimistic that a gentleman will call me to go out on a date, I can remind myself with the facts of our relationship up to that point: he has phoned daily, we have gone out every Friday and Saturday for the last four months, etc. If I would like to remain optimistic regarding a weight loss plan, I need remind myself of the clothes I have that are getting larger and the ability I have to get into smaller size jeans and not have any extra fat or bulges anywhere they don’t belong. Personal Strengths When I look at my personal strengths, there are a variety of strengths I can call upon to help with boosting my happiness quotient. I am a highly analytic individual. That is one of my major strengths. I am also an individual many people find easy to talk to. It is easy for me to develop friendships and relationships with others. I am also a very empathetic person, such that I can not only appreciate what someone else is going through, but I feel their pain along with them. Of course, having such a personality has major advantages for developing friendships, and according to research friendship is one of the major happiness enhancing tools/techniques[12] such that people find it easy to confide in you, instantly feel close to you, etc. it has its drawbacks. Many times such friendships can feel one sided – the other is always “dumping” on you, the other is always “seeking advice” not necessarily in a malicious way or with the intent to abuse a friendship, but because they see you as the one individual in whom they can confide. This can have a slingshot effect when suddenly the friendship no longer is pleasurable for me but is seen as a chore. For example, I have one friend who continually seeks advice about her husband and her inability to trust him. After belabouring the point for months in conversation, I know when she calls to go shopping or for coffee that conversation will almost exclusively revolve around that topic. After months of listening and providing advice, I now avoid spending time with her. There are several distinct approaches to happiness that the module has brought to light relative to seeking greater levels of happiness and knowing that although I have set-point issues and other genetic predispositions to overcome, in addition to my lists and using my strengths to develop relationships. For example, approaches to happiness that were brought out in the class module were pleasure, eudemonia , and methexis. Eudemonia is the Greek word for happiness, although a more popular translation for the term relates to the flourishing of the human spirit. In order to achieve greater levels of happiness, it seems that when we seek to nurture ourselves and our spirit, it cannot help but allow us to be all that we can and to flourish. Often, as commented in the previous section, group participation and a sense of affiliation and belonging, perhaps through friendship, but definitely in the group environment, as is identified by methexis, happiness is also possible. Our natural pleasure seeking behaviours, when satisfied, also lead to happiness. For example, I know without question that the sweet taste and warm smooth sensation of chocolate melting in my mouth is pleasurable. And, at times when I seek greater levels of happiness, I may reach for a piece of chocolate. The satisfaction that comes with the pleasurable event does heighten my level of happiness[13]. Two tools brought out in the module have proven to be particularly enlightening and beneficial, that I believe I can successfully incorporate into my life in order to achieve greater levels of happiness include: ABCDE Performing random acts of kindness The ABCDE method is a way to reframe thoughts and take active control over them[14]. Reivich and Shatte[15] tell us that if we take control of our thought processes, we take control of our emotions since thoughts are shown to generate emotions. ABCDE is an acronym for adversity, beliefs, consequences, dispute and energy[16]. The overall method requires a detailed exercise that requires documenting or describing as completely as possible the adverse situation, trying to be as factual as possible, without allowing beliefs to enter into the scenario description[17]. During the beliefs phase you build on the adversity and describe “what you were saying to yourself” during the adverse situation[18], in other words, what was the self-talk you were saying to yourself. The next phase focuses on the consequences of your beliefs and requires a description or detailing of all emotions and reactions felt[19]. Dispute requires the individual to identify at least one piece of factual evidence that highlights how the beliefs were inaccurate and unfounded[20], in other words, putting things in their proper perspective, taking the negative emotions out. After identifying the evidence, an alternative way of looking at the situation is discovered and then the whole scenario is put into perspective[21]. Finally, the energy step is used to identify or rate how the ABCD phases helped to shift what was negative energy into positive energy and thoughts[22]. I used this exercise following the demise of a close friendship that had been established similarly to that described earlier, when all I felt I was doing was being there to advise and in this case for over five years at someone else’s convenience only. The other individual is heavily egocentric and a narcissist. When we argued at the time of the demise, she typically said many very hurtful things. I am non-confrontational, so I just drove away leaving many things unsaid that festered inside of me, definitely compromising my happiness quotient. When applying ABCDE, I had the following results: Adversity: CN = who, dissolution of friendship/argument = what, two months ago = when, in the car as I was driving on the highway to drop her back at her home = where. It was during rush hour on the roads, it was hot and the air conditioner was on, I was going very fast and afraid that my growing anger was going to lead me to unsafe driving. I also felt like I was talking with someone who was drunk, i.e., “Don’t confuse me with the facts” as she only heard what she wanted to hear and picked out specific words rather than hearing or dealing with things in their proper context. Beliefs – part of me believed what she said, especially the very hurtful arrows she shot at me, thus self-talk such as “CN must be right, I am hateful” or “I am just like my mother[23]” rather than rejecting her comments as purely defensive. Consequences – I was absolutely enraged, almost got into an accident, was hysterical when I finally got home. I have been unable to let it go and be comfortable. I feel I left so many things unsaid that would hurt her the way she hurt me. Dispute: Evidence that her issues were untrue are based on factual history documenting the one sided friendship and my friendship and personality. Alternative way of seeing this is by stating “I’ve had enough of a bad situation, I don’t need to keep putting myself there and the friendship is over. It’s like a bad breakup with a member of the opposite sex, no matter how it’s done if someone is hurt, they lash out; it doesn’t mean what they said is true.” Putting it in perspective is similar to Alternative for me. Energy – I feel even more refreshed and positive, healthy and lighter overall just writing this down for the essay than I did when I originally went through this for the module in class. I feel clearer and more available for myself and others. I feel happier. Random acts of kindness are shown to bring happiness to others and to the self[24]. Nahum[25] tells us that something as simple as a kind word or volunteering demonstrate acts of benevolence, such that “others want to be around the person who is considered kind to others and therefore at peace with themselves.” This of course, builds on the concept that relationships and friendship, no matter how trivial, can bring happiness. In the trivial, as an act of not taking wait staff at restaurants or clerks at the grocery for granted when all they hear all day is complaints, I chat with them and ask about their day. If I see another customer has given them a particularly hard time I chat with the clerk or server to draw them out and make them feel better about themselves and the situation. It puts a smile on both of our faces and I always feel happier. As a result of the module, I registered with Authentic Happiness[26], Dr. Martin Seligman’s website, and a variety of psychometric instruments were used to determine this writer’s personal level of happiness. Five of the questionnaires on Seligman’s site[27] were completed. The following identify the questionnaires taken and the scores received. Authentic Happiness Inventory[28], scoring 3.08 on a scale of 1 – 5; Fordyce Emotions Questionnaire[29], scoring 7 overall, on a scale of 0 – 10; 80 out of 100 and 20 out of 100 on subscales; General Happiness Scale[30], scoring 3.75 on a scale of 1 – 7; Gratitude Survey[31], scoring 19 on a scale of 6 – 42; Approaches to Happiness Questionnaire[32] assessing three routes to happiness, scoring: 3.17 on a scale of 1 – 5 for Pleasant Life, 2.83 on a scale of 1 – 5 for Good Life, and 2.33 on a scale of 1 – 5 for Meaningful Life. Although the module had a significant impact on me, there are issues that need to be discussed relative to the merits of using psychometric instruments. One of the major frustrations found in the use of psychometric instruments is the lack of feedback based on the scoring received. For example, on a scale of 2.33 for Meaningful Life in the Approaches to Happiness Questionnaire[33] one could surmise that this writer does not feel that she is living a significantly meaningful life. That is not an accurate depiction at all and is contradictory to the 3.75 rating on the General Happiness Scale[34] which indicates there is a stronger element of happiness felt. Researchers have determined that the use of more than one psychometric instrument is often beneficial to eliminate jumping to conclusions based on one score, and trying to achieve a consensus and/or overall picture from those instruments used[35]. Steiner and Thibault[36] go on to point out the dangers associated with false-positive results when psychometric instruments are used in a general setting, for example, administering the Beck’s Depression Scale to an entire patient population, including those who are not suffering from depression. Hancock[37] also commented on the potential for a subject to have test anxiety, whether that be related to the academic environment or the general psychological makeup of the individual. Assessing the individual’s scores on a particular individual or series of psychometric instruments may not yield the same results in one person as it would someone with test anxiety as their general fears would compromise the validity and reliability of the instrument’s results[38]. Other researchers have commented on the impact to the validity of an instrument based on differences presented by cultural norms and ideologies[39],[40]. Other researchers have brought up the issues of instrument validity and reliability in general, such as Garb, Lilienfeld, Nezworski and Wood[41] who detail the generalized nature of interpreting the most frequently used psychometric instrument for the last 85 years – the Rorschach inkblot test. Garb et al.[42] state that with the exception of schizophrenia, the test does not measure or detect psychological or personality disorders with any degree of reliability or validity and is subject to interpreter error. Garb et al.[43] emphasize that results can be interpreted much like one’s horoscope with generalized phrases, referred to as Barnum statements, such as “Hmmmm. This is obviously a very bright individual. Well educated, a cerebral type. Focuses on thoughts, probably avoids reacting to events in a purely emotional way. I have the impression of a scientist rather than a business person or artist, though I do see some artistic tendencies” or they will interpret the results based on prior knowledge of the patient and facts surrounding the patient’s case. Researchers cite mixed reasons behind the difficulty of using psychometric instruments to determine one’s level of happiness. For example, Matousek[44] comments that happiness is a subjective term and that the element of subjectivity is the “greatest variable in the happiness equation.” Given the subjective nature of happiness, developing a valid and reliable psychometric instrument is difficult. Providing a means of interpreting the results of such an instrument would present even greater difficult as those participating in studies have their own subjective definitions of happiness and events as well. Bibliography Bacon, Steven E., Collins, Michael J.