here is the requirement After watching Amy Cuddy’s TED Talk,Discuss how developing your nonverbal communication knowledge and skills can benefit you personally and professionally.In your post, BE SURE to reference specific textbook information and observations from the video to support your ideas.BE SURE to demonstrate your understanding of the nature of nonverbal communication and the various nonverbal systems/codes in your post as well.I need to see that you are applying chapter concepts in your discussion threads! Be sure you are doing that. Provide a response to the “Scents and Sensibility” article,Discussing whether or not you believe olfactics is a nonverbal system of communication.some exm1-Mastering nonverbal communication can help tremendously in anyone’s professional and personal life, because nonverbal communication conveys more than verbal communication does. Nonverbal actually converys 66-90 percent of our communication. Learning how your actions and little things that people take from you can help you insure you’re putting the right message across. It’s not always what you say to a person that gives them a certain message, it’s the unspoken physical and behavioral cues, the book states. The main cues that give off the biggest nonverbal message is appearance, kinesics, eye contact, facial expressions, haptics, paralanguage, and proxemics. In your professional life it’s very important you convey the right message that will secure your future in the profession, not damage it. You want to come off professional so you will dress and act a certain way in the job area then you normally would otherwise. This will make people respect you in the work area. Having proper posture and facial expressions will give strong impressions to people. In the book it says when you walk with shoulders back, spines erect, and heads up you are perceived as confident and strong. Although these little things seem mindless, it will take you great lengths in your career. In the video Amy Cuddy mentions how body language can be a reason you get promoted, it can also show power and dominance. For your personal life, sending incongruent messages or wrong messages in general can create a lot of drama and chaos. Unlike the workplace, people in your personal life will probably be more emotional towards your nonverbal cues you give them. Incongruent messages are when your verbal and nonverbal meaning contradict each other. This can lead to a lot of unnecessary confusion. In this case, people instantly go with the nonverbal cues, which could be the worse of the two. By giving off positive nonverbal cues, you can create a closer, more open relationship with people. I found the whole article, Scents and sensibility very interesting. I’ve always known people are drawn to things they like by their scent, but never realized how that desire can lead you to pick a soulmate. I don’t know how much I believe in olfactics being a type of nonveral connection. Although you can help your scent with perfume, deodorant, or cologne there’s not much that can help your natural scent. I think olfactics is more of a mindset or attraction. The article mentions how it’s like a drug someone is drawn to, it says, “when you’re turned on by your partner’s scent, taking a deep whiff of his chest or the back of her neck feels like taking a powerful drug.” I view nonverbal communication as something you have much more control over in the moment. However, I do agree that someone’s scent can tell a lot about someone, or give them some type of communication. From the scent a person can assume, or take what they think from it.2- Developing your nonverbal communication knowledge and skills can substantially influence your future in positive ways. Doing so will allow you to have better connections with others both in your personal life and your professional life. The massive amount of information we share nonverbally proves the importance of fully understanding this phenomenon. The most important lesson I learned from the TED Talk is the message of “Fake it until you become it.” In order to do this, one must reject the idea that he or she does not belong in a particular stressful situation. If he or she does not think he or she belongs there, it is necessary to fake it until he or she becomes comfortable enough to feel that he or she actually belongs there. This method is all about building confidence. Having such confidence can help you get a wonderful job or even help you ask someone out for a date. Any way you slice it, “Faking it until you become it’’ can vastly expand one’s horizons. The video mentioned power poses as a source of confidence in stressful situations. Simply taking two minutes to assume a power pose before an important stressful situation can boost your confidence and in turn, your results. Combine these power poses with “Fake it until you become it” and you have a recipe for success. Our text defines nonverbal communication as the transmission of meaning through an individual’s nonspoken physical and behavioral cues. Nonverbal communication is just that- nonverbal. This type of information sharing is not transmitted through speech but instead through body language, voice, touch, personal space, appearance, and environmental features. Learning how to tune these systems can lead to unimaginable gain both in your personal and professional life. I absolutely believe olfactics is a nonverbal system of communication. I believe it fits the criteria of a nonverbal communication system as described in chapter six. This system conveys information to a potential partner without speaking a single word. Sharing this information is especially important as it has the ability to affect your long-term personal life. I personally believe that olfactics is not a pseudo-science and should be investigated more in-depth to reveal its true importance.3-Developing your non-verbal communication skills can help you personally and professionally. It can help you professionally because nonverbal communication can help demonstrate confidence, enthusiasm, and professionalism in the workplace. Nonverbal cues such as using good eye contact can help you better connect with your peers, which helps cooperation. Personally, using good body language such as not folding your arms during a conversation with another person can help them feel more comfortable around you. They are multiple types of nonverbal communication techniques. The use of body movement, vocie, touch, personal space, and appearence work together to create nonverbal communication. In the text Tyra Banks began doing fashion shows in Europe. A smile she made amous called the smize, which does not use the smile but the eyes. The text says that Tyra built a empire from her ability to manipulate her nonverbal communication to create unique expressions on runways and television. Olfactics is an example of nonverbal communication. This type of nonverbal communication fits the criteria discussed in chapter six. Like other nonverbal characteristics olfactis uses physical characterists since you use sense of smell.
Amy Cuddy TED Talk Nonverbal Communication Skills Discussion
CU 1976 Montreal Olympics Project Management Failure Case Analysis Essay
CU 1976 Montreal Olympics Project Management Failure Case Analysis Essay.
I have attached the work of my other team members have worked on. I have to work on question 17 to 20. Here is the question:The journal indicated below describes a national project. Based on the journal, and on your team’s understanding of the project, answer the questions below:DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000332 Journal title: “1976 Montreal Olympics: Case Study of Project Management Failure”#QuestionPoints1Was it an internal or external project? Provide rationale. 52Identify at least 10 major stakeholders for the project.53What were the needs or expectation of each stakeholder?54Identify and describe at least 5 most important resources used in the project.55What was the alternative approach for the project (i.e. if the stadium had not been built, what else could have been done to ensure the olympics still occurred)?56Based on (5) above, was building the stadium at this location and at this time the best approach to have been chosen? Provide rationale using PV, NPV, IRR, B/C. [1 page]207Provide two Level 3 Work Breakdown Structures (WBS) for this project. These two should be the intial (or planned) and final (or actual) WBS. Explain the difference [2 pages]208Based on (7), was there an evidence of scope creep in the project? Provide rationale.59Create one network diagram for the project using the final WBS in (7) above [1 page]3010Use the Level 2 tasks in the final WBS to create one GANTT chart for the project. [1 page]3011Use the initial and final WBS to create two high-level budgets for the project. These two should be the initial and final budgets. Explain the difference. [2 pages]3012Using the risk sources, describe three major (broad) categories of risks in the project.613Using a table, list at least ten individual risks ranked by severity, and also link each of them to one of the categories in (12) above [1 page]2014For each risk in (13) above, describe at least one thing that was done, or could have been done to mitigate that risk.515Was there adequate quality management processes in place (including quality planning, quality assurance and quality control)? Provide rationale. 416Was there adequate outsourcing in the project? Provide rationale.517The journal title indicates this project was a failure. Do you agree? Provide rationale. 518If anyone in your group was appointed the project manager for this project, what would you have done differently to make this project successful?519Describe at least five major lessons that can be learned from this project.520Other – Abstract, Introduction, Conclusion (one paragraph each)1021Other – Effective APA (Times New Roman, font size 12, double-spaced, in-text citations, grammar, reference list, etc)1022Other Considerations5 TOTAL240Side note from instructor:Your response should be between 15 -20 pages only, including all auxiliary pages such as Title page, Reference page and Table of Content.This research project requires you to tie together the key components of project management.Ensure all responses you provide (including numbers and facts) are supported with information from the journal, or where necessary, provide appropriate assumptions and additional information from external sources. However facts from the journal will trump all external sources. This journal including all other external sources should be correctly referenced.Use effective APA in-text citation to help the reader know exactly where you are picking your facts from. Your groups should help you bounce off ideas off each other, since no one person knows it all. If there are any questions or clarifications needed, the PM may contact me. All the best! It has to be in 5 to 6 pages, APA format and references are important
CU 1976 Montreal Olympics Project Management Failure Case Analysis Essay
Qualitative Methods Research Journal
best assignment help Qualitative Methods Research Journal. Paper details The purpose of the assignment is to make you familiar with Research Ethics and Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS2). Delivery: Journal – 4% How would you apply TCPS2 to your research topic (the study you are designing)? 1. Think of confidentiality and any other ethical issues you think might arise within your study (e.g. is your population particularly disadvantaged? is it a sensitive topic? 2. How would you go about getting access to the group of people you are interested in studying? 3. What ethical issues might come up when trying to access this population? 4. Will this be overt or covert research? 5. How will you get voluntary informed consent?Qualitative Methods Research Journal
Sartre’s “Why Write?” and Miller’s “Narrative” Essay (Critical Writing)
The reader is extremely important for the writer because reading is the significant act in disclosing the generosity of the work, and the writer should understand for whom he writes because the reader is free in reading, and he is also responsible for the work and for the produced universe. From this perspective, in “Why Write?”, Jean-Paul Sartre recognizes the importance of the reader’s personality for the general act of writing, reading, disclosing the world. Sartre notes that “the one who writes recognizes … the freedom of his readers” (Sartre 67). Thus, Sartre focuses on one of the most important questions for the writer in order to provide the contest for the ideas of generosity, essentialism, freedom, and justice. This question is “For whom does one write?” (Sartre 69). Concentrating on the role of the reader, Sartre receives the opportunity to discuss the complex process of writing as the act in which both the writer and reader are responsible for disclosing the aspects of the world. From this point, addressing the freedom of the reader, Sartre clearly states, “both of us bear the responsibility for the universe” as the world of writing (Sartre 66). Thus, the reader is responsible for the universe while referring to the idea of generosity. Disclosing the world, both the writer and reader should be not only free but also generous. That is why, the reader and his freedom are the focus for the writer who often writes for the certain public. In this case, literature becomes not only the product of writing but also the product of relations between the writer and his audience because the written world can reveal itself clearly only within the context of the reader’s perception and vision. People need narratives in the form of fiction and repetition of many stories in order to understand their place in the world, find the solution to the typical problems, and try the effective scenarios. In this case, narratives as the stories representing the occurred events and legends as the stories representing the classic scenarios are important to assist a person in coping with the concrete situation. In the work “Narrative”, Hillis Miller states that narratives are important to stimulate the person’s typical activities such as role-playing and daydreaming. Thus, the “make-believe is a fundamental human activity” (Miller 68). Fiction as the type of literature stimulates persons to make up situations and solutions in order to adapt to the reality. In order to find the place in the world, a person chooses to imitate the actions presented in narratives. Miller explains this practice while stating that “we need fictions in order to experiment with possible selves” (Miller 69). From this point, narratives can be discussed as safe places which can also present the plan of actions. Furthermore, legends and myths are more important in this context. People need the repetition of the same stories in order to add some sense to the world. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Legends and myths can provide the formula which works in the real world. In spite of the fact that plot elements cannot be identical every time, “etiological myths” are significant to provide the information on the mankind’s origins as well as effective scenarios (Miller 72). Such myths as the myth about Oedipus are important for the person because they provide the effective explanation to the things which cannot be discussed logically. As a result, the person receives the hints to solve issues which can be indicated as taboos or other controversial problems. Works Cited Miller, Hillis. “Narrative”. Critical Terms for Literary Study. Ed. Frank Lentricchia and Thomas McLaughlin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2010. 67-79. Print. Sartre, Jean-Paul. “What is Literature?” and Other Essays. New York, NY: Harvard University Press, 1988. Print.
Tufts University FBI Electronic Surveillance Program and FISA Discussion Questions
Tufts University FBI Electronic Surveillance Program and FISA Discussion Questions.
Question 1: First Draft; Sources – Focusing on whether you make a strong legal argument supported by legal sourcesTOPIC; The Do’s and Don’t on the constitutionality of the FBI electronic surveillance program focusing on the “400 Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), 50 U.S.C. 1809 statue.9-60.202 Illegal Electronic Eavesdropping – Prosecution Policy9-13.00 Electronic Recording of Statements.Homeland Security: The Essentials – Chapter 1Homeland Security: The Essentials – Chapter 2Before Privacy, Power: The Structural Constitution and the Challenge of Mass Surveillance9-60. Criminal Sanctions Against Illegal Electronic Surveillance400 Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), 50 U.S.C. 1809The Fourth Amendment in a Digital WorldSocial Network, Government Surveillance, and the Fourth Amendment Mosaic TheoryEavesdropping on Our Founding Fathers: How a Return to the Republic’s Core Democratic Values Can Help Us Resolve the Surveillance CrisisStepping on (or Over) the Constitution’s Line: Evaluating FISA Section 702 in a World of Changing ‘Reasonableness’ Under the Fourth AmendmentUSE THE ABOVE RESOURCES TO COME-UP WITH A FIRST DRAFTEXAMPLE OF A DRAFTDepartment of Homeland Security v. ThuraissigiamI. IntroductionThe case of Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam involves immigration law and the writ of habeas corpus. This case challenges the constitutionality of suspending the writ of habeas corpus to noncitizens who fail to provide a creditable fear of persecution if returned to their home country.A. Do the restrictions of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) limiting asylum seekers’ ability to obtain review under the federal habeas statute violate the Suspension Clause of the U.S. Constitution and the writ of habeas corpus?B. Thesis: The U.S. Supreme Court’s adjudication of the Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, 591 U.S. ___ (2020) case was constitutional and did not violate the Suspension Clause of the U.S. Constitution by denying the plaintiff right to habeas corpus review of an expedited removal order.II. FactsA. A native of Sri Lanka illegally entered the U.S. and was detained for expedited removal by U.S. Immigration officials. The expedited removal process permits immigration officials to “fast-track” the removal of inadmissible noncitizens who do not have the appropriate entry documentation or provide false information to enter the country and has been in the country for less than two continuous years. Those in that situation can be processed for expedited removal by foregoing the review process (Shah, 2020). The respondent, Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam, received an asylum interview by immigration officials and was determined not to have met the creditable fear of persecution standard.B. The plaintiff filed a federal habeas petition with the District Court alleging fear of persecution in his home country, a claim he failed to make during his asylum interview. The District Court dismissed the petition.C. The plaintiff appealed and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the ruling on grounds that the action violated both the Suspension and the Due Process Clauses.D. In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court held that asylum-seeker Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam did not have a constitutional right to habeas corpus review in federal court, reversing a decision in favor or the plaintiff by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Justices Sotomayor and Kagan dissented the Court’s ruling.III. HoldingA. As applied here, §1252(e)(2) does not violate the Suspension Clause.Habeas has traditionally provided a means to seek release from unlawfuldetention. Respondent does not seek release from custody, but an additionalopportunity to obtain asylum. His claims therefore fall outside the scope ofthe writ as it existed when the Constitution was adopted.(DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 2).B. As applied here, §1252(e)(2) does not violate the Due Process Clause.More than a century of precedent establishes that, for aliens seeking initial entry,“the decisions of executive or administrative officers, acting within powers expresslyconferred by Congress, are due process of law.” Respondent argues that this ruledoes not apply to him because he succeeded in making it 25 yards into U. S. territory.But the rule would be meaningless if it became inoperative as soon as an arriving alienset foot on U. S. soil. An alien who is detained shortly after unlawful entry cannot besaid to have “effected an entry.” (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 3).IV. Background or Discussion of Prior LawA. Current Immigration Laws Pertaining to the Thuraissigiam Case1. Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), 110 Stat. 3009–546The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), 110 Stat. 3009–546 was passed by Congress in 1996. Prior to the enactment of the IIRIRA, Congress realized the removal process for asylum seekers from the country placed an untenable impact on the system and did not want to risk releasing them into the country only to have them not appear for their removal hearing (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 1). Justice Alito affirmed this Act was devised to streamline the immigration system by rooting out meritless claims and quickly remove aliens from the country (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 1). Within the IIRIRA are restrictions which limit asylum seekers from obtaining federal habeas review and permits inadmissible aliens such as Mr. Thuraissigiam to be expeditiously removed from the country (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, pp. 2, 3). The Ninth Circuit ruled this action was unconstitutional because the respondent’s due process rights were violated due to the suspension of writ of habeas corpus (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 2).2. U. S. Const., Art. I, §9, cl. 2. (The Suspension Clause)The Suspension Clause in the U. S. Const., Art. I, §9, cl. 2. states, “The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” (law.cornell.edu, 2020).3. Writ of Habeas CorpusThe Writ of Habeas Corpus is used to determine the validity of a prisoner’s detention by the State. The Latin phrase means “that you have the body.” and originated from the 39th clause of the Magna Carta signed by King John of England in 1215 which states “No man shall be arrested or imprisoned…except by the lawful judgment of his peers and by the law of the land,” (law.cornell.edu, 2020). Habeas Corpus is also used in the examining extraditions, the amount of bail set, and court jurisdiction (law.cornell.edu, 2020).4. 8 U. S. C. (law.cornell.edu, 2020).a). §§1182 denotes classes of aliens ineligible for visas or admissionb). §§1229a(e)(2)(A) outlines the removal proceedings for the inadmissibility or deportability of an alien.c). §§1252(e)(2) lays out the provisions for Judicial review of orders of removald). 8 CFR §1240.11(c) describes applications for asylum and withholding of removal.5. Fifth Amendment, U.S. Constitution (Due Process)Among the number of rights covered by the Fifth Amendment is that of due process. The due process of law is a requirement for any criminal or civil legal proceeding that would deny a citizen “life, liberty or property” (law.cornell.edu, 2020).B. Past Relevant Law CasesDHS v. Thuraissigiam cited several law cases, among those are the following:1. Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U. S. 723, 746 (2008)In a 5-4 ruling, Justices found that individuals captured in Afghanistan fighting against the United States and then detained at the U.S. Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba had the right to challenge their detention. These “enemy combatants” would have had to remain in detention for the duration of that conflict. Their aim was for release from detention at Guantanamo (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 32).2. Nishimura Ekiu v. United States, 142 U. S. 651, 660 (1892)In this case, a 25-year-old Japanese female attempting to enter the U.S. in San Francisco challenged the constitutionality of some provisions of the Immigration Act of 1891. The litigant was detained before entering the country (aboard a sea vessel), immigration officials determined she would be “liable to become a public charge” and detained for removal. Following appeals by the detainee, the Court held that she did not have the right to habeas corpus and that the 1891 Act was constitutional (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 27).3. INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U. S. 289, 301 (2001)Here the Court ruled that the Clause, at a minimum, “protects the writ as it existed in 1789,” when the Constitution was adopted.4. Munaf v. Geren, 553 U. S. 674 (2008)In Munaf v. Geren, Mohammad Munaf, an American citizen was arrested by U.S. forces in Iraq for allegedly committing a kidnapping. His sister filed a petitioned for habeas through the U.S. District Court in DC who dismissed his case for lack of jurisdiction. Munaf was sentenced to death by an Iraqi court. Eventually, the Court ruled the habeas corpus statute extended to American citizens held overseas in American military custody.V. Reasoning/AnalysisThe Supreme Court was correct in their ruling regarding the constitutionality of the provisions contained in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act that allows for the expedited removal of certain applicants seeking admission into the United States. The 7-2 decision by the Court affirmed that the IIRIRA did not violate the Suspension Clause or the Due Process Clause. The IIRIRA provision at issue in this case, §1252(e)(2), limits the review of an alien in expedited removal status from obtaining a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The ruling in this case only pertained to this specific case and does not impede the asylum claim process for those noncitizens meeting the requirements for asylum.Immigrants entering the United States are not always granted access for a number of reasons as prescribed in §§1225(b)(1)(A)(i), (iii)(I)–(II). In this case, the issue in question is whether §§1252(e)(2) which provides for judicial review of orders of removal was violated by denying the respondent the writ of habeas corpus. Given that the respondent entered the country illegally and upon being observed within 25 yards across the border, he was immediately apprehended and processed for expedited removal. During this process, the respondent, Mr. Thuraissigiam, had the opportunity to establish a claim for asylum; however, during the asylum interview, it was determined he did not establish a “credible fear of persecution” as required by §1225(b)(1)(B)(v).The respondent’s determination for asylum was unfavorable because he did not satisfy immigration officials’ questioning regarding the persecution he would face in his home country of Sri Lanka. During his interview, he admitted by abducted by a group of unknown men and beaten, yet he asserted that he was not fearful of persecution because of his race, political views, or any other protected criteria (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 9). Immigration officials believed his story about the abduction and beating; however, due to the lack of specifics on who perpetrated this act, the most logical conclusion was to determine that his “credible” fear of persecution failed to meet the standards defined by §1225(b)(1)(B)(v) (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 9).As to the application of habeas, the concurring Justices effectively argued that the writ was traditionally applied for individuals to seek release from detention. Justice Clarence Thomas provided an insightful historical account of the origin of the Suspension Clause. In his concurrence, Justice Thomas noted the writ over time became a right to freedom from arbitrary detention as well as a procedural writ and later on the common-law writ of habeas corpus to liberty (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, THOMAS, J., concurring, 2020, p. 2). Furthermore, Justice Thomas cited the guarantee in Magna Carta that “[n]o free person (Nullus liber homo) shall be taken or imprisoned, or disseised or outlawed or exiled, or in any way destroyed . . . except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.” (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, THOMAS, J., concurring, 2020, p. 2).The case law relied upon by the respondent and dissenting Justices were inappropriately applied to this case. No current case law was cited that fell within the scope of DHS v. Thuraissigiam. In using the INS v. St. Cyr, this case affirmed by the Court that the Suspense Clause, “protects the writ as it existed in 1789,” when the Constitution was adopted.”, and the respondent was not seeking release from detention but the chance to apply again for asylum (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 11). Additionally, the Munaf case had nothing to do with seeking entry into the country but another different matter completely. In Nishimura Ekiu v. United States, 142 U. S. 651 (1892), a noncitizen who challenged the constitutionality of the Immigration Act of 1891 was denied the writ of habeas corpus by the Circuit Court and the Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s ruling (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 26). In Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U. S. 723, 746 (2008), Justices ruled that individuals captured in Afghanistan while fighting against the United States and detained at the U.S. Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba had the right to challenge their detention. However, they were petitioning for release from detention at Guantanamo (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 32) unlike the petition filed by the respondent.The position of Justice Sotomayor indicated the interviewing Asylum Officer and his supervisor’s determination was inappropriately reached and gave the appearance that she questioned the competency of the immigration officials in executing their duties. Her instinct appeared to with the plaintiff over the decision of the immigration officials. Justice Sotomayor’s statement, “But respondent sought only the proper interpretation and application of asylum law (which statutorily permits him to remain if he shows a credible fear of persecution)” (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting, 2020, p. 16), highlighted her concerns over whether the plaintiff’s claims of creditable fear of persecution was correctly determined despite information from the asylum interview by the plaintiff in which he clearly affirmed he did not fear persecution based on ethnicity, political view or any other reason (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 9). Immigration officials processed the respondent’s asylum claim appropriately and the respondent provided additional testimony to an Immigration Judge who approved a “de novo” review and remanded the case to the DHS for removal (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 29).The system works only if each branch of power trust that the others are operating in good faith. The Executive empowers officials to execute and enforce those laws legislated by the Congress. Justice Alito reminded that the Court held that Congress was allowed to determine the conditions for lawful entry into the country and that, “an alien at the threshold of initial entry cannot claim any greater rights under the Due Process Clause. (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 2).VI. ConclusionImmigration into the United States continues to be a significant issue for the country as well as for the thousands of immigrants petitioning for entry. For decades immigrants have attempt to and many have circumvented the law to gain access. Congress upon realizing the heavy burden of adjudicating the numerous cases of asylum seekers felt it necessary to relive some of the burden from the immigration system by enacting the IIRIRA. Certain provisions provide for the expeditious removal of alien immigrants not meeting standards set by Congress.As stated in the Court’s Opinion, “The past decade has seen a 1,883% increase in credible-fear claims, and in 2018 alone, there were 99,035 claims.” (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 8). The men and women who patrol our borders and are empowered by the Executive to enforce the laws passed by Congress are extremely aware of the way our immigration system is abused by those seeking to skirt the law to enter the country.Justice Alito concluded that the respondent, Mr. Thuraissigiam, did not have a constitutional right to habeas review because historically, the primary use of writ of habeas corpus was mainly for release from detention, which he did not request but rather to vacate his expedited removal order to permit him another chance to apply for asylum (Shah, 2020). Additionally, any due process rights granted to him would be limited by statute rights and not the Constitution (Shah, 2020).By being apprehended 25 yards from the border while attempting to enter the country illegally, the only rights the respondent has are those afforded by statute and is therefore not entitled to procedural rights. Therefore, the Suspension Clause nor the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment were violated and the IIRIRA’s limitations on habeas review in Mr. Thuraissigiam’s case were applied constitutionally (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 2020, p. 2).Future Impact of Court’s Ruling on Suspension Clause and the Writ of Habeas CorpusThe impact of this 7-2 Supreme Court decision will be minimal on asylum seekers as long as they are able to sufficiently prove a “credible” fear of persecution that meets the standards defined by §1225(b)(1)(B)(v). In several instances, the Justices used the terminology in the effect of “an alien in respondent’s position” to underscore that this is was a situational case and that the law would be applied to each case accordingly. The two dissenters in this case, Justices Sotomayor and Kagan, highlighted concerns that other critics of the Court’s decision held in that at what point once a noncitizen physically enters the U.S. does he or she have access to habeas corpus and due process protections (Shah, 2020). The Director of Appellate Litigation for the National Immigrant Justice Center, upon learning the Court’s ruling declared, “Today’s Supreme Court decision paves the way for more mistreatment of asylum seekers, for more illegal and arbitrary denials of protection, and tells the federal courts to stand by and watch it happen.” (National Immigrant Justice Center, 2020). Comments such as this shows how overly biased some groups are and that they do not look at the specific circumstances behind each ruling despite what the law states. The immigration laws as written provide clear guidelines on admissibility into the country. Should others want these laws to be expanded or changed, they will need to take it up with the Congress.SourcesBoumediene v. Bush. (2008). Retrieved from: https://casetext.com/case/boumediene-v-bush-5Casetext.com. (2020). 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Retrieved from: https://casetext.com/statute/united-states-code/ti…Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, 591 U.S. ___ (2020). Retrieved from: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-161…Law.cornell.edu. (2020). 8 U.S. Code CHAPTER 12—Immigration and Nationality. (2020). Retrieved from: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/chapter-…Munaf v. Geren, 553 U. S. 674 (2008). Available from: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/06-1666?_escaped_fragment_=&_escaped_fragment_=#!National Immigrant Justice Center. (2020). U.S. Supreme Court Limits Judicial Review Over Expedited Removal. Retrieved from: https://immigrantjustice.org/press-releases/us-supreme-court-limits-judicial-review-over-expedited-removal.Shah, Aditi. (2020). The Supreme Court Rules Against Judicial Review of Expedited Removal. Retrieved from: https://www.lawfareblog.com/Question 1-BProduce 6 pages of the final Position Paper from the draft – TOPIC; The Do’s and Don’t on the constitutionality of the FBI electronic surveillance program focusing on the “400 Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), 50 U.S.C. 1809 statue.As set forth in the syllabus, you are going to write a research paper that must address a legal issue raised in this class or the class readings. Also, a research paper must do more than summarize your findings. Instead, your research paper must have a clear thesis. A thesis is a statement that you seek to prove with evidence in your paper. Because this class is a Legal Studies class, you should limit your evidence to legal sources, i.e., cases, law review articles, and other primary and secondary legal sources. If you write a case note, you should select a recent Supreme Court case and then you should provide your analysis of that majority’s reasoning and the legal effects of that case. I have attached a handout that describes the parts of a case note:https://scholarship.law.umt.edu/mlr/writing_a_case_note.pdfQuestion 2, Focusing on whether you make a strong legal argument supported by legal sources – 4 pagesFor close to over 40 years, federal gun laws have always barred specific individuals with mental health treatment history from possessing, receiving, and purchasing firearms. However, state laws are a patchwork of various regulations, including the federal statute, which some exclude such laws on mental health history assessment. The debate on whether Congress should require all gun buyers to disclose their background check application, whether they have a history of mental illness and whether those applicants will be prescribed antidepressants within the past three years raises several questions for both the proponents and opposers.For proponents, although it is appropriate for Congress to demand all gun buyers to disclose their background check application, whether they have a history of mental illness, there has been a question of whether it is a sufficient justification for gun disqualification. The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has scientifically proved that most non-violent individuals do not have a mental illness, and most people who have mental illness are violent. According to APA, there is very little evidence linking mental illness to gun violence? (Baumann & Teasdale, 2018). Therefore, is a history of mental illness assessment sufficient enough to warrant gun access dispossession?Besides, the conception that a history of mental illness is a bad risk for firearm possession raises further questions about its legality. What criteria should be used to determine individuals whose mental illness history poses a severe threat if allowed to access a firearm? Two, under what conditions should the existing prohibition end.For opposers, who argue that such a move by Congress will impede the Second Amendment by denying individuals to bear arms for personal protection, the question remains whether the right is unlimited. The right is limited to specific categories of people, including the mentally ill and felons (Felthous & Swanson, 2016). So does the restriction by Congress to limit gun possession to mental history assessment violates the Constitution? Also, does such gun laws requiring assessment of mental illness history impede a patient’s privacy rights?ReferencesBaumann, M. L., & Teasdale, B. (2018). Severe mental illness and firearm access: Is violence the danger? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 56(2), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.11.003Felthous, A., & Swanson, J. (2016). Prohibition of persons with mental illness from gun ownership under Tyler. Psychiatric Law http://jaapl.org/content/jaapl/45/4/478.full.pdfFor close to over 40 years, federal gun laws have always barred specific individuals with mental health treatment history from possessing, receiving, and purchasing firearms. However, state laws are a patchwork of various regulations, including the federal statute, which some exclude such laws on mental health history assessment. The debate on whether Congress should require all gun buyers to disclose their background check application, whether they have a history of mental illness and whether those applicants will be prescribed antidepressants within the past three years raises several questions for both the proponents and opposers.For proponents, although it is appropriate for Congress to demand all gun buyers to disclose their background check application, whether they have a history of mental illness, there has been a question of whether it is a sufficient justification for gun disqualification. The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has scientifically proved that most non-violent individuals do not have a mental illness, and most people who have mental illness are violent. According to APA, there is very little evidence linking mental illness to gun violence? (Baumann & Teasdale, 2018). Therefore, is a history of mental illness assessment sufficient enough to warrant gun access dispossession?Besides, the conception that a history of mental illness is a bad risk for firearm possession raises further questions about its legality. What criteria should be used to determine individuals whose mental illness history poses a severe threat if allowed to access a firearm? Two, under what conditions should the existing prohibition end.For opposers, who argue that such a move by Congress will impede the Second Amendment by denying individuals to bear arms for personal protection, the question remains whether the right is unlimited. The right is limited to specific categories of people, including the mentally ill and felons (Felthous & Swanson, 2016). So does the restriction by Congress to limit gun possession to mental history assessment violates the Constitution? Also, does such gun laws requiring assessment of mental illness history impede a patient’s privacy rights?ReferencesBaumann, M. L., & Teasdale, B. (2018). Severe mental illness and firearm access: Is violence the danger? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 56(2), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.11.003Felthous, A., & Swanson, J. (2016). Prohibition of persons with mental illness from gun ownership under Tyler. Psychiatric Law http://jaapl.org/content/jaapl/45/4/478.full.pdf
Tufts University FBI Electronic Surveillance Program and FISA Discussion Questions