Get help from the best in academic writing.

Global influence in multinational firm’s accounting and the opportunities and challenges

Global influence in multinational firm’s accounting and the opportunities and challenges. Can you help me understand this Business question?

Please read the article “For Multinational Firms, Brazil Becomes a Pain in the Wallet” on the next page as a foundation for your discussion. Write a one-page essay that focuses on the following issues:

a) Does it make sense for a firm to go global, i.e. become a multinational firm?
b) In your discussion please explain 3 advantages and 3 disadvantages of going global, and
c) finish with a recommendation on whether jumping in the global arena in the current political and economical environment is warranted.
d) You are required to also discuss material we covered in class. In other words, your discussion cannot be based purely on the article provided.
The other requirements are in the documents.

Global influence in multinational firm’s accounting and the opportunities and challenges

Renmin University Gao Xingjian and Transcultural Chinese Theater by Sy Ren Quah Discussion.

I have 4 tasks totaling 2500 words. Here are the orders. The zip file contains the documents and further instrucitons 29-Sep-2020 – Lily – 1600944318 – 1000 Words (~4 pages) – 5 Days – ARTS3458 — Undergraduate – Distinction – Australia – 3 summaries 4-Oct-2020 – Lily – 1600944677 – 1000 Words (~4 pages) – 10 Days – ARTS3458 – – Undergraduate – Distinction – Australia – 3 reflections 4-Oct-2020 – Lily – 1600945236 – 500 Words – 10 Days – ARTS3458 — Undergraduate – Distinction – Australia – Cinematic and Performing ArtsReflection on a particular argument that jumps out when reading the 3 readings. – 3 summarys 29-Sep-2020 – Lily – 1600945475 – 1000 Words (~4 pages) – 5 Days – ARTS3458 – – Undergraduate – Distinction – Australia- Research Proposal ALL ATTACHED
Renmin University Gao Xingjian and Transcultural Chinese Theater by Sy Ren Quah Discussion

Combination Adjuvant Platform for Human and Animal Vaccines

Combination Adjuvant Platform for Human and Animal Vaccines. A novel combination adjuvant platform for human and animal vaccines Ravendra Garg, Sylvia van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk Volker and Gerdts Abstract Adjuvants are critical component of vaccines. They are being used to enhance and extend the overall immune response, to drive the response towards a specific type of immunity, and to reduce the need for multiple booster immunizations. Here we report the development of a combination adjuvant platform consisting of three immune stimulators, namely host defence peptides, polyphosphazenes and PolyI:C/CpG ODN. The adjuvant platform was co-formulated with a variety of human and animal vaccines and tested in mice, pigs, sheep, koalas, and fish. When co-formulated with a wide range of viral and bacterial antigens including Bordetella pertussis, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), Chlamydia trachomatis and influenza antigens, a single immunization induced 100-1,000 fold stronger humoral immune responses (IgG, IgG1, IgG2a), a much earlier onset of immunity, a clear shift towards a more balanced or Th-1 type of response and extended duration of immunity of up to two years in some cases. The vaccines were highly effective in neonates of less than 7 days of age and provided complete protection against a lethal challenge with B. pertussis or RSV. Furthermore, the polyphosphazenes in this combination allow the assembly of microparticles that when lyophilized were stable for several months. Intranasal immunization with these microparticles induced strong mucosal immune response in the upper respiratory tract. Moreover, the adjuvant platform was highly effective in the presence of maternal antibodies. In summary, we developed a novel vaccine platform for neonates, which provided more balanced, long lasting and fully protective immune responses in neonates after a single vaccination only. Introduction Vaccine provides huge public health benefits for reducing the burden of infectious diseases. Live vaccines generate effective immune responses but have been associated with a number of safety concerns, including improper attenuation and reverting back to virulence. Nonliving vaccine antigens i.e. whole, inactivated viruses and specifically recombinant or highly purified subunit vaccines are often weakly immunogenic and need adjuvants to enhance the immunogenicity of vaccine based on antibodies and effector T cell functions to prevent infection. Adjuvants are critical components of vaccines, usually used to stimulate faster, stronger, and long-lasting immune responses to vaccines. It has various roles in vaccine formulations i.e. enhance immune responses to vaccine antigens, provide faster onset of immunity, improving immune responses to immunization in infant or elderly populations, whose immune system are immature or waning, dose sparing, either reducing the quantity of antigen required in the vaccine preparation or reducing the immunization schedule (Coffman, Sher et al. 2010). Adjuvants are absolutely required in subunit vaccines due to the poor immunogenicity of such antigens. There is no single universal adjuvant which can cover all the vaccine requirements. Using single adjuvant has a number of limitations, including induction of weak, improper, and short lived immune responses. For example, alum and MF59 (Kenney and Edelman 2003) are the universally approved adjuvant for human vaccines. Both normally induce a Th2 biased immune responses but not cellular immune responses which required for immunity against intracellular infections. In many novel adjuvant technologies, using multiple adjuvants in combination often act synergistically by stimulating and activating a various type of immune cells. Combination of adjuvants platform is promising and beneficial for suboptimal vaccines and particularly advantageous for vaccines against specific and more susceptible populations, such as neonates and the older adults. In some aspects, the neonate immune system is similar to that of the elderly, both having diminished anti-microbial activity by immune cells, reduced antigen uptake and presentation by antigen presenting cells and compromised adaptive immune responses (Simon, Hollander et al. 2015). Strong adjuvants may provide an approach to boost immune responses in the both neonates and elderly populations. Most of the studies have combined a delivery system with an immunostimulatory adjuvant, especially combinations with the TLR agonists and MPL. Combination adjuvants have only recently been vigorously explored. Some combinations have been tested in humans and large animals and have yielded promising results. Recently, we developed a novel combination adjuvant platform (TriAdj) which is highly effective with wide range of animal and human vaccine. Novel Combination adjuvant platform for animal vaccines: Veterinary vaccines have been used for several of years, and have an important role in protecting animal health, animal welfare, food production, and public health. They are a cost-effective method to prevent animal disease, improve the food production, greatly reducing the need for antibiotics to treat food and companion animals and reduce or prevent transmission of zoonotic disease to human. Interestingly, the challenges related with vaccinating animals are stability, low cost, ease of administration etc., require new solutions in vaccine development. Freund introduced a combination of mineral oils and bacterial cell components (Freund’s complete adjuvant) for the improvement of vaccine immune responses (Freund et al., 1937). However, many nations are not using the Freund’s adjuvant in animals due to its reactivity and side effects. Alum and emulsions based formulations have been successfully used since long time in a wide variety of animal vaccines. However, with an advanced understanding of the immune system, many new adjuvants (Saponins, Liposomes, virosomes, particle based and TRL ligand) have recently been developed for veterinary applications. A wide range of adjuvants has been successfully used in commercial vaccines for animals and several new technologies are currently in preclinical development. Over the past decade, we have seen several new combination adjuvants, typically contain two and three individual adjuvant components, including MF59™ (Novartis Inc.), AS™ (Glaxo Smith Kline Inc.), IC31™ (Valneva Inc.) etc. We recently developed a novel combination adjuvant platform (TriAdj) that is contained of three components, namely toll-like receptor (TLR) agonist either PolyI:C or CpG ODN and an immunostimulatory host defense peptide (HDPs) in polyphosphazene carrier system (Kindrachuk, Jenssen et al. 2009; Garg, Latimer et al. 2013). Synthetic PolyI:C and CpG ODNs are well known potent adjuvant with various vaccine antigens and have been shown to enhance immune responses by activating monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells, natural killer cells and B cells, and induce the production of proinflammatory cytokines (Krieg 2002; Trumpfheller, Longhi et al. 2012). The second component, HDPs are derivatives of natural host defense peptides, which are cationic amphipathic peptides with microbicidal, chemotactic and/or immunomodulatory properties (Yeung, Gellatly et al. 2011). HDPs are involved in a range of immune functions including immune cell recruitment (neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, T cells and mast cells), innate immune activation, and wound healing (Jenssen, Hamill et al. 2006). The third component, polyphosphazenes are synthetic water-soluble biodegradable polymer with immunostimulatory properties, and forms non-covalent complexes with variety of viral and bacterial antigens and/or other adjuvants to enhance their stability, immunogenicity and allow multimeric presentation (Mutwiri, Benjamin et al. 2007; Andrianov, DeCollibus et al. 2009; Kovacs-Nolan, Latimer et al. 2009; Awate, Wilson et al. 2012). When vaccine antigens were co-formulated with this combination, we found much faster onset of immunity, highly effective even after a single immunization and significantly long lasting, robust, protective immune responses against variety of animal pathogens including bovine viral diarrhea virus, bovine respiratory syncytial virus and porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. The combination adjuvant is stable, cost effective and highly effective in a variety of animals including pigs, sheep, cattle, koalas, cotton rats and mice (Polewicz, Gracia et al. 2011; Khan, Waugh et al. 2014; Snider, Garg et al. 2014; Garg, Latimer et al. 2015). For example, formulation of E2 protein of bovine viral diarrhea virus with TriAdj resulted in strong humoral and cell mediated immune responses, leading to significant protection following pathogen challenge of calves (Snider, Garg et al. 2014). Fusion protein of bovine respiratory syncytial virus co-formulated with TriAdj developed significantly higher antibodies and interferon gamma secretion (Kovacs-Nolan, Mapletoft et al. 2009). Similarly, formulation of S1 domain of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, and outer membrane protein of chlamydial major with TriAdj enhanced humoral and cell mediated immune response in pig and koalas respectively (Khan, Waugh et al. 2014; Makadiya, Brownlie et al. 2016). Novel Combination adjuvant platform for human vaccines: Several combination adjuvants consisting of a variety of immunomodulators such as Immune stimulating complexes (ISCOMs), montanides, nanoemulsions, and Adjuvant Systems have been developed in recent years and are currently being tested with human vaccines in preclinical and clinical trials. The novel adjuvant platform, TriAdj was co-formulated with various human vaccines and tested in mice, pigs, sheep, koalas, and fish. This adjuvant platform is highly effective against a variety of infectious diseases. TriAdj was shown to promote the induction of strong immune responses to various viral and bacterial antigens in multiple animals. For instance, TriAdj in combination with fusion protein of human respiratory syncytial virus (hRSV), mediated the induction of robust, balanced and long-term protective immunity by stimulating long-lived neutralizing antibodies, memory B and CD8 T cells against hRSV (Garg, Latimer et al. 2013; Garg, Latimer et al. 2014). In addition, mucosal vaccination with TriAdj formulated antigen induced both systemic and local immunity in neonates, even in the face of maternal antibodies (Garg, Latimer et al. 2015). Similarly, when TriAdj was used with pertussis toxoid of Bordetella pertussis, strong and protective immune responses were found in both mice and pigs against lethal infection with B. pertussis (Gracia, Polewicz et al. 2011; Polewicz, Gracia et al. 2011). Furthermore, the vaccine formulated with TriAdj induced a prompt onset, longer duration than existing commercial vaccines and effective after a single vaccination even in the presence of maternal antibodies. (Polewicz, Gracia et al. 2013). TriAdj platform was also formulated with influenza virus antigens or chlamydia antigens, which induces strong immune responses in vaccinated animals (Kindrachuk, Jenssen et al. 2009; Shim, Ko et al. 2010). The combination of adjuvants was also shown to be suitable for maternal immunization. Vaccination of pregnant animals with TriAdj formulated human vaccines resulted in efficient transfer of maternal antibodies and protection from subsequent challenge of the offspring (Elahi, Buchanan et al. 2006; Garg, Latimer et al. 2016). These results indicate that maternal immunization with TriAdj formulated antigens might be an alternative, safe and effective approach to provide protection against pathogens in newborn and young infants. Furthermore, the adjuvant platform can be formulated into microspheres (100 nm to 2 μm) to enhance the mucosal and sytemic immune response following intranasal vaccination (Garlapati, Garg et al. 2012). The TriAdj is expected to have multiple applications for the development of vaccines against multiple respiratory pathogens and possibly other infectious agents. Mechanisms of action of novel Combination adjuvant platform: A number of mechanisms of action were identified for this novel combination adjuvant. For example, TriAdj as a mucosal adjuvant increased antigen uptake by dendritic cells, improved dendritic cell maturation, and more efficient transported to local draining lymph nodes to present the antigen to T cells (Garg, Latimer et al. 2013). TriAdj with antigens promoted the production of chemokines, cytokines and inflammatory cytokines, followed by recruitment and activation of several immune cell populations including dendritic cells, macrophages and neutrophils to the upper and lower respiratory tract, that leads to strong and long-term protective immune responses of this novel adjuvant formulation (Sarkar, Garg et al. 2016). This was further correlated to the induction of local humoral and cell-mediated immune responses, including production of large numbers of IgA secreting memory B cells as well as effective memory CD8 T cells. TriAdj also promoted increased germinal centre reactions and effective B cell activation and development in the lungs following mucosal immunization (Garg, Theaker et al. 2016). References Andrianov, A. K., D. P. DeCollibus, et al. (2009). “Poly[di(carboxylatophenoxy)phosphazene] is a potent adjuvant for intradermal immunization.” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(45): 18936-18941. Awate, S., H. L. Wilson, et al. (2012). “Activation of adjuvant core response genes by the novel adjuvant PCEP.” Molecular immunology 51(3-4): 292-303. Coffman, R. L., A. Sher, et al. (2010). “Vaccine adjuvants: putting innate immunity to work.” Immunity 33(4): 492-503. Elahi, S., R. M. Buchanan, et al. (2006). “Maternal immunity provides protection against pertussis in newborn piglets.” Infect Immun 74(5): 2619-2627. Garg, R., L. Latimer, et al. (2014). “Vaccination with the RSV fusion protein formulated with a combination adjuvant induces long-lasting protective immunity.” J Gen Virol 95(Pt 5): 1043-1054. Garg, R., L. Latimer, et al. (2015). “The respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein formulated with a novel combination adjuvant induces balanced immune responses in lambs with maternal antibodies.” Vaccine. Garg, R., L. Latimer, et al. (2013). “Induction of mucosal immunity and protection by intranasal immunisation with a novel respiratory syncytial virus vaccine formulation.” The Journal of general virology. Garg, R., L. Latimer, et al. (2016). “Maternal immunization with respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein formulated with a novel combination adjuvant provides protection from RSV in newborn lambs.” Vaccine 34(2): 261-269. Garg, R., M. Theaker, et al. (2016). “A single intranasal immunization with a subunit vaccine formulation induces higher mucosal IgA production than live respiratory syncytial virus.” Virology 499: 288-297. Garlapati, S., R. Garg, et al. (2012). “Enhanced immune responses and protection by vaccination with respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein formulated with CpG oligodeoxynucleotide and innate defense regulator peptide in polyphosphazene microparticles.” Vaccine 30(35): 5206-5214. Gracia, A., M. Polewicz, et al. (2011). “Antibody responses in adult and neonatal BALB/c mice to immunization with novel Bordetella pertussis vaccine formulations.” Vaccine 29(8): 1595-1604. Jenssen, H., P. Hamill, et al. (2006). “Peptide antimicrobial agents.” Clinical microbiology reviews 19(3): 491-511. Kenney, R. T. and R. Edelman (2003). “Survey of human-use adjuvants.” Expert review of vaccines 2(2): 167-188. Khan, S. A., C. Waugh, et al. (2014). “Vaccination of koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) with a recombinant chlamydial major outer membrane protein adjuvanted with poly I:C, a host defense peptide and polyphosphazine, elicits strong and long lasting cellular and humoral immune responses.” Vaccine 32(44): 5781-5786. Kindrachuk, J., H. Jenssen, et al. (2009). “A novel vaccine adjuvant comprised of a synthetic innate defence regulator peptide and CpG oligonucleotide links innate and adaptive immunity.” Vaccine 27(34): 4662-4671. Kovacs-Nolan, J., L. Latimer, et al. (2009). “The novel adjuvant combination of CpG ODN, indolicidin and polyphosphazene induces potent antibody- and cell-mediated immune responses in mice.” Vaccine 27(14): 2055-2064. Kovacs-Nolan, J., J. W. Mapletoft, et al. (2009). “Formulation of bovine respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein with CpG oligodeoxynucleotide, cationic host defence peptide and polyphosphazene enhances humoral and cellular responses and induces a protective type 1 immune response in mice.” The Journal of general virology 90(Pt 8): 1892-1905. Krieg, A. M. (2002). “CpG motifs in bacterial DNA and their immune effects.” Annu Rev Immunol 20: 709-760. Makadiya, N., R. Brownlie, et al. (2016). “S1 domain of the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus spike protein as a vaccine antigen.” Virol J 13: 57. Mutwiri, G., P. Benjamin, et al. (2007). “Poly[di(sodium carboxylatoethylphenoxy)phosphazene] (PCEP) is a potent enhancer of mixed Th1/Th2 immune responses in mice immunized with influenza virus antigens.” Vaccine 25(7): 1204-1213. Polewicz, M., A. Gracia, et al. (2011). “Influence of maternal antibodies on active pertussis toxoid immunization of neonatal mice and piglets.” Vaccine 29(44): 7718-7726. Polewicz, M., A. Gracia, et al. (2013). “Novel vaccine formulations against pertussis offer earlier onset of immunity and provide protection in the presence of maternal antibodies.” Vaccine 31(31): 3148-3155. Sarkar, I., R. Garg, et al. (2016). “Formulation of the respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein with a polymer-based combination adjuvant promotes transient and local innate immune responses and leads to improved adaptive immunity.” Vaccine 34(42): 5114-5124. Shim, D. H., H. J. Ko, et al. (2010). “Efficacy of poly[di(sodium carboxylatophenoxy)phosphazene] (PCPP) as mucosal adjuvant to induce protective immunity against respiratory pathogens.” Vaccine 28(11): 2311-2317. Simon, A. K., G. A. Hollander, et al. (2015). “Evolution of the immune system in humans from infancy to old age.” Proc Biol Sci 282(1821): 20143085. Snider, M., R. Garg, et al. (2014). “The bovine viral diarrhea virus E2 protein formulated with a novel adjuvant induces strong, balanced immune responses and provides protection from viral challenge in cattle.” Vaccine 32(50): 6758-6764. Trumpfheller, C., M. P. Longhi, et al. (2012). “Dendritic cell-targeted protein vaccines: a novel approach to induce T-cell immunity.” Journal of Internal Medicine 271(2): 183-192. Yeung, A., S. Gellatly, et al. (2011). “Multifunctional cationic host defence peptides and their clinical applications.” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: 1-16. Combination Adjuvant Platform for Human and Animal Vaccines

The half-life of radium-226 is 1600 years. Suppose we have a 23-mg sample. (a) F

assignment writing services The half-life of radium-226 is 1600 years. Suppose we have a 23-mg sample. (a) F.

The half-life of radium-226 is 1600 years. Suppose we have a 23-mg sample.(a) Find a function m(t) = m02−t/h that models the mass remaining after t years. m(t) =  (b) Find a function m(t) = m0e−rt that models the mass remaining after t years. (Round your r value to six decimal places.) m(t) =  (c) How much of the sample will remain after 4000 years? (Round your answer to one decimal place.)  mg (d) After how long will only 16 mg of the sample remain? (Round your answer to the nearest year.) t =  yr
The half-life of radium-226 is 1600 years. Suppose we have a 23-mg sample. (a) F

Does John D. Rockefeller II’s business/political philosophy — as he outlines in the assigned excerpt — hold true in the

Does John D. Rockefeller II’s business/political philosophy — as he outlines in the assigned excerpt — hold true in the U.S. today? (Note that I write “does” — not “should.”) How so, or why not? Make sure to effectively and quickly summarize one or two of his main ideas that either resonate today or that have been rejected (intentional passive voice). Aim to offer a mini-thesis to your overall answer in the first couple sentences. Make sure to ground your discussion of Rockefeller in the assigned text and lectures; ground your discussion of the larger business world today in serious sources (e.g., national newspapers and real magazines) rather than in jejune online-only sources. CITE FROM THE TEXT (USE PARENTHETICAL CITATIONS) TO SUPPORT YOUR IDEA, e.g, (Friedman, “The Social Responsibility of Business Is To Increase Its Profit, page#) YOU CAN BRING ONE SOURCE FROM OUTSIDE AS STATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS ABOVE. YOU HAVE 15 HOURS FROM NOW.

Mbemba Effect Analysis of Cooling Time Against Temperature Analysis Essay

Mbemba Effect Analysis of Cooling Time Against Temperature Analysis Essay.

Create a summary table of the data for the covered and uncovered conditions. That is, only include the total cooling time for each condition.You must follow American Chemical Society (ACS) style, similar to the sample table below:You must also create three line graphs.The first graph shows the data for the uncovered samplesThe second graph shows the data for the covered samplesThe third graph compares the uncovered and covered samples at room temperature and at 100 degrees Celsius. See the sheet named “comparison.”For each table, the vertical axis should indicate temperature, and the horizontal axis should indicate time.You must follow ACS style for the graphs, similar to the example below:Note: do not label the data points on your graphs.Below the table and each graph, write a graphing description of the data. Compare the total cooling time across the range of initial temperatures and the uncovered/covered conditions. Detail the rate of cooling, demonstrated by the slope of the lines. Does the rate change at different points in the cooling process? Look carefully and be specific. The differences may be subtle.
Mbemba Effect Analysis of Cooling Time Against Temperature Analysis Essay