Get help from the best in academic writing.

Ghost Boy is an interesting case study of a form of “locked-in syndrome” where an individual is aware, but cannot communicate because of total body paralysis (except for the eyes). It is extraordinarily rare for any motor function to return; however, as mentioned in Ghost Boy, devices are available that can sometimes aid in communication. Unfortunately, approximately 9 out of 10 victims of locked-in syndrome will die within four months of onset. Not everyone in a PVS (persistent vegetative state) has locked-in syndrome. In fact, most victims of PVS, have no consciousness at all, meaning that they are NOT aware of what is happening around them and have no thought.

Ghost Boy is an interesting case study of a form of “locked-in syndrome” where an individual is aware, but cannot communicate because of total body paralysis (except for the eyes). It is extraordinarily rare for any motor function to return; however, as mentioned in Ghost Boy, devices are available that can sometimes aid in communication. Unfortunately, approximately 9 out of 10 victims of locked-in syndrome will die within four months of onset. Not everyone in a PVS (persistent vegetative state) has locked-in syndrome. In fact, most victims of PVS, have no consciousness at all, meaning that they are NOT aware of what is happening around them and have no thought.. Given this information, as well as your reading of Ghost Boy, write a 2-3 page (double-spaced, 12-point font) essay that addresses the following questions. Note that you do not need to go in any sort of order. Feel free to structure the paper however you’d like and discuss any impressions you had of the reading that are not prompted below, but make sure to also address each of the following prompts: What were your overall impressions of the sections that we read of Ghost Boy? Was there anything that surprised you or that you found especially interesting? Martin was misdiagnosed as being in a PVS state, when in fact he was locked-in. This type of misdiagnosis is extremely rare, but does occur. If you were diagnosed as being in a PVS AND on life support, would you want to be kept alive? If so, for how long? If not, why not? Would you have any fear that you may have been diagnosed as being in PVS when you were really locked- in? Does your family know about your preferences for various end-of-life scenarios (e.g. how long you’d like to be kept on life support)? What problems could potentially arise if family members are unaware of your preferences?Ghost Boy is an interesting case study of a form of “locked-in syndrome” where an individual is aware, but cannot communicate because of total body paralysis (except for the eyes). It is extraordinarily rare for any motor function to return; however, as mentioned in Ghost Boy, devices are available that can sometimes aid in communication. Unfortunately, approximately 9 out of 10 victims of locked-in syndrome will die within four months of onset. Not everyone in a PVS (persistent vegetative state) has locked-in syndrome. In fact, most victims of PVS, have no consciousness at all, meaning that they are NOT aware of what is happening around them and have no thought.
Supervisory Functions in Healthcare. Paper details Based on your past experiences and the knowledge gained during your course work, consider the following question, and post a substantive initial post: In health care, what are the pros and cons of collaborating with other health care departments both internal and external when separated by physical barriers (e.g., floors, buildings, geography, and training professional differences)?Supervisory Functions in Healthcare
Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp Pediatric oncology focuses on caring for pediatric patients, ages zero to eighteen, who are diagnosed with cancer. Research has shown certain interventions which benefit with treatment of these patients. Not only does the nurse working with pediatric patients care for the patient, they also care for the patient’s support system, including parents, siblings and other family members. A nurse working in a pediatric oncology unit should exhibit strong communication skills and a professional behavior and provide education to the patients and their family or support system manners. A pediatric oncology nurse must also work with members of the healthcare team, such as the oncologist, pediatrician, social worker and case managers. A nurse caring for a pediatric patient can provide care that has the potential to improve the quality of life, including preventing the spread of infection, supporting the family and siblings as well as the patient, and providing alternative therapies to help decrease feelings of anxiety and fear in pediatric patients and families, and promote a better environment during treatment. Preventing Infection in Pediatric Oncology Healthcare providers follow a standard set of guidelines to prevent the spread of infection to patients. It is especially important for healthcare providers to follow these guidelines when working with patients who are immunocompromised, as in patients receiving cancer treatment. While there has been improvement in the rate of pediatric patients that survive cancer, there are still ways nurses can improve their care practices to help decrease the risk of infection. A research study performed by Elizabeth A. Duffy and Margaret Rabatin in 2018 focused on prevention of central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in pediatric oncology patients. A Central Venous Catheter access site is the main treatment option for pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy. Central venous sites can become infected if not properly cared for and if the correct steps are not properly followed from the time of insertion until removal of the access site. Depending on how long chemotherapy treatment is, the central venous access could be used for months to years. (Duffy

The British Empire in Africa

How far do you agree that changing attitudes to Empire within Britain explain both expansion and the dismantling of British imperial power in Africa? The British Empire began to expand into Africa in 1880 and by 1913 the empire had control over 458 million people and 25% of the world’s land. However by 1981 the British Empire had come to an end after it could no longer afford the maintenance of such a big Empire. British involvement in Africa was a period that saw many changes, some economic, some international and political changes, which in turn led to many adjustments in Africa itself. In turn these changes affected attitudes of the British government and public opinion and undoubtedly influenced key decisions about both expansion and dismantlement in Africa. Britain’s first intervention in Africa occurred in Egypt. Egypt was part of the Turkish Empire in 1882 but discontent lead to national revolts that scared Britain. Following the purchase of the Suez Canal shares in 1875, British financial and trading interests had grown in the area. Britain could not allow her investments in Egypt jeopardized, as Egypt was a vital route to India. As a consequence of trying to protect these investments Britain occupied Egypt for 40 years longer than anti imperialist Gladstone had hoped. This resulted in further territorial control for Britain; unconsciously Gladstone had expanded the British Empire and ignited the change from informal rule to formal occupation in North Africa. This was all necessary as it was done to protect economic interests of the empire, as well as securing the route to India. The expansion into the Sudan was comparable to that of Egypt as it was unintentional. Once again Britain got drawn in due to an uprising in the area. Gladstone’s first initiative was to put down this unrest as he sent General Gordon who was an experienced and valued soldier to evacuate British and Egyptian nationals from the Sudan to prevent any harm from occurring to them. In spite of this General Gordon disobeyed these orders with an intention of acquiring more land for the empire, resulting in his team and himself getting slaughtered two days before a British force was sent to help them. Expansion of the empire at this point was coincidental and unanticipated as the expansion in North Africa was the outcome of an unplanned policy to exploit economic benefits and ensure stability in the regions to care for British economic interests. However it was a turning point in attitudes towards Africa as the occupation of Egypt resulted in the scramble for Africa between European powers. Expansion remained informal . However ‘Men on the spot’ such as Cecil Rhodes, George Goldie and Sir William McKinnon influenced the central government and built their own success through shipping trade and selling natural resources. Britain wanted the West Coast of Africa for its palm oil. The palm oil resources of West Africa were appealing as palm oil was used as an industrial lubricant and was the base for soaps and candles. However this involvement was not one of formal rule but rather informal trade. It is significant that Britain was only involved for economic reasons and did not posses any ideology of expanding to the west. Britain took control of West Africa simply because the region was unstable due to local resistance and interests of other European powers. In 1885 Chamberlain sent in a British force to support George Goldie in order to secure the region for British interests against both the Ashanti and the French John Gallagher and Ronald Robinson, in their review of The Imperialism of Free Trade, Vol. VI, no. 1 (1953) emphasise the economic importance of informal empire to the British government. Nevertheless Britain was in a dilemma, as it could no longer conform to its informal rule if other European powers established their control over West Africa. This resulted in further reluctant expansion and increased support for men on the spot, as Britain could not allow other European countries to control land in West Africa, which could threaten their trade interests. Britain was once again driven into East Africa due to trade benefits and fear of European rivals, immense competition from Germany resulted in Britain giving support for McKinnon to establish the East Africa Company to combat the German East Africa Company. The change in the government’s attitudes was a result of seeking to save the empire due to the vast competition it was experiencing at the time. Cecil Rhodes was the most dominant individual in the push for British expansion in South Africa. He was a member of the Cape parliament .It was clear that his vision was to expand the empire across all of Africa as he saw this as his sense of imperial destiny. His expansion in South Africa was well planned however this time the British government supported the expansion as Rhodes was able to persuade the British government to grant a charter to form the British African company. This was a transformation as the central government was supporting this expansion to South Africa, it was Joseph Chamberlain who encouraged Rhodes in acquiring more land. The government actively supported him, as they needed to prevent other European power from having influence and power in the area and also they realized the massive economical benefits of South Africa. This led to a disagreement between the Boers who were descendants of the Dutch settlers in South Africa and the British. The Boers resented the policies of Joseph Chamberlain, which they thought he would remove their chance of independence and also they loathed the British for taking their natural resources like gold and minerals. Thus with equipment from the Germans the war between the Boers and the British had flared. This war would have damaging effects on both sides as the Boers land got destroyed and many were sent to horrendous concentration camps, but the repercussions of this event would have a profound effect on the dismantling of the Empire as British view on empire changed and the general public were starting to doubt if the empire was morally good for Africa and opinions shifted away from the previous acceptance and pride felt by many in the country. The expansion into South Africa made the British Empire seem weak as she was asserting power on undeveloped people. During World War one the African colonies played a major part in the war effort and their resources were much needed by Britain. At this point there was a change within the British Empire as the value of its colonies became apparent. After WW1 the metropolitan attitudes to empire changed, as many politicians believed that the empire was solely based around economic interests and partnership. This was enforced greatly following WW1 as Britain’s economic situation had worsened and national debts had increased to a staggering $4000 million, which meant undoubtedly the help and cooperation of the colonies was needed. At this point the empire was becoming an economic burden on the government, as the cost of war was unbearable, this contributed to the decline of the empire. WW2 had the same economic impact on the empire as it weakened it from its foundations which then resulted in Britain losing her position as world leader due to no longer being economically capable of handling such a empire. Britain wanted to influence post war developments in Africa so that it was beneficial to metropolitan investors however this was not able to occur due to the increased nationalism in African colonies such as Kenya, were the Mau Mau rebelled against British occupation and rule. Revolts by the Mau Mau made investors in 1950 unenthusiastic about investing in the area. Consequently this lead to nationalist pressure in the push forward for independence. Robert Tignor in Capitalism and Nationalism At the End of Empire: State and Business in Decolonizing Egypt, Nigeria, and Kenya, 1945-1963 (1998) argues that it was ‘neither foreign nor local business that were key players’ but this national movement that contributed to the dismantlement of the British empire. A direct impact of the economic failures experienced by Britain after the world war was that it helped fuel national movements such as the Mau Mau. As new ideas of self-determination and international climate attitude become more apparent after World War I and World War 2. This then reinforced the anti-imperial trend and encouraged growth in nationalism in Africa as the colonies began the push for independence. This then hastened the dismantlement of the British Empire. The rate of decolonisation was drastically accelerated because of the Suez crisis of 1956. Due to Nasser nationalizing the Suez Canal Britain and France invaded Egypt with the hope of replacing Nasser and taking control of the canal. These actions had a massive backlash on British prestige as the United States condemned their actions. Subsequently it resulted in the British withdrawing from Egypt, which highlighted Britain’s fragileness. This turn in the balance of power scared Eden, as he still believed there was space on the world stage for the British Empire however he was mistaken, as the Suez crisis was the last straw in British imperialism as it changed the balance of world power considerably. Britain was no longer the dominant power and consolation and approval from the United States was needed before the government could take any major decisions. This was a major blow to the empire’s reputation and power, this loss of faith accelerated the dismantlement of the British Empire. This was seen through the change in politics in London as Eden resigned and a new modern Prime Minster was appointed. Harold Macmillan’s modern and progressive prospective would accelerate the decolonisation of Africa, as unlike Eden he did not support imperialism and realized that the empire could no longer deliver the same economic benefits as before. Macmillan’s shift in political opinion resulted in him addressing the South African parliament in 1960 with his wind of change speech. This speech would have a huge impact on the decolonisation of the empire as it was seen as an indication that the central government had accepted that Britain could no longer have imperial possessions. This was apparent in the rapid granting of independence for the African colonies.[1] Libya gained independence in 1951 and Egypt in 1952 and were the first African nations to gain independence. In 1957 Ghana was the first country south of the Sahara to gain independence. This period in time marked a quick decolonisation as indicated by the attached map, as fourteen African countries gained their independence in 1960. By 1966, all but six African countries were independent and the dismantlement in these countries would be different as it was not rapid but prolonged. One of these countries was Zimbabwe, which was previously known as Rhodesia, it was a settler colony and the European settler community kept the mass of the population, which was African from seizing majority rule. The European settlers. This resulted in aggressive nationalism, which was different to the rest of Africa. Subsequently it meant the prolonged granting of independence as Zimbabwe was finally independent in 1980. Overall the view of empire among the public had changed dramatically over the hundred-year period. Attitudes had shifted from the previous patriotic view of empire to a realization that empire could not exist in the new modern world. This was a result of events such as the Wars Britain was involved in and the dramatic change in international view. It is evident that Britain did not intend on expanding the empire in 1880 and the reluctance of this expansion was apparent in the expansion into North Africa. However, once Britain realized the economic benefits of expanding their territories in Africa imperialism became much easier which then generated wide spread support for empire. Acquiring such beneficial land made Britain very weary of other countries as losing colonies in Africa would effectively result in a decrease in power and influence. This then resulted in the one major continuity in imperial policy through out this period, which was the focus on protecting the empire’s economic interests. The dismantlement of empire was fast paced as the empire had become more difficult to manage effectively. Empire was no longer being an economic benefit as it previously was in 1900, but more of an economic burden due to constantly trying to put down nationalism in Africa. The change in attitudes regarding the benefits empire in my opinion resulted in the decolonisation of these colonies and the end of an era in British rule. Part B bibliography: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/54185/gail-m-gerhart/capitalism-and-nationalism-at-the-end-of-empire-state-and-busine. British imperial and foreign policy 1846-1980 (textbook) written by John Aldred. http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/2095.htm. http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/modern/suez_01.shtml. http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/coldwar.htm. http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/COLDsuez.htm. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/571713/Suez-Crisis. http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/dept/scwmss/projects/suez/suez.html. http://everything2.com/title/Suez crisis. The lions share: A short history of British Imperialism, Bernard Porter, 2004. British imperialism by R. Johnson. Empire – documentary by Neill Ferguson. The history of Britain By Simon Schama. http://exploringafrica.matrix.msu.edu/students/curriculum/m7b/activity4.php.

look at the below two question

essay helper free look at the below two question.

Q1. Sensitivity analysis is needed for validation, what-if analysis, and optimization of complicated simulation models, critically evaluate this statement with reference to importance of sensitivity analysis and suggest anytwo novel techniques for sensitivity analysis of simulation models.Q2. Refer one journal articles related to Process Modeling & Simulation. Review the article contents and present the summary in paragraphs explaining the methodology, modeling/statistical tools used, software /packages used for simulation, experimental & analytical procedures adopted in the research study.Note:The answer will be paraphrase For Q1. / 1000 words, For Q2. / 1000 words Harvard Referencing Provide some figures/pictures and diagrams with reference Please refer the different books and journals which you can use for answer this question.
look at the below two question

ENG 111 CUNY Bronx Community College Cultural Sensitivity and Language Use Essay

ENG 111 CUNY Bronx Community College Cultural Sensitivity and Language Use Essay.

Based on Natasha Spring’s “Freedom of Speech vs. Politically Correct Language” and John Leo’s “Free Inquiry? Not On Campus,” revise and expand the essay on cultural sensitivity and language use that you started in Unit 3A. Your revised essay (on all four texts) need not radically shift its focus or perspective on the issues (though it can), but it should meaningfully incorporate ideas and challenges from the two new readings into its discussion of the underlying issues. Use specific details from the texts to support and illustrate your observations, being sure to use quotation marks when including an author’s words.Natasha Spring, “Freedom of Speech vs. Politically Correct Language”John Leo, “Free Inquiry? Not On Campus”
ENG 111 CUNY Bronx Community College Cultural Sensitivity and Language Use Essay

Relevance of flux leakage

Introduction: The task presented was to analyse changes in flux levels through a transformer, concentrating mainly on the flux leakage through an air gap. The line LL’ is the reference line along which the data was collected, it is 2.5mm below the upper section of the core. These results were to be represented in graph form, for all possible combinations of the following: Core materials: MU3 and CR10 (cold-rolled 1010 steel) Coil materials: Copper and Aluminium Current in coil 1: 2A, 4A, 6A, 8A, 10A This report provides details of the use of the MagNet package to perform Finite Element Analysis of the transformer flux. The main purpose of the investigation was to interpret the change in the level of flux leakage in the air gap. Before presenting the data acquired, it is important to understand the purpose of a transformer, the relevance of flux leakage and the operation of the software being used for the analysis. Transformers: Transformers enable electricity to be distributed from the generating power station, through a series of substations and into homes, commercial and industrial premises at the appropriate voltage. A basic transformer consists of two conductive coils (or windings) wound round a core, consisting of thin sheets (laminations) of a material such as silicon steel or iron. If a voltage is applied to the primary winding an alternating current will flow. When current flows through a conductor a rotating magnetic field is created, as the coil is wound round a core which has low magnetic resistivity, these fields induce alternating flux within the core. Those flux lines which do not link the primary and secondary windings are called leakage flux, and are usually due to losses through air gaps or material losses. Those which do link both coils are referred to as mutual flux. The reason for using high permeability material in the core is to ensure that as many flux lines as possible do link the two windings. Flux (B) varies in direct proportionality with magnetic field intensity (H) and material permeability (µr) relative to permeability of a vacuum (µ0 = 4p x 10-7). The relationship is defined as: B = µ0 µr H The rotating flux induces an alternating voltage in the secondary winding, the magnitude of which depends on the number of turns on each coil. The flux path which links the windings and induces the secondary voltage Vs. In an ideal transformer (i.e. no losses and 100% power transfer) the relationship between the turns on each winding and the voltages is called the turns ratio and is given: Vp/Vs = Np/Ns = a (a is the turns ratio). Using this ratio it is possible to induce a secondary voltage, by stepping the primary voltage up or down as required. In the real world transformers are not ideal, therefore it is necessary to take into account losses which occur. These losses can be subdivided into two categories, no load or load losses. Load losses encapsulates those relating to the windings, including eddy current and power lost as heat (or I2R losses), they severity is determined by design of the coils and the associated load. The no-load losses are those which the core is responsible for, these are always present and are independent of the transformer load. This type of loss can be further subdivided into the following: Hysteresis