Get help from the best in academic writing.

FU Wk 3 Conflicting Viewpoints Synthesizing and Writing Banned Books Essay

FU Wk 3 Conflicting Viewpoints Synthesizing and Writing Banned Books Essay.

Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part IPrewritingDue Week 3 and worth 30 pointsWhen looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking by playing the “Believing Game.” The Believing Game is about making the effort to “believe” – or at least consider – the reasons for an opposing view on an issue.The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.In Part I of the assignment (due Week 3), you will first read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes: “The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” by Peter Elbow. Next, you will review the Procon.org Website in order to gather information. Then, you will engage in prewriting to examine your thoughts.Note: In Part II of the assignment (due Week 5), you will write an essay geared towards synthesizing your ideas.Part I – Prewriting: Follow the instructions below for this prewriting activity. Use complete sentences and adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.Select one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website and state your position on the issue.From the Procon.org Website, identify three (3) premises (reasons) listed under either the Pro or Con section – whichever section opposes your position.For each of the three (3) premises (reasons) that oppose your position on the issue, answer these “believing” questions suggested by Elbow:What’s interesting or helpful about this view?What would I notice if I believed this view?In what sense or under what conditions might this idea be true?”The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.This prewriting assignment has no page requirement. There is no requirement at this time to include references in the assignment.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language.Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic.✋ ✋ THIS IS PART TWO LISTED BELOW Assignment 1.2: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part IISynthesizing and WritingDue Week 5 and worth 100 pointsWhen looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking.The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.For Part I of the assignment (due Week 3), you read a critical thinking process: “The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” by Peter Elbow. , reviewed the Procon.org Website in order to gather information, and engaged in prewriting to examine your thoughts.* Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the webtext.In Part II of the assignment (due Week 5), you will write a paper to synthesize your ideas.Part II – WritingWrite at three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:State your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1.Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explain why you selected these specific reasons.Explain your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the same.The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.Based on the guidelines in SWS, “A well-researched assignment has at least as many sources as pages.” Since this assignment requires you to write at least 3-4 pages, you should include at least 3-4 references.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language.Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic.
FU Wk 3 Conflicting Viewpoints Synthesizing and Writing Banned Books Essay

you are encouraged to participate and contribute your thoughts on what should be the goal of a firm.

M2: Discussion on the Goals of the Firm22 unread replies.2121 replies.In Module 1 and Module 2, we learn about possible goals of the firm in some detail. However, you must have realized this issue merits more in-depth analysis. In this discussion you are all encouraged to participate and contribute your thoughts on what should be the goal of a firm. Feel free to describe the aspects you have observed in your work experience.Your post is due on or before Wednesday, January 31, 11:59pm. Your discussion participation will be evaluated by the following rubric. The categories and points are as follows:I. Quality of Posts (50 points)II. Quantity of Posts (20 points)III. Timeliness of Posts (20 points)IV. Professionalism (10 points)see the attachment below for more detail
you are encouraged to participate and contribute your thoughts on what should be the goal of a firm

Rene Descartes and John Locke both have similar theories about primary qualities. They both hold the same position on what is that primary qualities are. Both of them believe that primary qualities have the power to cause ideas in our minds. The main distinction between their theories lies in whether primary qualities are perceived by means of the senses or by the intellect. Rene Descartes believed that there are two types of qualities, primary and secondary qualities. To Rene Descartes, primary qualities are those that are clearly and distinctly perceived by us (33). These qualities are those that exist due to their geometric integrity and which are related to some extension of a body in space. By this reasoning, Descartes believes these primary qualities are composed of anything that is measurable and can have math applied to them such as motion, shape and size. Descartes believes that primary qualities are not misleading like secondary qualities are. This is because the essence of secondary qualities is not geometric and thus these qualities are perceived obscurely. Nevertheless both of these qualities produce ideas within us. The difference about the ideas produced by these qualities lie in whether it is clear and distinct or obscure and confused. The reason that these secondary qualities are often misleading and primary qualities are not is because we perceive both of these qualities differently. Descartes states that primary qualities, unlike secondary qualities, are perceived clearly and distinctly. This he beliefs, is due to the fact that our method that we go by perceiving these qualities is different. Primary qualities are perceived through our intellect as opposed to secondary qualities which are perceived through our senses (14). Descartes believes that our understanding comes through our intellect and not our senses, therefore the ideas that we are able to grasp from primary qualities are not by means of our senses but rather by means of our intellect since they are clear and distinct unlike those ideas that come from our senses which are obscure and confused. Both primary and secondary qualities are perceived by the mind immediately and therefore result in the ideas we have (32). Unlike secondary qualities, primary qualities are features of the physical objects that are actually there but we come to understand the ideas produced by primary qualities solely by means of our intellect. Descartes uses the example of a thousand-sided figure to show how primary qualities produce these clear and distinct ideas compared to the often misleading ideas of secondary qualities (sixth meditation). He states that the imagination by means of the senses is able to generate an obscured and confused idea about a thousand sided figure in comparison to the intellect which is able to perceive it clearly no matter how many sides the figure has. These ideas, which are a product of primary qualities are related to extension and are therefore perceived by our intellect using our understanding (sixth meditation). Descartes theory on primary qualities has some similarity to John Locke’s but differs on how it is that these ideas come to be about within us. John Locke’s point of view regarding primary and secondary qualities is similar to some extent to Descartes’ theory of primary and secondary qualities. To Locke, primary qualities are spatiotemporal and quantitative. Therefore like Descartes, primary qualities are composed of size and shape, something which is measurable (135). Like Descartes, Locke believes that these qualities have the effect of producing the ideas that we have within us. An idea to Locke is the thought or understanding which is produced by the object. He calls the power that an object has to produce such ideas within us, qualities. Locke states that ideas are existent in our minds. To Locke these qualities are properties belonging to the objects and are the cause of the ideas that we house in our minds (134). The difference between primary qualities and secondary qualities to Locke is the kinds of ideas that these are able to produce in our minds. Locke believes that the ideas produced by primary qualities are a resemblance of these qualities. Locke believes that these qualities are actually existent in the objects themselves. On the other hand, those of secondary qualities hold no resemblance to them (136). Unlike Descartes, John Locke has a different theory by which we acquire these ideas. Unlike Descartes, John Locke believes that we acquire our ideas through the perception of the senses. According to Locke, reasoning is an exception to his perspective on innate ideas. He believes that all of our ideas are acquired through our experiences and by means of our senses. Locke states how our mind is similar to that of a blank state, and it is only by experiences that we are able to perceive by means of our senses that we acquire the ideas we possess. Qualities are the powers that objects have and it is within these powers that ideas are produced by them within us. Primary qualities are inseparable from the object, and thus the power of primary qualities produces ideas that resemble the object. This is shown by the example he gives of when something is divided even into its smallest of parts, even when these are too small for us to perceive, the primary qualities are still existent in the object (138). Although Descartes and Locke description of what primary qualities are is similar, their belief in how it is that we come to reason or reflect on these qualities is different. Descartes believes that we can’t rely entirely on our senses, since they often deceive us. He believes that those ideas obtained from primary qualities are distinct and clear. Therefore he believes that the ideas produced by primary qualities are grasped by means of the intellect. Locke unlike Descartes believes that the ideas we acquire through our life is by experience and it is by the senses that we come to have such experiences. Therefore to Locke, the ideas produced by the power of primary qualities are grasped by means of the senses. To Locke and Descartes, primary qualities are the causal effect which produces the clear ideas that we have, the main difference between their theories is whether we obtain these through our senses and by reflecting or solely by the intellect.

The Plan for a Dream Vacation to Las Vegas, Nevada Creative Essay

Table of Contents The Description of the Target Group Vacation to Las Vegas, Nevada Travel agent vs. online travel site Reference List Visiting to one of the most popular cities of Nevada, Las Vegas, may seem like an endless party, where each member is eager to continue entertaining, without sleeping all days and nights in order to enjoy the beauty of this city, if it is possible. Huge buildings, touching the sky, multicolored lights, making the city brighter and even warmer, and people afoot – all this creates a picture of a lively city that is always ready to accept one more visitor and present the world, full of events and happiness, to him/her. “What matters is that, like an oasis mirage in a parched desert, Las Vegas is whatever you desire most, if only for a day, a night or a dirty weekend. Here, everyone lives like the King” (Benson 2007). There are 5 evident reasons to visit Las Vegas, Nevada: (1) an ability to watch amazing shows any time you want; (2) a good chance to observe a Pyramid, Ancient Rome, and the Eiffel Tower; (3) a possibility to drink for free visiting different casinos; (4) a great opportunity to win much and be recognized by the world or loose everything; (5) a funny and unforgettable place to get married. Las Vegas is worth visiting for many reasons, and I, as a sophisticated travel agent, am ready to introduce you this city and prove that you will never forget your vacations and your trip to Las Vegas, where an opportunity to relax, gamble, and meet new people are available all the time. The Description of the Target Group The chosen target group for vacation to Las Vegas, Nevada has rather clear purposes to relax, to rejuvenate, and simply to have fun. The choice of this city is obvious: Las Vegas is created for fun, shopping, gambling, and various entertainments, and if people want to have the most amazing vacations ever, the city is waiting for them. Las Vegas attracts the attention of more that 35 million people annually (Moehring

Read and write

python assignment help Read and write. I don’t know how to handle this Writing question and need guidance.

Final Draft Word Count and Setup Requirement:1000-1200 words (plus an APA cover page and a References page).Double-spaced lines Case study source identified with APA in-text citations and on a Reference page12-point Times New Roman font3 person point of view WHAT: After gathering evidence from a case study provided by your instructor, write an essay in which you evaluate how effectively a real-life company solved a problem. Use the Rhetorical Structure defined in the HOW section.HOW:BRAINSTORM: Carefully read the case study provided by your instructor and then ask yourself the following questions before drafting this assignment: What was the problem encountered by the company? What solution was implemented? What steps were involved? Who implemented the solution? (What company? What agents within that company?)What did people within the company have to say about the solution? When was the solution implemented? Where was the solution implemented? Why this solution? (Was it effective? How do you know?)FOCUS/THESIS: Try using this as a thesis statement model: The solution Company X implemented to solve(define the problem)did/did not work effectively because(You can list more than one reason). RHETORICAL STRUCTURE or ARRANGEMENT: (Use these subheadings)Introduction: Inform the reader of the company your evaluation will discuss, the problem the company faced, and the solution the company implemented. You can use 2 or 3 paragraphs for your introduction. End your introduction with your thesis statement. Evaluation of Solution: Using evidence from the Case Study and your own reasoning, discuss, point by point, why you think the solution did or did not work effectively. Remember, any solution to a problem must address the root cause of the problem. Conclusion: End this essay with a one-paragraph summary of your Case Study Evaluation’s main points.
Read and write

A study on impact of rewards on employee motivation in the telecommunications

Introduction “Motivation is the art of getting people to do what you want them to do because they want to do it.” –Dwight D. Eisenhower Like a little kid being given a chocolate on standing first in his class or a big hug for doing something good like helping someone, or cleaning the place after playing, rewards whether monetary or non-monetary can be significant tools for the motivation of employee and a positive step towards the improvement of his performance an boosting his morale. Jack Zigon (1998) defines rewards as “something than increases the frequency of an employee action”. It’s a common observation that most of us don’t perform our tasks completely, not because they are difficult but because of low interest or motivation to perform that task. The desire or motivation is necessary for the performance of an activity. Kleinginna and Kleinginna (1981a) defines motivation as, “internal state or condition that activates behavior and gives it direction; desire or want that energizes and directs goal-oriented behavior; influence of needs and desires on the intensity and direction of behavior.” Background Gatlin, Rebecca (1997), says that a good and attractive reward program is necessary the employees in order to motivated them otherwise the unmotivated employees will not perform their tasks properly and will ultimately affect the company in a negative way i.e. decrease in profitability. Organization’s performance is dependent on the employees who work for it, so in order to get the better and quality output, rewards contribute a lot in this part, so it is essential for organization’s managers to make effective and attractive reward programs to motivate their employees, Deeprose(1994). Gregory P. Smith, author of book ‘Dynamic Ways to Reward, Energize

Unit 4 assignment Systematic review on Hypothermia in TBA patient

Unit 4 assignment Systematic review on Hypothermia in TBA patient.

Interpreting Statistical Output for Data Analysis PowerPoint PresentationPurpose:The purpose of this Assignment is to enable you to present the information that you gather from a systematic review on your PICOT topic. This activity will give you the experience to present what your research findings to others.Directions:Define the clinical key questions based on PICOT.Briefly review the database selected for key clinical questions.Identify the studies of the database search that are a Level I or II evidence.Interpret the statistical results of the studies identified in Step 3.Design a presentation.Place results /overview of research in PowerPoint.Length of the presentation should be 12–15 slides.Follow APA format.To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Resources.Assignment Requirements:Before finalizing your work, you should:be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above)consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary;utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors; andYour writing Assignment should:follow the conventions of Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and;use APA 6th edition formatRubric for above assignmentUnit 4 Assignment Dropbox – Submit AssignmentHide Submission Folder InformationSubmission FolderUnit 4 Assignment DropboxHide RubricsPICOT: P: Pre-and post-hospital use of hypothermia in TBI patients.I: How does the use of hypothermia decrease brain cells.C: Compare the use of hypothermia to not using it pre-and post-hospital.O: does hypothermia affect morbidity and mortality in TBI.T: Using hypothermia at the scene or in the ER.Rubric Name: MN504_1702C_-2CriteriaMastery5 pointsProficient4 pointsPracticed3 pointsEmergent2 pointsIntroductory1 pointNo Progress0 pointsMN504_1702C_-2.1: Describe the key elements of evidence based practice.Clearly defined key clinical question used to search evidence-based databank (i.e, Pubmed, Medline, CINAHL, etc) with a detailed overview of research.Clearly defined key clinical question used to search evidence-based databank (i.e, Pubmed, Medline, CINAHL, etc) with a brief overview of analysis.Briefly defined clinical question without the reference necessary for database research.Vaguely defined key clinical question without data analysis of the research results.Did not clearly define key clinical question or provide data analysis of research results.Student work demonstrates no understanding or progress towards achievement of this outcome.Overall Score5: Mastery4.5 or more4: Proficient3.5 or more3: Practiced2.5 or more2: Emergent1.5 or more1: Introductory0.5 or more0: No Progress0 or moreAssociated Learning Outcomes
Unit 4 assignment Systematic review on Hypothermia in TBA patient