Get help from the best in academic writing.

FNU Wk 14 Theory of Power & Theory of Unitary Caring Nursing Theories Discussion

FNU Wk 14 Theory of Power & Theory of Unitary Caring Nursing Theories Discussion.

Textbook :Smith, M. & Parker, M. (2014). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company. ISBN-13: 978-0-8036-3312-4After reviewing our three nursing theorists presented this week in chapters 29, 30, and 31. Let’s reflect upon the events that are taking place in healthcare today (Covid-19 Pandemic). Which theorist would you select to construct a framework for care of your staff and patients? Please explain why with examples. Chapter 29:Barrett’s Theory of Power as Knowing Participation in ChangeChapter 30:Marlaine Smith’s Theory of Unitary CaringChapter 31: Kristen Swanson’s Theory of Caring***Think about some of the concepts involved. Examples include fear, isolation, family separation, being pregnant and exposed to the virus, psychological issues, guilt, impacted care standards. – Please follow all APA 6th Edition Guidelines, *- Please include references and intext citations *- A minimum of 250 words required *- Also, please elaborated two responses with a minimum of 150 words and reference as if it were to respond to two peers based on (Chapters 29,30 and 31)
FNU Wk 14 Theory of Power & Theory of Unitary Caring Nursing Theories Discussion

Social media, communications homework help.

PLEASE WRITE IN MIDDLE School level not college (good and american grammar) like “”””””””” when I went to the Deaf school and then I learnt what Deaf world was like, which fits my life well. Today I’m still learning the deepest of Deaf culture. Being Deaf can’t be the main barrier to lead to the failure of the big life dreams that I have. My life has been affected in various ways because of my status but that doesn’t make me fail in making my own decisions on my life. Learning about the Deaf characters and culture has made me view my status in a positive manner making me think on the privileges that the society has offered to me by giving me a chance to utilize the important privileges delegated to me. Though the society has offered several positive privileges to the Deaf, some of the people focus much on empowering the underprivileged hence hindering the Deaf from making special developments in their lives.When I was in a hearing school, I often felt overwhelmed and wanted to avoid studying and never wanted to go to college. My parents tried to convince me that school was extremely important, but I did not listen to them. One day, I told my mother that I wanted to receive a better education in a deaf school, and my mother did not want me to go to a deaf school because she believed that I did not care about education for my life. A few days later, I felt so disappointed that I was forced to learn unwanted lessons. I decided to keep telling my mother my goal was to go to a deaf school and my mother finally accepted it. I started to be joyful at that news and readied for a better education. As a college student, I applied for City college of San Francisco to learn more English and general studies and then transferred to the University. I am majoring in communication and public relations and minor in digital media. I personally love working with people, I feel very happy seeing them satisfied with their present and looking forward to their future, and I love learning different cultures, backgrounds, beliefs, traditions, and many things that I have never learnt before, although what i really would be glad to add to my personal experience is developing a new project, to develop a new website to make the hearing and Deaf worlds one unit so they will be able to communicate with each other to learn about their different worlds.””””””””””””””‘—-What is your purpose for using social media personally and professionally? Discuss this 50-100 words… I have Facebook and IG, not Twitter. its for keeping in touching and making live a better life and advertisiting.- organized just like you write your paper with introduction, body, then wrap up with a main point – reflective and insightful coming from your heart————————
Upload a picture of yourself in Blackboard profile. Go to “#BlackboardHelp” –>“About You” (under Explore All) –> “Profile” –> “Add a profile picture” –> Read the instruction on how to upload your profile picture.When did you open your Facebook account? 2013What was your first Facebook status? Did you like what you say in your status? Why or why not? Would you say the same status today? say welcome to Facebook or I will punch you. Yes I like and its funny.50 – 100 words) Google the very first tweet on Twitter. Who wrote the first tweet? (10 – 50 words) Research online to find anything interesting with #WhereItAllBegan and share with us. (50 – 100 words) Any burning questions relating to the syllabus.Note: Your responses must include constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and/or stimulating thoughts. Your responses must be in scholarly tone including proper writing following APA format if you cite any sources. Please read the attached discussion board rubric for more details. ————————————-
#Hashtag – Midterm Group Project – PICK HASHTAGS – DUE MONDAY, JANUARY 30 AT 11:59PMPlease post your top three #hashtags that you’d like to research for your midterm project. See the following hashtags. If you see a different #hashtag that you want to work on, please let me know as well. The #hashtag has to be related to social change, social justice, or social perspectives. •#HashtagEtiquette•#NameYourVagina•#EverydaySexism•#BlackLivesMatter•#LoveWins•#TheBarriersWeFace•#YesAllWomen•#GivingTuesday•#BringBackOurGirls•#HearingPrivilege- its not fair to Deaf community because some of them look down on us as a disablted. We will have to fight for our humans and rights.•#ChronicSex•#TwoMenKissing•#ashtag•#BlackWomenDidThat•#GetYourBellyOut•#ActuallyAutistic•#WhyIStayed•#SayHerName•#HobbyLobby•#YouOkSis•#WhyISign —- Because I was born Deaf and it teaches me many new things fast than learning how to read lips.•#GirlsLikeUs•#FlushRushNow•#Solidarityisforwhitewomen•#BlackGirlMagic•#AllMenCan•#StopGamerGate•#UmbrellaRevolution•#AmINext—– Yes I can do anything and everyone can do too it doesnt matter what races and disbality. •#ICantBreathe•#HoodsOff•#CaptionThis•#TransIsBeautiful•WhereLoveIsIllegalEveryone including adults and elders use social media but what kind of social media do they use? Read this infographic about adults vs. teens for using social media in this link: discuss why adults and teens use social media different way? Do you agree with the infographic information? Why or why not? Provide some examples from your real-life experience. (50 – 150 words)There are many surprising statistical information in this infographic (…). Discuss what you learned from the infographic about how many of us use social media and how often we are on social media? Will our generation change in the future? (50 – 150 words) CORRECT LINK:… Share one #hashtag relating to deaf community that is a clever of world of mouth marketing! Use to do some research work. Be sure this #hashtag is viral that has 20,000 re-tweets, likes, shares, or reposts. (50 – 150 words)What is your vision of social media in year 2037 (20 years from now)? Describe how we live and how we socialize. (50 – 150 words)
Upload Assignment: Assignment #2 – Best and Effective Tweets Please use TWITTER only to do your research. Go to and look for three (3) BEST and EFFECTIVE tweet that is from an original person (like you) — not from a celebrity person. How did this tweet go viral with over 10,000 re-tweets or likes?? What makes those tweets very effective? What was so powerful about those tweets? What impact did these tweets contribute to our society? Write this in 1 – 2 pages. Your paper must be: – double-spaced – using APA format – 1 – 2 pages- clear, organized, and concise – relevant to the assignment
Social media, communications homework help

Complete Professional Communication Task (DEX)

Complete Professional Communication Task (DEX). I need support with this Business question so I can learn better.

Persuasive Messages
Scenario: Your supervisor disagrees with your suggestion that employees should be allowed to create online profiles in LinkedIn. You believe that communicating with others on LinkedIn will give employees an opportunity to meet their peers and will also provide potential leads and business partners. However, your supervisor believes that other companies will get an opportunity to review her employees’ qualifications and might make them employment offers that they would accept. You believe you can persuade your supervisor to accept your perspective and are deciding whether to send an e-mail or to speak with her in person.
Complete the following tasks:

Create an e-mail to your supervisor explaining your perspective on the matter of LinkedIn profiles. Use the information you have learned about presenting both verbal and nonverbal messages as you write the e-mail.
Describe what might be different about your message if you speak with your supervisor in person rather than send an e-mail. Use the concepts you learned about both verbal and nonverbal messages as you write your answer (300-word minimum).
Compare your two messages, and explain which medium might be more persuasive.

Requirements: Combine all three steps into one document, but separate all three steps into three pages. You can do this by inserting a page break after each step. This assignment does not require a title page or a reference page. All three sections together should total at least 900 words.
Complete Professional Communication Task (DEX)

Ottawa University Effectiveness of Web Based Decision Support Systems Analysis

online assignment help Ottawa University Effectiveness of Web Based Decision Support Systems Analysis.

For this week’s assignment, you will go about planning for your hypothetical retirement using web-based decision support systems (DSS) for financial planning and decision making. Follow the steps below and use the provided websites to determine how much you need to save to have enough income for your retirement. Assume that you are 50 years old and plan to retire in 16 years. You have one dependent and $100,000 in savings. Your current annual income is $85,000. Your goal is to be able to generate an annual retirement income of $60,000, including Social Security benefit payments.1.To calculate your estimated social security benefit, use the Quick Calculator at the Social Security Administration Web site here.2.Use the financial tools available on one of the following web sites to determine how much money you need to save to help you achieve your retirement goal.3.CNN Business4.Kiplinger: Finance Advice and Business Forecasts5.Critique the site—its ease of use, its clarity, the value of any conclusions reached, and the extent to which the site helps investors understand their financial needs and the financial markets.6.Now use the other site. How does it compare to the site you initially chose?Create a 4 page essay in which you respond to all of the above items. Follow APA format.
Ottawa University Effectiveness of Web Based Decision Support Systems Analysis

A Response Paper to H.J McCloskey’s “On Being an Atheist” Essay

Table of Contents Introduction The Cosmological Argument The Teleological Argument The Problem Of Evil The Comfort Of Atheism Conclusion Bibliography Footnotes Introduction The article ‘On Being an Atheist’ is a thoughtful piece that discredits the arguments poised by theists as being inadequate. Written by a great philosopher, McCloskey engages the reader with his intellectual critic approach of theists over atheists. He argues that most people who believe in God either do so blindly or lack adequate information. He believes that God’s existence have never and will never be proved and therefore refers to the arguments as mere proofs.1 He demands for genuine examples to ascertain the truth and he argues that with the absence of such examples, he is convinced that God does not exist. Though McCloskey seems to make a solid argument to prove his claims, they are lacking in nature. Providing absolute proof can be challenging in most instances. This is evident from the PointeCast presentation (Lesson 18) argument which states that it is impossible to proof existence of certain things such as the magnetic field. No human being has proof that magnetic field exists and the scientists themselves do not have experimental data to proof the same. The presentation further argues that the existence of the universe is hard to ascertain and other factors such as naturalism and evolution have been used to argue its existence. McCloskey argument on ‘proof’ is not convincing to any rational person because the general standard of proof has been set very high for anyone to proof a certain claim. His argument that God does not existence for lack of proof is therefore not justified. The Cosmological Argument McCloskey base his focus on the cosmological argument where he argues that the universe as the human beings view it is not any proof that God or any other superior being exists.2 He further argues that humans err in believing God’s existence based on cosmological argument. His claim has been refuted by Evans in his book ‘Philosophy of Religion’ who argues that the universe ought to have had a beginning.3 Cosmological argument seeks to provide answers to human beings about the universe and its existence. The argument implies that the superior being is as a result of the existence of the cosmos. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More What this mean in a nut shell is that all what is entailed in the universe came to being as a result of something and the universe itself is also as a result of something that is based externally. The argument forms a basis that nature is dependent on God’s existence and it is this power that makes God the First Cause. God’s powers are more powerful than nature itself hence triggering the concept of creation from nature itself. McCloskey claims that the cosmological argument does not proof that God is behind the creation of the universe. He however seems to support the idea that there is a powerful cause behind the creation but he argues that the particular cause remains unknown. Evans seems to concur that there is an unknown cause based on the cosmological argument. It triggers one’s imagination to seek further knowledge about God. He concludes his argument by stating that the superior cause behind the universe creation is not perfect as the universe itself is imperfect. This rebuts the claims that an ‘omnipotent all-perfect being’ was involved in the creation process. It is not clear how McCloskey came up with the conclusion that the world is not perfect. He fails to justify his claim and base his argument on his own personal views with an assumption that everybody understands his point of view. It can be argued by a rational man that the universe appears to be both perfect and imperfect in its creation. How else can concepts such as night and day, man and woman or even monsoons and droughts be explained? Though this concept of opposites does not form a strong basis of the argument, it does deserve recognition to make support such a claim. The Teleological Argument The teleological argument is also attacked by McCloskey basing his argument on design and purpose.4 The argument is based on the belief that everything in the universe was designed and that everything designed ought to have a purpose. The argument is an attempt to prove God’s existence. We will write a custom Essay on A Response Paper to H.J McCloskey’s “On Being an Atheist” specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More It is argued that if indeed everything seems to have an existence, then it is justifiably correct to claim that the existence has been designed and is meant to serve a particular purpose. In general, teleological argument holds the belief that anything that is designed ought to have been designed by somebody or something else. McCloskey argues that this argument does not form any basis as the design is not backed by unquestionable examples. He relies on the concept of evolution as his main judgment to support his argument. Evans, in response interestingly makes an intelligent claim that even though evolution is a mechanical process, it ought to have a designer who is God and in achieving that goal, he ultimately realizes his purpose. This argument helps to trigger one’s mind on the kind of design visible on everything. It creates a never ending cycle in the minds of those seeking to know if indeed there is anything that can be seen or if it is just an illusion. Nevertheless, if indeed it is an illusion, who designed that illusion? It therefore becomes human logic to conclude that everything was designed and created for it to come into existence.5 The Problem Of Evil Based on this reasoning, it is evident that most people tend to ignore this part of the argument. Whilst theists base their belief on a good God, atheists try to come up with numerous justifications implicating God’s imperfections. This creates the problem of evil. McCloskey relies on the problems of evil to justify his claims. One such claim is the idea of a perfect God and yet evil exist. He argues that if indeed God is all-powerful and all-perfect, he does not understand why he would let such a problem exist amongst his people. Though he makes a strong and significant assessment regarding the problem of evil, Evans critics his approach by arguing that there is no evidence that theism is conflicting due to the presence of evil. Not sure if you can write a paper on A Response Paper to H.J McCloskey’s “On Being an Atheist” by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More He argues that no one knows the reason behind the problem of evil or even why God allows it but he claims that it is probably better if the situation stays as it is. He argues that a God’s believer has the knowledge that their final resting place is heaven and not earth and there is a reason why God allowed evil to dominate over the earth. The earth is filled with imperfections while heaven is perfect. He justifies his argument by stating that God gave everybody a free will to choose the kind of life they want to live in. McCloskey argues that God did not give man a free will to choose what is right. He claims that God, by creating man and choosing what is right for him cannot justify the claim that man has a free will. He further argues that if God designed everything, then he designed it right for man. McCloskey triggers the question, ‘what is right’? Only God, the creator has the ultimate answer to that particular question. It therefore becomes difficult to uphold the problem of evil to object theism. It is evident that the problem of evil poses a challenge to atheists as opposed to theists. The problem of evil has not drawn responses from Evans but also from other philosophers like Mackie and Plantinga.6 Plantinga’s argument refutes the problem of evil. He argues that the problem of evil contradicts the belief of the existence of an omniscient and all powerful God. He argues that it is a possibility that God created a world that is characterized with evil to create a free will. This argument has however been criticized by Mackie who supports McCloskey in his argument. Mackie argues that theism’s argument on the existence of God and evil is not consistent. He criticizes Plantinga’s premise that if indeed God is ‘omnipotent and wholly’, it contradicts the problem of evil. However, it can be argued logically that these two grounds are not contradictory as Mackie and McCloskey claims. While God has been defined as an ‘omnipotent’, there is no limit to his actions. Besides, a good and evil deed is opposed to each other as a good deed always out-smarts an evil deed. It is up to human beings to freely choose whether to engage in the evil or the good deed. This ability makes him an important being in the whole creation process. By exercising his free will on earth, he therefore serves his purpose as God intended him to when he was creating everything in the universe, including man himself. The Comfort Of Atheism McCloskey finally attempts to argue the simplicity of being an atheist. He states that atheism offers a comfort zone without having to seek any answers to justify his belief. He interestingly argues that atheism do not provide a confused avenue of why a superior being would bring one to the world and end up subjecting him to sufferings in the name of love. Atheism, he argues, offers a source of comfort to victims who seem not to find any answers to their questions and states that they will find comfort in caring friends. This is indeed a disturbing argument. He seems to put his moral obligations upon his fellow human beings whom he argues are unselfish in their acts.7 His argument is refuted by William Craig who argues that failure to involve God in one’s life, a human being become useless and is doomed.8 He continues to argue that if God is deemed inexistence, then the universe cease to exist and so does man. Craig’s argument seems to be more logical than McCloskey’s. Conclusion However, it can be concluded that God’s existence is basically based on what one believes in. Faith is the utmost stepping stone to such belief. Faith should be from within and not merely by reading philosophical arguments or science fiction. To get answers to certain questions such as ‘Who created the universe?’, or ‘Does God exist?’ may be impossible and both Evans and McCloskey fails to have specific answers. It all comes back to personal faith and which philosophical side seems more logical than the other. Only then can man allow God to reveal himself. Bibliography Craig, William Lane, “The Absurdity of Life without God,” Reasonable faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics, 3rd ed. Wheaton: Crossway Books Publishers, 2008. Evans, Stephen and Zachary, Manis. Philosophy of Religion: Thinking about faith. Atlanta: IVP Academic, 1985. Feinberg, John. The many faces of evil: theological systems and the problem of evil. Michigan: Zondervan, 1994. Hasker,William. Metaphysics: Constructing a World View. Dourners Grove: Inter Varsity Press, 1983. Holmes, Arthur Frank. Ethics, approaching moral decisions. Dourners Grove: Inter Varsity Press, 1984. McCloskey, John. “On Being an Atheist.” Question, Issue 1 (1968): 62-69. Footnotes 1 John McCloskey, “On Being an Atheist.” Question, Issue 1 (1968): 62. 2 John McCloskey, 63. 3 Stephen Evans and Manis Zachary, Philosophy of Religion: Thinking about faith (Atlanta: IVP Academic, 1985), 10. 4 John McCloskey, 64. 5 William Hasker, Metaphysics: Constructing a World View (Dourners Grove: Inter Varsity Press, 1983), 105. 6 John Feinberg, The many faces of evil: theological systems and the problem of evil (Michigan: Zondervan, 1994), 203. 7 Arthur Frank Holmes, Ethics, approaching moral decisions. (Dourners Grove: Inter Varsity Press, 1984), 123. 8 William Craig Lane, “The Absurdity of Life without God,” Reasonable faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics, 3rd ed. (Wheaton: Crossway Books Publishers, 2008), 70.

Georgian Court Fisherman and The Jinni Magic and Supernatural Elements Discussion

Georgian Court Fisherman and The Jinni Magic and Supernatural Elements Discussion.

Magic and supernatural elements are important for many storytelling traditions. What examples of magic and supernatural elements did you see in this week’s stories? What kinds of characters used magic? What did they use magic for? Were there supernatural characters or events in this week’s stories? What role did these supernatural characters or events play in the plot of the stories? What did these magical and supernatural effects contribute to the impression that the stories made on you this week?use characters from the stories Circling the Mediterranean: Europe and the Islamic World The Qur’an The Thousand and One Nightsdiscussion post 250 words + use examples from the stories
Georgian Court Fisherman and The Jinni Magic and Supernatural Elements Discussion

Essay Writing at Online Custom Essay

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service