I’m working on a american studies multi-part question and need an explanation to help me understand better.
In paragraph format answer the following questions–200 words each. Be sure to provide detailed examples (either from the readings or the real world) and explain their connection.1) How does Hochschild define the American Dream?2) What are her four tenants of the dream?3) How are they flawed?Please address the readings and learning modules as part of your response. Avoid, phrases such as: “I think,” “to me,” “in my opinion,” and “I agree.” Simply present your argument with supporting material from the course.
Florida State College Facing up to the American Dream Article Discussion
California State Photorealistic Depiction of the Civil Rights Movement Discussion
California State Photorealistic Depiction of the Civil Rights Movement Discussion.
I’m working on a latin american studies discussion question and need a sample draft to help me study.
Virtual Exhibition ReviewDirections: You are to view and review at least 2 virtual exhibitions listed below and compare and contrast them. You need to go through and read and view the entire virtual exhibitions before reviewing. That means viewing all the links and pages on the virtual exhibition. These exhibitions have been selected by the Professor, which means I have viewed them.https://theautry.org/exhibitions/when-i-remember-i-see-red (Links to an external site.)https://www.loc.gov/exhibitions/rosa-parks-in-her-own-words/about-this-exhibition/ (Links to an external site.)https://artsandculture.google.com/exhibit/photos-from-the-civil-rights-movement/9wISPkiyouv-Lw (Links to an external site.)https://artsandculture.google.com/exhibit/teotihuacan-city-of-water-city-of-fire/EwJSkilCgvwQLg (Links to an external site.)https://artsandculture.google.com/exhibit/nuestras-historias-colonial-mexico%C2%A0/kwJyaglKKAjIIg (Links to an external site.)https://www.si.edu/exhibitions/we-return-fighting-african-american-experience-world-war-i:event-exhib-6481?id=event_exhib_6481 (Links to an external site.)https://www.si.edu/exhibitions/forgotten-workers-chinese-migrants-and-building-transcontinental-railroad:event-exhib-6332?id=event_exhib_6332 (Links to an external site.)https://www.si.edu/exhibitions/patriot-nations-native-americans-our-nations-armed-forces:event-exhib-6361?id=event_exhib_6361 (Links to an external site.)https://www.si.edu/exhibitions/american-democracy-great-leap-faith:event-exhib-4930?page=1&id=event_exhib_4930 (Links to an external site.)https://nmaahc.si.edu/explore/exhibitions/now-showing (Links to an external site.)https://www.womenshistory.org/exhibits/pathways-equality (Links to an external site.)You then must type a 2 ½ to 3 page (double-spaced) review/essay of your 2 virtual exhibitions and you must include all of the following questions in order to get any credit.Note: In the first line of the write up, list the two exhibitions that you are reviewingGive a brief description of each exhibition. Include a brief description of what you viewed. For example, give examples of objects, historical documents, photos and/or information covered in each exhibition. Should be at least one full page—2 different paragraphs –one paragraph per exhibition.Compare and Contrast each exhibition. These could be regarding both themes/issues covered in the exhibitions, as well as reviewing the style and effectiveness of the virtual exhibition. (at least 1 full paragraph)How did these exhibitions contribute to your understanding of Multicultural history, Chicano history or U.S. history in general? Give specific examples. (at least 1 full paragraph)Why are these exhibitions significant to California and Multicultural U.S. History? Give specific examples as evidence. (at least 1 full paragraph)Can you CONNECT any of the content of these exhibitions to our course CHS 245? For example, are there any themes discussed in this class or in the class readings that can also be seen in the exhibitions you chose? Give specific examples..and use direct quotes from class material as supporting evidence. For example, connect the virtual exhibitions to specific class content in the form of readings, and other course lecture material. (at least 1 full paragraph)Include any final thoughts on how these exhibitions contributed to your historical learning or historical thinking. Overall what did you learn and where there any questions raised for you.Note: This assignment should not just be descriptive, but rather include critical reflection on how this event contributed to your understanding of history. Be sure to use direct quotes as supporting evidence in your essay.PDF or Microsoft Word file.Make sure to Proof read your Review/Essay and it also needs to follow all standard formal
California State Photorealistic Depiction of the Civil Rights Movement Discussion
Data Analytics and Organization Leadership Questions
assignment helper Data Analytics and Organization Leadership Questions.
Minimum 400 words for each question. APA format and two professional referencesQ. 1 What is the importance of
regular expressions in data analytics? Also, discuss the differences
between the types of regular expressions.Choose two types of regular expressions
and discuss the differences between the two. Please be sure to include
two or three differences for each. Include how they help manipulate
data. Minimum 400 wordsQ.2. Explain the benefits of a Technology Roadmap as viewed by IT professionals (include citations followed by references) and as viewed by you in your own words. minimum 400 words
Data Analytics and Organization Leadership Questions
Breastfeeding in first six months and Childhood Obesity
Can breastfeeding in the first six months prevent childhood obesity? Childhood obesity is becoming a worldwide concern given the potential health implications in the future. Obese children are more likely to suffer physical and mental health problems and are likely to develop into obese adults (Labayen, Ruiz et al. 2012), thereby increasing the long term risk of developing chronic conditions such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and stroke. The cause of childhood obesity is multifactorial, including hereditary factors, comorbidities, dietary habits and physical activity. There is much debate as to the impact of breastfeeding during the early stages of life and how it correlates with childhood obesity compared with formula-fed newborns. Breast milk is nutritionally balanced to provide infants with all dietary requirements during the early stages of life. It also provides antibodies to reduce infection risks in newborns. Breast milk constitutes the appropriate amounts of protein, water, fat and sugar for a newborn and changes composition over time to adapt to a growing child’s needs. Formula tends to be higher in protein and fat than the baby actually requires and this excessive intake has been linked with adiposity (Hernell 2011). Marseglia et al have reviewed the potential impact of key breast milk constituents thought to play a role in reducing obesity risk (Marseglia, Manti et al. 2015). There have been a number of recent reviews discussing the association between breastfeeding and childhood obesity, all of which have concluded that breastfeeding confers a protective effect against childhood obesity and being overweight (Horta and Victora 2013, Aguilar Cordero, Sánchez López et al. 2014, Lefebvre and John 2014, Yan, Liu et al. 2014). The largest reduction in obesity risk was 81%, reported in a study of females aged 11 years of who had been breastfed for more than three months compared with controls who had never been breastfed (Panagiotakos, Papadimitriou et al. 2008). The males in the same study had a reduced risk of 72% and both results were statistically significant. However, other literature reports either no association between breastfeeding and childhood obesity (Burdette, Whitaker et al. 2006, Huus, Ludvigsson et al. 2008, Jing, Xu et al. 2014), or an increased risk of obesity following breastfeeding of 9% (Kwok, Schooling et al. 2010), 10% (Novaes, Lamounier et al. 2012), 11% (Buyken, Karaolis-Danckert et al. 2008), 14% (Sabanayagam, Shankar et al. 2009), 18% He (2000), 29% (Al-Qaoud and Prakash 2009), 34% (Neutzling, Hallal et al. 2009), 40% (Toschke, Martin et al. 2007) and 83% (Araújo, Victora et al. 2006), although none of which were statistically significant. Some studies suggest that there is a dose-response relationship, with increased duration of breastfeeding resulting in a decreased prevalence of being obese in childhood (von Kries, Koletzko et al. 2000, Fallahzadeh, Golestan et al. 2009, Griffiths, Smeeth et al. 2009, Yan, Liu et al. 2014). In contrast, other studies have reported no significant association between breastfeeding and its duration and obesity prevention (Burke, Beilin et al. 2005, Al-Qaoud and Prakash 2009, Sabanayagam, Shankar et al. 2009, Vehapoglu, YazÄ±cÄ± et al. 2014). One meta-analysis analysed the association between breastfeeding duration and obesity (Yan, Liu et al. 2014). As eligible studies reported different durations, the review categorised breastfeeding duration into less than three months, 3-4.9 months, 5-6.9 months and seven or more months. Those exclusively breastfed for at least seven months had a 21% decrease in the risk of childhood obesity, whilst those fed for less than three months only showed a 10% decrease. They concluded that the duration of breastfeeding was associated with a decreased likelihood of childhood obesity and reported a stepwise gradient of decreasing risk with increasing duration of breastfeeding. Single studies report a significant protective effect against childhood obesity when breastfeeding is done for at least one to three months (Goldfield, Paluch et al. 2006), three months (Twells and Newhook 2010), 13-25 weeks (McCrory and Layte 2012), four months (Scholtens, Gehring et al. 2007, Griffiths, Smeeth et al. 2009, Chivers, Hands et al. 2010), nine months (Nelson and Sethi 2005), 12 months (Burke, Beilin et al. 2005) and two or more years (Rathnayake, Satchithananthan et al. 2013). However, the differences in study design make it difficult to directly compare findings as the comparator groups can be formula-fed babies or babies’ breastfed for short durations. For studies investigating the impact of breastfeeding for at least six months on childhood obesity, the comparator group can be either newborns breastfed for less than six months (i.e. mixed feeding of variable durations) or newborns exclusively formula-fed. Additionally, the age of the children being assessed also differs in studies. When comparing those breastfed for at least six months with those breastfed less than six months, studies report a reduction in obesity risk of 60% when assessing two year olds (Weyermann, Rothenbacher et al. 2006), 54% and 43% in four year olds (Komatsu, Yorifuji et al. 2009, Simon, Souza et al. 2009), and 67% in six year olds (Thorsdottir, Gunnarsdottir et al. 2003). This suggests that the age of assessment affects the degree of risk reduction observed. However, when comparing against formula-fed newborns there are studies reporting reductions of 14%, 28% and 67% for three year olds (Poulton and Williams 2001, Armstrong, Reilly et al. 2002, Taveras, Rifas-Shiman et al. 2006), 6% for four year olds (Moschonis, Grammatikaki et al. 2008), 45% for seven year olds (Yamakawa, Yorifuji et al. 2013), 60% for nine year olds (Toschke, Martin et al. 2007), 64% for 11 year olds (Poulton and Williams 2001), 21% for 21 year olds (Poulton and Williams 2001) and 6% for 45 year olds (Michels, Willett et al. 2007). This data suggests that observing adults to determine the impact of breastfeeding on obesity is not advisable. Only one study reported an increased risk of obesity for newborns breastfed more than six months compared with formula-fed newborns, reporting a non-significant 40% increased risk of obesity in nine year olds (Toschke, Martin et al. 2007). Interestingly, very few detailed, for those breastfeeding for at least six months, whether the feeding duration was exclusively breastfeeding or mixed. Only two studies (Simon, Souza et al. 2009, Yamakawa, Yorifuji et al. 2013) reported on exclusive breastfeeding. There is evidence that exclusive breastfeeding also results in a decreased prevalence of being obese in childhood (Fallahzadeh, Golestan et al. 2009, Simon, Souza et al. 2009, Lefebvre and John 2014). Mayer-Davis et al (2006) compared exclusively breastfed newborns with exclusively formula-fed newborns and found that the breastfed children were significantly less likely to be overweight (34%) and that the results were not affected by maternal weight or diabetes status (Mayer-Davis, Rifas-Shiman et al. 2006). When exploring the differences between studies who defined breastfeeding as “Never – ever” and those reporting “exposure” to breastfeeding (implying mixed feeding practices of different types), a systematic review found a reduced likelihood of obesity in the exclusive feeding group of 20% and in the mixed group of 27% (Yan, Liu et al. 2014). This was supported by another review comparing “ever” breastfed with “exclusively breastfed for a specific number of months”, the latter showing a 27% decreased risk compared with the former at 21% (Horta and Victora 2013). That review postulated that if there is no critical window effect, but rather a cumulative effect of breastfeeding, studies that compared ever vs. never breastfed subjects will tend to underestimate any association. Any observed association between breastfeeding and later obesity does not prove causality (Butte 2001). There may be any number of potential confounders impacting on the relationship including geography, social deprivation status, parental weight status, smoking, marital status and education, ethnicity, gender, number of hospital admissions during the early stages of life, diet, sleep duration and physical activity. Whilst a number of studies discuss their impact, very few studies actually provide control for these factors in their analysis. The issue of geography is a potential confounder of any association between breastfeeding and obesity. In high-income countries, the babies usually receive formula, whereas many non-breastfed infants in low and middle income countries receive whole or diluted animal milk (Horta and Victora 2013). However, Hancox et al have reported that whilst breastfeeding reduced the risk of obesity slightly, there was no evidence that an association between breastfeeding and body mass index (BMI) was different in lower income countries compared with higher income countries (Hancox, Stewart et al. 2014). The socio-economic status of the mother may also contribute to the child’s weight status in childhood. The World Health Organisation (WHO) review analysed obesity risk in studies also controlling for social deprivation and found a further 3% decrease in the risk of obesity to 37% compared with studies which did not (34%) (Horta and Victora 2013). Armstrong et al reported that the reduced prevalence in obesity for breastfed children also persisted after adjustment for socio-economic status, birth weight and gender (30% reduction) (Armstrong, Reilly et al. 2002). The impact of gender was prominent as Nelson et al reported that breastfeeding for at least nine months reduced the risk of being overweight more in girls than in boys (Nelson and Sethi 2005). A similar gender inequality was reported by Panagiotakos et al with girls breastfed for more than three months having a larger reduced risk of obesity than the boys (Panagiotakos, Papadimitriou et al. 2008). Sibling studies have been unable to rule out the impact of confounders on childhood obesity. One study which controlled for this as part of a sibling study reported the adolescent BMIs were 0.39 standard deviations lower in the breastfed sibling than the non-breastfed sibling (Metzger and McDade 2010). However, another study of sibling pairs was unable to prove a protective effect for breastfeeding (Nelson and Sethi 2005). As well as the lack of control for confounders, other study limitations may affect the results reported. Definitions of obesity vary from a BMI of ≥90th to ≥97th, making any direct comparison of the outcome problematic. During their meta-analysis Yan et al investigated the association of breastfeeding and obesity, stratifying by the definitions of obesity and found a lower adjusted odds ratio for the BMI ≥ 97th group (25%) than the BMI ≥ 95th group (22%) (Yan, Liu et al. 2014). Most studies varied in the time when obesity was measured. As the definition of childhood can extend from one year olds to adolescents, there is an increasing influence of external and genetic factors on a child’s weight as potential confounders for any weight gain. When Scholtens et al looked at children breastfed for at least four months they reported a significantly lower BMI at age 1 compared to children not breastfed, but at age 7 this difference was no longer significant (Scholtens, Gehring et al. 2007). The WHO review reported a 38% decreased risk of obesity when assessing 10-19 year olds compared with 23% for 1-9 year olds and 11% for adults aged 20 and over, suggesting that endpoint for analysis is critical in determining the impact of breastfeed on obesity at various stages in childhood (Horta and Victora 2013). Finally, study design and follow up can affect the findings as high dropout rates affect long term follow ups, and the methodology used to analyse the results can produce unreliable results. Beyerlein et al investigated the impact of breastfeeding on children’s BMI in Germany but was unable to make any firm conclusions as the results differed according to whether they used linear or logistic regression (Beyerlein, Toschke et al. 2008). To summarise, there is a wealth of literature reporting the decreased risk of childhood obesity for newborns who are breastfed, although there was limited literature exploring those breastfed for at least six months. However, most studies cannot completely control for confounding maternal, child, cultural, genetic and environmental factors. The WHO recommend that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months and that it should be supplemented with additional foods for the first two years (World Health Organisation 2015). Following close examination of the literature, we would conclude that breastfeeding for at least six months should reduce the risk of obesity in early childhood, although the protective effect may be lost in latter childhood depending upon the child’s upbringing. References Aguilar Cordero, M. J., A. M. Sánchez López, N. Madrid Baños, N. Mur Villar, M. Expósito Ruiz and E. Hermoso Rodríguez (2014). “[Breastfeeding for the prevention of overweight and obesity in children and teenagers; systematic review].” Nutr Hosp 31(2): 606-620. Al-Qaoud, N. and P. Prakash (2009). “Breastfeeding and obesity among Kuwaiti preschool children.” Med Princ Pract 18(2): 111-117. Araújo, C. L., C. G. Victora, P. C. Hallal and D. P. Gigante (2006). “Breastfeeding and overweight in childhood: evidence from the Pelotas 1993 birth cohort study.” Int J Obes (Lond) 30(3): 500-506. Armstrong, J., J. J. Reilly and C. H. I. Team (2002). “Breastfeeding and lowering the risk of childhood obesity.” Lancet 359(9322): 2003-2004. Beyerlein, A., A. M. Toschke and R. von Kries (2008). “Breastfeeding and childhood obesity: shift of the entire BMI distribution or only the upper parts?” Obesity (Silver Spring) 16(12): 2730-2733. Burdette, H. L., R. C. Whitaker, W. C. Hall and S. R. Daniels (2006). “Breastfeeding, introduction of complementary foods, and adiposity at 5 y of age.” Am J Clin Nutr 83(3): 550-558. Burke, V., L. J. Beilin, K. Simmer, W. H. Oddy, K. V. Blake, D. Doherty, G. E. Kendall, J. P. Newnham, L. I. Landau and F. J. Stanley (2005). “Breastfeeding and overweight: longitudinal analysis in an Australian birth cohort.” J Pediatr 147(1): 56-61. Butte, N. F. (2001). “The role of breastfeeding in obesity.” Pediatr Clin North Am 48(1): 189-198. Buyken, A. E., N. Karaolis-Danckert, A. Günther and M. Kersting (2008). “Effects of breastfeeding on health outcomes in childhood: beyond dose-response relations.” Am J Clin Nutr 87(6): 1964-1965; author reply 1965-1966. Chivers, P., B. Hands, H. Parker, M. Bulsara, L. J. Beilin, G. E. Kendall and W. H. Oddy (2010). “Body mass index, adiposity rebound and early feeding in a longitudinal cohort (Raine Study).” Int J Obes (Lond) 34(7): 1169-1176. Fallahzadeh, H., M. Golestan, T. Rezvanian and Z. Ghasemian (2009). “Breast-feeding history and overweight in 11 to 13-year-old children in Iran.” World J Pediatr 5(1): 36-41. Goldfield, G. S., R. Paluch, K. Keniray, S. Hadjiyannakis, A. B. Lumb and K. Adamo (2006). “Effects of breastfeeding on weight changes in family-based pediatric obesity treatment.” J Dev Behav Pediatr 27(2): 93-97. Griffiths, L. J., L. Smeeth, S. S. Hawkins, T. J. Cole and C. Dezateux (2009). “Effects of infant feeding practice on weight gain from birth to 3 years.” Arch Dis Child 94(8): 577-582. Hancox, R. J., A. W. Stewart, I. Braithwaite, R. Beasley, R. Murphy, E. A. Mitchell and I. P. T. S. Group (2014). “Association between breastfeeding and body mass index at age 6-7 years in an international survey.” Pediatr Obes. Hernell, O. (2011). “Human milk vs. cow’s milk and the evolution of infant formulas.” Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program 67: 17-28. Horta, B. L. and C. G. Victora (2013). Long-term effects of breastfeeding: a systematic review, World Health Organisation: 74. Huus, K., J. F. Ludvigsson, K. Enskär and J. Ludvigsson (2008). “Exclusive breastfeeding of Swedish children and its possible influence on the development of obesity: a prospective cohort study.” BMC Pediatr 8: 42. Jing, H., H. Xu, J. Wan, Y. Yang, H. Ding, M. Chen, L. Li, P. Lv, J. Hu and J. Yang (2014). “Effect of breastfeeding on childhood BMI and obesity: the China Family Panel Studies.” Medicine (Baltimore) 93(10): e55. Komatsu, H., T. Yorifuji, T. Iwase, A. Sasaki, S. Takao and H. Doi (2009). “Impact of breastfeeding on body weight of preschool children in a rural area of Japan: population-based cross-sectional study.” Acta Med Okayama 63(1): 49-55. Kwok, M. K., C. M. Schooling, T. H. Lam and G. M. Leung (2010). “Does breastfeeding protect against childhood overweight? Hong Kong’s ‘Children of 1997’ birth cohort.” Int J Epidemiol 39(1): 297-305. Labayen, I., J. R. Ruiz, F. B. Ortega, H. M. Loit, J. Harro, I. Villa, T. Veidebaum and M. Sjostrom (2012). “Exclusive breastfeeding duration and cardiorespiratory fitness in children and adolescents.” Am J Clin Nutr 95(2): 498-505. Lefebvre, C. M. and R. M. John (2014). “The effect of breastfeeding on childhood overweight and obesity: a systematic review of the literature.” J Am Assoc Nurse Pract 26(7): 386-401. Marseglia, L., S. Manti, G. D’Angelo, C. Cuppari, V. Salpietro, M. Filippelli, A. Trovato, E. Gitto, C. Salpietro and T. Arrigo (2015). “Obesity and breastfeeding: The strength of association.” Women Birth. Mayer-Davis, E. J., S. L. Rifas-Shiman, L. Zhou, F. B. Hu, G. A. Colditz and M. W. Gillman (2006). “Breast-feeding and risk for childhood obesity: does maternal diabetes or obesity status matter?” Diabetes Care 29(10): 2231-2237. McCrory, C. and R. Layte (2012). “Breastfeeding and risk of overweight and obesity at nine-years of age.” Soc Sci Med 75(2): 323-330. Metzger, M. W. and T. W. McDade (2010). “Breastfeeding as obesity prevention in the United States: a sibling difference model.” Am J Hum Biol 22(3): 291-296. Michels, K. B., W. C. Willett, B. I. Graubard, R. L. Vaidya, M. M. Cantwell, L. B. Sansbury and M. R. Forman (2007). “A longitudinal study of infant feeding and obesity throughout life course.” Int J Obes (Lond) 31(7): 1078-1085. Moschonis, G., E. Grammatikaki and Y. Manios (2008). “Perinatal predictors of overweight at infancy and preschool childhood: the GENESIS study.” Int J Obes (Lond) 32(1): 39-47. Nelson, A. and S. Sethi (2005). “The breastfeeding experiences of Canadian teenage mothers.” J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 34(5): 615-624. Neutzling, M. B., P. R. Hallal, C. L. Araújo, B. L. Horta, M. e. F. Vieira, A. M. Menezes and C. G. Victora (2009). “Infant feeding and obesity at 11 years: prospective birth cohort study.” Int J Pediatr Obes 4(3): 143-149. Novaes, J. F., J. A. Lamounier, E. A. Colosimo, S. C. Franceschini and S. E. Priore (2012). “Breastfeeding and obesity in Brazilian children.” Eur J Public Health 22(3): 383-389. World Health Organisation. (2015). “Breastfeeding.” Retrieved March 2015 from http://www.who.int/topics/breastfeeding/en/. Panagiotakos, D. B., A. Papadimitriou, M. B. Anthracopoulos, M. Konstantinidou, G. Antonogeorgos, A. Fretzayas and K. N. Priftis (2008). “Birthweight, breast-feeding, parental weight and prevalence of obesity in schoolchildren aged 10-12 years, in Greece; the Physical Activity, Nutrition and Allergies in Children Examined in Athens (PANACEA) study.” Pediatr Int 50(4): 563-568. Poulton, R. and S. Williams (2001). “Breastfeeding and risk of overweight.” JAMA 286(12): 1449-1450. Rathnayake, K. M., A. Satchithananthan, S. Mahamithawa and R. Jayawardena (2013). “Early life predictors of preschool overweight and obesity: a case-control study in Sri Lanka.” BMC Public Health 13: 994. Sabanayagam, C., A. Shankar, Y. S. Chong, T. Y. Wong and S. M. Saw (2009). “Breast-feeding and overweight in Singapore school children.” Pediatr Int 51(5): 650-656. Scholtens, S., U. Gehring, B. Brunekreef, H. A. Smit, J. C. de Jongste, M. Kerkhof, J. Gerritsen and A. H. Wijga (2007). “Breastfeeding, weight gain in infancy, and overweight at seven years of age: the prevention and incidence of asthma and mite allergy birth cohort study.” Am J Epidemiol 165(8): 919-926. Simon, V. G., J. M. Souza and S. B. Souza (2009). “Breastfeeding, complementary feeding, overweight and obesity in pre-school children.” Rev Saude Publica 43(1): 60-69. Taveras, E. M., S. L. Rifas-Shiman, K. S. Scanlon, L. M. Grummer-Strawn, B. Sherry and M. W. Gillman (2006). “To what extent is the protective effect of breastfeeding on future overweight explained by decreased maternal feeding restriction?” Pediatrics 118(6): 2341-2348. Thorsdottir, I., I. Gunnarsdottir and G. I. Palsson (2003). “Birth weight, growth and feeding in infancy: relation to serum lipid concentration in 12-month-old infants.” Eur J Clin Nutr 57(11): 1479-1485. Toschke, A. M., R. M. Martin, R. von Kries, J. Wells, G. D. Smith and A. R. Ness (2007). “Infant feeding method and obesity: body mass index and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements at 9-10 y of age from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC).” Am J Clin Nutr 85(6): 1578-1585. Twells, L. and L. A. Newhook (2010). “Can exclusive breastfeeding reduce the likelihood of childhood obesity in some regions of Canada?” Can J Public Health 101(1): 36-39. Vehapoglu, A., M. YazÄ±cÄ±, A. D. Demir, S. Turkmen, M. Nursoy and E. Ozkaya (2014). “Early infant feeding practice and childhood obesity: the relation of breast-feeding and timing of solid food introduction with childhood obesity.” J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 27(11-12): 1181-1187. von Kries, R., B. Koletzko, T. Sauerwald and E. von Mutius (2000). “Does breast-feeding protect against childhood obesity?” Adv Exp Med Biol 478: 29-39. Weyermann, M., D. Rothenbacher and H. Brenner (2006). “Duration of breastfeeding and risk of overweight in childhood: a prospective birth cohort study from Germany.” Int J Obes (Lond) 30(8): 1281-1287. Yamakawa, M., T. Yorifuji, S. Inoue, T. Kato and H. Doi (2013). “Breastfeeding and obesity among schoolchildren: a nationwide longitudinal survey in Japan.” JAMA Pediatr 167(10): 919-925. Yan, J., L. Liu, Y. Zhu, G. Huang and P. P. Wang (2014). “The association between breastfeeding and childhood obesity: a meta-analysis.” BMC Public Health 14: 1267.
The Nokia Company’ Principles of Finance Essay
Table of Contents Introduction Argument Conclusion References Introduction The world’s appetite for technology has grown tremendously over the years. Everyone wants to lay their hands on the latest technology or at least one that is within their means. This has had a great impact in the electronic and communication market in which the Nokia Corporation has for many years maintained leadership (Nokia 2011). The value of the company has grown and matured in the stock market and secured a position for the company in as far as investor confidence is concerned. There have been numerous alternatives of finance available for the company one of which has been equity futures. The consistent current financial profile has enabled the company convince their investors to invest their properties in the company. Argument The company’s shares have for the longest time fallen below the 6 euro mark in share value with the margin of change being below 20 %. The company has undeniably been on a down ward trend with figures falling to 4.5 Euros an all time low. The quarterly outlook has shown a consistent drop in the share price (Yahoo Finance 2011). This situation cannot be criticized since Nokia has made its move into the smart phone production. The level of sales has dropped due to the change in consumer taste in favor of Smartphone technology. This has caused the company to partner with other companies such as Microsoft to try and restore the market leadership as well as recover the 18 % plunge in profit margins (Yahoo Finance. 2011). The share price will be expected to remain the same come next year due to the slim margins of sales that have been experiences these year. The consumer base will take time to embrace the new changes in the mobile software and therefore the shares will take time to get back to normal. This will proceed on to the first and second quarters of the year since during this time the company will be experiencing the recess period. The third quarter will however bring in improvements in share value owing to the change in the price earnings ratio that is expected to increase. The fourth quarter will definitely record a substantial growth due to the high season of holidays and ceremonies around the globe (Arthur 2011). He company’s risk portfolio stands at a positive side for the investor since the level of volatility of the shares against the stork markets index has a positive trend. The market share returns have a high level of sensitivity to asset returns. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More This ,makes the shears more risky but much more profitable for an investor who purchases futures. Level of sensitivity. For instance, the company has made an 11.6 billion euro deal with Microsoft for the acquisition of the right to use their windows mobile software’s along with other handset applications (Orlowski 2011). Microsoft enjoys a worldwide market leadership and command and will go a long way in improving the company’s asset value and returns. In effect the value of the shareholders wealth is expected to increase by a lesser but equally substantial margin. This has been the trends over the past few years with each change marking the introduction of a new product or a modification of an existing one. However, the share price has had a sharp margin of change which makes the stock risky but lucrative. Besides futures, there are several other investment vehicles available in the company. Preference shares for instance attract a return that is slightly above the banks savings rate of return which makes investment in the company more profitable. There is however, a greater chance at high profitability in the acquisition of futures as compared to all other investments. Conclusion The value of 100 shares in the Nokia Company will be expected to rise by a fair margin (Butcher 2010). This margin will provide returns that are greater than the risk free rate of the savings and certificate deposits in banks since the company has a positive beta in as far as the market portfolio is concerned. References Orlowski. A. ( 2011). “Memo Gives Full Details of Nokiea Staff Cull and Closure“. The Register. Web. Arthur, C. (2011). Nokia shares dive after sales warning. The Guardian. Web. Butcher, M. (2010). Nokia’s new CEO has a mobile mountain to climb. Tech Crunch. Web. We will write a custom Essay on The Nokia Company’ Principles of Finance specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Nokia. (2011). Investors resources. Nokia. Web. Yahoo Finance. (2011). Nokia Corporation, Yahoo Finance. Web.