Get help from the best in academic writing.

FISV 5600 UMA Primary Goal of The Corporation Discussion

24 Hour Essay Help / By
FISV 5600 UMA Primary Goal of The Corporation Discussion.

What is the primary goal of the corporation?Maximize Wealth – should be the primary goal of the financial manager. Unlike profit (earnings per share, EPS) maximization, wealth maximization considers the impact of current decisions on the long-term financial health of the firm.Social Responsibility – firms should be socially responsible at the same time they earn “normal” profits; otherwise they probably will go out of business.Wealth Maximization and Social Responsibility – actions that maximize the value of the firm also are beneficial to society; wealth maximization improves the standard of livingalso, encourage external resources for your posts, and please be sure to cite them properly300-500 wordsDefend your answer and do your best to back it up with research!
FISV 5600 UMA Primary Goal of The Corporation Discussion

Thomas Aquinas, also known as Aquino, was a prominent philosopher of 1200s who attempted to argue God’s existence through criticizing other philosophers’- such as Anselm- arguments. In his argument, Aquinas states that the existence of God is a self-evident because God appears to be something known by everything alive. According to Aquinas (207), “everything in the nature is aware of God’s existence.” He says that whenever people know the meaning of the term “God”, God becomes self-evident. He further argues that if for instance a person does not believe in God, this would not be self-evident. For example, there have been reported cases of children been raised by wild animals such as monkeys or wolves. Nevertheless, these children are still human with human intelligence but they are not able to know God or even know that he even exists. Even though they have human intelligence or potential for it, they will never know God hence it would not be self-evident. According to Aquinas (90), a thing can be self-evident in itself and to us. In a nutshell, whenever a whole phrase such as “the universe is round” is known to everyone, the self-evident is to all. However, if either one element or all in the phrase is unknown to all, the self-evident is considered to be in itself as it is absence to those who the phrase element is not clear. As a result, according to Aquinas (473), “there are some mental concepts that are self-evidence only to the learned, as those incorporeal substances are not in space.” I tend to view this explanation as a fact since the preposition “God exists,” is self-evident in itself since the predicate and the subject are same thing. God is his own existence. This means that since the real meaning of God is not known to us, the preposition is self-evident in itself, thus calling for demonstration of things that are known to us in a more clear way even if they are less known in their nature. Anselm, a renowned philosopher, used ontological arguments to explain the existence of God. Anselm believed that nothing greater than God can be conceived and if other things do exist, then God must exist. According to Anselm (88) “it is ridiculous if God does not exist, because there would be a possibility of conceiving of ‘a Being which would be greater than the one who no other greater can be conceived.’ In his argument, at least one empirical premise is used in an attempt to prove God’s existence.” Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More In this empirical premise, it is normally deduced that there could have not been life if certain essential things existing in the universe were to hold a different appearance, no matter how minimal, from what they are. His ontological argument further emphasizes that from the very definition of term “God”, it is possible to prove that he exists. However, as Aquinas (78) states out, it is important to note that conceptual claims do not bring about existential claims. In order to prove that a certain thing does exist, for instance bacteria, one needs to understand that more than concept reflection is crucial. Instead, more solid facts from empirical research from the field are needed to explain the existence of such a thing. From his much concern of nature of being, Anselm (365) came up with ontological argument through distinguishing contingent being from necessary being in four philosophical statements. First, he stated that if the Being he was imagining about was the greatest imaginable, it meant that he was not greater. Secondly, if it was not true in imagining that he was not greater, it was then not true that he was imagining of the Greatest Being imaginable. Thirdly, “Being is greater than not being”, and fourthly, if the being he was imagining does not exist, then it was not true that he was imagining the Greatest Being imaginable. According to Anselm (49), “This meant that if whatever he was thinking was of the Greatest Being Thinkable, it was therefore true that that being exists.” In trying to emphasis on the existence of God, Anselm (23) explains that even a foolish person will understand when he hears of a being which is greater than anything else that can be conceived. Anselm (8) further explains that “whatever a person understands will be according to his understanding, in which it assuredly understands alone, is not enough to conceive that, than which nothing greater can be conceived.” This according to Anselm (110), means that, “supposing it exists in understanding alone: then it can be conceived to exist in reality; which is greater and therefore if that, which nothing is greater can be conceived, exists in the understanding alone, the very being, than which nothing greater can be conceived, is one, than which a greater can be conceived.” However, this is not possible. Therefore, Anselm (9) argues that a being greater than anything thinkable do exist not only in understanding but also in reality. The argument brings out God as the ‘being which is greater than any other imaginable being’ and that He exists in people’s mind in form of an idea. Also, Anselm (63) argues that “if all other things are considered to be equal, it implies that that beings that exist in peoples mind in form of an idea as well as in reality is greater than any being existing only in people’s mind as an idea.” We will write a custom Essay on The ontological argument attempts to prove God’s existence specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More This shows that if God was to exist in peoples mind as an idea, there could be another thing greater than God. However, it is a fact that we cannot think of anything that is greater than God, since “it is impossible to think of something greater than the greatest possible being that can be imagined” Anselm (309). Thus, God exists. According to Anselm (109) “if the existence of a being is necessary, then, ‘that being is greater than one which existence is not necessary’.” This is another way of saying that if God only exist in people’s imaginations without existing in reality, there could be another being perceived, greater than God. However, because God is the only greater being thinkable existing, he necessary exist in reality. This shows that necessary existence is a property. For example, if “m” necessarily exists, it means that its existence is independent and does not rely on any other being’s existence. Moreover, if a being is considered to necessarily exist, it means that it exists eternally in the world logically. According to Anselm (127), “such a being is not just, so to speak, indestructible in this world, but indestructible in every logically possible world- and this does seem, at first blush, to be a great-making property.” This is a true nature of God. His indestructibility in this world shows that His existence is eternally. Aquinas however argues that God’s existence is self evident. Aquinas brings out an argument that God’s existence is self-evidence. Aquinas opposes the idea that claims regarding the God’s concept can be used to deduce His existence. According Aquinas (26), “not everyone who hears this word ‘God’ understands it to signify ‘a being that which nothing greater can be imagined,’ seeing that some have believed God to be a body.” For this idea to be practical, it requires conviction of people to perceiving God’s definition similarly. Nevertheless, despite the criticism, the ontological argument can be explained without using the term ‘God’, by replacing the term with “A being than which none greater can be conceived.” However, ‘a being than which none greater can be conceived’ will be another form of a statement referring naturally to the name of God. In addition, according to Aquinas (39), even if it was possible for everybody to hold the same picture of God as ‘a being than which none greater can be imagined,’ “it does not prove that a person understands what the word signifies, rather, this shows that it only exists mentally.” Aquinas (41) argues that though we can understand the phrase “a being than which none greater can be imagined” we do not have a clue what this series of words really denotes. This view according to Aquinas (74) indicates that, “God is unlikely than any other reality known to us; while we can easily understand concepts of finite things, the concept of an infinitely great being dwarfs finite human understanding.” Not sure if you can write a paper on The ontological argument attempts to prove God’s existence by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More No matter how appropriately we can try to intertwine the phrase “a being than which none greater can be conceived” with a finite concepts that we are aware of, it is clear that an appropriate description of God is nowhere near these finite concepts. This simply means that they do not provide us with clear information of Gods existence. All in all, the effectiveness of the argument does not require us to have a complete knowledge of the concept of “a natural thing which none greater can be conceived.” This is so because even if we do not know what is meant by this concept, we will still understand the thing in an appropriate way which can enable us to know such a thing does or does not exist. Therefore according to Aquinas, the success of Anselm’s argument does not rely on how well one understands the concept. Instead, if the concept is logical even mere understanding of it is enough in making the argument successful. One of the Aquinas’ proofs of God’s existence, which brings out the difference with Anselm approaches, is the aspect of “things that move things.” In his explanation, he argues that each motion has something that causes it to move. He also explains that there is in the very first thing that causes motion to everything including the universe. He considers this to be God. Through this proof, Aquinas shows that to understand the existence of God, He is to be understood. Unlike Anselm who argues that every person will understand the presence of God through internal understanding of existence of a being which no other imaginable being is greater than, Aquinas’s approach indicates that it is through understanding the meaning of the term ‘God’ that brings out his existence through self-evident. Nevertheless, it is evidential that Aquinas approach constitutes an improvement over Anselm’s. Despite the argument that understanding God’s existence requires one understanding of the term itself, Aquinas (34) approach revolves around the phrase “God is a being which none greater can be imagined.” Through understanding God in a self-evident perspective, it requires this knowledge to exist in that persons mind as an idea from what the person knows, an argument initiated by Anselm. Further understanding of God’s existence through evidences such as motion of things, order efficient causes, nature of being and not being in things, gradation in things and world governance, is an integrated way of Anselm’s (96) argument of “a being that exists as an idea in mind as well as in reality.” This is because these are thing that requires supernatural power to control hence bringing the controller as being the greatest. Furthermore, the argument that ‘the existence of God is self-evidence’ is a fact that brings out Gods great nature as seen by people, a completion of Anselm’s argument of ‘a God greater than any other imaginable thing.’ This is because to understand God is to understand his mighty doings. However, there is evidence of originality in Aquinas argument on the “effect of a person not believing in God” in proving the ‘self-evident’ argument. This is so because if a person is not exposed into an environment which will provide him with the meaning of God, his human intelligence will not give him understanding pertaining God and his existence. Works Cited Anselm Saint. The major works. London: Oxford University press. 1998. Print Aquinas Thomas. Theologian of the Christian life. London: Ashgate Publishing 2003. Print
biology lab experiments reports (organic compounds) and (cells). Help me study for my Biology class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.

each lab should include:
objective (from lab manual doc attachment)
Introduction
materials used (from lab manual doc attachment)
method of doing the lab (from lab manual doc attachment)
results (the tables from lab manual doc attachments)
conclusion
Discussion ( comparison between my results and others’s results.)
references: work sited the main recourse is lab manual (picture is included)

I will include pictures of the lab procedures and tables and results if you have any questions please ask me.
thank you.

biology lab experiments reports (organic compounds) and (cells)

Writer’s Choice

Writer’s Choice. Paper details In no more than four-pages, double-spaced and in 12 font, use Ronald Takaki’s Double Victory to answer the question, “Was World War II a “good” war?” Footnote or endnote for every direct quote or paraphrase of unique language (all plagiarism earns a zero for the exam) Use of the Chicago Style for the bibliography and footnotes/endnotes (standard deduction of 50 points for other styles) Use of TAKAKI with a minimum of five direct quotes (standard deduction of 50 points for not using Takaki) No outside sources permitted (automatic zero) Standard margins, Double-space, 12-font Thesis Statement in BOLD Maximum of four pages No cover page No emailed papers accepted Bibliography of All Sources Used (or, you will earn a zero) Bibliography in Chicago styleWriter’s Choice

Rasmussen University Increase a Clients Ability to Thrive Social Work Presentation

custom essay Rasmussen University Increase a Clients Ability to Thrive Social Work Presentation.

I’m working on a social work presentation and need a sample draft to help me learn.

Module 04 Assignment – Increase a Client’s Ability to ThriveYou are interviewing for a Human Services
Generalist Position with a human services organization that serves a
community near you. They provide educational and employment resources to
job-seeking, low-income families and individuals.As part of the interview process, the hiring manager has asked you to
prepare a visually appealing PowerPoint slideshow introducing ways to
coordinate various systems within a client’s life that are supportive
and encourage them to thrive. Your PowerPoint slideshow will need to:Have a title slide that includes the name of your community.Contain 4-6 content slides.Address the following:
What personality/human behaviors need to be addressed with regard to helping someone find a job and/or seek education?How can a family system support a client who is seeking a job or
additional education? When might a family system work against an
individual with these needs?What macro systems/social forces need to be considered?Suggest 2 national and 2 local community resources to help
individuals from low-income families who are seeking employment or
additional education.
Use proper spelling/grammar.Cite at least 3 academic references and present the sources in APA format on a References slide.
Rasmussen University Increase a Clients Ability to Thrive Social Work Presentation

Utilitarian, Libertarian, Deontological, and Virtue Ethics Perspectives Case Study

An ethical dilemma is a situation that involves conflicts between moral principles in which obeying one ultimately results to transgression of the other. The utilitarian ethical perspective holds that a good course of action maximizes happiness for the parties involved, and therefore the moral worth of a certain action is determined by its outcome. Libertarian ethical principles hold that individuals have the right to be respected and the only limit to an individual’s ability to enjoy these rights is the obligation to respect others’ basic rights. Deontological theories are also referred to as duty-based ethics. In deontology, morality is judged through examining the nature of the actions and the will of the individuals to do the right thing. Drawing judgment from an individuals will and control of certain actions is based on the argument that the future is not controllable. Virtue ethics perspective emphasizes on the influence of character traits and moral virtues toward the resultant ethical behavior.1 For the utilitarian principle, completion of the project could give a team a satisfaction for its achievement. Melanie and other members of her team were putting in extra time to ensure that the project was completed and launched in a few weeks. Several individuals at Zagante were forced to put in extra working hours to complete their assignments related to the software code project. Some dedicated members of the staff were forced to sleep in their cubicles because of the demands of their assignments. Melanies hard work was aimed at ensuring a successful launch of the product together with hopes for promotion to the project’s senior vice president.2 On the contrary, considering the deontological theory, Melanie and the team were working on TerraPix 2.0 map-making software meant for enhancing topographical view for the oil companies. Technology related companies in the region had suffered in the previous two years and Zagante was not exception. Although the company survived through the hard time, it was affected financially thus forcing its management to freeze the hiring process. This meant that although the present employees were lucky to retain their jobs, they had to work extremely hard to ensure that the product was a success. In an effort to maintain their jobs, zagante staff was exploited through the requirement to put in extra time and effort at the minimal pay.3 Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More In the process of carrying out evaluations for her team members, Melanies comparison between Tom’s and Jeremy’s profiles is a dilemma. This brings into focus the virtue ethics. Although both candidates displayed outstanding qualities, Tom’s profile was more striking professionally but Melanie leaned on Jeremy’s side because she considered him as a close friend. On the contrary, considering libertarian principle, Melanie caught Jeremy programming a game instead of working on the running project, TerraPix. Later on, Jeremy admitted that he was working on a project he had picked from his brother-in-law’s company. His brother in laws company was pressured by the need to complete the programs before the commencement of a certain trade show. According to Jeremy, the offer, that includes the payment was good such that he could not decline. Melanie confronted Jeremy for moonlighting, and inquested to know how he felt about it. According to Melanie, the team had their own project, which might not be as enticing but it was important for the company.4 On the utilitarian principle, Jeremy argued that he was fully engaged in the project and only took the side assignments because he felt that he could comfortably handle them off his working hours. According to Jeremy, his brother in law’s company was conversant with his tight schedule at work and were okay with it.5 Melanie was angered because he felt that the best programmer in the organization was on his exit from the company. On the contrary, considering the deontological principles, Melanie continued to question Jeremy if he would take up the opportunity if they offered a full time position and whether he was happy in his current job. Jeremy took up the side job to have fun, break the monotony of doing the same thing day in day out, and he was interested in gaming from childhood. In addition, he was learning new techniques which could be helpful to Zagante in the future. For example, he said that he was learning to use MAX 4 modelling tool, which at some point zagante had considered checking it out.6 According to Simons, straightforward ethical decisions are meant for enhancing both short-term and long-term benefits of the growth of the business.7 We will write a custom Case Study on Utilitarian, Libertarian, Deontological, and Virtue Ethics Perspectives specifically for you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Ethics are aimed at protecting and maintaining a good business and individual’s reputation. For example values like honesty, conscientiousness, and integrity create a connection between ethical principles and the expected business activities. Jeremy’s need for extra income to support his family brings in the deontological principle. Melanie demanded to know the precise reason as to why Jeremy decided to take up the extra work. Was it because working at Zagante had become monotonous or for the need of the money. Jeremy made it clear that he was not sacrificing to be away from his family , especially the newborn for fun, but it was because life was becoming expensive day in day out. In addition the fact that his wife was not going to work for some time meant that he had to provide for the entire household solely. In the interest of the company and Jeremy (utilitarian principle), Melanie requested Jeremy to focus on terrapix because they expected his entire devotion to enhance successful launching of the project. Melanie promised to keep the secret of Jeremys moonlighting so far as Jeremy would not do anything that would jeopardize the success of the project and his reputation.8 Appropriate ethical behavior acts as a guideline to what may be considered in a business organization as the right course of action. According to American Psychiatric Association, decisions made for proper business management are never ethical even in situations in which they seem to adhere to the required ethical principles.9 Ethical decisions are considered to be right when they in conflict with important business decisions. The awareness of the existing conflict justifies the decision. In the process of safeguarding the interest of the company, deontological principle , Melanie carried out research in an effort to understand the consequences of moonlighting. Melanie found out about a case involving a supervisor from the city water department. The supervisor operated an irrigation business besides his job and had used his employer’s resources to carry out his personal work. Melanie related this to Jeremy’s case whereby he was using Zagantes computers to carry out his personal tasks. In another case, a teacher moonlighted as a stripper in which although she enjoyed doing it, it was not beneficial to her toward her growth managerially. Jeremys case still bothered her. This is because he moonlighted for a company which was not a competitor meaning that he had little to gain from the side job and he was using Zagantes resources (computer). But onto her fears, Melanie was not ready to fire Jeremy because the company could not afford to lose such a talent. Melanie considered that moonlighting could not earn Jeremy a promotion and after his search, there was no other case of an individual who had been promoted for moonlighting.10 In situations where an organization does not regulate a certain behavior, its activities can be regulated by external policies. For the virtue ethics, Melanie further inquested from the company’s human resource director, Jill Darby, if there were any policies on employees moonlighting. Melanie lied that there was no one involved in moonlighting, but she was only concerned because the issue came up with her team. Jill confirmed that the company did not have any policies. Not sure if you can write a paper on Utilitarian, Libertarian, Deontological, and Virtue Ethics Perspectives by yourself? We can help you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More However, according to Jill, the state has stipulated clear rules about it, in addition to the vacuum created by the incomplete agreement signed when one is hired. In business organizations, there should be a coincidence between the quest for personal interests and ethical behavior.11 Covering up of behavior is usually harmful to the business in the long run. When Jill asked whether the company was facing a potential problem, Melanie covered up for Jeremy and lied that her team was a source of solutions and not problems. Melanie explained that her concern was fueled by frustration of her team members because of bare minimal pay rises in the entire year. Melanie tried to explain that although employees understand the financial situation of the company, they could take up side jobs to meet their financial needs. To solve the employees financial strains, Jill referred Melanie to Aaron who could offer low interest rate loans to employees who were in a fix.12 Virtue Ethics Perspective The ethical dilemma presented by the case study can be solved using the virtue ethics principles. A behavior which is detrimental to the business in the short term but enhances growth of the business in the long term should be encouraged. According to Grace and Cohen, the ideas acquired from such practices can be used in redefining the business.13 Changing of the new ideas into a profession enables the business to benefit from the inventions. As Melanie thought about Jeremy, she gathered that he was faithful to the company, he had worked there for five years, earned promotions and importantly enjoyed working for the company. She informed David and Marc that Frank Lloyd was fired for moonlighting. According to David, that was a bad managerial decision that most probably his boss regretted for a long time. Melanie said that she was not going to fire Jeremy because moonlighting was kind of normal to programmers. David supported her idea by explaining that when he worked at way bridge associates, the architects had side businesses of designing houses that paid less. In these circumstances, virtue ethics principle allows Jeremy to carry out the side business as far as it does not affect his performance in the project. Melanie asked whether these side businesses affected their jobs and David said that it had no effect because it was expected. In addition, moonlighting for the architects gave the firm a reason to pay the architects less than their worth. However, side jobs enabled the architects to learn new ideas and bring them into the project.14 In conclusion, Melanie called jeremy in her office and explained to him that the company could give low interest loans and thus he would not be required to take up side jobs. Jeremy declined the offer and Melanie was upset because the side job was not beneficial to the project. In addition, she was afraid of the implications of Jeremy’s moonlighting to the rest of the team. Jeremy did not care about the effect of his actions to the rest of the team.15 He considered them as grown ups who were obligated to perform their duties. In addition, Jeremy considered that so long as he performed his duties to meet the project’s expectations, it was not important to the team and the management on what he did with time out of the office. Melanie was agitated by this statement and realized that it was time for her and the organization to fire Jeremy. In trying to offer Jeremy a solution to his financial constraints, Melanie did not consider other interests Jeremy derived from taking the side job and this made them to fall apart.16 Value Ethics Bibliography American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual. 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Pub. 1994. Drumwright, Minette, and Murphy, Patrick. “How Advertising Practitioners View Ethics: Moral Muteness, Moral Myopia, and Moral Imagination.” Journal of Advertising, 33 (2004): 7-24. Grace, Damian and Cohen, Stephen. Business Ethics: Australian Problems and Cases. 2 Ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1998. Hinman, Lawrence. Ethics: A Pluralistic Approach to Moral Theory. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1994. Rachels, James. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993. Robinson, Mary 2000, Business and Human Rights: A Progress Report. PDF File. 8 August 2012. Sandel, Michael. “The Case Against Perfection.” The Atlantic Monthly (April 2004): 1-11. Savulescu, J et al. “Why We Should Allow Performance Enhancing Drugs in Sport.” British Journal of Sports Medicine, 38 (2004): 666-670. Simons, Paul. Be Interested in the People You Serve and Your Life Will Be Happy”, Fourth Annual Lecture. Sydney: St. James Ethics Centre. 1994. Singer, Peter. Practical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1993. Footnotes 1 Savulescu, J. et al. “Why We Should Allow Performance Enhancing Drugs in Sport.” British Journal of Sports Medicine, 38 (2004): p. 669. 2 Savulescu, J et al. “Why We Should Allow Performance Enhancing Drugs in Sport.” British Journal of Sports Medicine, 38 (2004): 669. 3 James, Rachels. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993. p. 226. 4 Minette, Drumwright, and Murphy, Patrick. “How Advertising Practitioners View Ethics: Moral Muteness, Moral Myopia, and Moral Imagination.” Journal of Advertising, 33 (2004): 7-24. 5 Robinson, Mary 2000, Business and Human Rights: A Progress Report. PDF File. 8 August 2012. 6 Minette, Drumwright, and Murphy, Patrick. “How Advertising Practitioners View Ethics: Moral Muteness, Moral Myopia, and Moral Imagination.” Journal of Advertising, 33 (2004): 7-24. 7 Simons, Paul. Be Interested in the People You Serve and Your Life Will Be Happy”, Fourth Annual Lecture. Sydney: St. James Ethics Centre. 1994. p.16. 8 Lawrence, Hinman. Ethics: A Pluralistic Approach to Moral Theory. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1994. 9 James, Rachels. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993. p.56 10 Michael, Sandel. “The Case Against Perfection.” The Atlantic Monthly (April 2004): 1-11. 11 Lawrence, Hinman. Ethics: A Pluralistic Approach to Moral Theory. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1994.p. 106. 12 Michael, Sandel. “The Case Against Perfection.” The Atlantic Monthly (April 2004): 1-11. 13 Damian, Grace, and Stephen, Cohen. Business Ethics: Australian Problems and Cases. 2 Ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1998. p.2 14 Hinman, Lawrence. Ethics: A Pluralistic Approach to Moral Theory. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1994. P.211. 15 Singer, Peter. Practical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1993. p.183. 16 Lawrence, Hinman. Ethics: A Pluralistic Approach to Moral Theory. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1994. p. 304

Penn State University Healthcare Program Interview Transcript

Penn State University Healthcare Program Interview Transcript.

Assignment: Advocating for the Nursing Role in Program Design and ImplementationAs their names imply, the honeyguide bird and the honey badger both share an affinity for honey. Honeyguide birds specialize in finding beehives but struggle to access the honey within. Honey badgers are well-equipped to raid beehives but cannot always find them. However, these two honey-loving species have learned to collaborate on an effective means to meet their objectives. The honeyguide bird guides honey badgers to newly discovered hives. Once the honey badger has ransacked the hive, the honey guide bird safely enters to enjoy the leftover honey.Much like honeyguide birds and honey badgers, nurses and health professionals from other specialty areas can—and should—collaborate to design effective programs. Nurses bring specialties to the table that make them natural partners to professionals with different specialties. When nurses take the requisite leadership in becoming involved throughout the healthcare system, these partnerships can better design and deliver highly effective programs that meet objectives.In this Assignment, you will practice this type of leadership by advocating for a healthcare program. Equally as important, you will advocate for a collaborative role of the nurse in the design and implementation of this program. To do this, assume you are preparing to be interviewed by a professional organization/publication regarding your thoughts on the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs.To Prepare:Review the Resources and reflect on your thinking regarding the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs.Select a healthcare program within your practice and consider the design and implementation of this program.Reflect on advocacy efforts and the role of the nurse in relation to healthcare program design and implementation.The Assignment: (3–4 pages)In a 3- to 4-page paper, create an interview transcript of your responses to the following interview questions:Tell us about a healthcare program, within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?Who is your target population?What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design?What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation? How does this role vary between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why?By Day 7 of Week 8Submit your interview transcript.
Penn State University Healthcare Program Interview Transcript