understanding and summarizing technical paper
understanding and summarizing technical paper. I’m studying for my Computer Science class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?
Hi
Attached paper need to be understood and summarized in presentation (PowerPoint file) with 10 – 15 slides. The request as below:
– Read and understand the paper.
– Highlight the main and important ideas (need to send me the original file with highlighting).
– Summarize these main ideas in a presentation (no rephrasing need, use same paper words)
– Technical details and figures explanation is expected.
Thank you.
understanding and summarizing technical paper
Hyperlipidemia Management
best assignment help
There are four general classes of lipid-lowering drugs: niacin, fibric-acid derivatives, bile-acid sequestrants, and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Describe the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacotherapeutics of each drug. When, specifically, do you use each drug? Include monitoring parameters and patient education.For assignment requirements, review the rubric for Assignment 9.1 in your syllabus.Submission
Assignment 9.1 Hyperlipidemia RubricAll of the information must be included:1, Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of each drug listed correctly2, Pharmacotherapeutics of each drug including use, rationale, monitoring parameters and patient education listed correctly.
SEU Errors Occurring During Performance Appraisal Discussion
SEU Errors Occurring During Performance Appraisal Discussion.
I’m working on a management discussion question and need support to help me study.
Within an organization, when an employee is assessed based upon his or her performance, it is critical that the employee can provide feedback associated with their performance review. In fact, employees should be able to disagree with aspects of the performance review (as applicable).Many organizations have processes associated with appealing a performance review. Explain what factors you believe should be included in the appeals process. Then, justify who you believe should be involved, at each step of the appeal, in the process.Additionally, explain how two of the errors found in Section 7-3 (page 206 in your textbook), can impact performance reviews. Then, identify how these errors can be corrected/prevented.It is important to present an in-depth analysis and integrate sufficient support from scholarly resources throughout the assignment. Use suitable headings and subheadings to organize the work in an appropriate manner. Be sure to support your statements with logic and argument, citing any sources referenced. Embed course material concepts, principles, and theories (require supporting citations) in your initial response along with at least 2 scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article. Keep in mind that these scholarly references can be found in the Saudi Digital Library by conducting an advanced search specific to scholarly references. Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines. Be sure to support your statements with logic and argument, citing all sources referenced.TextbookAguinis, H. (2019). Performance Management, fourth edition (fourth ed.). Chicago Business Press.
SEU Errors Occurring During Performance Appraisal Discussion
The Product- Liability Debate
Discussion: The Product-Liability Debate 66 unread replies.66 replies. General Discussion Instructions You are required to post to this discussion THREE TIMES, on THREE DIFFERENT DAYS. Please refer to the Discussion Grading Rubric for details regarding how your performance will be assessed. NOTE: Please be certain to read the entire discussion assignment since in some cases there is more than one question you need to discuss, respond to, or address. Be sure that you have answered the entire question! Post 1: Initial Post This posting should be a minimum of one short paragraph and a maximum of two paragraphs. Word totals for this post should be in the 100–200-word range. Whether you agree or disagree, explain why with supporting evidence and concepts from the readings or a related experience. Include a reference, link, or citation when appropriate. Preparation Consider the following: A woman sued McDonald’s because she was burned by hot coffee; A man sued a motor home manufacturer after the vehicle crashed when he left the driver’s seat to fix himself a sandwich (he had the vehicle on cruise control); A woman sued a department store after she was injured by a falling display (pushed over by her own child); Millions of families lose loved ones to mesothelioma caused by prolonged exposure to asbestos. These are all examples of product liability lawsuits that have made headlines in recent years. Non-attorney spokespeople advertise on behalf of law firms, seeking participants for class-action lawsuits. This is today’s product liability climate. Research an instance of product liability that has resulted in a court decision within the last twelve to twenty-four months. It doesn’t matter if the decision was in favor of the plaintiff or the defendant; just be certain that you are able to report on the outcome of the lawsuit. Make sure to get a link and URL for case facts so that your classmates can follow up and read more about what you bring to the discussion. After you have read about the case and completed your research, post to the discussion as required below. For Discussion Provide a brief synopsis of the case you read in preparation for this discussion. Be sure to include a URL and/or Web link in your post. Based on the case you read about, should the consumer bear more responsibility for product injuries, or should manufacturers bear more responsibility? How does product liability impact business operations and decisions? Do you believe that the current product-liability legal system is broken? Why or why not? If you believe it is broken, how would you fix it? If you believe it is working well, defend the system. Posts 2 and 3: Respond to Classmates’ Posts Instructions After you have created your initial post, look over the discussion posts of your classmates and give at least two thoughtful responses to two different classmates (one per classmate) as outlined in the Discussion Grading Rubric. A response posting should be a minimum of one short paragraph. Word totals for these posts should be in the 75–100-word range. Whether you agree or disagree, explain why with supporting evidence and concepts from the readings or a related experience. Include a reference, link, or citation when appropriate. The goal of your response posts is to extend discussions already taking place or pose new possibilities or opinions not previously voiced. Your goal should be to motivate the group discussion and present a creative approach to the topic. Search entries or author Search entries or author Filter replies by unread ReplyReply to Discussion: The Product-Liability Debate Collapse SubdiscussionCollin Hayes Collin Hayes WednesdaySep 15 at 10:14pm In the Takata airbag lawsuit, the airbags were filled with a chemical called ammonium nitrate which causes them to come out very fast and aggressive. The airbags can even explode and can possibly spray metal shards into the car’s cabin. There have been a total of 23 deaths and 290 injuries worldwide. It is the companies fault for making defective airbags and the product liability hurts the company name and reputation as it takes business away. The product liability is going to cause them to have to start making airbags that work at 100% efficiency if they want to stay open. I think the system is working well because it protects consumers like myself and guarantees compensation to those that have been affected. https://www.classaction.com/takata-airbags/lawsuit/ (Links to an external site.) Seth Greiling Seth Greiling (He/Him) YesterdaySep 16 at 10:27am I agree with you in this case that the manufacture is responsible for the defective air bag and it hurts the brand and companies name. This legal system does support and look after the consumer to ensure safety and security. The manufacture should always have to make changes if a consumer is hurt or could be hurt. ReplyReply to Comment Collapse SubdiscussionSeth Greiling Seth Greiling (He/Him) YesterdaySep 16 at 10:10am The General Mills Fruit Snack settlement, the fruit snacks advertisement that General Mills deceptively labeled various fruit-flavored snacks as containing “no artificial flavors.” When in the ingredients actually did include some forms of artificial flavor. In this case the manufactures should bare more responsibility because its involving a label of what people are consuming. This impacts on business operation and decisions is how they will repackage and label products moving forward. I believe that the current product-liability legal system works most of the time. It working works well because it should protect the consumer for a companies mistake or failure to ensure safety of the product and customer. Seth Greiling Seth Greiling (He/Him) YesterdaySep 16 at 10:10am ^Link: https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/consumer-products/food/1021855-general-mills-fruit-snacks-settlement-rejected-after-no-class-member-rebate-offered/ (Links to an external site.) ReplyReply to Comment Collapse SubdiscussionAmy McBride Amy McBride YesterdaySep 16 at 7:56pm 3M Earplugs were made and sold to the military to protect service members’ hearing upon exposure to machine gunfire, explosions, and other loud sounds from 2001-2015. During the time these 3M earplugs were standard issued. The plugs were known to slip out in the wearer’s ear, exposing them to the dangerously loud sounds from which they should’ve been protected. 3M designed the earplugs in a defective manner and failed to warn users of the defect or provide proper instructions for their use. As a result, hundreds of thousands of service members developed hearing loss or tinnitus. Hearing damage is the leading cause of disability claims reported to Veterans Affairs. The current product-liability legal system needs work. 3M had agreed on payment to settle these allegations to the Defense Logistics Agency. However, 3M was not required to admit liability as part of the settlement. As of now, over 240,000 3M Hearing Loss Lawsuits have been filed. No recall was ever issued on the product. Their fraud resulted in lifelong injuries to American soldiers. 3M is seeing a rebound in its business. The manufacturers need to bear more responsibility, and the people who falsified certification need to be held liable for their actions https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/3m-earplug-lawsuit-update-2021-1-7m-4876368/ ReplyReply to Comment Collapse SubdiscussionKristen Turner Kristen Turner 2:42pmSep 17 at 2:42pm The company Graco is dealing with a lawsuit regarding the marketing of their booster seats. the company was marketing the seats as safe for children 3 years and older and children that were over the weight of 30 pounds. However, it recently came to light that during their testing it was found that the seats are not safe for children under the age of 4 or under 40 pounds. This further pushes the allegation that the company misled the consumers to purchase these seats to grow their sales even though it was unsafe. In this case, it was solely the manufacturer’s responsibility to disclose the correct information about these products especially because many consumers are putting their trust in this company. Unfortunately, with this lawsuit coming to light it is causing people to reconsider purchasing from this company and potentially decreasing sales. Currently, the system is working well enough to protect the consumers from false advertising that can cause injury. https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/baby-food-class-action-lawsuit-and-settlement-news/1030928-graco-booster-seat-class-action-lawsuits-get-green-light/