Get help from the best in academic writing.

Final Paper Drug Class

Final Paper Drug Class. I need support with this Subject Major question so I can learn better.

Final choose 3 things that you learned the most about in this course or things you didn’t know about before and made an impact. You are to type a 1 page paper for EACH of the 3 things discussing in depth what you learned, and how is has changed your views in relation to the subject. (minimum of 3 pages total)
VERY IMPORTANT – you cannot just write about the 3 assignment papers you did in class already. You can combine them to make 1 area you have learned but must write about 2 other things learned from your textbook.

Assignments Already Turned In: Assignment 2, 3 & the most recent Drug assignment in last post.
Textbook: Chapters completed this semester 1-18
Topics for assignment: any 3 things throughout the book that seem interesting.

Final Paper Drug Class

An automobile tire is inflated to a pressure of 29.2 psi. Express this pressure.

An automobile tire is inflated to a pressure of 29.2 psi. Express this pressure in atmospheres, kilopascals, inches Hg, millimeters Hg and torr.Hint:   1 atm   =   101.3 kPa   =   29.92 in Hg   =  760 mm Hg   =   14.69 psi   =   760 torrpsiatmkPain Hgmm Hgtorr  29.2 
An automobile tire is inflated to a pressure of 29.2 psi. Express this pressure

UCLA The First Definition of Piety in Platos Euthyphro Essay.

FIRST PAPER
Directions: Write a 2-page paper in response to the prompt below. Your paper should be
double-spaced and use a standard font (e.g. Times New Roman), size 12, and standard margins.
Make sure you answer each part of the prompt.

The First Definition of Piety in Plato’s Euthyphro

At Euthyphro 7a, Euthyphro makes his first attempt at a definition of piety: ‘what is dear to the
gods is pious’. Socrates examines this definition at Euthyphro 7a–8b,1 and argues that it is not an
acceptable definition. Explain how Socrates’ argument works. Is this a good argument against
Euthyphro’s definition? Explain your answer.

Plagiarism notice:
Anyone found plagiarizing or cheating in an assignment will automatically fail the course and be
reported to the Center for Student Conduct. For further information on plagiarism and how to
avoid it, see: http://sa.berkeley.edu/cite-responsibly.
As a tool to promote academic integrity in this course, all written work submitted via bCourses
will be checked for originality using Turnitin. Turnitin compares student work to a database of
books, articles, websites, and other student papers. For more information about Turnitin at
Berkeley, visit http://ets.berkeley.edu/academic-integrity.
1 See lecture notes 5.2 on how to cite Plato’s dialogues. Euthyphro 7a–8b can be found on pp.8–9 of
Plato: Five Dialogues. Note that the following two pages (down to start of 9d on p.11) are also
relevant.
UCLA The First Definition of Piety in Platos Euthyphro Essay

Broward Community College Clinical Practice Guidelines Paper.

Clinical practice guidelines use available evidence to develop recommendations that guide practice to improve patient care. Select a clinical practice guideline, based on your area of interest, from one of the web sites below or another site. Describe the following information from the guideline you selected. Identify the name of the clinical guideline and date developedIdentify the populationIdentify 3 recommendations found in the guidelineIdentify the grade or level of recommendation for the three recomendations identified and describe what the assigned grade or level means.How can you use the information from the guideline in your practice?Suggested Clinical Practice Guideline sites:https://www.guidelinecentral.com/summaries/specialties/nursing/https://www.ena.org/practice-resources/resource-library/clinical-practice-guidelineshttps://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/BrowseRec/Indexhttps://guidelines.ecri.org/
Broward Community College Clinical Practice Guidelines Paper

About diamond

About diamond. Introduction “A diamond is forever” (De Beers Group, 2008) is likely to be one of the best known slogans the mining industry has ever had. Sixty years after the foundation of the De Beers Consolidated Mines in South Africa (CMSA) in 1888 (Epstein, 1982) this slogan represents a campaign aimed at marketing the sale of De Beers diamonds. In the early twentieth century the British – South African company monopolised giving them the control over the majority of the world’s diamond supply. To establish the monopoly, Ernest Oppenheimer, considered as “prototype of the multinational businessman: German by birth, British by naturalization, Jewish by religion, and South African by residence” has perceived that “the only way to increase the value of diamonds is to make them scarce” (Epstein, 1982) in 1910. Ernest Oppenheimer has so far laid the foundation for De Beers’ business strategy of controlling supply that lasted for nearly one century facilitating the process of becoming an international cartel in the late 1930 years. Within the following twenty years, De Beers monopolised the natural diamond industry on a global scale. The company monitored all pipe mines, was “fully backed by the British, Belgian and French governments [and was considered as] the official channel for the diamond trade” (Epstein, 1982) among all other governments. This distinction only lasted until the 1990’s when first threats menaced the monopoly. De Beers has been put face to face with the loss of its position in the world’s diamond producing industry hence they had to cope with a dwindling reputation. To counter this negative trend which not only existed for the diamond industry but also among customers the De Beers Group had to react. Therefore, this business report is going to examine the factors behind any changes that have taken place in the structure of the company’s value chain in recent years. It will also explain the reasoning behind any points made. To support the reasoning different business frameworks will be use. The Global Value Chain Competitive Advantage and Value Chain Michael E. Porter, professor of Business Administration at the Harvard Business School, analyses the basis of competitive advantage in his book “Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance”, that was published in 1998. He explained that it is the company’s competitive advantage that leads to value creation, hence to gain leverage among competitors in their particular market segment (Porter, 1998). Porter points out two general distinctions of competitive advantage: either a company can offer benefits at a lower cost than the rival which is called cost advantage or the company surpasses the benefits that are delivered by the competitor which is a differentiation advantage. To create a competitive advantage, irrespective of its nature, so to say by cost or differentiation the business fields resources and capabilities to finally create superior value. To visualise this issue, one can take in regard the resource-based view in the following simplified model (QuickMBA, 2009). Contemplating Fig. 1 there is still one step missing before competitive advantage is attained. It is realised by a range of value creating activities which Porter identified as value chain. He further found out that a company needed to outperform one or more of those activities that are above the overall value which ascertains the company being ahead of its competitors (QuickMBA, 2009). To get a better understanding of what the value chain contains and expresses one should have a look at the figure below that was adapted from (Porter, 1998). Continued The value chain aims at creating the highest possible value for the company and is the last step to gain a competitive advantage as seen in Fig.1. There can be different reasons why a company may add or even lose value. Throughout the years of business, the firm may have to undertake measures to make a change in the firm’s value chain (e.g. due to external factors). One of these external factors can be the time – in virtue of changing circumstances in the business environment, or a special market. The company needs to move with the times to stay competitive. A negative example that may cause a change in value can be the chaining of unfortunate events (e.g. collapsing market, contract termination with major producers, new competition, and consumer’s taste shift). This chain of unfortunate events would engender dire consequences that may conduce a company to consider changing or restructuring its value chain to haul itself out of the loophole. In the following section Porter’s theory of competitive advantage and the value chain will be applied on the particular case of De Beers. Afterwards, any factors of the past decade it will be looked at in detail. These factors include any event that occasioned De Beers to react quickly to a negative trend of falling market share and worsening reputation and consequently how the company dealt with the situation to stop this thread. De Beers’ Competitive Advantage and Value Chain De Beersoperates since its foundation in the late 19th century as already mentioned in the introduction. From scratch it followed a successful strategy that helped controlling the vast majority of the world’s diamond supply and being market leader since the beginning of its operations. In Fig. 3 is shown briefly how De Beers created its competitive advantage over competitors and how the company managed to acquire a market share of some 85% (Irwin, 2001). The activities that created value and in what way the success story of De Beers continued will be explained subsequently. Before analysing the value chain it is expedient to have a look at the De Beers Family of Companies (De Beers, Family of Companies, 2009) showing every single member that is at some extent involved in the company’s operations. Looking at Fig.4 one can see that the Anglo American Group, the Central Holdings Group and the Government of the Republic Botswana are the shareholders of the De Beers société anonyme (De Beers sa). The company’s head office is located in Luxembourg managing and monitoring the entire business whereas commercial activities are executed from subsidiaries in different parts of the world (De Beers Group, 2008). The Family of Companies is integrated across the breadth of the global diamond value chain. This covers exploration of deposits, sorting and valueing rough diamonds as well as cutting and polishing diamonds. We will have a closer look at these single instances in a little while. De Beers saAbout diamond

TA 101 Glendale Community College Play Review Paper

online homework help TA 101 Glendale Community College Play Review Paper.

PLAY REVIEWYou must see two full-length plays or musicals as part of this course during the semester! You must write a play review for both plays (one review for each) and your play reviews MUST follow my instructions CLOSELY – see below! New Revisions in light of COVID-19Due to the health crisis, you will need to see a play with one of the following methods I have posted below. I post other live theatre options online that you can review. You must see a full-length play or musical using one of the sites below. If you want to review from a different site, you MUST ask me first!–Digital Theatre + (GCC has a FREE account and they usually have a FREE one week trial) www.digitaltheatreplus.com(Links to an external site.)For DT+ try these: username: remote / password: remote OR try this user ID and password to see if they still work – Group username: student.glendaleCC Group password: dt123–Broadway HD (one week free trial): https://www.broadwayhd.com (Links to an external site.)Offers a one week free membership.–PBS (select plays not films): Download the FREE PBS app to see one of their excellent selection of plays and musicals recorded live. OR Google “PBS Great Performances” or “PBS Broadway” or click here: https://www.pbs.org/show/great-performances/collections/broadway-pbs/ (Links to an external site.)–National Theatre Live (Youtube channel): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUDq1XzCY0NIOYVJvEMQjqw (Links to an external site.)CUT AND PASTE THE QUESTIONS BELOW INTO A WORD DOC.THE PLAY OR MUSICAL MUST BE SEEN THIS TERM!STAND UP COMEDY, SHORT PLAYS (LIKE AN IMPROV SET) OR CIRCUS PERFORMANCES (LIKE CIRCLE DU SOLEIL) WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR PLAY REVIEWS!Review #1 and Review #2 must be of any full-length professional or collegiate play that you can find online using the sources above and that was recorded in front of a live audience. A full-length play/musical = 80 minutes or longer.GUIDELINES:A “critique” as defined by the Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary as “an act of criticizing; a critical estimate or discussion; the art of evaluating or analyzing with knowledge and propriety works of art or literature.”TIP: Read examples of critiques through the Los Angeles Times, Burbank Leader, New York Times, Variety, and other sources to see what critics focus on. Also, the textbook briefly outlines a theatre critic’s duties.PLAY REVIEW FORM RUBRIC: 10% of overall grade total.-All questions are answered clearly with proper grammar and spelling as well as specific designer, actor, director names given as evidence to back up statements. (4%)-You have included critical thought and analysis within the answers, with specific evidence to back up general statements and opinions (HINT: Use designer names, actor names, and other specifics here as well). (4%) -You have an understanding of terminologies such as theme, plot, and summary. (2%).TOTAL = (10% / 10 points)Other items to consider when writing your play review:Content and AnalysisIs there a mature approach to the subject matter? Was there use of slang incomplete sentences?Is this college-level work?Class concepts/general theatreAre there specifics on acting, directing, theme, technical theatre?Does the critique/review present conclusions based on class/textbook concepts?Grammar/Spelling/Sentence StructureDoes the critique present adequate support of opinions and does it have good grammar and spelling?Following Directions/Proof of AttendanceYou must submit on time. Late work cannot be accepted. Note deadlines.Frequently Asked Questions:Q: How does one write a critique/review?A: First place to start is research. Either a newspaper or internet server can help you here. Do not “cut and paste” the synopsis from a website. Use your own ideas and critical thought.Q: What is contained in a critique?A: What was your experience like? Was this your first time seeing this particular play? What were your expectations? Did those expectations change? Since you are “analyzing” as stated in the definition above, how would this compare to other works that you have experienced? How was the acting? The story? The technical elements (such as costumes, set design, sound design)?Q: What if I completely disliked the experience?A: I would like to know about it. A particular product isn’t for everyone, but I would like to know why. You are analyzing it from a critical point of view, which means explaining to an “audience” who hasn’t been to the play or film about the experience and why or why they shouldn’t attend.Other HELPFUL HINTS:- Write in “third person” – rather than “I really liked this show”, state your opinion so you are giving a general perspective: “PCPA’s production clearly depicted the playwright’s intention through the directorial concept and portrayal of the complex characters”- Take a pencil and pad with you when you watch the performance to jot ideas down.- Use the names of the actors, director, and designers in your critique (information that is found in the program). Be specific as possible.Where can I find the names of the performers? Producer? Designers? Playwright? Watch the end credits and/or do research if needed. PLAY REVIEW FORM QUESTIONS: Cut and paste and include them in a document, convert it to a PDF and then submit it under the correct assignment link. You can also type in manually here if you’d prefer, just make sure you answer all of the questions listed in order to receive full credit.NOTE: This is not an essay, but I do expect well-written sentences when asked to comment.For the rating section, you may highlight or simply include your rating AND a brief comment about why you scored a certain role (actor, director, etc.) as you did. FORMAT – COPY THE REVIEW FORMAT BELOW AND PASTE IT INTO A WORD DOC:——————————————-PLAY REVIEW #DATE OF REVIEW:FIRST NAME:LAST NAME:PLAY TITLE:AUTHOR/PLAYWRIGHT:PRODUCER(S):THEATRE (Name and Location):PERFORMANCE DATE (ex. 12/22/2017) and DATE YOU WATCHED IT:PLATFORM or SITE used to view the play (e.g. Broadway HD, PBS, etc.):WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PRODUCTION FOR OTHERS TO SEE? Why or Why not? Explain briefly.OVERALL REACTION TO THE SHOW:EXPLAIN your OVERALL REACTION (using critical thought). Give a brief justification as to why you rated your overall reaction as you did :BRIEFLY OUTLINE THE STORYLINE OF THE PLAY:WHAT WAS THE THEME OF THE PLAY? (What was the playwright want you to walk away with upon the play’s conclusion?) :DESCRIBE THE TWO MOST COMPELLING ASPECTS OF THE PRODUCTION. EXPLAIN YOUR CHOICE (Aspects of the production include direction, set design, lighting design, costumes, sound design, make up, acting, dance, music, stage combat, etc.)DESCRIBE THE LEAST SUCCESSFUL ASPECT OF THE PRODUCTION. EXPLAIN:WHAT DO YOU SEE AS THE PLAY’S MOST RELEVANT TOPIC IN REGARD TO YOUR LIFE? (TIP: All stories are relatable to the human condition in one way or another – go deep to explore this through your critical analysis to help find the answer)Below is a scale system 1 -5 (which you may highlight, circle, or indicate how you wish. Remember to use your program to find the names of the artists responsible.TIP: Have you included names and details in your answers above? Back up evidence, which includes designer, actor, director names and details from the show will help you be most successful for this assignment and give the reader a sense of attending. Again, ask yourself “WHY?” you rated them as you did. Write a one-sentence explanation of why you scored them the way you did. Go beyond one-word conclusions to describe (e.g. “boring”).RATE DIRECTION:1 = BAD; 2= SO-SO; 3= OKAY; 4 = GOOD; 5 = WOWDIRECTOR’S NAME:RATE SET DESIGN:1 = BAD; 2= SO-SO; 3= OKAY; 4 = GOOD; 5 = WOWSET DESIGNER’S NAME:RATE LIGHTING DESIGN:1 = BAD; 2= SO-SO; 3= OKAY; 4 = GOOD; 5 = WOWLIGHTING DESIGNER’S NAME:RATE COSTUME DESIGN:1 = BAD; 2= SO-SO; 3= OKAY; 4 = GOOD; 5 = WOWCOSTUME DESIGNER’S NAME:RATE MAKE-UP DESIGN:1 = BAD; 2= SO-SO; 3= OKAY; 4 = GOOD; 5 = WOWMAKE-UP DESIGNER’S NAME:RATE OTHER TECHNICAL AREAS (e.g. If there were notable aspects of the production that weren’t listed above such as Sound Design, Music, etc.):RATE ACTING:1 = BAD; 2= SO-SO; 3= OKAY; 4 = GOOD; 5 = WOWIf it was a one person show, just list one actor.ACTOR’S NAME:ACTOR’S NAME:ACTOR’S NAME:
TA 101 Glendale Community College Play Review Paper

BUSI 511 Liberty University Health Delivery System & US Health Care System Response

BUSI 511 Liberty University Health Delivery System & US Health Care System Response.

Please draft a meaningful response to another students discussion board post. It should have a minimum of 2 cited sources.Here is the post you are replying to: An understanding of the major characteristics of our past and current health care system will enable healthcare administrators, policymakers, and other stakeholders to plan for the future state of the United States health care system. In comparison to other countries, the U.S. lags in providing affordable national coverage to its citizens. This paper will address the two main objectives in health delivery, the ten characteristics health care system, and the importance of accountable care organizations. Main Objectives in a Health Delivery System Shi and Singh (2019) break down the health delivery system into two objectives. The first objective is “to provide cost-effective health services that meet quality standards to a nation (2019). The second are measurable objectives that are evaluated with access, cost, and quality (2019). Continuous improvements based on these two objectives keep health systems profitable and in business, while advancing patient outcomes and quality of care. The Ten Characteristics of the U.S. Health Care System Over the past several decades, stakeholders internal and external to healthcare have identified the characteristics that the U.S. has and is operating under. According to Shi and Singh (2019), exhibit 1.1 points out the ten characteristics of the U.S. health care system which are:
No central governing agency and little integration and coordination
Technology-driven delivery system focusing on acute care
High cost, unequal access, and average outcome
Delivery of health care under imperfect market conditions
Government as subsidiary to the private sector
Fusion of market justice and social justice
Multiple players and balance of power
Quest for integration and accountability
Access to health care services selectively based on insurance coverage
Legal risks influencing practice behaviors (p. 53).
Importance of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) Many clinicians, policymakers, and changes in legislation seeking to improve the quality of care. In 2008, the Triple Aim was coined under Dr. Donald Berwick whose goals were: improving the experience of care, improving the health of populations, and reducing per capita costs of health care (Berwick, Nolan, and Whittington, 2008). Under the Obama Administration, in 2010, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was initiated, forcing many health care organizations (HCOs) to revamp their business strategies with Medicare, Medicaid, and the public communities (Fox and Grogan, 2017). To be compliant, health systems had to convert their practices into accountable care organizations (ACOs) to avoid paying hefty fines established by the ACA. This type of conversion is achieved through integrated delivery systems (IDS), or health networks that partnering and coordinating through the physicians, hospitals, and insurers (Shi and Singh, 2019). The number of American’s reached jumped from 6 million at the start of 2011 to 23.5 million through the 744 organizations that made the switch to ACOs (Shi and Singh, 2019). Another benefit to the ACA is that it has empowered physicians to become champions in their work by aiming on the patient experience and delivery of quality care. Pimperl et al., (2018) performed a two-step method to identify such physicians who were exceptional with robust performance management systems and ACA efforts (para. 1). Patients benefit best when clinicians are focused on quality through government mandates and incentives. Bible IntegrationThe English Standard Bible, (2001/2020), 1 Thessalonians 5:21 says, “but test everything; hold fast what is good.” This letter was from Paul addressing the Thessalonian church, encouraging them to test the prophecies and hold fast what is good so that the gospel can continue to advance effectively and keep disciples on the path of righteousness. In an economical and business sense, professionals of all walks tested the feasibility of ACOs and the benefits to reach more Americans. As future healthcare administrators, we carry out the responsibility to work with an ever-changing legal swim lane. In this manner, we’ll hold fast what is deemed good by our government and perform our jobs to benefit the HCOs in which we’ll work.ReferencesBerwick, D. M., Nolan, T. W., & Whittington, J. (2008). The Triple Aim: Care, Health, and Cost. Health Affairs, 27(3), 759-69. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.liberty.edu/10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759English Standard Version, 1 Thessalonians 5:21. (n.d.). Retrieved July 2, 2020, from https://www.esv.org/1+Thessalonians+5/ (Original work published 2001)Fox, D. M., & Grogan, C. M. (2017). Population Health During the Obama Administration: An Ambitious Strategy With an Uncertain Future. American Journal of Public Health, 107(1), 32–34. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303547Pimperl, A. F., Rodriguez, H. P., Schmittdiel, J. A., & Shortell, S. M. (2018). A Two-Step Method to Identify Positive Deviant Physician Organizations of Accountable Care Organizations with Robust Performance Management Systems. Health services research, 53(3), 1851–1869. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12693Shi, L. & Singh, D. A. (2019). Essentials of the U.S. Health Care System (5th ed.). Burlington, Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
BUSI 511 Liberty University Health Delivery System & US Health Care System Response

Walden University Leadership and Management Discussion

Walden University Leadership and Management Discussion.

COLLEAGUE’S POSTINGManagement is being able to “manage.” They are given the parameters to keep things in running motion. They don’t necessarily lead all the time, but are able to make the necessary decisions to keep a business afloat. They are on the top of the food chain so-to-speak. They manage all the decisions.Leaders can manage, but they are in more contact with the people around them. They are also under the most scrutiny if things don’t go as well as they should. They are also held to a higher standard because they lead. If they delegate assignments to others, they will take the brunt of the misfire because they were the ones in charge. For example, I manage my husband’s barber shop. I check his calendar to make sure he is blocked out on certain days. I make sure all expenses are taken care of in a timely manner and recorded, I also create the emails that need to get sent to cancel any appointments for any reason he can’t be in the shop.Where I work, I am a lead teacher at an early learning center. I make up the lesson plans, make sure we have all the proper daily reports, we have the items we need for the day whether it’s hygiene, food, or for lessons. I delegate certain times of the day to my assistant teacher, we work together on completing certain paperwork, but overall if something doesn’t get done right, I am the responsible one because it is my classroom. Also, take Chapter 2 in The Ethics of Leadership for example, they discuss how the leaders are more vulnerable because they are held to a higher standard and looked at through a microscope. Being in management, sure you can take responsibility for your actions just like the leader, but ultimately, there is no one above you except for you to bring those mistakes to light as opposed to a leader. Reference:Ciulla, J. B. (2003). Chapter 2. In The ethics of leadership (pp. 53-54). South Melbourne, Australia: Thomson/Wadsworth.—————————————————————————————————————————————————————–Respond 150 words or more to your colleagues’ postings in two or more of the following ways:Ask a probing question.Offer and support an opinion.Make a suggestion.Expand on your colleague’s posting.IMPORTANT in order to be accepted!! Be sure and have at least one supported claim with a citation and reference in each substantive post. Your responses must be substantive. This implies 150 words or more and all claims are supported – with a scholarly source. In your respond to colleague’s posting, you can challenge there post if you don’t agree and your respond she expand the post to keep the discussion going!
Walden University Leadership and Management Discussion