Evaluation of Corporate PerformanceThe Final Paper will involve applying the concepts learned in class to an
analysis of a company using data from its annual report. Using the concepts from
this course, you will analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the company and
write a report recommending whether or not to purchase the company stock.
The completed report should include:
An introduction to the company, including background information.
A financial statement review.
Pro Forma financial statements (Balance Sheet and Income Statement) for the
next two fiscal years, assuming a 10% growth rate in sales and Cost of Goods
Sold (COGS) for each of the next two years.
A ratio analysis for the last fiscal year using at least two ratios from
each of the following categories: a.
Financial leverage c.
Asset management d.
Calculate Return on Equity (ROE) using the DuPont system.
Assess management performance by calculating Economic Value Added (EVA).
Evaluate the soundness of the company’s financial policies (e.g. capital
structure, debt, leverage, dividend policy, etc.) based on the material covered
A synopsis of your findings, including your recommendations and rationale
for whether or not to purchase stock from this company. This report should be 15 to 20 pages long, excluding title page and reference
page(s), using APA 6th edition formatting guidelines. Support your findings and
recommendations with evidence from at least five scholarly sources in addition
to the annual report, such as the textbook, industry reports, and articles from
the Ashford University Library. Be sure to include links to websites that were
used as references or to access company information.
Writing the Final PaperThe Final Paper:
Must be 15 to 20 double-spaced pages in length (excluding the title and
reference pages), and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the
approved APA style guide.
Must include a cover page that includes:- Title of paper- Student’s
name- Course name and number- Instructor’s name- Date submitted
Must include an introductory paragraph with a succinct thesis statement.
Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph.
Must use at least five scholarly sources.
Must use APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide to document
Must include, on the final page, a Reference Page that is completed
according to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide.
THIS REPORT WILL BE ON APPLE.
Evaluation of Corporate Performance – Final Paper
Patient Centred Care in the NHS
Introduction The NHS is a large multi-functioning health care service that deals with over 1 million patients every 36 hours1. The NHS sets out to provide quality health care which include three important parts; Clinical efficiency, patient safety and patient experience2 . The need for even greater quality health care in the NHS saw a shift in focus towards a more patient centric NHS3. This is because they believe a patient centric care, care that encompasses the patients’ needs and values and allowing this to shape and guide all clinical decisions4, will allow for a better quality of health care. This essay will explore how patient centric the NHS really is in terms of the different departments it encompasses, policies, laws and overall patient satisfaction. It will also investigate whether there are certain areas that the NHS needs to improve in terms of patient centric care and exploring if this is the case how to do so. Departments The NHS is made up of many departments and collaborates with a wide range of organisations such as the National Institute for Health
Brian Terry’s Death Essay
custom writing service Brian Terry’s Death Essay. Brian Terry’s death on 14th December 2010 Brian Terry was a customs protection agent who was well organized which made sure that even in the advent of him being gunned down in the border outside the Rio Rico on December 14th the Christmas gift to his family still arrived to them in time from where he mailed it in Michigan. The issue that there are two guns found at the scene of his death complicates Brian’s death and the guns are suspected to have been purchased by suspects across the border of Mexico (CalabreseBrian Terry’s Death Essay
You will write A Book Review for this class in order to more deeply understand and assess military leadership,
You will write A Book Review for this class in order to more deeply understand and assess military leadership, a critical component of the outcomes of this course. In the the Book Review Assignment, you need to both identify the author’s thesis as well as evaluate how effectively the author supports it by using specific examples from throughout the book. You must to use footnotes in current Turabian formatting when citing your examples. Please consult Turabian Quick Guide under Writing Style Guides in the Course Menu for expectations. INSTRUCTIONS Each Book Review must be 4–5 pages in length, double-spaced, and have margins of 1-inch. You must use Times New Roman, font size from 10–12. The Book Review Assignment must be submitted as a word document. The following textbooks will be used for the Book Reviews: Cal Newport, Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World. New York and Boston: Grand Central Publishing, 2016.
HIST 101 UMKC Revolution & Sudden Change in Political Organization Discussion
HIST 101 UMKC Revolution & Sudden Change in Political Organization Discussion.
Paper two see the uploaded document.Paper One READ:Chapter 5 and 6 in Give Me Liberty! (textbook)—for context and backgroundChapter 5 and 6 in Voices of Freedom (reader)WRITE: Using the assigned primary sources in your reader listed above, write a 750-1,000 word paper (roughly 3-4 double spaced pages) that responds to ONE of the following questions with a clearly articulated thesis/argument:Is there a unified sense of American identity presented in the primary sources that pushes forward a consistent desire for independence from Great Britain or are they disjointed? Are there definitive sides to this argument that are pushing for independence or resisting this urge? If there are separate arguments going on, which is the most compelling?Eric Foner references a “revolution within,” but what does this mean? What is this revolution? Is it running counter to the cause of liberty, equality, and revolution or complementing it? Could the new nation win the revolution against the British, yet lose the internal revolution that Foner references?SAMPLE CITATIONS:Pick footnotes OR in-text citations for citing within your paper, including a citation to show where information, ideas, and quotes came from right when you use that information, idea, or quote so your reader knows exactly where it came from. Footnotes are strongly preferred:Footnote: When in a real paper the citation below would appear at the bottom (or foot) of your page. To insert a footnote in Word, go to “References,” then click “Insert Footnote.”Example: Thomas Paine, “Common Sense (1776),” in Voices of Freedom, Vol. 1 6th edition, Eric Foner, ed. (New York: Norton, 2020), 97.In-text citation:Example: (Paine, “Common Sense,” 97).NOTE how the footnote and in-text citations above are for the specific document being referenced/used and not the whole book. Eric Foner is the editor, not the author, of the documents and should not be listed as the author unless you are citing/quoting the secondary material (which is permissible as long as you keep it to a minimum).Include a works cited page with a full list of ALL sources you used within your paper (everything cited within your paper should be included in your works cited)Works Cited: Paine, Thomas. “Common Sense (1776),” in Voices of Freedom, Volume 1, 6th edition. Eric Foner, ed. New York: Norton, 2020.MPORTANT REMINDERS (standard for all papers):The textbook chapters and document introductions in the reader are secondary sources and they provide context and background to understand the primary sources (meaning those written at the time). While secondary sources are useful, remember that this is a primary source paper. You are allowed to use secondary sources if you absolutely must, but do so sparingly. The point of this paper is to use assigned primary sources to craft an argument and support it, so make sure they are the heart of your paper. Papers with an overreliance on the textbook, lectures, document summaries, or outside sources (rather than the assigned primary sources) cannot earn a grade higher than a C.If you decide to do outside research (which is not required or recommended), make sure it supplements the assigned sources. Do not allow them to replace or overshadow what was assigned.All papers must be word-processed, double spaced, and use standard font (12 pt Times New Roman or Calibri). You do not need a title page.Papers must be at least 750 words (shorter will be penalized). Headers, footers, citations, or works cited do NOT go toward the word count. Aim to conclude by around 1,000 words, but longer is allowed as long as the paper remains on topic and actively uses the documents in a productive way to advance and prove the thesis. Papers that ramble on without purpose (especially if they exceed the 1,000-word benchmark) will lose points.You MUST cite your sources using a standard citation convention where you cite within your paper (preferably using Chicago style footnotes, but APA or MLA in-text citations are permissible if that is what you know and can use consistently) AND include a works cited page at the end. See sample citations above.Make sure you have a clear thesis and consistently use documents to prove that thesis. A thesis should be clearly articulated in the introductory paragraph (generally the last sentence) and present an argument you will prove (not simply a statement of fact that cannot be debated). In order to earn a grade higher than a C, you must answer the entire question, have a clear thesis, explicitly use and cite documents, and write with relatively few spelling and grammatical errors. Be sure you are using and analyzing primary sources to prove your thesis, not just summarizing or talking about primary sources without tying to your larger argument.Quoting the documents is good, but do not allow the documents to speak for you and/or make your argument for you. We need to be able to hear your voice and your argument, with the sources as your support to prove it. There is a fine line between good quoting and over quoting. If it is something you can easily paraphrase, do so instead of quoting (but still cite it). If it is a really good, concise quote that perfectly supports your argument and you could not possibly say it better, then quote it (and—again—cite it).
HIST 101 UMKC Revolution & Sudden Change in Political Organization Discussion