Get help from the best in academic writing.

Essay with Preposition medical school essay help Engineering assignment help

ESSAY – PREPOSITION, CONJUCTION, INTERJUNCTION There are two best friends, Steve and Jason, who are majoring in Chinese Language study in college at Kuala Lumpur. They have very contradicted characteristics- one is hardworking, the other is lazy; one is honest, the other is tricky; one is normal looking, the other is handsome. People could not understand how two totally different personality guys could be so closed. Although Steve and Jason have completely different personality, they share the same hobby, travelling.

This is why they could be so close to each other. They like to travel in every semester break. Last month, they visited Shanghai in China for the first time. “Whoa, I didn’t expect that Shanghai is such a crowded city. ” Jason found it surprisingly. “Come on, didn’t you do some research about this place before travelling? ” “Herm, you know I always busy…… ” Steve did not surprise as he knew his friend very well. Thus, Steve acted as the tour guide throughout the whole journey. In other words, Jason depended on Steve completely during the travelling.

The third day of the journey, it was too crowded in the subway station. Jason and Steve were on the way to the city hall. As it was too many passengers, they could not stand side by side in the subway. “Err……Steve, I know I’ve bring so much trouble to you. I’m very sorry for that. I promise I will prepare myself better next time! ” Then they continued their journey and came back to Malaysia safely. After the incident, Jason became more responsible and independence. Since then, their friendship becomes even deeper and stronger.

Human-Wildlife Conflict in Urban Environments

Human-Wildlife Conflict in Urban Environments.

 Readings Make sure to read chapter seventeen in your text. A couple of other things to point out in your book: Consider the role that Cultural Carrying Capacity (or Social Carrying Capacity, as it’s also known) can play in driving human decisions about wildlife. It’s an interesting and useful concept, we think. Drake also refers to Wildlife Stakeholder Acceptance Capacity. We’d like to expand the idea of habitat modification that Drake goes into on page 397. We actually think that his examples of cultural modification are all examples of habitat modification. If someone stops feeding their pet outside, they are modifying the habitat by removing that potential food resource, for example. Splitting those into two concepts seems to dilute the importance of how habitat features – manmade or otherwise – can drive human-wildlife interactions. Again, habitat modification read this way does mean human behavior change, which is often challenging. But it’s often the best bet if you’re trying to come to a long-term solution. Going back to our above conversation, this is one of the reasons why the knowledge that the social sciences can bring us is so vital to conservation work! Finally, in his conclusion, Drake discusses the importance of understanding the difference between “real” and “perceived” conflict. We also think that this is an important distinction to make, at least in some ways. “Real” conflict might occur when a coyote preys on a pet cat who’s been left outdoors, for example, whereas “perceived” conflict might occur when someone happens to see a coyote in a local park and is unsettled by the experience. On the other hand, to the person who’s upset at seeing the coyote, it is “real” conflict, and telling them that it’s not would likely be counter-productive. Your second reading is “Rearticulating the myth of human-wildlife conflict.” We’ve been talking about rhetoric at various times throughout this semester, and this study looks at the term “human-wildlife conflict” and whether it’s an accurate and useful term or not. Your third reading is “Unwanted Animals” (diving back into the rhetoric world a bit). This article addresses wildlife damage control in urban areas with an eye on ethics and moral concerns. Finally, your fourth reading is “Animal welfare and ethical issues relevant to the humane control of vertebrate pests.” The authors go into an in-depth discussion of how vertebrates who are causing damage to humans should be handled, again from an ethical standpoint (although there are also practical aspects to much of what they say here). Note that this article is written about New Zealand specifically. Although there’s obviously a lot of overlap with the subject across different countries, do note that in New Zealand, pests are often defined as non-native and harmful to the native environment or human interests. In the US, “pests” are often native species (think of raccoons, squirrels, crows, beavers, coyotes, etc.). Questions (please keep the format as Q>A, not an essay) 1. Pests: Do you think terms like “pest” and “human-wildlife conflict” are problematic? Why or why not? If you think they are a problem, are there terms you’d recommend using instead? Why? 2. White-tailed Deer and Canada Geese: What are the pros and cons of the various management techniques used in urban areas for Canada geese and White-tailed deer? You might want to do some additional research on the methods that your text discusses. Are there specific methods that have been used where you live? What were the results?

Essay Help “>Essay Help