Get help from the best in academic writing.

English essay

English essay. I need help with a English question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

Read these two articles one by Amy Harmon and one by Jane Brody. You will want to make sure that you understand the articles and that you figure out your response to them. In order to prepare for the exam, I recommend the following:
mark places in the margins where you agree or disagree or would like to raise a question for yourself
I will Give you the prompt when you’re done reading these two articles. you need to come up with a response before the prompt is given so you would be ready.
English essay

writing assignment 3

writing assignment 3. Can you help me understand this Business Law question?

Answer the following questions based upon your assigned readings and class materials. IF YOU USE ANOTHER SOURCE FOR YOUR ANSWER, YOU MUST CITE THAT SOURCE, but please be advised that other sources may give information that is not as discussed or presented in class and will not provide additional credit.
Your answers must be in complete sentences and free of typographical errors.
Your writing assignment must be saved as either as WORD documents or in PDF, with double-spaced, 1” margins. The assignment must be well written and professional in appearance. Your completed assignment must be uploaded onto Blackboard for submission. NO OTHER FORMATS WILL BE ACCEPTED. THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS.
Please contact the HELP desk for technological issues
. 1. Identify and define the elements of negligence.
2. Under a negligence claim, please identify and define the two separate elements of causation and discuss how they are applied.
3. In most states, what defenses are available in negligence-based product liability actions? Please define each defense.
Ximena, who runs a successful real estate agency, ran across a very interesting pamphlet on customer relations. The pamphlet was fifty pages long and cost $70.00. Ximena thought the price was outrageous. Accordingly, she bought one copy and photocopied the pages that she thought were pertinent and gave them to her employees. She copied forty of the pages out of the pamphlet for each of twenty employees. A disgruntled employee informed the pamphlet’s publisher what Ximena had done, and she was charged with copyright infringement. Ximena defended on the basis of the fair use doctrine.
4. Identify, define and discuss the four factors a court would consider in determining whether a violation occurred. Will Ximena would prevail? Explain your answer.
writing assignment 3

Impact of Budget Deficit on Economic Growth

assignment helper Economic Growth The impact of the budget deficit on economic growth is theoretically explained through the effect of the deficit on the flow of money into the economy and through the supply side (infrastructure, education, etc). The more that government expenditure exceeds revenue the more money will be circulated in the economy, which leads to higher employment and output (McCandless, 1991). Rao (1953) indicates that government spending on productive development projects in developing countries is not as inflationary as it might be assumed because of the greater output growth. Eisner and Pieper (1987) report a positive impact of cyclically and inflation-adjusted budget deficit on economic growth in the United States and other Organization for Economic Cooperation and development (OECD) countries. Arora and Dua (1993) examined effect of budget deficit on investment and on trade balance in the U.S. during the period from 1980 to 1989. The results suggest that higher budget deficit crowd out domestic investment and increase trade deficit. Shojai (1999) in his study concluded that budget deficit, financed by the central bank, can also lead to ineffectiveness in financial markets and rises inflation in the developing countries. Budget deficit also pervert real exchange rates and the interest rate, which in turn undermines the international competitiveness of the economy. Recent studies, such as the World Economic Outlook (IMF, 1996); found that in the mid-1980s, a group of developing countries with high level of budget deficit had significantly lower economic growth than in countries with low and medium deficit. Karras (1994) investigated the effects of budget deficit on money growth, inflation, investment, and real output growth. Author came to conclusions that deficit do not cause high inflation through monetary expansion; deficit has a negative relationship with real output growth rate; and increased deficit do appear to slow down investment usually after one or two years. Fischer (1993) proves the opposite of theoretical prediction, on a consistent sample of countries. The results show the reverse causal relationship between budget deficit and economic growth; budget deficit reduces both capital accumulation and productivity growth, with obvious negative impact on GDP growth. Adam and Bevan (2005) investigated the relationship between budget deficit and economic growth for a group of 45 developing countries and identified that two variable have a contrary causal relationship, and a level of deficit below which causality is blurred. The results imply that reduction of budget deficit level to about 1.5% of gross domestic product is apparently has a positive impact on the growth rate of GDP. A reduction in budget deficit below this limit, not only no longer produces positive effects on economic growth, but can also actually be detrimental if the reduction is due to a significant fiscal contraction. Brauninger (2002) conducted a study on the relationship between budget deficit, public debt and endogenous growth. The result shows that if the deficit ratio fixed by the government stays below a critical level, then there are two steady states where capital and public debt grow at the same constant rate, and an increase in the deficit ratio reduces the growth rates Trade balance “Studies of the twin-deficits relationship generally proceed from one of two theoretical bases. The hypothesis that increases in the government’s budget deficit leads to an increase in the trade deficit follows directly from the Mundell- Fleming model (Fleming, 1962; Mundell, 1963). It is worth noting here that the Mundell-Fleming model is an open economy extension of the IS-LM model. As such, it is not fully “rational”; the assumptions made regarding expectations formation are static. According to Mundell-Fleming, an increase in the state’s budget deficit can generate an accompanying increase in the trade deficit through increased consumer spending. By increasing the disposable incomes and the financial wealth of consumers, the budget deficit encourages an increase in imports. To the extent that increased demand for foreign goods leads to depreciation in the exchange rate, the effect on net exports is mitigated. However, the larger budget deficit also pushes up the interest rate (in large open economies) because this appreciates the exchange rate, which encourages a net capital inflow and a larger decline in net exports. The size of the effect is an empirical matter (Shojai, 1999, p. 92).” (Saleh, 2003, p.13). “Fieleke (1987) provided the theoretical basis for the relationship between the budget deficit and the trade deficit. He argued that “the dominant theory is that an increase in government borrowing in a country will, other things being equal, put upward pressure on interest rates (adjusted for expected inflation) in that country, thereby attracting foreign investment. As foreign investors acquire the country’s currency in order to invest there, they bid up the price of that currency in the foreign exchange market. The higher price of the country’s currency will discourage foreigners from purchasing its goods but will conversely encourage residents of the country to use their now more valuable currency to purchase foreign goods, so that the country’s current account will move toward a deficit (or toward a larger deficit). In addition, any increase in the country’s total spending resulting from the enlarged government deficit will go partly for imports and for domestic goods that would otherwise be exported, also worsening the current account balance” (pp. 173-174).” (Saleh, 2003, p.13). Zietz and Pemberton (1990) found that the budget deficit has effect on trade deficit primarily through the impact on imports of rising domestic absorption and income, rather than through the interest and real exchange rates. The authors found that higher foreign income may play a limited role in reducing the trade deficit, especially taking into account the fact that the growth of foreign income also implies an increase in the real exchange rate. Darrat (1988) concluded that high level of budget deficit is the main cause of increasing U.S. trade deficit. Author found bidirectional relationship between two variables, where budget deficit has influence on trade deficit, but also found a stronger evidence of trade deficit impacts on budget deficit. Bernheim (1988) investigated the relationship between fiscal policy and current account among six countries United States of America, the United Kingdom, Mexico, West Germany, Canada and Japan. Author found that fiscal policy has a significant impact on trade deficit in all countries except Japan. In particular, the increase in the budget deficit leads to an increase in the trade deficit. Abell (1990) studied impact of budget deficit on trade deficit and did not find directional relationship between two variables. Author proposed that budget deficit can affect on trade deficit through interest rate, foreign capital inflow and exchange rate. In particular, when the budget deficit financing is implemented through a bond issue that could lead to higher interest rates, high interest rates attract foreign investment, foreign investment inflow trend increases the exchange rate of the national currency, strong domestic currency impacts on net exports and finally causes trade deficit. Bachman (1992) examined the factors that impact on current account deficit in U.S. The author used four variables that could conceivably be the cause of changes in current account deficit (budget deficit, investment, relative productivity and risk premium). The results imply that only the budget deficit explains the change in the current account while other not. The government should reduce budget deficit to eliminate its current account deficit. Dibooglu (1997) based on the traditional twin deficits model and the Ricardian Equivalence hypothesis, investigated the sources of the U.S. current account deficit using a several macroeconomics variables. According to the results author found the support of the traditional approach where budget deficit negatively impacts on the current account via real interest rate and terms of trade. Leachman and Francis (2002) investigated the question of the twin deficits in the U.S. in the period after World War II. The results are consistent with the twin deficits phenomenon and the evidence suggests that the direction of causality runs from the state budget deficit to a deficit of foreign sector. Inflation Empirical studies examining the relationship between the budget deficit and inflation is not reached consensus on the possible relationship between inflation and deficit. Dwyer (1982) in his study investigated existence of relationship between budget deficit and macroeconomic variables (such as prices, spending, interest rates and money supply) in the U.S. Author checked three hypothesises (a) a deficit increases prices through a wealth effect; (b) a deficit results in debt, thus increasing the money supply and prices; and (c) expected inflation increases the deficit. The results show that, the predictable changes in government debt held by the public have no effects of debt on inflation. Also there were no evidence of that the high level of budget deficit raises price, spending, interest rates or the money supply. Hamburger and Zwick (1981) examined the effect of the budget deficit on monetary growth in the U.S. The authors came to conclusion that the combination of expansionary fiscal policy and the Federal Reserve’s efforts to control interest rates was one of the main causes tending to higher inflation. Darrat (1985) investigated effect of budget deficit on inflation in the U.S. The evidence shows that both monetary growth and budget deficit had a significant impact of inflation. Additionally author found that budget deficit has more significant impact on inflation than monetary growth. Ahking and Miller (1985) investigated the link between budget deficit, money growth and inflation. The results showed the causal but not stable relationships between variables over time. Eisner (1989) examined the impact of the budget deficit on inflationary pressures, to see if the structural deficit takes to inflation. Author found that there was no support for the proposition that budget deficit impacts on inflation. Dua (1993) investigated the relationship between long-term interest rates, government spending and budget deficit. The results show that the uncertainty of inflation and the expected growth rate of the money supply are important determinants of changes in long-term interest rates. Hondroyiannis and Papapetrou (1994) studied the impact of budget deficit on inflation in Greece. Authors came to conclusion that there is a long-term relationship between the percentage of gross domestic product and inflation in the economy. Metin (1995) studied the inflationary process in Turkey and found that fiscal expansionary policy was a main factor for inflation. “The excess demand for money affected inflation positively but only in the short-run. Imported inflation and the excess demand for assets in capital markets had some effect on consumer price inflation while there was no significant effect from the excess demand for goods. A key policy implication is that inflation could be reduced rapidly by eliminating the fiscal deficit.” (pp. 529). Metin (1998) studied the relationship between the public sector deficit, inflation, the real growth rate of income and the monetary base. The results imply that the budget deficit significantly affect inflation. Darrat (2000) in his study found that the high budget deficit has a positive and significant impact on inflation and can be a reason of inflationary effect in Greece. Exchange Rate Not many studies have examined the impact of the budget deficit on the value of the national currency, although there is some literature on the relationship between the current account deficit and the public budget deficit (eg, Abel, 1990). It is largely believed that the effect of short-term budget deficit on exchange rates has led to uncertainty in the nature of the relationship between two variables. Krugman (1995) and Sachs (1985) debated that lower budget deficit depreciates the value of the dollar. There is a lot of literature that contributed to many economists holding this opinion, mostly in the case of the US (Mundell, 1963; Dornbusch 1976). Evans (1986) argues that decreasing budget deficit might actually appreciate the value of the dollar in the short run. Cantor and Driskill (1995) suggest that the possibility of both short run and long run appreciation of the domestic currency in relation to public spending depends on the country’s debt. Feldstein (1986) in his study points out that appreciation of the dollar in the 1980s related to the high level of budget deficit. Wijnbergen, (1987) found a similar phenomenon Canada where budget deficit provided the appreciation of the Canadian dollar. Evans (1986) examined relationship between budget deficit and value of domestic currency, and has found no evidence of the presence of any relationship between two variables and suggests that budget deficit is a sign of weakness in the economy (and quite possibly a signal of future inflation). In another paper, Evans (1987) suggests that the high budget deficit does not necessarily lead to a strong currency. He argues that if the budget deficit affects aggregate demand, it can lead to higher price levels and, in turn, will lead to a national currency loses its value. Beck ( 1993) tests the value of the budget deficit and public spending on changes in exchange rates in five industrialized countries : United States, Germany, Japan, United Kingdom, and Canada , and believes that there is a negative relationship between budget deficits and exchange rates in all cases except Japan. Humpage (1992) examined the existence of relationship between federal budget deficit and the exchange rate in the long-run. The results show no evidence of a long-run relationship between U.S. fiscal policy and real long-term interest rates, real exchange rates of U.S. dollar, and net exports References: Abell, John D. “Twin Deficits during 1980s: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Macroeconomics, Winter 1990, Vol. 12 (1), pp. 81-96. Bachman, Daniel David. “Why is the U.S. current account deficit so large? Evidence from Vector Autoregressions.” Southern Economic Journal, October 1992, Vol. 59 (2), pp. 232-240. Bernheim, B. D. “Budget Deficits and the Balance of Trade.” Tax Policy and the Economy, 1988, Vol. 2, pp. 1-32. Darrat, Ali F. “Have Large Budget Deficits Caused Rising Trade Deficits?” Southern Economic Journal, April 1988, Vol. 54 (4), pp. 879-87. Diboolu, Selahattin. “Accounting for U.S. Current Account Deficits: An Empirical Investigation.” Applied Economics, 1997, Vol. 29, pp. 787-793. Leachman, L. L. and Francis, B. “Twin Deficits: Apparition or Reality?” Applied Economics, 2002, Vol. 34, pp. 1121-1132. Saleh, A.S. “The Budget Deficit and Economic Performance: A Survey.” Working Paper, September 2003, Department of Economics, University of Wollongong Zietz, Joachim and D. K. Pemberton. “The U.S. Budget and Trade Deficits: A Simultaneous Equation Model.” Southern Economic Journal, April 1990, Vol. 57 (1), pp. 23-34. Vuyyury, S. and Seshaiah, S.V. “Budget Deficits and other Macroeconomic Variables in India” Applied Econometrics and International Development, 2004, Vol. 4-1, pp. 37-54 Georgantopoulos, A.G. “The Macroeconomic Effects of Budget Deficits in Greece: A VAR-VECM Approach” International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 2011, Issue 79, pp. 156-166 McCandless, G. (1991), “Macroeconomic Theory”, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Adam, C. S. and Bevan, D. L. (2004). Fiscal Deficits and Growth in Developing Countries. Journal of Public Economics, Vo.89, pp. 511-597. Risti, L.C., Nicolaescu, C. “Budget Deficits Effects on Economic Growth” Joutnal of Economics and Business Research, 2013, Vo. 1, pp. 162-170.

MVCC Data Interoperability Data Errors and Plan to Enhance Interoperability PPT

MVCC Data Interoperability Data Errors and Plan to Enhance Interoperability PPT.

SCENARIOYou are a new graduate working at Wizer Hospital as an HIM analyst. You have been asked to compile data into a database for leadership so they can quickly and efficiently pull reports. You have been given an Excel spreadsheet and asked to analyze the data and evaluate a data dictionary. As you are preparing the data, you notice several duplicates and errors within the MPI files that were pulled from the electronic health record (EHR). Ensuring that the data from the MPI files and data dictionary is accurate and that all duplicates are resolved is critical for the facility as they move forward with HIE implementation and interoperability.REQUIREMENTSYour submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly.A. Refer to the attached “Master Patient Index” to do the following:1. Identify three duplicate patients.2. Identify three errors in the data.B. Refer to the attached “Sample Data Dictionary” supporting document to do the following:1. Identify three missing elements from the data dictionary.2. Evaluate whether the data dictionary contains the required elements to meet interoperability standards.C. Create a presentation about how inaccurate data impacts the ability to share healthcare information with other organizations by doing the following:1. Summarize your findings from parts A1 and A2.2. Summarize your findings from parts B1 and B2.3. Describe a process improvement plan for data entry to ensure patient identification, including the following: the problem statement, the sources where the data errors could have originated, a plan that addresses the steps needed to correct the data errors, a plan that addresses what to do if a duplicate cannot be corrected, a plan that addresses ongoing maintenance of duplicates, a plan that addresses the problem statementD. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.E. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.RUBRICA1. DUPLICATE PATIENTS:NOT EVIDENT3 patients are not identified.APPROACHING COMPETENCE3 patients are identified, but 1 or more of the patients is not a duplicate.COMPETENT3 patients are each accurately identified as a duplicate.A2. ERRORS IN DATA:NOT EVIDENT3 errors in data are not identified.APPROACHING COMPETENCEN/ACOMPETENT3 errors in data are identified.B1. REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF THE DATA DICTIONARY:NOT EVIDENT3 missing elements are not identified.APPROACHING COMPETENCEN/ACOMPETENT3 missing elements are identified.B2. ELEMENTS OF INTEROPERABILITY OF DATA:NOT EVIDENTAn evaluation is not provided.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe evaluation does not accurately conclude whether the data dictionary does or does not contain the required elements to meet interoperability standards.COMPETENTThe evaluation accurately concludes whether the data dictionary does or does not contain the required elements to meet interoperability standards.C1. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM A1 AND A2:NOT EVIDENTA summary is not provided.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe summary does not accurately describe the findings from parts A1 and A2, or the summary is incomplete.COMPETENTThe summary accurately and completely describes the findings from both part A1 and A2.C2. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM B1 AND B2:NOT EVIDENTA summary is not provided.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe summary does not accurately describe the findings from parts B1 and B2, or the summary is incomplete.COMPETENTThe summary accurately and completely describes the findings from parts B1 and B2.C3. PROCESS IMPROVEMENT PLAN:NOT EVIDENTA process improvement is not provided.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe description does not appropriately identify a process improvement plan for data entry that ensures patient identification or does not include each of the given points.COMPETENTThe description appropriately identifies a process improvement plan for data entry that ensures patient identification, including each of the given points.D. APA SOURCES:NOT EVIDENTThe submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style.COMPETENTThe submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style.E. PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION:NOT EVIDENTContent is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.APPROACHING COMPETENCEContent is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.COMPETENTContent reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.
MVCC Data Interoperability Data Errors and Plan to Enhance Interoperability PPT

Strategy Marketing Plan for “High Flying Drone Enterprise” Coursework

Executive Summary High Flying Drone Enterprise is a new innovative company that provides high-quality and expedient delivery service to our valued customers by means of utilizing flying drones. As a start-up company located within the southern region of California, High Flying Drone Enterprise’s primary market plan focuses on creating and delivering an assortment of new products and services. This task will be accomplished by reaching out to the needs, wants, and desires of our every day busy and hardworking customers. In today’s demanding and technological economy, consumers spend countless hours searching and shopping on the Internet for better quality and cost-effective deals. By implementing modern and current technology in the fast and growing market, High Flying Drone Enterprise will better assist their customers by making their online purchases a much more pleasant and experience. In addition to providing our valued customers with a better and faster delivery service, High Flying Drone Enterprise will also offer substantial savings by cutting out the middleman within the supply chain. Instead of receiving products and services through traditional channels, such as land transportation, our customers will also benefit by receiving a positive and enjoyable experience with their purchases from our unconventional delivery method. In addition to our customers receiving direct shipments and significant savings, High Flying Drone Enterprise will present an unlimited potential of providing a new age with quality products and expedient service. Welcome to High Flying Drone Enterprise! Market Situation / Objective High Flying Drone Enterprise is a small family and friendly company located in the southern region of California. Our market objective is to have fun while flying drones and, of course, to provide a top-quality air delivery service (ranging from packaged deliveries of sorted foods, pharmaceuticals, and retail items) to the doorsteps of our hard-working local community. Product and service orders can be accomplished by customers using our interactive Internet site. Upon making a successful online order, our customers will then become part of the mission by being able to track their orders while in progress. This can be accomplished by them being able to view the flight video of their drone en-route. Furthermore, our customers can converse with our drone pilots through chat, voice, or video technology. With this said, our customers can have a positive and interactive shopping experience with the joy of flight like no other. We also highly encourage our employees to work, learn, and grow together. We can provide training across the board for every employee and encourage new ideas. Our sales and marketing team will strive to increase our profit margin but also engage in community outreach and customer loyalty. Market Trends / Strategy According to Meola (July 2017), “Drone adoption is growing rapidly among consumers and companies, and the retail industry is leading the way in that adoption. Drones could serve different purposes for retailers, but drone delivery (which is exactly what it sounds like: products delivered by drone) is the most well-known and readily apparent.” With this said, drone delivery services are changing the future on how consumers will quickly obtain products and services such as groceries, pharmaceuticals, and retail items. For example, many companies, such as Domino Pizza and Amazon, have experimented by using GPS and camera navigations to find businesses and residents. Based on future predictions, a wide range of markets will eventually benefit from drone delivery services. For this reason, High Flying Drone Enterprise has ventured out on a quest to capture the upcoming growing demand for becoming a top-quality drone delivery service. SWOT Analysis Strengths – High Flying Drone Enterprise is a drone delivery service that has many timely, accurate, and efficient advantages. A few examples include but are not limited to providing a faster delivery time compared to conventional methods like ground travel which usually has numerous obstacles such as congested traffic. Our drones also have the capability to deliver to inaccessible and remote areas compared to conventional methods. Additional strengths include providing reduced costs compared to the cost of employing human labor. Weaknesses – Our commercial drone operations are required to strictly abide by the rules and regulations established by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA, 2019). These regulations include, but not limited to drones being properly registered, drone pilots being required to be certified, flight operations being conducted during specific daylight hours, cargo weight being less than 55 pounds, drones not exceeding an altitude above 400 feet, preflight inspections being conducted, drones not exceeding a maximum ground speed of 100 mph, and drones being required to remain clear of restricted flight zones such as airports and military installations (FAA, 2019). Other weaknesses include environmental conditions such as inclement weather, which could restrict and prevent drones from conducting their operations. Finally, people could possibly steal cargo or be injured by operational drones. Opportunities – High Flying Drone Enterprise has many opportunities, which include but are not limited to providing close-range package deliveries for foods, pharmaceuticals, and retail items. Due to being a new innovative market, our drone delivery service has a great potential of expanding to various markets and locations, which is our future objective. Threats –Due to being a new innovation, many new companies may emerge, providing a competitive market against us. People could potentially steal cargo from our operational drones. Additionally, people have the potential to injure or kill our drones. Finally, wildlife issues possibly may become a factor, such as birds colliding with flying drones. Valued Proposition Drone delivery services offer significant value to both businesses and consumers through a variety of means. The technology is robust, adaptable, and much more affordable than traditional methods of delivery, particularly on a local level. Unencumbered by many barriers to traditional transportation, drones offer more efficient workflows and patterns of delivery. Drones that are electric offer a sustainable advantage to delivery trucks both through pollution emittance and time wasted. Eventually, drones will become autonomous, removing the human element as well. Drones directly deliver lightweight packaging from the distribution center to the consumer’s doorstep in under an hour. This direct route and process ensure speed, efficiency, and reliability. The drone delivery service ensures a level of control for the customer as to the time their product is delivered and the method. Furthermore, drone delivery services can be employed by organizations such as hospitals, banks, and governments to rapidly deliver vital packages in between locations. Finally, this approach to delivery ensures a level of safety as, despite the challenges posed by airspace management, drones remain safe (even in the relatively infantile stages of the industry), which ensures the well-being of the drone devices, consumers, and their valued packages (Adams, 2019). Buying Processes The primary consumers of the drone delivery service are expected to be businesses and companies which deliver products directly to consumers. These may range from local companies to large conglomerates such as Amazon that utilize their own drone fleets but may require external providers to keep up with the traffic. Therefore, the buying process begins with consumer dissatisfaction with traditional delivery methods and a desire for an innovative and efficient approach. The customer contacts the company, and details are negotiated regarding the logistics, price, and implementation of the drone delivery system. Initial information can be found on the company website, and a representative is available at all times to guide the buying decisions. The business will likely request specifications first and then submit a request for proposals which allows the company to present the core concepts and benefits of selectin drone delivery (Linton, n.d.). There is potential to bundle products with the drone delivery system such as a service to optimize logistics as well as appropriate tracking and data software to provide detailed information on delivery patterns which can significantly benefit a business. Finally, the order is negotiated, reviewed, and placed, confirming any contractual obligations. Get your 100% original paper on any topic done in as little as 3 hours Learn More Key Message The key message which the High Flying Drone Enterprise should deliver is providing a viable and efficient “last-mile delivery” solution. It effectively provides fast and local delivery services for business and private consumers, eliminating numerous logistical barriers to provide an effective solution. Businesses should be targeted with the approach to resolve logistical issues and the ability to meet delivery demands through innovative and effective methods. Emphasis should be made towards the distinguishing factor of delivery drones in the current economy, and any business which utilizes them will gain consumer attention as highly technological (Roberson, 2019). Meanwhile, private consumers should be targeted with an emphasis on the speed and reliability of the delivery service within the local region. In both cases, the possibilities of the technology must be advertised early in the buying process and becoming more focused on price and sustainability towards the end. Needed Promotional Tools Tool Description Audience