Get help from the best in academic writing.

English C102 Capstone Project Rubric /5 Hegelian letter (four paragraphs, grammar, logic, tone) /5 Socratic

Part I is your letter to a historical figure, celebrity, politician, writer, scientist, or other noteworthy person.  It is four paragraphs long. Your opening should address the recipient as “Dear ___.”The letter consists of four paragraphs, a-d:(a) You introduce yourself and establish your credibility and interest in the famous person;(b) You summarize the person’s stance, position, or opinion on an issue (this section is called the “thesis”);(c) You respectfully dispute all or portions of the person’s position (the “antithesis”);(d) You propose a reasonable alternative or a compromise (the “synthesis”).The tone should be moderate and reasonable. Each paragraph should be 6-10 sentences long.This type of letter, broken into separate movements like a symphony’s, is called Hegelian dialectic!2. Part II is a Socratic dialogue that you’ve created. Start by giving the setting and a description of the two characters who are speaking.  The entire dialogue will be exactly 2 pages long.  In it, one character persuades another character to accept his/her point of view.Format it as if you were writing a play; double-space the dialogue as usual.Employ 7-10 of the rhetorical techniques you learned from our Modules readings and notes.On a separate page I’ve attached Phaedrus from Plato; use it as a model. 3. Part III is your analysis of your Socratic dialogue.  It should be only three paragraphs long.  Yes, you will write a mini-essay that assesses your own writing. It should be pretty easy to write, considering your inside knowledge of the author’s writing process!Paragraph one is your introduction, which gives an overview of your Socratic dialogue and concludes with a thesis stating the purpose of your essay.Paragraphs 2 and 3 analyze rhetorical techniques used in the dialogue by providing and deconstructing specific quotations from the dialogue.For supporting details, remember to quote from your dialogue (don’t forget to use citations 🙂 The last few sentences of paragraph 3 conclude the essay.  Here you may talk about your experience writing the dialogue and what you perceive to be the dialogue’s strengths and weaknesses.  Other notes on the essay analysis: Dig deeply into minutia in the dialogue. Analyze closely organization, diction, rhetorical techniques, figurative language, realism of the dialogue, and so on.You may use terms from the Toulmin Model. Be sure to set up your analysis just as you would any other 102 essay, with intro, body, and conclusion paragraphs.As usual, each body paragraph should be structured around transitions, topic sentences, major/minor supporting evidence, and concluding sentences.

Marijuana Legalization in Canada

Marijuana Legalization in Canada.

Topic: Potential Effects of Legalizing Marijuana in
Canada

Inclusion:

1. Literature Review

2. Abstract

3. Use the case to illustrate lessons from the Policy Making theories

Style: Conform to published article in Canadian Journal of Political Science

 

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

Universal HIV/AIDs screening in newborns (and informing/not informing)

English C102 Capstone Project Rubric /5 Hegelian letter (four paragraphs, grammar, logic, tone) /5 Socratic Universal HIV/AIDs screening in newborns (and informing/not informing).

 Use the grading rubric below to guide the development of your paper. Item Total point value Novice Competent Proficient Present a brief summary of your ‘hot topic’ including a definition, if applicable. Maximum length: 1 page 1 0.7-0.8 0.8-0.9 0.9-1 Present the legal precedents related to your ‘hot topic’. Ensure that your review is thorough. It may be necessary to review how legal precedents have changed over time. Students must include all current/present legal precedents. Maximum length: 2 pages 4.5 3.15-3.6 3.6-4.05 4.05-4.5 Present the various ethical viewpoints related to your ‘hot topic’. Ensure that your review is thorough. It may be necessary to review how ethical viewpoints have changed over time. Students must include a summary of current/present ethical viewpoints. Maximum length: 2 pages 4.5 3.15-3.6 3.6-4.05 4.05-4.5 Make a position-statement on your ‘hot topic’ from your own ethical viewpoint. You will need to provide ‘support’ for your position-statement such as your ELI results, favored ethical theories, religious/spiritual belief system, or other applicable resources/references. Please note that you are not arguing the rightness/wrongness of the ‘hot topic’ itself. Rather, you are providing support for your position-statement. Maximum length: 4 pages 5 3.5-4 4-4.5 4.5-5 APA 6th edition format including spelling and grammar. Title page is required. Reference page is required. An abstract is NOT required. * * * * Definitions of novice, competent, and proficient are located in the syllabus, grading rubric definitions section. *Please note that using APA 6th edition format including spelling/grammar is an expectation of all RN-BSN students. It is included in all sections of grading. Please submit your Hot Topic paper through this link as a Word document attachment. Feel free to say anything you like in the textbox. Rubric Hot Topic paper grading rubric Hot Topic paper grading rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Present a brief summary of your ‘hot topic’ including a definition, if applicable. Maximum length: 1 page 1.0 to >0.9 pts Proficient 0.9 to >0.8 pts Competent 0.8 to >0 pts Novice 1.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Present the legal precedents related to your ‘hot topic’. Ensure that your review is thorough. It may be necessary to review how legal precedents have changed over time. Students must include all current/present legal precedents. Maximum length: 2 pages 4.5 to >4.05 pts Proficient 4.05 to >3.6 pts Competent 3.6 to >0 pts Novice 4.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Present the various ethical viewpoints related to your ‘hot topic’. Ensure that your review is thorough. It may be necessary to review how ethical viewpoints have changed over time. Students must include a summary of current/present ethical viewpoints. Maximum length: 2 pages 4.5 to >4.05 pts Proficient 4.05 to >3.6 pts Competent 3.6 to >0 pts Novice 4.5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Make a position-statement on your ‘hot topic’ from your own ethical viewpoint. You will need to provide ‘support’ for your position-statement such as your ELI results, favored ethical theories, religious/spiritual belief system, or other applicable resources/references. Please note that you are not arguing the rightness/wrongness of the ‘hot topic’ itself. Rather, you are providing support for your position-statement. Maximum length: 4 pages 5.0 to >4.5 pts Proficient 4.5 to >4.0 pts Competent 4.0 to >0 pts Novice 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA 6th edition format including spelling and grammar. Title page is required. Reference page is required. An abstract is NOT required.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

Piaget Theory Analysis on Child observation

write an analysis, using Piaget’s Theory, to determine the child’s actions based on observation provided. Only reference Miller, P. H. (2016). Theories of developmental psychology (6th edition). New York, NY: Worth Publishers. Chapter 2 “Piaget’s Cognitive-Stage Theory and the Neo-Piagetians”
1-2 pages
I will provide the child observation running record sheet and will also provide the book for reference only use information provided in chapter 2

Which provides a better explanation for peace within among liberal democracies: institutions, identity or economic structures.

Which provides a better explanation for peace within among liberal democracies: institutions, identity or economic structures..

– Which provides a better explanation for peace within among liberal democracies: institutions, identity or economic structures. develop an analytical framework which helps you to adjudicate between the three different approaches (e.g. Lakatos’ cirtiera). This should be the basis of your evaluation and less whether you agree or not. Make strong structure, because i need high grade. The essay is of approximately   in length (excluding bibliography).  Students are expected to: (1) Double-line space and spell-check their essay, (2) provide a word count at the end of the essay and, (3) number their pages. Failure to follow any of the following instructions will be taken into account when assessing the essay grade.  All assessed work must be word-processed, using 1.5 or 2.0 line spacing and a font size between 12 and 14. It must be fully referenced using the   . References must be page-specific. There is more guidance on referencing on VITAL. Structure:  All essays should be structured in the following way: introduction (what is it about?), discussion of the theories (what do they say? commonalities & differences?), and conclusion (what should we take from this?). Please find on Vital further guidance on how to structure an essay properly. There is more guidance on how to structure an essay on VITAL.  Please note: This essay is not about an empirical theory test, it is about discussing and assessing the theories.  Present all the important information at the right time and place in your essay so that the reader does not have to go back and forth to figure out what is relevant. For instance, if you talk about covert operations yet you do not start to explain what one actually is until the conclusion, there is something wrong with the structure.  If possible, keep related content together. This means do not discuss, for instance, covert operations, then move on to human intelligence, and then throw in another paragraph on covert operations.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

Possible impact of open innovation on local economic development in a Metropolitan Municipality.

Possible impact of open innovation on local economic development in a Metropolitan Municipality..

Possible impact of open innovation on local economic development in a Metropolitan Municipality. A case study on the City of Tshwane

 

Paper details:

The proposal must be structured in true following manner: Introduction/ Problem Methodology Literature Review Limitations Time regards Reference list

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/

Comparison chart

Comparison chart.

 First, read ‘Teaching to change the World” 5th Edition by Oakes, Lipton, Anderson, & Stillman, Chapter 5: The Subject Matters: Constructing Content Across the Content Areas. Then, create a comparison chart of the major differences between the traditional and progressive paradigms. Within the comparison, address the list of learning principles created, to make sense of the debates. Take into consideration the understanding that when a paradigm emerges, it challenges the existing paradigm. In terms of discussing a paradigm shift in education, an emerging paradigm can be undermined by lack of quality and depth of professional development for teachers, administrators, and school staff; the depth of knowledge of the teacher both in curriculum and learning that facilitates or hinders development of students to think mathematically, scientifically, literarily, historically, artistically; the involvement of parents and other stakeholders in developing their understanding the emerging paradigm; and implementation of the change process. Feel free to be creative when creating your chart! You may wish to make your chart visually appealing with an educational tool, such as Canva, Piktochart, or Prezi. These tools offer free versions, but may require registration. You are encouraged to get familiar with these tools, as you may someday decide to use them for teaching. Alternatively, you can keep your chart simple by using Microsoft Word.

Essay Help “>Essay Help

https://onlinecustomessaywriting.com/